Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Do environmental changes or juvenile competition act as mechanisms of species displacement in crayfishes?

  • Primary Research Paper
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Big Creek Crayfish, Orconectes peruncus, is native to the St. Francis River drainage in Missouri, USA and is often absent where the introduced Woodland Crayfish, Orconectes hylas, has established. We performed a field experiment to determine whether effects of current abiotic conditions and interspecific competition with O. hylas were responsible for displacement of O. peruncus from parts of their former range. We examined growth and survival of juvenile male O. peruncus exposed to juvenile male O. hylas in enclosures at two sites in the former range of O. peruncus. Enclosures contained 8 (low density) or 16 individuals (high density) and had O. peruncus only (control) or both species (interspecific treatment). Juvenile O. peruncus were able to survive and grow in portions of their former range, implicating biotic versus abiotic factors in the displacement of O. peruncus. Survival rates of O. peruncus did not differ among treatments at either site. Orconectes peruncus showed significant growth in all treatments and interspecific effects were not greater than intraspecific effects on O. peruncus growth rates. High-density treatments showed significantly reduced O. peruncus growth rates compared to low-density treatments, except in Carver Creek interspecific treatments. When considered in the context of previous studies examining the effects of O. hylas on O. peruncus, results suggest that neither direct competition between juvenile males of the two species or abiotic change are responsible for the decreased range of O. peruncus. Additional research is required to determine the mechanism(s) driving the displacement of O. peruncus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allert, A. L., J. F. Fairchild, R. J. DiStefano, C. J. Schmitt, W. G. Brumbaugh & J. M. Besser, 2009. Ecological effects of lead mining on Ozark streams: in situ toxicity to woodland crayfish (Orconectes hylas). Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 72: 1207–1219.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, D. A. & P. A. Moore, 2003. Field observations of intraspecific agonistic behavior of two crayfish species, Orconectes rusticus and Orconectes virilis, in different habitats. Biological Bulletin 205: 26–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berrill, M. & M. Arsenault, 1984. The breeding behaviour of a northern temperate orconectid crayfish, Orconectes rusticus. Animal Behaviour 32: 333–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boone, M., 2001. St. Francis River watershed inventory and assessment. Missouri Department of Conservation [available on internet at http://www.mdc.mo.gov/fish/watershed/stfranc/contents/380cotxt.htm]. Accessed November, October 21, 2010.

  • Bovee, K. D. & R. Milhouse, 1978. Hydraulic simulation in instream flow studies: theory and techniques. Instream Flow Information Paper Number 5. FWS/OBS-78/33. Cooperative Instream Flow Service Group, Fort Collins, Colorado.

  • Byers, J. E., 2002. Impact of non-indigenous species on natives enhanced by anthropogenic alteration of selection regimes. Oikos 97: 449–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capelli, G. M. & B. L. Munjal, 1982. Aggressive interactions and resource competition in relation to species displacement among crayfish in the genus Orconectes. Journal of Crustacean Biology 2: 486–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chucholl, C., H. B. Stich & G. Maier, 2008. Aggressive interactions and competition for shelter between a recently introduced and an established invasive crayfish: Orconectes immunis vs. O. limosus. Fundamental and Applied Limnology 172: 27–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creaser, E. P., 1931. Three new crayfishes (Cambarus) from Puebla and Missouri. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan 224: 1–10.

  • Cruz, M. J., R. Rebelo & E. G. Crespo, 2006. Effects of an introduced crayfish, Procambarus clarkii, on the distribution of south-western Iberian amphibians in their breeding habitats. Ecography 29: 329–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiStefano, R. J., 2008. Conservation of imperiled crayfish—Orconectes (Procericambarus) peruncus (Creaser, 1931) (Decapoda: Cambaridae). Journal of Crustacean Biology 28: 189–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiStefano, R. J., J. Young & D. B. Noltie, 2002. A study of the life history of Orconectes hylas with comparisons to Orconectes peruncus and Orconectes quadruncus in Ozark streams, USA. Freshwater Crayfish 13: 439–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J., H. E. McClymont, M. Christmas & A. M. Dunn, 2009. Competition and parasitism in the native White Clawed Crayfish Austropotamobius pallipes and the invasive Signal Crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus in the UK. Biological Invasions 11: 315–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faxon, W., 1890. Notes on North American crayfishes, family Astacidae. Proceedings of the US National Museum 12: 619–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortino, K. & R. P. Creed Jr., 2007. Abiotic factors, competition or predation: what determines the distribution of young crayfish in a watershed? Hydrobiologia 575: 301–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garvey, J. E., R. A. Stein & H. M. Thomas, 1994. Assessing how fish predation and interspecific prey competition influence a crayfish assemblage. Ecology 75: 532–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guan, R. & P. R. Wiles, 1997. Ecological impact of introduced crayfish on benthic fishes in a British lowland river. Conservation Biology 11: 641–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, J. M., P. A. Chambers & E. E. Prepas, 1990. Selective foraging by the crayfish Orconectes virilis and its impact on macroinvertebrates. Freshwater Biology 24: 69–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, A. M. & D. M. Lodge, 1999. Replacement of resident crayfishes by an exotic crayfish: the roles of competition and predation. Ecological Applications 9: 678–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inouye, B. D., 2001. Response surface experimental designs for investigating interspecific competition. Ecology 82: 2696–2706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, E. R. & D. D. Magoulick, 2009. Does juvenile competition explain displacement of a native crayfish by an introduced crayfish? Biological Invasions 11: 725–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, E. R. & J. D. Olden, 2010. Latent extinction and invasion risk of crayfishes in the Southeastern United States. Conservation Biology 24: 1099–1110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, D. M., C. A. Taylor, D. M. Holdich & J. Skurdal, 2000. Nonindigenous crayfishes threaten North American freshwater biodiversity: lessons from Europe. Fisheries 25(8): 7–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazlum, Y. & A. G. Eversole, 2005. Growth and survival of Procambarus acutus acutus (Girard, 1852) in competitive settings. Aquaculture Research 36: 537–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Missouri Natural Heritage Program, 2011. Missouri species and communities of conservation concern checklist. Jefferson City, MO.

  • Olsen, M. T., D. M. Lodge, G. M. Capelli & R. J. Houlihan, 1991. Mechanisms of impact of an introduced crayfish (Orconectes rusticus) on littoral congeners, snails, and macrophytes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 48: 1853–1861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkyn, S. M., K. J. Collier & B. J. Hicks, 2001. New Zealand stream crayfish: functional omnivores but trophic predators? Freshwater Biology 46: 641–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, W. L., J. L. Feder, G. Dwyer & D. M. Lodge, 2001. Hybrid zone dynamics and species replacement between Orconectes crayfishes in a Northern Wisconsin lake. Evolution 55: 1153–1166.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pflieger, W. L., 1996. The crayfishes of Missouri. Missouri Department of Conservation. Jefferson City, Missouri: 152pp.

  • Rabalais, M. R. & D. D. Magoulick, 2006. Is competition with the invasive Orconectes neglectus chaenodactylus responsible for the displacement of the native crayfish Orconectes eupunctus? Biological Invasions 8: 1039–1048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabeni, C. F., 1985. Resource partitioning by stream-dwelling crayfish: the influence of body size. American Midland Naturalist 113: 20–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahm, E. J., S. A. Griffith, D. B. Noltie & R. J. DiStefano, 2005. Laboratory agonistic interactions demonstrate failure of an introduced crayfish to dominate two imperiled endemic crayfishes. Crustaceana 78: 437–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riggert, C. M., R. J. DiStefano & D. B. Noltie, 1999. Distributions and selected aspects of the life histories and habitat associations of the crayfishes Orconectes peruncus (Creaser, 1931) and O. quadruncus (Creaser, 1933) in Missouri. American Midland Naturalist 142: 348–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, H. K., P. Smietana, T. Maiwald, B. Oidtmann & R. Schulz, 2006. Case studies on the co-occurrence of Astacus astacus (L.) and Orconectes limosus (Raf.): snapshots of a slow displacement. Freshwater Crayfish 15: 212–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Söderbäck, B., 1994. Interactions among juveniles of two freshwater crayfish species and a predatory fish. Oecologia 100: 229–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Söderhäll, K. & L. Cerenius, 1999. The crayfish plague fungus: history and recent advances. Freshwater Crayfish 12: 11–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strahler, A. N., 1957. Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 38: 913–920.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. A., G. A. Schuster, J. E. Cooper, R. J. DiStefano, A. G. Eversole, P. Hamr, H. H. Hobbs III, H. W. Robison, C. E. Skelton & R. F. Thoma, 2007. A reassessment of the conservation status of crayfishes of the United States and Canada after 10+ year of increased awareness. Fisheries 32(8): 372–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau, 2000. 2000 TIGER/Line Census Files (data files on CD-ROM). Washington, DC.

  • Usio, N., M. Konishi & S. Nakano, 2001. Species displacement between an introduced and a ‘vulnerable’ crayfish: the role of aggressive interactions and shelter competition. Biological Invasions 3: 179–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westhoff, J. T., C. F. Rabeni, & S. P. Sowa, 2011. The distribution of one invasive and two native crayfishes in relation to coarse-scale natural and anthropogenic factors. Freshwater Biology 56: 2415–2431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitledge, G. W. & C. F. Rabeni, 1997. Energy sources and ecological role of crayfishes in an Ozark stream: insights form stable isotope and gut analysis. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 54: 2555–2563.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Missouri Department of Conservation, the Missouri Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, and the Arkansas Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit. J. Baker assisted with study coordination and field sampling. J. Barnes, K. Bradley, A. Foster, C. Jansen, S. Longing, K. McCabe, and M. Moore assisted with field sampling. A. Allert and S. Olsen of the United States Geological Survey Columbia Environmental Research Center provided the enclosures. The manuscript was improved by comments from E. Rahm and E. Larson and two anonymous reviewers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Missouri Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, University of Missouri-Columbia, 302 Anheuser Busch Natural Resources Building, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA

    Jacob T. Westhoff

  2. Missouri Department of Conservation, Resource Science Center, 1110 South College Avenue, Columbia, MO, 65201, USA

    Robert J. Distefano

  3. U.S. Geological Survey, Arkansas Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, 72701, USA

    Daniel D. Magoulick

Authors
  1. Jacob T. Westhoff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert J. Distefano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Daniel D. Magoulick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacob T. Westhoff.

Additional information

Handling editor: John Havel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Westhoff, J.T., Distefano, R.J. & Magoulick, D.D. Do environmental changes or juvenile competition act as mechanisms of species displacement in crayfishes?. Hydrobiologia 683, 43–51 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-011-0939-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-011-0939-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation