, Volume 722, Issue 1, pp 205–222

Flow-induced alterations to fish assemblages, habitat and fish–habitat associations in a regulated lowland river

  • C. M. Bice
  • S. L. Gehrig
  • B. P. Zampatti
  • J. M. Nicol
  • P. Wilson
  • S. L. Leigh
  • K. Marsland
Primary Research Paper


Understanding the cause–effect response of aquatic biota to hydrological variability is fundamental to the restoration of regulated rivers. Spatio-temporal variation in fish assemblage structure, microhabitat cover and fish–habitat associations were investigated in the main channel of the regulated lower River Murray, Australia, during a prolonged period of low within-channel flows and following a high flow event and flood. Several small-bodied species (e.g. carp gudgeon, Hypseleotris spp.), were abundant and significantly associated with submerged macrophytes during low flows, but were absent or significantly less abundant following flooding, and the loss of these microhabitats. Large-bodied riverine species that spawn in response to increases in flow (e.g. golden perch, Macquaria ambigua ambigua) or spawn and recruit in inundated floodplain habitats (e.g. common carp, Cyprinus carpio), exhibited flexible microhabitat use and were significantly more abundant following flooding. In the lower River Murray, high flow events appear integral in structuring fish assemblages, indirectly influencing the abundance of small-bodied fish by re-structuring macrophyte cover and directly influencing the abundance of large-bodied species by facilitating critical life history processes (e.g. recruitment). These results highlight species-specific differences in cause–effect responses to flow variability and have implications for managing flow in regulated rivers.


River Murray Flood Flow regime Life-history Recruitment River restoration Environmental flow 


  1. Anderson, M. J., R. N. Gorley & K. R. Clarke, 2008. PERMANOVA+ for PRIMER: Guide to Software and Statistical Methods. PRIMER-E, Plymouth.Google Scholar
  2. Balcombe, S. R. & A. H. Arthington, 2009. Temporal changes in fish abundance in response to hydrological variability in a dryland floodplain river. Marine and Freshwater Research 60: 146–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balcombe, S. R. & G. P. Closs, 2004. Spatial relationships and temporal variability in a littoral macrophyte assemblage. Marine and Freshwater Research 55: 609–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baumgartner, L. J., I. G. Stuart & B. P. Zampatti, 2008. Determining diel variation in fish assemblages downstream of three weirs in a regulated lowland river. Journal of Fish Biology 72: 218–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baumgartner, L. J., J. Conallin, I. Wooden, B. Campbell, R. Gee, W. A. Robinson & M. Mallen-Cooper, 2013. Using flow guilds of freshwater fish in an adaptive management framework to simplify environmental flow delivery for semi-arid riverine systems. Fish and Fisheries. doi:10.111/faf.12023.Google Scholar
  6. Baxter, R. M., 1977. Environmental effects of dams and impoundments. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 8: 255–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blanch, S. J., K. F. Walker & G. G. Ganf, 2000. Water regimes and littoral plants in four weir pools of the River Murray, Australia. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management 16: 445–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bonvechio, T. F. & M. S. Allen, 2005. Relations between hydrological variables and year-class strength of sportfish in eight Florida waterbodies. Hydrobiologia 532: 193–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boys, C. & M. Thoms, 2006. A large-scale, hierarchical approach for assessing habitat associations of fish assemblages in large dryland rivers. Hydrobiologia 572: 11–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bray, J. & J. Curtis, 1957. An ordination of the upland forest communities of Southern Wisconsin. Ecological Monographs 27: 325–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brock, M. A. & M. T. Casanova, 1997. Plant life at the edge of wetlands: ecological responses to wetting and drying patterns. In Klomp, N. & I. Lunt (eds), Frontiers in Ecology: Building the Links. Elsevier, Oxford: 181–192.Google Scholar
  12. Bunn, S. E. & A. H. Arthington, 2002. Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity. Environmental Management 30: 492–507.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bunn, S. E., M. C. Thoms, S. K. Hamilton & S. J. Capon, 2006. Flow variability in Dryland Rivers: boom, bust and the bits in between. River Research and Applications 22: 179–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chambers, P. A., E. E. Prepas, H. R. Hamilton & M. L. Bothwell, 1991. Current velocity and its effect on aquatic macrophytes in flowing waters. Ecological Applications 1: 249–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cheshire, K. J. M., Q. Ye, P. Wilson & L. Bucater, 2012. From drought to flood: annual variation in larval fish assemblages in a heavily regulated lowland temperate river. Goyder Institute for Water Research Technical Report Series No. 12/6.Google Scholar
  16. Clarke, K. R. & R. N. Gorley, 2006. PRIMER v6: User Manual/Tutorial. PRIMER-E Ltd, Plymouth.Google Scholar
  17. Connallin, A. J., K. A. Hillyard, K. F. Walker, B. M. Gillanders & B. B. Smith, 2011. Offstream movements of fish during drought in a regulated lowland river. River Research and Applications 27: 1237–1252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cowx, I. G., R. A. Noble, A. D. Nunn, J. Bolland, S. Walton, G. Peirson & J. P. Harvey, 2012. Flow requirements of non-salmonids. Fisheries Management and Ecology 19: 548–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Crook, D. A., A. I. Robertson, A. J. King & P. Humphries, 2001. The influence of spatial scale and habitat arrangement on diel patterns of habitat use by two lowland river fishes. Oecologia 129: 525–533.Google Scholar
  20. DEWNR, 2012. DEWNR Unpublished Data. Department of Environment Water and Natural Resources.Google Scholar
  21. Dudgeon, D., 2000. Large-scale hydrological changes in tropical Asia: prospects for riverine biodiversity. BioScience 50: 793–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dufrene, M. & P. Legendre, 1997. Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecological Monographs 67: 345–366.Google Scholar
  23. Faragher, R. M. & M. Rodgers, 1997. Performance of sampling gear types in the new South Wales river surveys. In Harris, A. H. & P. C. Gehrke (eds), Fish and Rivers in Stress: The NSW Rivers Survey. NSW Fisheries Office of Conservation/CRC for Freshwater Ecology, Sydney/Canberra.Google Scholar
  24. Frissel, C. A., W. J. Liss, C. E. Warren & M. D. Hurley, 1986. A heirarchical framework for stream habitat classification: viewing streams in a watershed context. Environmental Management 10: 199–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Geddes, M. C., 1990. Crayfish. In Mackay, N. & D. Eastburn (eds), The Murray. Murray-Darling Basin Commission, Canberra: 302–307.Google Scholar
  26. Gozlan, R. E., S. Mastrorillo, F. Dauba, J. N. Tourenq & G. H. Copp, 1998. Multi-scale analysis of habitat use during late summer for 0+ fishes in the River Garonne (France). Aquatic Sciences 60: 99–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Grenouillet, G. & D. Pont, 2001. Juvenile fishes in macrophyte beds: influence of food resources, habitat structure and body size. Journal of Fish Biology 59: 939–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Growns, I. O., D. A. Pollard & J. H. Harris, 1996. A comparison of electric fishing and gillnetting to examine the effects of anthropogenic disturbance on riverine fish communities. Fisheries Management and Ecology 3: 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Growns, I., P. C. Gehrke, K. L. Astles & D. A. Pollard, 2003. A comparison of fish assemblages associated with different riparian vegetation types in the Hawkesbury-Nepan River system. Fisheries Management and Ecology 10: 209–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Halleraker, J. H., H. Sundt, K. T. Alfredson & G. Dangelmaier, 2007. Application of multiscale environmental flow methodologies as tools for optimized management of a Norwegian regulated national salmon watercourse. River Research and Applications 23: 493–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hubert, W. A., 1983. Passive capture techniques. In Nielsen, L. A. & D. L. Johnson (eds), Fisheries Techniques. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda: 147–163.Google Scholar
  32. Humphries, P., A. King & J. Koehn, 1999. Fish, flows and floodplains: links between freshwater fishes and their environment in the Murray–Darling River system, Australia. Environmental Biology of Fishes 56: 129–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Junk, W. J., P. B. Bayley & R. E. Sparks, 1989. The flood pulse concept in river floodplain systems. Canandian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 106: 110–127.Google Scholar
  34. King, A. J., P. Humphries & P. S. Lake, 2003. Fish recruitment on floodplains: the roles of patterns of flooding and life history characteristics. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 60: 773–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. King, A. J., Z. Tonkin & J. Mahoney, 2009. Environmental flow enhances native fish spawning and recruitment in the Murray River, Australia. River Research and Applications 25: 1205–1218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Koehn, J. D., 2009. Multi-scale habitat selection by Murray cod Maccullochella peelii peelii in two lowland rivers. Journal of Fish Biology 75: 113–129.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kwak, T. J., 1988. Lateral movement and use of floodplain habitat by fishes of the Kankakee River, Illinois. American Midland Naturalist 120: 241–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lake, J. S., 1967. Rearing experiments with five species of Australian freshwater fishes. 1. Inducement of spawning. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 18: 137–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lyon, J., I. Stuart, D. Ramsey & J. O’Mahoney, 2010. The effect of water level on lateral movements of fish between river and off-channel habitats and implications for management. Marine and Freshwater Research 61: 271–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mallen-Cooper, M. & I. G. Stuart, 2003. Age, growth and non-flood recruitment of two potamodromous fishes in a large semi-arid/temperate river system. River Research and Applications 19: 697–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McCune, B. & M. Mefford, 2005. PC-ORD. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data, Version 5.12. MjM Software Design, Glendon Beach.Google Scholar
  42. McCune, B., J. B. Grace & D. L. Urban, 2002. Analysis of Ecological Communities. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach.Google Scholar
  43. MDBA, 2011. The living Murray annual environmental watering plan 2011–2012. MDBA Publication No. 170/11. Murray-Darling Basin Authority, Canberra.Google Scholar
  44. Minns, C. K., 1995. Allometry of home range size in lake and river fishes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 52: 1499–1508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nesler, T. P., R. T. Muth & A. F. Wasowicz, 1988. Evidence for baseline flow spikes as spawning cues for Colorado squawfish in the Yampa River, Colorado. American Fisheries Society Symposium 5: 68–79.Google Scholar
  46. Nestler, J. M., P. S. Pompeu, R. A. Goodwin, D. L. Smith, L. G. M. Silva, C. R. M. Baigún & N. O. Oldani, 2012. The river machine: a template for fish movement and habitat, fluvial geomorphology, fluid dynamics and biogeochemical cycling. River Research and Applications 28: 490–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nilsson, C., 1987. Distribution of stream-edge vegetation along a gradient of current velocity. Journal of Ecology 75: 513–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nilsson, C., C. A. Reidy, M. Dynesius & C. Revenga, 2005. Fragmentation and flow regulation of the world’s large river systems. Science 308: 405–408.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. O’Connor, J. P., D. J. O’Mahony & J. M. O’Mahony, 2005. Movements of Macquaria ambigua, in the Murray River, south-eastern Australia. Journal of Fish Biology 66: 392–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Poff, N. L. & J. D. Allan, 1995. Functional organization of stream fish assemblages in relation to hydrological variability. Ecology 76: 606–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Resh, V. H., A. V. Brown, A. P. Covich, M. E. Gurtz, H. W. Li, G. W. Minshall, S. R. Reice, A. L. Sheldon, J. B. Wallace & R. C. Wissmar, 1988. The role of disturbance in stream ecology. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 7: 433–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Reynolds, L., 1983. Migration patterns of five fish species in the Murray–Darling River system. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 34: 857–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rørslett, B., M. Mjelde & S. W. Johansen, 1989. Effects of hydropower development on aquatic macrophytes in Norwegian Rivers: present state of knowledge and some case studies. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management 3: 19–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rozas, L. P. & W. E. Odum, 1988. Occupation of submerged aquatic vegetation by fishes: testing the roles of food and refuge. Oecologia 77: 101–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Smith, B. B., A. Conallin & L. Vilizzi, 2009. Regional patterns in the distribution, diversity and relative abundance of wetland fishes of the River Murray, South Australia. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia 133: 339–360.Google Scholar
  56. Stuart, I. G. & M. Jones, 2006. Large, regulated forest floodplain is an ideal recruitment zone for non-native carp (Cyprinus carpio L.). Marine and Freshwater Research 57: 333–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Van Dijk, I. J. M., H. E. Beck, R. S. Crosbie, R. A. M. de Jeu, Y. Y. Liu, G. M. Podger, B. Timbal & N. R. Viney, 2013. The Millennium drought in southeast Australia (2001–2009): natural and human causes and implications for water resources, ecosystems, economy, and society. Water Resources Research 49: 1040–1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Vilizzi, L. & S. N. Merdith, 2009. Direct and indirect effects in flow-habitat-biota relationships in the littoral zone of a large lowland river. Fundamental and Applied Limnology 174: 215–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Walker, K. F., 1985. A review of the ecological effects of river regulation in Australia. Hydrobiologia 125: 111–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Walker, K. F., 2001. A river transformed: the effects of weirs of the lower Murray, the way forward on weirs. Australian Conservation Foundation, Inland Rivers Network.Google Scholar
  61. Walker, K. F., 2006. Serial weirs, cumulative effects: the Lower River Murray, Australia. In Kingsford, R. T. (ed.), Ecology of Desert Rivers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 248–279.Google Scholar
  62. Walker, K. F. & M. C. Thoms, 1993. Environmental effects of flow regulation on the lower River Murray, Australia. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management 8: 103–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Walker, K. F., A. J. Boulton, M. C. Thoms & F. Sheldon, 1994. Effects of water-level changes induced by weirs on the distribution of littoral plants along the River Murray, South Australia. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 45: 1421–1438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Walker, K. F., F. Sheldon & J. T. Puckridge, 1995. A perspective on dryland river ecosystems. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 11: 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ward, J. V. & J. A. Stanford, 1979. The ecology of regulated streams. Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Weaver, M. J., J. J. Magnuson & M. K. Clayton, 1997. Distribution of littoral fishes in structurally complex macrophytes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 54: 2277–2289.Google Scholar
  67. Wedderburn, S. D., K. F. Walker & B. P. Zampatti, 2007. Habitat separation of Craterocephalus (Atherinidae) species and populations in off-channel areas of the lower River Murray, Australia. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 16: 442–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Welcomme, R. L., 1985. River Fisheries. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, Rome, FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 262: 329 pp.Google Scholar
  69. Winemiller, K. O. & K. A. Rose, 1992. Patterns of life-history diversification in North American fishes: implications for population regulation. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 49: 2196–2218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Winemiller, K. O., S. Tarim, D. Shormann & J. B. Cotner, 2000. Fish assemblage structure in relation to environmental variation among Brazos River oxbow lakes. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 129: 451–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zampatti, B. P. & S. J. Leigh, 2013a. Within-channel flows promote spawning and recruitment of golden perch, Macquaria ambigua ambigua (Richardson, 1845) (Percichthyidae)—implications for environmental flow management in the River Murray, Australia. Marine and Freshwater Research 64: 618–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zampatti, B. P. & S. J. Leigh, 2013b. Effects of flooding on recruitment and abundance of golden perch (Macquaria ambigua ambigua) in the lower River Murray. Ecological Management and Restoration 14: 135–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zeug, S. C. & K. O. Winemiller, 2007. Ecological correlates of fish reproductive activity in Floodplain Rivers: a life-history-based approach. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 64: 1291–1301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. M. Bice
    • 1
  • S. L. Gehrig
    • 1
  • B. P. Zampatti
    • 1
  • J. M. Nicol
    • 1
  • P. Wilson
    • 1
  • S. L. Leigh
    • 1
  • K. Marsland
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Inland Waters and Catchment Ecology ProgramSouth Australian Research and Development Institute (SARDI), Aquatic SciencesHenley BeachAustralia
  2. 2.Natural Resources, SA Murray-Darling BasinDepartment of Environment, Water and Natural ResourcesMurray BridgeAustralia

Personalised recommendations