Advertisement

Hydrobiologia

, Volume 723, Issue 1, pp 145–156 | Cite as

Is the exotic red swamp crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) a current threat for the Mediterranean tree frog (Hyla meridionalis) in the Camargue (Southern France)?

  • Héctor Rodriguez-PerezEmail author
  • Hugo Cayuela
  • Samuel Hilaire
  • Anthony Olivier
  • François Mesleard
THE ROLE OF PONDS

Abstract

The non-indigenous red swamp crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) has been shown to be a threat for amphibian conservation. Many amphibian species breed in temporary ponds to diminish predation risk as such ecosystems are free of large predators. However P. clarkii, occurring as an invasive species in the Camargue delta, can readily disperse on the ground and thus colonize isolated ponds. We studied the current impact of the exotic crayfish on the reproductive success of the Mediterranean tree frog (Hyla meridionalis). In a mesocosm experiment, we tested the effect of two crayfish densities (1 and 3 crayfish/m2) on tadpole abundance. We also tested in a field experiment, within a temporary pond, the crayfish’s predation on the tree frog’s eggs. Finally, we developed site occupancy models using data from 20 ponds to assess the effect of crayfish abundance on tadpole abundance. Neither the experiments, nor the site occupancy models showed a negative impact of the current crayfish abundance on the tree frog populations breeding in ponds. We found that recorded crayfish densities were lower than in other areas where crayfish has impacted amphibian populations, but we hypothesize that current crayfish abundance in the area may increase in the future, thus impacting tree frog populations.

Keywords

Exotic species Amphibian conservation Procambarus clarkii Hyla meridionalis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Eric Meineri and two anonymous referees for their helpful comments which helped us to improve the manuscript. We also thank Michael Paul for improving the English. This study was funded by the MAVA Foundation .

References

  1. ACEMAV coll, R. Duguet & F. Melik (eds), 2003. Les amphibiens de France, Belgique et Luxembourg, Collection Pasthénope. Editions Biotope, Mèze (France).Google Scholar
  2. Aquiloni, L., M. Ilhéu & F. Gheradi, 2005. Habitat use and dispersal of the invasive crayfish Procambarus clarkii in ephemeral water bodies of Portugal. Marine & Freshwater Behaviour & Physiology 38(4): 225–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bates, D. M., M. Maechler & B. M. Bolker, 2011. lme4: Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using S4 Classes. R package version 0.9999375-42.Google Scholar
  4. Biek, R., W. C. Funk, B. A. Maxell & L. S. Mills, 2002. What is missing in amphibian decline research: insights from ecological sensitivity analysis. Conservation Biology 16: 728–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blaustein, A. R., B. A. Han, R. A. Relyea, P. T. J. Johnson, J. C. Buck, S. S. Gervasi & L. B. Kats, 2011. The complexity of amphibian population declines: understanding the role of cofactors in driving amphibian losses. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1223: 108–119.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bolker, B. M., M. E. Brooks, C. J. Clark, S. W. Geange, J. R. Poulsen, M. H. H. Stevens & J.-S. S. White, 2009. Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 24: 127–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bonis, A., J. Lepart & P. Grillas, 1995. Seed bank dynamics and coexistence of annual macrophytes in a temporary and variable habitat. Oikos 74: 81–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boogert, N. J., D. M. Paterson & K. N. Laland, 2006. The implications of niche construction and ecosystem engineering for Conservation Biology. BioScience 56: 570–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Byers, J. E., S. Reichard, J. M. Randall, I. M. Parker, C. S. Smith, W. M. Lonsdale, I. A. E. Atkinson, T. R. Seastedt, M. Williamson, E. Chornesky & D. Hayes, 2002. Directing research to reduce the impacts of nonindigenous species. Conservation Biology 16: 630–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cayuela, H., A. Besnard, A. Béchet, V. Devictor & A. Olivier, 2012. Reproductive dynamics of three amphibian species in Mediterranean wetlands: the role of local precipitation and hydrological regime. Freshwater Biology 57(2): 2629–2640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Céréghino, R., B. Oertli, M. Bazzanti, C. Coccia, A. Compin, J. Biggs, N. Bressi, P. Grillas, A. Hull, T. Kalettka & O. Scher, 2012. Biological traits of European pond macroinvertebrates. Hydrobiologia 689: 51–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cruz, M. J. & R. Rebelo, 2005. Vulnerability of Southwest Iberian amphibians to an introduced crayfish, Procambarus clarkii. Amphibia-Reptilia 26: 293–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cruz, M. J., S. Pascoal, M. Tejedo & R. Rebelo, 2006a. Predation by an exotic crayfish, Procambarus clarkii, on Natterjack Toad, Bufo calamita, embryos: its role on the exclusion of this amphibian from its breeding ponds. Copeia 2: 274–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cruz, M. J., R. Rebelo & E. G. Crespo, 2006b. Effects of an introduced crayfish, Procambarus clarkii, on the distribution of south-western Iberian amphibians in their breeding habitats. Ecography 29: 329–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cruz, M. J., P. Segurado, M. Sousa & R. Rebelo, 2008. Collapse of the amphibian community of the Paul do Boquilobo Natural Reserve (central Portugal) after the arrival of the exotic American crayfish Procambarus clarkii. The Herpetological Journal 18: 197–204.Google Scholar
  16. Diaz-Paniagua, C., 1990. Temporary ponds as breeding sites of amphibians at a locality in southwestern Spain. Herpetological Journal 1: 447–453.Google Scholar
  17. Díaz-Paniagua, C., R. Fernández-Zamudio, M. Florencio, P. Gacía-Murillo, C. Gómez-Rodríguez, A. Portheault, L. Serrano & P. Siljeström, 2010. Temporary ponds from Doñana National Park: a system of natural habitats for the preservation of aquatic flora and fauna. Limnetica 29: 41–58.Google Scholar
  18. Ficetola, F. G., M. E. Siesa, R. Manenti, L. Bottoni, F. De Bernardi & E. Padoa-Schioppa, 2011. Early assessment of the impact of alien species: differential consequences of an invasive crayfish on adult and larval amphibians. Diversity and Distributions 17: 1141–1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fiske, I. & R. Chandler, 2011. Unmarked: an R package for fitting hierarchical models of wildlife occurrence and abundance. Journal of Statistical Software 43: 1–23.Google Scholar
  20. Fox, J. & S. Weisberg, 2011. An R Companion to Applied Regression, 2nd ed. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
  21. Gamradt, S. C. & L. B. Kats, 1996. Effect of introduced crayfish and Mosquito fish on California Newts. Conservation Biology 10: 1155–1162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gamradt, S. C., L. B. Kats & C. B. Anzalone, 1997. Aggression by non-native crayfish deters breeding in California Newts. Conservation Biology 11: 793–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Geiger, W., P. Alcorlo, A. Baltanás & C. Montes, 2005. Impact of an introduced crustacean on the trophic webs of Mediterranean wetlands. Biological Invasions 7: 49–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gherardi, F., 2002. Behaviour. In Holdich, D. M. (ed.), Biology of Freshwater Crayfish. Springer, Cornwall: 258–290.Google Scholar
  25. Gherardi, F. & S. Barbaresi, 2000. Invasive crayfish: activity patterns of Procambarus clarkii in the rice fields of the Lower Guadalquivir (Spain). Archiv für Hydrobiolgie 150: 153–168.Google Scholar
  26. Gibelin, A. L. & M. Deque, 2003. Anthropogenic climate change over the Mediterranean region simulated by a global variable resolution model. Climate Dynamics 20: 327–339.Google Scholar
  27. Gómez-Rodríguez, C., C. Díaz-Paniagua, L. Serrano, M. Florencio & A. Portheault, 2009. Mediterranean temporary ponds as amphibian breeding habitats: the importance of preserving pond networks. Aquatic Ecology 43: 1179–1191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gómez-Rodríguez, C., C. Díaz-Paniagua, J. Bustamante, A. Portheault & M. Florencio, 2010. Inter-annual variability in amphibian assemblages: implications for diversity assessment and conservation. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 20: 668–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gosner, K. L., 1960. A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica 16: 183–190.Google Scholar
  30. Guillera-Arroita, G., M. S. Ridout & B. J. T. Morgan, 2010. Design of occupancy studies with imperfect detection. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 1: 131–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Habsurgo-Lorena, A. S., 1979. Present situation of exotic species of crayfish introduced into Spanish continental waters. Freshwater Crayfish 4: 175–184.Google Scholar
  32. Holdich, D. M. (ed.), 2002. Biology of Freshwater Crayfish. Blackwell Science, Cornwall, UK.Google Scholar
  33. Holdich, D. M., J. D. Reynolds, C. Souty-Grosset & P. J. Sibley, 2010. A review of the ever increasing threat to European crayfish from non-indigenous crayfish species. Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems 11: 394–395.Google Scholar
  34. Jakob, C., G. Poizat, M. Veith, A. Seitz & A. J. Crivelli, 2003. Breeding phenology and larval distribution of amphibians in a Mediterranean pond network with unpredictable hydrology. Hydrobiologia 499: 51–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kats, L. B. & R. P. Ferrer, 2003. Alien predators and amphibian declines: review of two decades of science and the transition to conservation. Diversity and Distributions 9: 99–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kendall, W. L. & G. C. White, 2009. A cautionary note on substituting spatial subunits for repeated temporal sampling in studies of site occupancy. Journal of Applied Ecology 46: 1182–1188.Google Scholar
  37. Kreider, J. L. & S. A. Watts, 1998. Behavioral (feeding) responses of the crayfish, Procambarus clarkii, to natural dietary items and common components of formulated crustacean feeds. Journal of Chemical Ecology 24: 91–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Martino, A., J. Syväranta, A. Crivelli, R. Céréghino & F. Santoul, 2011. Is European catfish a threat to eels in southern France? Aquatic Conservation: Marine Freshwater Ecosystems 21: 276–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mazerolle, M. J., 2011. AICcmodavg: Model Selection and Multimodel Inference Based on (Q) AIC(c). Version 1.15.Google Scholar
  40. Mazerolle, M. J., L. L. Bailey, W. L. Kendall, J. Andrew Royle, S. J. Converse & J. D. Nichols, 2007. Making great leaps forward: accounting for detectability in herpetological field studies. Journal of Herpetology 41: 672–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Miaud, C. & J. Muratet, 2004. Identifier les oeufs et les larves des amphibiens de France. INRA, Nancy.Google Scholar
  42. Nyström, P., 2002. Ecology. In Holdich, D. M. (ed.), Biology of Freshwater Crayfish. Springer, Cornwall: 192–235.Google Scholar
  43. Ottonello, D., S. Salvidio & E. Rosecchi, 2005. Feeding habits of the European pond terrapin Emys orbicularis in Camargue (Rhone delta, Southern France). Amphibia-Reptilia 26: 562–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pechmann, J. H. K. & H. M. Wilbur, 1994. Putting declining populations in perspective, natural fluctuations and human impacts. Herpetologica 50(1): 65–84.Google Scholar
  45. Pleguezuelos, J. M., 1997. Distribución y biogeografía de los anfíbios y reptiles en España y Portugal. Universidad de Granada; Asociación Herpetológica Española, Granada, España.Google Scholar
  46. Portheault, A., C. Díaz-Paniagua & C. Gómez-Rodríguez, 2007. Predation on amphibian eggs and larvae in temporary ponds: the case of Bufo calamita in Southwestern Spain. Revue d’Ecologie (Terre et Vie) 62: 315–322.Google Scholar
  47. Poulin, B., G. Lefebvre & A. J. Crivelli, 2007. The invasive red swamp crayfish as a predictor of Eurasian bittern density in the Camargue, France. Journal of Zoology 273: 98–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Quinn, G. P. & M. J. Keough, 2002. Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologist. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. R Development Core Team, 2012. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, Vienna.Google Scholar
  50. Rhazi, L., P. Grillas, E.-R. Saber, M. Rhazi, L. Brendonck & A. Waterkeyn, 2012. Vegetation of Mediterranean temporary pools: a fading jewel? Hydrobiologia 689: 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Richter-Boix, A., G. A. Llorente & A. Montori, 2006. Breeding phenology of an amphibian community in a Mediterranean area. Amphibia-Reptilia 27: 549–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rodríguez, C., E. Bécares, M. Fernández-Aláez & C. Fernández-Aláez, 2005. Loss of diversity and degradation of wetlands as a result of introducing exotic crayfish. Biological Invasions 7: 75–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rosecchi, E., G. Poizat & A. J. Crivelli, 1997. Introductions de poissons d’eau douce et d’écrevisses en Camargue: historique, origines et modifications des peuplements. Bulletin Français de la Pêche et de la Pisciculture 344(345): 221–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Royle, J. A. & J. D. Nichols, 2003. Estimating abundance from repeated presence-absence data or point counts. Ecology 84: 777–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Savini, D., A. Occhipinti-Ambrogi, A. Marchini, E. Tricarico, F. Gherardi, S. Olenin & S. Gollasch, 2010. The top 27 animal alien species introduced into Europe for aquaculture and related activities. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 26: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Semlitsch, R. D., 2002. Critical elements fro biologically based recovery plans of aquatic-breeding amphibians. Conservation Biology 16: 619–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stuart, S. N., J. S. Chanson, N. A. Cox, B. E. Young, A. S. L. Rodrigues, D. L. Fischman & R. W. Waller, 2004. Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide. Science 306: 1783–1786.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wilbur, H. M., 1997. Experimental ecology of food webs: complex systems in temporary ponds. Ecology 78: 2279–2302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zuur, A. F., E. N. Ieno, N. J. Walker, A. A. Savaliev & G. M. Smith, 2009. Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Héctor Rodriguez-Perez
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hugo Cayuela
    • 2
    • 3
  • Samuel Hilaire
    • 1
  • Anthony Olivier
    • 1
  • François Mesleard
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Tour du Valat, Research Centre for the Conservation of Mediterranean WetlandsLe Sambuc-ArlesFrance
  2. 2.Biogéographie et Ecologie des Vertébrés (UMR 5175)CNRS, Centre d’Ecologie Fonctionnelle et EvolutiveMontpellier Cedex 5France
  3. 3.Laboratoire d’Ecologie des Hydrosystèmes Naturels et Antropisés (LEHNAUMR 5023)CNRSVilleurbanne CedexFrance
  4. 4.UMR CNRS/IRD IMBE 7263/237Université Avignon et Pays du Vaucluse, IUT AgroparcAvignon Cedex 9France

Personalised recommendations