Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Vegetation dynamics in side-channels reconnected to the Rhine River: what are the main factors controlling communities trajectories after restoration?

  • Primary Research Paper
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The hydraulic management of large rivers led to a disconnection of side-channels. Restoration works were to reconnect these side-channels to the main course in order to recover hydrological and ecological functions. The aim of the study was to analyze the vegetation dynamics after restoration and to link it to the change in chemical and hydro-geomorphological characteristics. Changes in species richness, cover and composition of the macrophytes communities were studied in nine side-channels of the Rhine river (France) after reconnection which occurred between 1998 and 2006. Vegetation dynamics was surveyed between 2007 and 2011 and compared to the ones of three target side-channels (never disconnected). Three vegetation communities were identified: one characterized by rheophilic species, a second one by mesotrophic species, and a third one by eutrophic species. Distribution of communities depended mainly on the flow velocity and the sediment texture of the side-channels. The floristic composition of communities evolved rapidly and remained stable a few years after restoration. Changes in species richness and cover remained relatively low in all side-channels over the study period. Time after restoration did not affect the dynamics of colonization. Reconnection allowed the restored side-channels to exhibit vegetation dynamics similar to those of the target side-channels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • American Public Health Association, 1985. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 16th ed. APHA, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amoros, C., A. Elger, S. Dufour, L. Grosprêtre, H. Piégay & C. Henry, 2005. Flood scouring and groundwater supply in rehabilitated side-channels of the Rhône River, France: sedimentation and aquatic vegetation responses. Large Rivers 15: 147–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baart, I., C. Gschöpf, A. P. Blaschke, S. Preiner & T. Hein, 2010. Prediction of potential macrophyte development in response to restoration measures in an urban riverine wetland. Aquatic Botany 93: 153–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrat-Segretain, M.-H., 2001. Invasive species in the Rhône River floodplain (France): replacement of Elodea canadensis Michaux by E. nuttallii St. John in two former river channels. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 152: 237–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernhardt, E. S., M. A. Palmer, J. D. Allan, G. Alexander, K. Barnas, S. Brooks, J. Carr, S. Clayton, C. Dahm, J. Follstad-Shah, D. Galat, S. Gloss, P. Goodwin, D. Hart, B. Hassett, R. Jenkinson, S. Katz, G. M. Kondolf, P. S. Lake, R. Lave, J. L. Meyer, T. K. O’Donnell, L. Pagano, B. Powell & E. Sudduth, 2005. Synthesizing U.S. river restoration efforts. Science 308: 636–637.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bernhardt, E. S., E. B. Sudduth, M. A. Palmer, J. David Allan, J. L. Meyer, G. Alexander, J. Follstad-Shah, B. Hassett, R. Jenkinson, R. Lave, J. Rumps & L. Pagano, 2007. Restoring rivers one reach at a time: results from a survey of U.S. river restoration practitioners. Restoration Ecology 15: 482–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J., A. Corfield, P. Gron, H. O. Hansen, D. Walker, M. Whitfield & P. Williams, 1998. Restoration of the rivers Brede, Cole and Skerne: a joint Danish and British EU-LIFE demonstration project, V—short-term impacts on the conservation value of aquatic macroinvertebrate and macrophyte assemblages. Aquatic Conservation: Marine & Freshwater Ecosystems 8: 241–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornette, G. & C. Amoros, 1991. Aquatic vegetation and hydrology of a braided river floodplain. Journal of Vegetation Science 2: 497–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornette, G., C. Amoros & J.-C. Rostan, 1996. River incision and vegetation dynamics in cut-off channels. Aquatic Sciences 58: 31–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornette, G., C. Amoros & N. Lamouroux, 1998. Aquatic plant diversity in riverine wetlands: the role of connectivity. Freshwater Biology 39: 267–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun-Blanquet, J., 1968. L’école phytosociologique zuricho-montpelliéraine et la S.I.G.M.A. Vegetatio 16: 1–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, S. S. & P. S. Lake, 2007. River restoration in Victoria, Australia: change is in the wind, and none too soon. Restoration Ecology 15: 584–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carbiener, R., M. Trémolières, J. L. Mercier & A. Ortscheit, 1990. Aquatic macrophyte communities as bioindicators of eutrophication in calcareous oligosaprobe stream waters (Upper Rhine plain, Alsace). Vegetatio 86: 71–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clewell, A. F. & J. Aronson (eds), 2007. Ecological restoration principles, values, and structure of an emerging profession. Island Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Combroux, I. C. S., G. Bornette & C. Amoros, 2002. Plant regenerative strategies after a major disturbance: the case of a riverine wetland restoration. Wetlands 22: 234–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conservatoire des Sites Alsaciens & Office National des Forêts (coord.), 2004. Référentiel des habitats reconnus d’intérêt communautaire de la bande rhénane: description, états de conservation et mesures de gestion. Programme LIFE Nature de conservation et restauration des habitats de la bande rhénane: 158 pp.

  • Demars, B. O. L. & D. M. Harper, 2005. Distribution of aquatic vascular plants in lowland rivers: separating the effects of local environmental conditions, longitudinal connectivity and river basin isolation. Freshwater Biology 50: 418–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greulich, S. & M. Trémolières, 2006. Present distribution of the genus Elodea in the Alsatian Upper Rhine floodplain (France) with a special focus on the expansion of Elodea nuttallii St. John during recent decades. Hydrobiologia 570: 249–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haury, J., M.-C. Peltre, M. Trémolières, J. Barbe, G. Thiébaut, I. Bernez, H. Daniel, P. Chatenet, G. Haan-Archipoff, S. Muller, A. Dutartre, C. Laplace-Treyture, A. Cazaubon & E. Lambert-Servien, 2006. A new method to assess water trophy and organic pollution—the macrophyte biological index for rivers (IBMR): its application to different types of river and pollution. In Caffrey, J. M., A. Dutartre, J. Haury, K. J. Murphy & P. M. Wade (eds), Macrophytes in Aquatic Ecosystems: From Biology to Management. Springer, Dordrecht: 153–158.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, C. P. & C. Amoros, 1996. Restoration ecology of riverine wetlands. III. Vegetation survey and monitoring optimization. Ecological Engineering 7: 35–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, C. P., C. Amoros & N. Roset, 2002. Restoration ecology of riverine wetlands: a 5-year post-operation survey on the Rhône River, France. Ecological Engineering 18: 543–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hrivnák, R., H. Otahelová & M. Valachovič, 2007. The relationship between macrophyte vegetation and habitat factors along a middle-size European river. Polish Journal of Ecology 55: 717–729.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janauer, G. A., U. Schmidt-Mumm & B. Schmidt, 2010. Aquatic macrophytes and water current velocity in the Danube River. Ecological Engineering 36: 1138–1145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joret, G. & J. Hébert, 1955. Contribution à la détermination du besoin des sols en acide phosphorique. Annales Agronomiques 2: 233–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondolf, G. M., 1997. Application of the pebble count: notes on purpose, method, and variants. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 33(1): 79–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacoul, P. & B. Freedman, 2006. Environmental influences on aquatic plants in freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Reviews 14: 89–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer, D. B. & G. E. Likens, 2010. The science and application of ecological monitoring. Biological Conservation 143: 1317–1328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, J. D. & M. S. Adams, 1989. The distribution of submerged aquatic macrophyte biomass in a eutrophic stream, Badfish Creek: the effect of environment. Hydrobiologia 171: 111–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, A., I. Combroux & M. Trémolières, 2013. Dynamics of nutrient contents (phosphorus, nitrogen) in water, sediment and plants after restoration of connectivity in side-channels of the River Rhine. Restoration Ecology 21: 232–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NF ISO 13878, 1998. Soil Quality, Determination of Total Nitrogen Content by Dry Combustion (“Elemental Analysis”). AFNOR, Paris.

  • Nienhuis, P. H., A. D. Buijse, R. S. E. W. Leuven, A. J. M. Smits, R. J. W. de Nooij & E. M. Samborska, 2002. Ecological rehabilitation of the lowland basin of the river Rhine (NW Europe). Hydrobiologia 478: 53–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, T. C. M., A. Baattrup-Pedersen & T. V. Madsen, 2006. Effects of stream restoration and management on plant communities in lowland streams. Freshwater Biology 51: 161–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, M. L., N. Fridberg, J. Skriver, A. Baattrup-Pedersen & S. E. Larsen, 2007. Restoration of Skjern River and its valley—short term impacts on river habitats, macrophytes and macroinvertebrates. Ecological Engineering 30: 145–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riis, T. & B. J. F. Biggs, 2003. Hydrologic and hydraulic control of macrophyte establishment and performance in streams. Limnology & Oceanography 48: 1488–1497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riis, T. & K. Sand-Jensen, 2001. Historical changes in species composition and richness accompanying perturbation and eutrophication of Danish lowland streams over 100 years. Freshwater Biology 46: 269–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riis, T., B. J. F. Biggs & M. Flanagan, 2004. Colonisation and temporal dynamics of macrophytes in artificial stream channels with contrasting flow regimes. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 159: 77–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robach, F., G. Thiébaut, M. Trémolières & S. Muller, 1996. A reference system for continental running waters: plant communities as bioindicators of increasing eutrophication in alkaline and acidic waters in north-east France. Hydrobiologia 340: 67–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sand-Jensen, K., T. Riis, O. Vestergaard & S. E. Larsen, 2000. Macrophyte decline in Danish lakes and streams over the past 100 years. Journal of Ecology 88: 1030–1040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiemer, F., C. Baumgartner & K. Tockner, 1999. Restoration of floodplain rivers: the ‘Danube Restoration Project’. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management 15: 231–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, L., G. Maire & J. Humbert, 2001. La puissance fluviale: définition, intérêt et limites pour une typologie hydro-géomorhologique des rivières. Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie N.F. 45: 201–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, L., M. Lebeau, M. Trémolières, S. Defraeye, C. Coli, E. Denny, T. Beck, M. Dillinger, J. C. Dor, P. Gombert, A. Gueidan, S. Manne, J. P. Party, P. Perrotey, M. Piquette, U. Roeck, A. Schnitzler, O. Sonnet, J. P. Vacher, V. Vauclin, M. Weiss, N. Zacher & P. Wilms, 2009. Le « Polder » d’Erstein : objectifs, aménagements et retour d’expérience sur cinq ans de fonctionnement et de suivi scientifique environnemental (Rhin, France). Ingénieries Eau-Agriculture-Territoires No Spécial: 67–84.

  • Schmitt, L., M. Lafont, M. Trémolières, C. Jezequel, A. Vivier, P. Breil, P. Namour, K. Valin & L. Valette, 2011. Using hydro-geomorphological typologies in functional ecology: preliminary results in contrasted hydrosystems. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 36: 539–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stefanik, K. C. & W. J. Mitsch, 2012. Structural and functional vegetation development in created and restored wetland mitigation banks of different ages. Ecological Engineering 39: 104–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiébaut, G., 2005. Does competition for phosphate supply explain the invasion pattern of Elodea species? Water Research 39: 3385–3393.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trémolières, M., I. Eglin, U. Roeck & R. Carbiener, 1993. The exchange process between river and groundwater on the central Alsace floodplain (eastern France). 1. The case of the canalised Rhine River. Hydrobiologia 254: 133–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tremp, H., 2007. Spatial and environmental effects on hydrophytic macrophyte occurrence in the Upper Rhine floodplain (Germany). Hydrobiologia 568: 167–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Région Alsace for the financial support to a PhD thesis, and all students for their help in the field campaigns. Thanks also go to S.M. Thomaz and two anonymous reviewers for improving a previous version of the paper, and to Jacques Prim for linguistic assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. LHyGeS - UMR 7517 - CNRS, Institut de Botanique, Université de Strasbourg, 28, rue Goethe, 67083, Strasbourg Cedex, France

    Albin Meyer , Isabelle Combroux & Michèle Trémolières

  2. LIVE - UMR 7362 - CNRS, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France

    Laurent Schmitt

Authors
  1. Albin Meyer
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Isabelle Combroux
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Laurent Schmitt
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Michèle Trémolières
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Albin Meyer .

Additional information

Handling editor: Sidinei Magela Thomaz

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 104 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meyer , A., Combroux, I., Schmitt, L. et al. Vegetation dynamics in side-channels reconnected to the Rhine River: what are the main factors controlling communities trajectories after restoration?. Hydrobiologia 714, 35–47 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-013-1512-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-013-1512-y

Keywords