Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Beguiling and risky: ‘environmental works and measures’ for wetland conservation under a changing climate

  • CLIMATE CHANGE AND AUSTRALIAN WETLANDS
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In Australia’s Murray–Darling Basin, small-scale engineering works called ‘environmental works and measures’ have been implemented as a basis for river and other wetland conservation. While implementing these, governments seem to have embraced the beguiling notion that scarce water supplies can be divided further, while conserving the environment and maintaining agricultural production. The difficulties in doing this are expected to increase in the face of extreme climate variability. With this scenario as a backdrop, the $280 million (Monetary values ($) in this paper are in Australian dollars (AUD). At the time of writing AUD $1.00 = ~USD $1.02.) Living Murray and related programmes are assessed to see whether microengineering works to manage the hydrology of wetlands make for effective adaptation to water scarcity and climate change or whether it amounts to an overly narrow adaptation or maladaptation. Some measures were found to be substantially beneficial, such as the construction of fishways. However, under these programmes, only 0.6% of the Basin’s wetlands would be inundated and there are significant risks including desiccation of non-target wetlands and further reductions in water allocations for the environment. It is recommended that trade-offs between alternative strategies are assessed as the basis for minimising perverse impacts under changing climatic and hydrological conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

Notes

  1. Six referrals of LM EWM project proposals to the Federal Minister between 18th February 2004 and 30th September 2010 drawn from the online database for the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act (accessed on 5 January 2012) at: http://www.environment.gov.au/epbc/.

References

  • Australian Bureau of Agricultural & Resource Economics (ABARE) & Bureau of Rural Sciences (BRS), 2010. Environmentally Sustainable Diversion Limits in the Murray–Darling Basin: Socioeconomic Analysis. Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Bureau of Rural Sciences, Canberra.

  • ABC News, 2008. NSW, Commonwealth Buy Toorale Station, 11 Sept 2008. Australian Broadcasting Corporation, Sydney.

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), 2010. Water Account Australia 2008-09 Catalogue 4610.0. Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra.

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), Australian Bureau of Agricultural & Resource Economics (ABARE) & Bureau of Rural Sciences (BRS), 2009. Socio-economic context for the Murray–Darling Basin – Descriptive Report. Murray–Darling Basin Authority, Canberra.

  • Australian Government, 1999. Environment Protection & Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999. Australian Government, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballinger, A. & R. MacNally, 2006. The landscape context of flooding in the Murray–Darling Basin. In Aldo, P. (ed.), Advances in Ecological Research, Vol. 39. Academic Press, London: 85–105.

  • Barnett, J. & S. O’Neill, 2010. Maladaptation. Global Environmental Change 20: 211–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, B. C., Z. W. Kundzewicz, S. Wu & J. P. Palutikof (eds), 2008. Climate change and water. Technical Paper of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC Secretariat, Geneva.

  • Baumgartner, L. J., N. K. Reynoldson, L. Cameron & J. G. Stanger, 2009. Effects of irrigation pumps on riverine fish. Fisheries Management and Ecology 16: 429–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beesley, L., A. Price, A. King, B. Gawne, D. Nielsen & J. Koehn, 2011. Watering floodplain wetlands in the Murray–Darling Basin for native fish. Waterlines Report 56. National Water Commission, Canberra.

  • Bice, C. M. & B. P. Zampatti, 2011. Engineered water level management facilitates recruitment of non-native common carp, Cyprinus carpio, in a regulated lowland river. Ecological Engineering 37: 1901–1904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, I., G. Howell, P. Everingham & J. Swirepik, 2008. Blueprints for the future of the Murray’s iconic floodplains and wetlands. 12th International River Symposium, Brisbane.

  • Cai, W. & T. Cowan, 2008. Evidence of impacts from rising temperature on inflows to the Murray–Darling Basin. Geophysical Research Letters 35: L07701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CAoWMiA, 2007. Water for Food, Water for Life. A Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture. Earthscan & International Water Management Institute, London.

  • Commonwealth of Australia, 2007. Water Act. Act No. 137 of 2007. Attorney-General’s Department, Canberra.

  • Commonwealth of Australia, Government of New South Wales, Government of Victoria, Government of Queensland, Government of South Australia, Government of the Australian Capital Territory, & Government of the Northern Territory, 2004. Intergovernmental Agreement on a National Water Initiative. Council of Australian Governments, Canberra.

  • Connell, D. & R. Q. Grafton (eds), 2011. Basin Futures: Water Reform in the Murray–Darling Basin. ANU E Press, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • CSIRO, 2008. Water availability in the Murray–Darling Basin. A Report from CSIRO to the Australian Government. CSIRO, Canberra.

  • CSIRO, 2012. Assessment of the Ecological and Economic Benefits of Environmental Water in the Murray–Darling Basin. CSIRO, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, S., R. MacNally, M. White, J. Read, P. Baker, J. Thomson & P. Griffioen, 2007. Mapping the current condition of river red gum (Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh.) stands along the Victorian Murray River floodplain. A Report to the Northern Victorian Catchment Management Authorities and the Department of Sustainability and Environment. Department of Sustainability & Environment, Melbourne.

  • Cunningham, S., R. MacNally, P. Griffioen & M. White, 2009. Mapping the Condition of River Red Gum and Black Box Stands in the Living Murray Icon Sites. Murray–Darling Basin Authority, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, P. B., M. T. Rimmer & G. Wittwer, 2011. Saving the southern Murray–Darling Basin: the economic effects of a buyback of irrigation water. Economic Record 87: 153–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DWLBC, 2007. Construction of an environmental flow regulator on lower Chowilla Creek. Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 referral form, 2007/3307. Department of Water, Land & Biodiversity Conservation, Berri.

  • Falkenmark, M. & D. Molden, 2008. Wake up to realities of river basin closure. International Journal of Water Resources Development 24: 201–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foerster, A, 2008. Managing and protecting environmental water: lessons from the Gwydir for ecologically sustainable water management in the Murray Darling basin. Environmental Planning & Law Journal 25(1): 130–153.

  • Foerster, A., 2011. Developing purposeful and adaptive institutions for effective environmental water governance. Water Resources Management: 1–14.

  • GMW, 2010. Hattah Lakes Living Murray Floodplain Management Project. Referral of proposed action, 2010/5662. Goulburn-Murray Water, Tatura.

  • Grafton, R. Q., 2011. Economic costs and benefits of the proposed Basin Plan. In Connell, D. & R. Q. Grafton (eds), Basin Futures: Water Reform in the Murray–Darling Basin. ANU E Press, Canberra: 254–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grafton, R. Q., H. L. Chu, M. Stewardson, & T. Kompas, 2011. Optimal dynamic water allocation: irrigation extractions and environmental tradeoffs in the Murray River, Australia. Water Resources Research 47: W00G08.

  • Hall, K. C., D. S. Baldwin, G. N. Rees & A. J. Richardson, 2006. Distribution of inland wetlands with sulfidic sediments in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia. Science of the Total Environment 370: 235–244.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Howitt, J. A., D. S. Baldwin, G. N. Rees & J. L. Williams, 2007. Modelling blackwater: predicting water quality during flooding of lowland river forests. Ecological Modelling 203: 229–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HRSCRA, 2011. Of Drought and Flooding Rains. Inquiry into the Impact of the Guide to the Murray–Darling Basin Plan. House of Representatives Standing Committee on Regional Australia, The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra.

  • Jolly, I., R. Crosbie, K. McEwan, K. Holland, S. Lamontagne, K. Moe & C. Simmons, 2008. Project 054121: Surface Water–Groundwater Interactions in River Murray Wetlands and Implications for Water Quality and Ecology. CSIRO, Adelaide.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. J. & I. G. Stuart, 2008. Regulated floodplains – a trap for unwary fish. Fisheries Management & Ecology 15: 71–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G., T. Hillman, R. Kingsford, T. McMahon, K. Walker, A. Arthington, J. Whittington & S. Cartwright, 2002. Independent Report of the Expert Reference Panel on Environmental Flows and Water Quality Requirements for the River Murray System. Cooperative Research Centre for Freshwater Ecology, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, A. J. & J. P. O’Connor, 2007. Native fish entrapment in irrigation systems: a step towards understanding the significance of the problem. Ecological Management & Restoration 8: 32–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, A. J., K. A. Ward, P. O’Connor, D. Green, Z. Tonkin & J. Mahoney, 2010. Adaptive management of an environmental watering event to enhance native fish spawning and recruitment. Freshwater Biology 55: 17–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingsford, R. T., K. Brandis, R. F. Thomas, P. Crighton, E. Knowles & E. Gale, 2004. Classifying landform at broad spatial scales: the distribution and conservation of wetlands in New South Wales, Australia. Marine & Freshwater Research 55: 17–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koehn, J. D., A. J. Hobday, M. S. Pratchett & M. Gillanders, 2011. Climate change and Australian marine and freshwater environments, fishes and fisheries: synthesis and options for adaptation. Marine & Freshwater Research 62: 1148–1164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lankford, B. A., 2003. Environmental water requirements: a demand management perspective. Journal of the Chartered Institution of Water & Environmental Management 17: 19–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, J., I. Stuart, D. Ramsey & J. O’Mahony, 2010. The effect of water level on lateral movements of fish between river and off-channel habitats and implications for management. Marine & Freshwater Research 61: 271–278.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MDBA, 2010. Guide to the Proposed Basin Plan: Overview. Murray–Darling Basin Authority, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • MDBA, 2011a. The Living Murray Story. One of Australia’s Largest River Restoration Projects. Murray–Darling Basin Authority, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • MDBA, 2011b. The Living Murray Annual Implementation Report 2009–10 and Audit of the Living Murray Implementation. MDBA Publication Number 143/11. Murray–Darling Basin Authority, Canberra.

  • MDBA, 2011c. Proposed Basin Plan, Water Act 2007. Murray–Darling Basin Authority, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • MDBC, 2004. Native Fish Strategy for the Murray–Darling Basin 2003–2013. Murray–Darling Basin Commission, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • MDBC, 2006a. The Chowilla Floodplain and Lindsay–Wallpolla Islands Icon Site Environmental Management Plan 2006–2007. MDBC Publication No. 33/06. Murray–Darling Basin Commission, Canberra.

  • MDBC, 2006b. The Gunbower–Koondrook–Pericoota Forest Icon Site Environmental Management Plan 2006–2007, MDBC Publication No. 32/06. Murray–Darling Basin Commission, Canberra.

  • MDBLGF, 2011. Communique 27 May 2011. Murray–Darling Basin Water Ministers Meet in Adelaide. Canberra: Murray-Darling Basin Ministerial Council. Retrieved 30 June 2011, from http://www.mdba.gov.au/files/Communique-Ministerial-Council-Meeting-5-27-May-2011_v1.pdf.

  • MDBMC, 2003. Murray Darling Basin Ministerial Council Communique, 14 Nov 2003. Retrieved 21 Nov 2008, from http://www.mdbc.gov.au/_data/page/1589/MC34_communique_Nov-03.pdf.

  • MDBMC, 2004. The Living Murray Environmental Works and Measures Program. Murray–Darling Basin Ministerial Council, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA), 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minister for the Environment, 2011. Western Riverina National Parks, Hansard, Legislative Council, 6 Sept 2011. Parliament of New South Wales, Sydney.

  • Moreno-Mateos, D., M. Power, F. A. Comın & R. Yockteng, 2012. Structural and functional loss in restored wetland ecosystems. PLoS Biology 10: e1001247.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • NCCMA, 2005. Flooding enhancement of Gunbower Forest. Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 referral form, 2005/1994. North Central Catchment Management Authority, Huntley.

  • Nelson, D. R., 2010. Adaptation and resilience: responding to a changing climate. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 2: 113–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nevill, J., 2009. Managing cumulative impacts: groundwater reform in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia. Water Resources Management 23: 2605–2631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NWC, 2009. Australian Water Reform 2009: Second Biennial Assessment of Progress in Implementation of the National Water Initiative, Sept 2009. National Water Commission, Canberra.

  • NWC, 2011. The National Water Initiative – Securing Australia’s Water Future: 2011 Assessment. National Water Commission, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Water, 2009. Koondrook–Perricoota Forest Flood Enhancement Works. Referral of proposed action, 2009/5115. NSW Office of Water, Sydney.

  • Palmer, M. A., E. S. Bernhardt, J. D. Allan, P. S. Lake, G. Alexander, S. Brooks, J. Carr, S. Clayton, C. N. Dahm, J. Follstad Shah, D. L. Galat, S. G. Loss, P. Goodwin, D. D. Hart, B. Hassett, R. Jenkinson, G. M. Kondolf, R. Lave, J. L. Meyer, T. K. O’Donnell, L. Pagano & E. Sudduth, 2005. Standards for ecologically successful river restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology 42: 208–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pittock, J., 2010. A pale reflection of political reality: integration of global climate, wetland, and biodiversity agreements. Climate Law 1: 343–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pittock, J., 2011. National climate change policies and sustainable water management: Conflicts and synergies. Ecology & Society 16: 25 (online).

  • Pittock, J. & C. M. Finlayson, 2011a. Freshwater ecosystem conservation in the Basin: principles versus policy. In Connell, D. & R. Q. Grafton (eds), Basin Futures: Water Reform in the Murray–Darling Basin. ANU E Press, Canberra: 39–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pittock, J. & C. M. Finlayson, 2011b. Australia’s Murray–Darling Basin: freshwater ecosystem conservation options in an era of climate change. Marine & Freshwater Research 62: 232–243.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pittock, J. & J. Hartmann, 2011. Taking a second look: climate change, periodic re-licensing and better management of old dams. Marine & Freshwater Research 62: 312–320.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pittock, J. & B. A. Lankford, 2010. Environmental water requirements: demand management in an era of water scarcity. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences 7: 75–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pittock, J., C. M. Finlayson, A. Gardner & C. McKay, 2010. Changing character: the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands and climate change in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia. Environmental & Planning Law Journal 27: 401–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saintilan, N. & I. Overton (eds), 2010. Ecosystem Response Modelling in the Murray–Darling Basin. CSIRO, Collingwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiklomanov, I. A. (ed.), 1997. Assessment of Water Resources and Water Availability in the World. World Meteorological Organization & Stockholm Environment Institute, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, I. G., B. P. Zampatti & L. J. Baumgartner, 2008. Can a low-gradient vertical-slot fishway provide passage for a lowland river fish community? Marine & Freshwater Research 59: 332–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WGCS, 2011. Statement on the 2011 Draft Murray–Darling Basin Plan. Wentworth Group of Concerned Scientists, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitworth, K. L. & D. S. Baldwin, 2011. Reduced sulfur accumulation in salinised sediments. Environmental Chemistry 8: 198–206.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • World Water Assessment Programme (WWAP), 2009. The United Nations World Water Development Report 3: Water in a Changing World. UNESCO Publishing & Earthscan, Paris.

  • Young, W. J., N. Bond, J. Brookes, B. Gawne & G. J. Jones, 2011. Science review of the estimation of an environmentally sustainable level of take for the Murray–Darling Basin. Final Report to the Murray–Darling Basin Authority. CSIRO, Canberra.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jamie Pittock.

Additional information

Guest editor: C. Max Finlayson / Wetlands and climate change: ecological outcomes and adaptation as shown by Australian case studies

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pittock, J., Finlayson, C.M. & Howitt, J. Beguiling and risky: ‘environmental works and measures’ for wetland conservation under a changing climate. Hydrobiologia 708, 111–131 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-012-1292-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-012-1292-9

Keywords