Advertisement

Hydrobiologia

, Volume 708, Issue 1, pp 111–131 | Cite as

Beguiling and risky: ‘environmental works and measures’ for wetland conservation under a changing climate

  • Jamie PittockEmail author
  • C. Max Finlayson
  • Julia Howitt
CLIMATE CHANGE AND AUSTRALIAN WETLANDS

Abstract

In Australia’s Murray–Darling Basin, small-scale engineering works called ‘environmental works and measures’ have been implemented as a basis for river and other wetland conservation. While implementing these, governments seem to have embraced the beguiling notion that scarce water supplies can be divided further, while conserving the environment and maintaining agricultural production. The difficulties in doing this are expected to increase in the face of extreme climate variability. With this scenario as a backdrop, the $280 million (Monetary values ($) in this paper are in Australian dollars (AUD). At the time of writing AUD $1.00 = ~USD $1.02.) Living Murray and related programmes are assessed to see whether microengineering works to manage the hydrology of wetlands make for effective adaptation to water scarcity and climate change or whether it amounts to an overly narrow adaptation or maladaptation. Some measures were found to be substantially beneficial, such as the construction of fishways. However, under these programmes, only 0.6% of the Basin’s wetlands would be inundated and there are significant risks including desiccation of non-target wetlands and further reductions in water allocations for the environment. It is recommended that trade-offs between alternative strategies are assessed as the basis for minimising perverse impacts under changing climatic and hydrological conditions.

Keywords

Climate change Floodplain Maladaptation Murray–Darling Opportunity cost Overly narrow adaptation River 

References

  1. Australian Bureau of Agricultural & Resource Economics (ABARE) & Bureau of Rural Sciences (BRS), 2010. Environmentally Sustainable Diversion Limits in the Murray–Darling Basin: Socioeconomic Analysis. Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Bureau of Rural Sciences, Canberra.Google Scholar
  2. ABC News, 2008. NSW, Commonwealth Buy Toorale Station, 11 Sept 2008. Australian Broadcasting Corporation, Sydney.Google Scholar
  3. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), 2010. Water Account Australia 2008-09 Catalogue 4610.0. Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra.Google Scholar
  4. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), Australian Bureau of Agricultural & Resource Economics (ABARE) & Bureau of Rural Sciences (BRS), 2009. Socio-economic context for the Murray–Darling Basin – Descriptive Report. Murray–Darling Basin Authority, Canberra.Google Scholar
  5. Australian Government, 1999. Environment Protection & Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999. Australian Government, Canberra.Google Scholar
  6. Ballinger, A. & R. MacNally, 2006. The landscape context of flooding in the Murray–Darling Basin. In Aldo, P. (ed.), Advances in Ecological Research, Vol. 39. Academic Press, London: 85–105.Google Scholar
  7. Barnett, J. & S. O’Neill, 2010. Maladaptation. Global Environmental Change 20: 211–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bates, B. C., Z. W. Kundzewicz, S. Wu & J. P. Palutikof (eds), 2008. Climate change and water. Technical Paper of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC Secretariat, Geneva.Google Scholar
  9. Baumgartner, L. J., N. K. Reynoldson, L. Cameron & J. G. Stanger, 2009. Effects of irrigation pumps on riverine fish. Fisheries Management and Ecology 16: 429–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beesley, L., A. Price, A. King, B. Gawne, D. Nielsen & J. Koehn, 2011. Watering floodplain wetlands in the Murray–Darling Basin for native fish. Waterlines Report 56. National Water Commission, Canberra.Google Scholar
  11. Bice, C. M. & B. P. Zampatti, 2011. Engineered water level management facilitates recruitment of non-native common carp, Cyprinus carpio, in a regulated lowland river. Ecological Engineering 37: 1901–1904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burns, I., G. Howell, P. Everingham & J. Swirepik, 2008. Blueprints for the future of the Murray’s iconic floodplains and wetlands. 12th International River Symposium, Brisbane.Google Scholar
  13. Cai, W. & T. Cowan, 2008. Evidence of impacts from rising temperature on inflows to the Murray–Darling Basin. Geophysical Research Letters 35: L07701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. CAoWMiA, 2007. Water for Food, Water for Life. A Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture. Earthscan & International Water Management Institute, London.Google Scholar
  15. Commonwealth of Australia, 2007. Water Act. Act No. 137 of 2007. Attorney-General’s Department, Canberra.Google Scholar
  16. Commonwealth of Australia, Government of New South Wales, Government of Victoria, Government of Queensland, Government of South Australia, Government of the Australian Capital Territory, & Government of the Northern Territory, 2004. Intergovernmental Agreement on a National Water Initiative. Council of Australian Governments, Canberra.Google Scholar
  17. Connell, D. & R. Q. Grafton (eds), 2011. Basin Futures: Water Reform in the Murray–Darling Basin. ANU E Press, Canberra.Google Scholar
  18. CSIRO, 2008. Water availability in the Murray–Darling Basin. A Report from CSIRO to the Australian Government. CSIRO, Canberra.Google Scholar
  19. CSIRO, 2012. Assessment of the Ecological and Economic Benefits of Environmental Water in the Murray–Darling Basin. CSIRO, Canberra.Google Scholar
  20. Cunningham, S., R. MacNally, M. White, J. Read, P. Baker, J. Thomson & P. Griffioen, 2007. Mapping the current condition of river red gum (Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh.) stands along the Victorian Murray River floodplain. A Report to the Northern Victorian Catchment Management Authorities and the Department of Sustainability and Environment. Department of Sustainability & Environment, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  21. Cunningham, S., R. MacNally, P. Griffioen & M. White, 2009. Mapping the Condition of River Red Gum and Black Box Stands in the Living Murray Icon Sites. Murray–Darling Basin Authority, Canberra.Google Scholar
  22. Dixon, P. B., M. T. Rimmer & G. Wittwer, 2011. Saving the southern Murray–Darling Basin: the economic effects of a buyback of irrigation water. Economic Record 87: 153–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. DWLBC, 2007. Construction of an environmental flow regulator on lower Chowilla Creek. Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 referral form, 2007/3307. Department of Water, Land & Biodiversity Conservation, Berri.Google Scholar
  24. Falkenmark, M. & D. Molden, 2008. Wake up to realities of river basin closure. International Journal of Water Resources Development 24: 201–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Foerster, A, 2008. Managing and protecting environmental water: lessons from the Gwydir for ecologically sustainable water management in the Murray Darling basin. Environmental Planning & Law Journal 25(1): 130–153.Google Scholar
  26. Foerster, A., 2011. Developing purposeful and adaptive institutions for effective environmental water governance. Water Resources Management: 1–14.Google Scholar
  27. GMW, 2010. Hattah Lakes Living Murray Floodplain Management Project. Referral of proposed action, 2010/5662. Goulburn-Murray Water, Tatura.Google Scholar
  28. Grafton, R. Q., 2011. Economic costs and benefits of the proposed Basin Plan. In Connell, D. & R. Q. Grafton (eds), Basin Futures: Water Reform in the Murray–Darling Basin. ANU E Press, Canberra: 254–262.Google Scholar
  29. Grafton, R. Q., H. L. Chu, M. Stewardson, & T. Kompas, 2011. Optimal dynamic water allocation: irrigation extractions and environmental tradeoffs in the Murray River, Australia. Water Resources Research 47: W00G08.Google Scholar
  30. Hall, K. C., D. S. Baldwin, G. N. Rees & A. J. Richardson, 2006. Distribution of inland wetlands with sulfidic sediments in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia. Science of the Total Environment 370: 235–244.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Howitt, J. A., D. S. Baldwin, G. N. Rees & J. L. Williams, 2007. Modelling blackwater: predicting water quality during flooding of lowland river forests. Ecological Modelling 203: 229–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. HRSCRA, 2011. Of Drought and Flooding Rains. Inquiry into the Impact of the Guide to the Murray–Darling Basin Plan. House of Representatives Standing Committee on Regional Australia, The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra.Google Scholar
  33. Jolly, I., R. Crosbie, K. McEwan, K. Holland, S. Lamontagne, K. Moe & C. Simmons, 2008. Project 054121: Surface Water–Groundwater Interactions in River Murray Wetlands and Implications for Water Quality and Ecology. CSIRO, Adelaide.Google Scholar
  34. Jones, M. J. & I. G. Stuart, 2008. Regulated floodplains – a trap for unwary fish. Fisheries Management & Ecology 15: 71–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jones, G., T. Hillman, R. Kingsford, T. McMahon, K. Walker, A. Arthington, J. Whittington & S. Cartwright, 2002. Independent Report of the Expert Reference Panel on Environmental Flows and Water Quality Requirements for the River Murray System. Cooperative Research Centre for Freshwater Ecology, Canberra.Google Scholar
  36. King, A. J. & J. P. O’Connor, 2007. Native fish entrapment in irrigation systems: a step towards understanding the significance of the problem. Ecological Management & Restoration 8: 32–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. King, A. J., K. A. Ward, P. O’Connor, D. Green, Z. Tonkin & J. Mahoney, 2010. Adaptive management of an environmental watering event to enhance native fish spawning and recruitment. Freshwater Biology 55: 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kingsford, R. T., K. Brandis, R. F. Thomas, P. Crighton, E. Knowles & E. Gale, 2004. Classifying landform at broad spatial scales: the distribution and conservation of wetlands in New South Wales, Australia. Marine & Freshwater Research 55: 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Koehn, J. D., A. J. Hobday, M. S. Pratchett & M. Gillanders, 2011. Climate change and Australian marine and freshwater environments, fishes and fisheries: synthesis and options for adaptation. Marine & Freshwater Research 62: 1148–1164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lankford, B. A., 2003. Environmental water requirements: a demand management perspective. Journal of the Chartered Institution of Water & Environmental Management 17: 19–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lyon, J., I. Stuart, D. Ramsey & J. O’Mahony, 2010. The effect of water level on lateral movements of fish between river and off-channel habitats and implications for management. Marine & Freshwater Research 61: 271–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. MDBA, 2010. Guide to the Proposed Basin Plan: Overview. Murray–Darling Basin Authority, Canberra.Google Scholar
  43. MDBA, 2011a. The Living Murray Story. One of Australia’s Largest River Restoration Projects. Murray–Darling Basin Authority, Canberra.Google Scholar
  44. MDBA, 2011b. The Living Murray Annual Implementation Report 2009–10 and Audit of the Living Murray Implementation. MDBA Publication Number 143/11. Murray–Darling Basin Authority, Canberra.Google Scholar
  45. MDBA, 2011c. Proposed Basin Plan, Water Act 2007. Murray–Darling Basin Authority, Canberra.Google Scholar
  46. MDBC, 2004. Native Fish Strategy for the Murray–Darling Basin 2003–2013. Murray–Darling Basin Commission, Canberra.Google Scholar
  47. MDBC, 2006a. The Chowilla Floodplain and Lindsay–Wallpolla Islands Icon Site Environmental Management Plan 2006–2007. MDBC Publication No. 33/06. Murray–Darling Basin Commission, Canberra.Google Scholar
  48. MDBC, 2006b. The Gunbower–Koondrook–Pericoota Forest Icon Site Environmental Management Plan 2006–2007, MDBC Publication No. 32/06. Murray–Darling Basin Commission, Canberra.Google Scholar
  49. MDBLGF, 2011. Communique 27 May 2011. Murray–Darling Basin Water Ministers Meet in Adelaide. Canberra: Murray-Darling Basin Ministerial Council. Retrieved 30 June 2011, from http://www.mdba.gov.au/files/Communique-Ministerial-Council-Meeting-5-27-May-2011_v1.pdf.
  50. MDBMC, 2003. Murray Darling Basin Ministerial Council Communique, 14 Nov 2003. Retrieved 21 Nov 2008, from http://www.mdbc.gov.au/_data/page/1589/MC34_communique_Nov-03.pdf.
  51. MDBMC, 2004. The Living Murray Environmental Works and Measures Program. Murray–Darling Basin Ministerial Council, Canberra.Google Scholar
  52. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA), 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  53. Minister for the Environment, 2011. Western Riverina National Parks, Hansard, Legislative Council, 6 Sept 2011. Parliament of New South Wales, Sydney.Google Scholar
  54. Moreno-Mateos, D., M. Power, F. A. Comın & R. Yockteng, 2012. Structural and functional loss in restored wetland ecosystems. PLoS Biology 10: e1001247.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. NCCMA, 2005. Flooding enhancement of Gunbower Forest. Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 referral form, 2005/1994. North Central Catchment Management Authority, Huntley.Google Scholar
  56. Nelson, D. R., 2010. Adaptation and resilience: responding to a changing climate. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 2: 113–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Nevill, J., 2009. Managing cumulative impacts: groundwater reform in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia. Water Resources Management 23: 2605–2631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. NWC, 2009. Australian Water Reform 2009: Second Biennial Assessment of Progress in Implementation of the National Water Initiative, Sept 2009. National Water Commission, Canberra.Google Scholar
  59. NWC, 2011. The National Water Initiative – Securing Australia’s Water Future: 2011 Assessment. National Water Commission, Canberra.Google Scholar
  60. Office of Water, 2009. Koondrook–Perricoota Forest Flood Enhancement Works. Referral of proposed action, 2009/5115. NSW Office of Water, Sydney.Google Scholar
  61. Palmer, M. A., E. S. Bernhardt, J. D. Allan, P. S. Lake, G. Alexander, S. Brooks, J. Carr, S. Clayton, C. N. Dahm, J. Follstad Shah, D. L. Galat, S. G. Loss, P. Goodwin, D. D. Hart, B. Hassett, R. Jenkinson, G. M. Kondolf, R. Lave, J. L. Meyer, T. K. O’Donnell, L. Pagano & E. Sudduth, 2005. Standards for ecologically successful river restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology 42: 208–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Pittock, J., 2010. A pale reflection of political reality: integration of global climate, wetland, and biodiversity agreements. Climate Law 1: 343–373.Google Scholar
  63. Pittock, J., 2011. National climate change policies and sustainable water management: Conflicts and synergies. Ecology & Society 16: 25 (online).Google Scholar
  64. Pittock, J. & C. M. Finlayson, 2011a. Freshwater ecosystem conservation in the Basin: principles versus policy. In Connell, D. & R. Q. Grafton (eds), Basin Futures: Water Reform in the Murray–Darling Basin. ANU E Press, Canberra: 39–58.Google Scholar
  65. Pittock, J. & C. M. Finlayson, 2011b. Australia’s Murray–Darling Basin: freshwater ecosystem conservation options in an era of climate change. Marine & Freshwater Research 62: 232–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Pittock, J. & J. Hartmann, 2011. Taking a second look: climate change, periodic re-licensing and better management of old dams. Marine & Freshwater Research 62: 312–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Pittock, J. & B. A. Lankford, 2010. Environmental water requirements: demand management in an era of water scarcity. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences 7: 75–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Pittock, J., C. M. Finlayson, A. Gardner & C. McKay, 2010. Changing character: the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands and climate change in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia. Environmental & Planning Law Journal 27: 401–425.Google Scholar
  69. Saintilan, N. & I. Overton (eds), 2010. Ecosystem Response Modelling in the Murray–Darling Basin. CSIRO, Collingwood.Google Scholar
  70. Shiklomanov, I. A. (ed.), 1997. Assessment of Water Resources and Water Availability in the World. World Meteorological Organization & Stockholm Environment Institute, Geneva.Google Scholar
  71. Stuart, I. G., B. P. Zampatti & L. J. Baumgartner, 2008. Can a low-gradient vertical-slot fishway provide passage for a lowland river fish community? Marine & Freshwater Research 59: 332–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. WGCS, 2011. Statement on the 2011 Draft Murray–Darling Basin Plan. Wentworth Group of Concerned Scientists, Sydney.Google Scholar
  73. Whitworth, K. L. & D. S. Baldwin, 2011. Reduced sulfur accumulation in salinised sediments. Environmental Chemistry 8: 198–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. World Water Assessment Programme (WWAP), 2009. The United Nations World Water Development Report 3: Water in a Changing World. UNESCO Publishing & Earthscan, Paris.Google Scholar
  75. Young, W. J., N. Bond, J. Brookes, B. Gawne & G. J. Jones, 2011. Science review of the estimation of an environmentally sustainable level of take for the Murray–Darling Basin. Final Report to the Murray–Darling Basin Authority. CSIRO, Canberra.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jamie Pittock
    • 1
    Email author
  • C. Max Finlayson
    • 2
  • Julia Howitt
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Crawford School of Public PolicyThe Australian National UniversityCanberraAustralia
  2. 2.Institute for Land, Water & SocietyCharles Sturt UniversityAlburyAustralia
  3. 3.School of Agricultural & Wine SciencesCharles Sturt UniversityWagga WaggaAustralia

Personalised recommendations