Biodiversity loss in Appalachian headwater streams (Kentucky, USA): Plecoptera and Trichoptera communities
Government and academic studies indicate that many streams in the Appalachian Mountains have degraded biological communities stemming from a variety of regional landuses. Headwater stonefly (Plecoptera) and caddisfly (Trichoptera) assemblages were assessed between 1999 and 2004 in relation to pervasive landuse disturbances (coal mining and residential) in mountainous areas of eastern Kentucky, USA. Indicator metrics (richness, abundance, tolerance, and an observed/expected (O/E) null model) were compared among 94 sites with different land use pressures including least disturbed reference, residential, mining, and mixed mining and residential categories. Thirty-three stonefly species from 26 genera and 9 families were identified; Leuctra, Acroneuria, Haploperla, and Isoperla comprised the core genera that commonly decreased with disturbance. Caddisflies were represented by 48 species, 32 genera, and 14 families. Core caddisfly genera (Neophylax, Pycnopsyche, Rhyacophila, Lepidostoma, and Wormaldia) were extirpated from most disturbed sites. Species richness was significantly higher at reference sites and reference site mean tolerance value was lowest compared to all other categories; relative abundance of both orders was variable between disturbance groups. Non-metric multidimensional scaling (for riffle-dwelling stonefly and caddisfly genera) clustered reference sites distinctly from most other sites. The O/E index was highly correlated with individual habitat and chemical stressors (pH, conductivity) and on average, it estimated ~ 70% loss of common stoneflies and caddisflies across all disturbed landuse categories. Expected plecopteran and trichopteran communities were radically altered in streams draining mining and residential disturbance. Long-term impacts incurred by both landuses will continue to depress these vulnerable indigenous fauna.
KeywordsBenthic macroinvertebrates Bioassessment EPT Coal mining Residential development Conductivity
- Barbour, M. T., J. Gerritsen, B. D. Snyder & J. B. Stribling, 1999. Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers: periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates, and fish, second edition. EPA 841-B-99-002. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Braun, E. L., 1950. Deciduous Forests of North America. Hafner, New York, NY.Google Scholar
- Chambers, D. B., & T. Messinger, 2000. Benthic invertebrate communities and their responses to selected environmental factors in the Kanawha River Basin, West Virginia, Virginia, and North Carolina. Water-resources investigations report 01-4021. US geological survey, Charleston, West Virgina.Google Scholar
- Crichton, M. I. & D. B. Fisher, 1982. Records of caddisflies (Trichoptera) from Rothamsted light traps at field centres. Field Studies 5: 569–579.Google Scholar
- Cuffney, T. F., H. Zappia, E. M. P. Giddings & J. F. Coles, 2005. Effects of urbanization on benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages in contrasting environmental settings: Boston, Massachusetts; Birmingham, Alabama; and Salt Lake City, Utah. American Fisheries Society Symposium 47: 361–407.Google Scholar
- deMoor, F. C. & V. D. Ivanov, 2007. Global diversity of caddisflies (Trichoptera: Insecta) in freshwater. Hydrobiologia 595: 393–407.Google Scholar
- Fochetti, R. & J. M. T. de Figueroa, 2008. Global diversity of stoneflies (Plecoptera: Insecta) in freshwater. Hydrobiologia 595: 365–377.Google Scholar
- Griffith, M. B., E. M. Barrows & S. A. Perry, 1998. Lateral dispersal of adult aquatic insects (Plecoptera, Trichoptera) following emergence from headwater streams in forested Appalachian catchments. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 91: 195–201.Google Scholar
- Harding, J. S., J. M. Quinn & C. W. Hickey, 2000. Effects of mining and production forestry. In Collier, K. J. & M. J. Winterbourn (eds), New Zealand Stream Invertebrates: Ecology and Implications for Management. New Zealand Limnological Society, Christchurch: 230–259.Google Scholar
- Howard, H. S., B. Berrang, M. Flexner, G. Pond & S. Call, 2001. Kentucky mountaintop mining benthic macroinvertebrate survey. Appendix in Mountaintop mining/valley fills in Appalachia. Final programmatic environmental impact statement. Region 3, US Environmental Protection Agency, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania [available on internet at http://www.epa.gov/region3/mtntop/pdf/Appendices/Appendix%20D%20Aquatic/Kentucky%20Macroinvertebrate%20Study/report.pdf].
- Karr, J. R. & E. W. Chu, 1999. Restoring Life in Running Waters. Island Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- KYDEP (Kentucky Department for Environmental Protection), 2007. Kentucky administrative regulations, 401 KAR 5:031 Section 4. Kentucky Department for Environmental Protection, Frankfort, Kentucky [available on internet at http://www.lrc.ky.gov/kar/401/010/031.htm].
- KYDEP (Kentucky Department for Environmental Protection), 2009. Laboratory procedures for macroinvertebrate processing, taxonomic identification, and reporting. Kentucky Energy and Environment Cabinet [available on internet at http://water.ky.gov/Documents/QA/Surface%20Water%20SOPs/BenthicMacroinvertebratesLabProcessingandIdentificationSOP.pdf].
- MacDonald, L. E. & D. Coe, 2007. Influence of headwater streams on downstream reaches in forested areas. Forest Science 53: 148–168.Google Scholar
- Malmqvist, B. & P. Hoffsten, 1999. Influence of drainage from old mine deposits on benthic macroinvertebrate communities in central Swedish streams. Water Resources 33: 2415–2423.Google Scholar
- McCune, B. & J. B. Grace, 2002. Analysis of Ecological Communities. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, OR.Google Scholar
- McCune, B. & M. J. Mefford, 1999. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data. Version 4.25. MjM Software, Gleneden Beach, OR.Google Scholar
- Merritt, R. W., K. W. Cummins & T. M. Burton, 1984. The role of aquatic insects in the processing and cycling of nutrients. In Resh, V. H. & D. M. Rosenberg (eds), The Ecology of Aquatic Insects. Praeger Publishers, New York, NY: 134–163.Google Scholar
- Morse, J. C., B. P. Stark, W. P. McCafferty & K. J. Tennessen, 1997. Southern Appalachian and other southeastern streams at risk: implications for mayflies, dragonflies, stoneflies, and caddisflies. In Benz, G. W. & D. E. Collins (eds), Aquatic Fauna in Peril: The Southeastern Perspective. Special Publication 1. Southeastern Aquatic Research Institute. Lenz Design and Communications, Decatur, GA: 17–42, 554.Google Scholar
- Petty, J. T., J. B. Fulton, M. P. Strager, G. T. Merovich, J. M. Stiles & P. F. Ziemkiewicz, 2010. Landscape indicators and thresholds of stream ecological impairment in an intensively mined Appalachian watershed. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 29: 1292–1309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pond, G. J. & S. E. McMurray, 2002. A macroinvertebrate bioassessment index for headwater streams in the eastern coalfield region, Kentucky. Kentucky Department for Environmental Protection, Division of Water, Frankfort, KY [available on internet at http://water.ky.gov/Documents/QA/Surface%20Water%20SOPs/Historic%20SOPs/EKyMBI.pdf].
- Pond, G. J., S. C. Call, J. F. Brumley & M. C. Compton, 2003. The Kentucky macroinvertebrate bioassessment index: derivation of regional narrative criteria for headwater and wadeable streams. Kentucky Department for Environmental Protection, Division of Water, Frankfort, KY [available on internet at http://water.ky.gov/Documents/QA/MBI/Statewide_MBI.pdf].
- Stephan, C. E., D. I. Mount & D. J. Hanson, 1985. Guidelines for deriving numeric National Water Quality Criteria for the protection of aquatic organisms and their uses. PB85-227049. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC [available on internet at http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/criteria/library/85guidelines.pdf].
- U.S. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency), 2005. Mountaintop Mining/Valley Fills in Appalachia, Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement [available on internet at http://www.epa.gov/region3/mtntop/index.htm].
- U.S. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency), 2011a. The effects of mountaintop mines and valley fills on aquatic ecosystems of the Central Appalachian coalfields. EPA/600/R-09/138F. Office of Research and Development, National Center for Environmental Assessment, Washington, DC [available on internet at http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/cfm/recordisplay.cfm?deid=225743].
- U.S. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency), 2011b. A field-based aquatic life benchmark for conductivity in Central Appalachian streams. EPA/600/R-10/023F. Office of Research and Development, National Center for Environmental Assessment, Washington, DC [available on internet at http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/cfm/recordisplay.cfm?deid=220171].
- Wallace, J. B., M. E. Gurtz & F. Smith-Cuffney, 1988. Long-term comparison of insect abundances in disturbed and undisturbed Appalachian headwater streams. Internationale Vereinigung fur theoretische und angewandte Limnologie. 23: 1224–1231.Google Scholar
- Webster, J. R., S. W. Golladay, E. F. Benfield, J. L. Meyer, W. T. Swank & J. B. Wallace, 1992. River conservation and management. In Boon, P. J., P. Calow & G. E. Petts (eds), Catchment Disturbance and Stream Response: An Overview of Stream Research at Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory. Wiley, New York: 231–253.Google Scholar
- Woods, A. J., J. M. Omernik, W. H. Martin, G. J. Pond, W.M Andrews, S. M. Call, J. A. Comstock & D. D. Taylor, 2002. Ecoregions of Kentucky (2 sided color poster with map, descriptive text, summary tables, and photographs), Reston, VA, US Geological Survey (map scale 1:1,000,000).Google Scholar
- Wright, I. A. & S. Burgin, 2009. Comparison of sewage and coal-mine wastes on stream macroinvertebrates within an otherwise clean upland catchment, southeastern Australia. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 204: 2227–2241.Google Scholar