Hydrobiologia

, Volume 680, Issue 1, pp 171–178

Assessing the range of newly established invasive species in rivers using probabilistic methods

  • I. Jarić
  • G. Cvijanović
  • A. Hegediš
  • M. Lenhardt
Primary Research Paper

Abstract

Data on the presence of invasive species are often scarce, especially during the initial period following their introduction, when population abundance and species detectability are both still very low. In such cases, sporadic sightings in their newly occupied territory are often the only available information about their presence and distribution. Here, we demonstrate the potential of using probabilistic models for the assessment of the distribution of newly established invasive species in rivers, based on their sighting records. We have applied Solow’s equation to the sighting record of the Amur sleeper (Perccottus glenii) in the Danube River, to assess the probable range of its population. The method applied indicated that, at the time when the sightings have been made (2003–2008), the Amur sleeper population in the Danube most probably extended between the 704.5 and 1,178.5 river km, while it was highly improbable (P < 0.05) that it was present downstream from the 606 river km or upstream from the 1,277 river km. The application of this approach has, however, to be tested further on a larger number of scenarios and case studies in order to evaluate its reliability. What this method lacks in complexity, compared to more advanced species distribution assessments, it makes up by its ability to be easily used and quickly applied for preliminary assessments of the ranges of riverine species. As a result, the proposed approach might be of interest for scientists and managers dealing with invasive species.

Keywords

Introduced species Species distribution assessment Sighting record Amur sleeper Perccottus glenii Danube 

References

  1. Britton, J. R., J. Pegg & R. E. Gozlan, 2011. Quantifying imperfect detection in an invasive pest fish and the implications for conservation management. Biological Conservation 144: 2177–2181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Burgman, M. A., R. C. Grimson & S. Ferson, 1995. Inferring threat from scientific collections. Conservation Biology 9: 923–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ćaleta, M., D. Jelić, I. Buj, D. Zanella, Z. Marčić, P. Mustafić & M. Mrakovčić, 2011. First record of the alien invasive species rotan (Perccottus glenii Dybowski, 1877) in Croatia. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 27: 146–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Covaciu-Marcov, S.-D., I. C. Telcean & S. Ferenti, 2011. Range extension of Perccottus glenii Dybowski, 1877 in Western Romania, a new distribution route in the Danube River Basin? Journal of Applied Ichthyology 27: 144–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. DeVaney, S. C., K. M. McNyset, J. B. Williams, A. T. Peterson & E. O. Wiley, 2009. A tale of four “carp”: invasion potential and ecological niche modeling. PLoS One 4: e5451.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Grogan, C. S. & J. Boreman, 1998. Estimating the probability that historical populations of fish species are extirpated. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 18: 522–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gormley, A. M., D. M. Forsyth, P. Griffioen, M. Lindeman, D. S. L. Ramsey, M. P. Scroggie & L. Woodford, 2011. Using presence-only and presence–absence data to estimate the current and potential distributions of established invasive species. Journal of Applied Ecology 48: 25–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hegediš, A., M. Lenhardt, B. Mićković, G. Cvijanović, I. Jarić & Z. Gačić, 2007. Amur sleeper (Perccottus glenii Dubowski, 1877) spreading in the Danube River Basin. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 23: 705–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jarić, I. & T. Ebenhard, 2010. A method for inferring extinction based on sighting records that change in frequency over time. Wildlife Biology 16: 267–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jarić, I., M. Lenhardt, G. Cvijanović & T. Ebenhard, 2009. Acipenser sturio and Acipenser nudiventris in the Danube–extant or extinct? Journal of Applied Ichthyology 25: 137–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jurajda, P., M. Vassilev, M. Polacik & T. Trichkova, 2006. A first record of Perccottus glenii (Perciformes: Odontobutidae) in the River Danube in Bulgaria. Acta Zoologica Bulgarica 58: 279–282.Google Scholar
  12. Koščo, J., S. Lusk, K. Halačka & V. Luskova, 2003. The expansion and occurrence of the Amur sleeper (Perccottus glenii) in eastern Slovakia. Folia Zoologica 52: 329–336.Google Scholar
  13. Lenhardt, M., G. Markovic, A. Hegedis, S. Maletin, M. Cirkovic & Z. Markovic, 2011. Non-native and translocated fish species in Serbia and their impact on the native ichthyofauna. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 21: 407–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Marshall, C. R., 1990. Confidence intervals on stratigraphic ranges. Paleobiology 16: 1–10.Google Scholar
  15. McInerny, G. J., D. L. Roberts, A. J. Davy & P. J. Cribb, 2006. Significance of sighting rate in inferring extinction and threat. Conservation Biology 20: 562–567.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Popa, L. O., O. P. Popa, E. I. Pisică, A. Iftime, S. Matacă, F. Diaconu & D. Murariu, 2006. The first record of Perccottus glenii Dybowski, 1877 (Pisces: Odontobutidae) and Ameiurus melas Rafinesque, 1820 (Pisces: Ictaluridae) from the Romanian sector of the Danube. Travaux du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle “Grigore Antipa” 49: 323–329.Google Scholar
  17. Qiu, H. & Y. F. Chen, 2009. Bibliometric analysis of biological invasions research during the period of 1991 to 2007. Scientometrics 81: 601–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Regan, T. J., M. A. McCarthy, P. W. J. Baxter, F. S. Panetta & H. P. Possingham, 2006. Optimal eradication: when to stop looking for an invasive plant. Ecology Letters 9: 759–766.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Reshetnikov, A. N., 2003. The introduced fish, rotan (Perccottus glenii), depresses populations of aquatic animals (microinvertebrates, amphibians, and fish). Hydrobiologia 510: 83–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Reshetnikov, A. N., 2004. The fish Perccottus glenii: history of introduction to western regions of Eurasia. Hydrobiologia 522: 349–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Reshetnikov, A. N., 2010. The current range of Amur sleeper Perccottus glenii Dybowski 1877 (Odontobutidae, Pisces) in Eurasia. Russian Journal of Biological Invasions 1: 119–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rivadeneira, M. M., G. Hunt & K. Roy, 2009. The use of sighting records to infer species extinctions: an evaluation of different methods. Ecology 90: 1291–1300.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Roberts, D. L. & A. R. Solow, 2003. When did the dodo become extinct? Nature 426: 245.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rout, T. M., Y. Salomon & M. A. McCarthy, 2009. Using sighting records to declare eradication of an invasive species. Journal of Applied Ecology 46: 110–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Simonović, P., S. Marić & V. Nikolić, 2006. Records of Amur sleeper Perccottus glenii (Odontobutidae) in Serbia and its recent status. Archives of Biological Sciences 58: 7P–8P.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Smolik, M. G., S. Dullinger, F. Essl, I. Kleinbauer, M. Leitner, J. Peterseil, L. -M. Stadler & G. Vogl, 2010. Integrating species distribution models and interacting particle systems to predict the spread of an invasive alien plant. Journal of Biogeography 37: 411–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Solow, A. R., 1993a. Inferring extinction from sighting data. Ecology 74: 962–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Solow, A. R., 1993b. Inferring extinction in a declining population. Journal of Mathematical Biology 32: 79–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Solow, A. R., 2005. Inferring threat from a sighting record. Mathematical Biosciences 195: 47–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Strauss, D. & P. M. Sadler, 1989. Classical confidence intervals and Bayesian probability estimates for ends of local taxon ranges. Mathematical Geology 21: 411–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Šipoš, Š., B. Miljković & Lj. Pejčić, 2004. The first record of Amur sleeper (Perccottus glenii Dybowski, 1877, fam. Odontobutidae) in the Danube River. International Association for Danube Research 35: 509–510.Google Scholar
  32. Václavík, T. & R. Meentemeyer, 2009. Invasive species distribution modeling (iSDM): Are absence data and dispersal constraints needed to predict actual distributions? Ecological Modelling 220: 3248–3258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. Jarić
    • 1
    • 2
    • 4
  • G. Cvijanović
    • 1
  • A. Hegediš
    • 1
  • M. Lenhardt
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute for Multidisciplinary ResearchBelgradeSerbia
  2. 2.Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland FisheriesBerlinGermany
  3. 3.Institute for Biological ResearchBelgradeSerbia
  4. 4.BelgradeSerbia

Personalised recommendations