, Volume 661, Issue 1, pp 187–196 | Cite as

Response of a native, herbivorous snail to the introduced seaweed Sargassum muticum

  • Kevin H. Britton-SimmonsEmail author
  • Benjamin Pister
  • Iñigo Sánchez
  • Daniel Okamoto
Primary research paper


The role of native consumers in mediating biological invasions is poorly understood. In theory, there are reasons to expect both strong and weak effects of native consumers on non-native species. However, non-native ranges may include multiple regions or even continents, each with its own suite of consumers and invader–consumer interactions may play out differently in different places and times. In this Washington State (USA) study we found that the common herbivorous snail Lacuna vincta was 2–9 times more abundant on the non-native seaweed Sargassum muticum, compared to native kelps. Choice feeding trials with fresh tissue and artificial foods both suggest that S. muticum is a preferred food for Lacuna vincta. Lab experiments indicated that L. vincta did not experience diminished predation by two common predators on Sargassum muticum compared to native kelp hosts. Our results suggest that Sargassum experiences considerable herbivory by Lacuna vincta in our study region, a conclusion that is consistent with previous work and our own field observations. In our system, L. vincta and S. muticum have been coexisting in the same habitats for at least 50 years and available data suggest that it acquired a preference for S. muticum more than 30 years after the initial invasion. Comparison of our results to recent work on Sargassum–herbivore interactions in Europe suggests that the response of native consumer communities to S. muticum varies both within and among regions. Geographic and temporal variation in the response of native consumers are likely to be hallmarks of many large-scale invasions.


Enemy release Biotic resistance Sargassum muticum Lacuna vincta Biological invasion 



For helpful discussions about this work we thank E. Iyengar, B. Podolsky, D. Padilla, K. Roy, E. Parnell, J. Burnaford, and V. Thompsen. Thanks to C. Button for assistance in the field. Comments from two anonymous reviewers greatly improved the manuscript. Funding for this research came from the SeaDoc Foundation and The University of Chicago Hinds Fund. Friday Harbor Laboratories provided laboratory, boat and SCUBA facilities. I.S. was funded by a FICYT predoctoral fellowship from the Asturias Regional Government and by the ALIENS project (EVK3-CT2001-00062) of the European Union. K.B.S. was supported by a Department of Education GAANN fellowship during part of this study.


  1. Amsler, C. D. & V. A. Fairhead, 2006. Defensive and sensory chemical ecology of brown algae. Advances in Botanical Research 43: 1–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Britton-Simmons, K. H., 2004. Direct and indirect effects of the introduced alga Sargassum muticum on benthic, subtidal communities of Washington State, USA. Marine Ecology Progress Series 277: 61–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Colautti, R. I., A. Ricciardi, I. A. Grigorovich & H. J. MacIsaac, 2004. Is invasion success explained by the enemy release hypothesis? Ecology Letters 7: 721–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Conover, W. J., 1999. Practical Nonparametric Statistics, 3rd ed. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  5. Critchley, A. T., W. F. Farnham & S. L. Morrell, 1983. A chronology of new European sites of attachment for the invasive brown alga, Sargassum muticum, 1973–1981. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the UK 63: 799–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cronin, G. & M. E. Hay, 1996. Within-plant variation in seaweed palatability and chemical defenses: optimal defense theory versus the growth-differentiation balance hypothesis. Oecologia 105: 361–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Darwin, C. S., 1859. The Origin of Species. Random House, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Duffy, J. E. & M. E. Hay, 2002. Strong impacts of grazing amphipods on the organization of a benthic community. Ecological Monographs 70: 237–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Duggins, D. O., 1983. Starfish predation and the creation of mosaic patterns in a kelp-dominated community. Ecology 64: 1610–1619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Duggins, D. O., J. E. Eckmann, C. E. Siddon & T. Klinger, 2001. Interactive roles of mesograzers and current flow in survival of kelps. Marine Ecology Progress Series 223: 143–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Elton, C. S., 1958. The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  12. Engelen, A. H., C. Espirito-Santo, T. Simoes, C. Monteiro, E. A. Serrao, G. A. Pearson & R. O. Santon, 2008. Periodicity of propagule expulsion and settlement in the competing native and invasive brown seaweeds, Cystoseira humilis and Sargassum muticum (Phaeophyta). European Journal of Phycology 43(3): 275–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Giver, K. J., 1999. Effects of the invasive seaweed Sargassum muticum on native marine communities in Northern Puget Sound, Washington. M.S. Thesis. Western Washington University, WA.Google Scholar
  14. Goodsell, P. J. & A. J. Underwood, 2008. Complexity and idiosyncrasy in the responses of algae to disturbance in mono- and multi-species assemblages. Oecologia 157: 509–519.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Griswold, M. W. & L. P. Lounibos, 2004. Does differential predation permit invasive and native mosquito larvae to coexist in Florida? Ecological Entomology 30: 122–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hammerstrom, K., M. N. Dethier & D. O. Duggins, 1998. Rapid phlorotannin induction and relaxation in five Washington kelps. Marine Ecology Progress Series 165: 293–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harding, J. M., 2003. Predation by blue crabs, Callinectes sapidus, on rapa whelks, Rapana venosa: possible natural controls for an invasive species? Journal of Experimental Marine Biology & Ecology 297(2): 161–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hay, M. E., 1996. Marine chemical ecology: what’s known and what’s next? Journal of Experimental Marine Biology & Ecology 200: 103–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hay, M. E., Q. E. Kappel & W. Fenical, 1994. Synergisms in plant defenses against herbivores: interactions of chemistry, calcification, and plant quality. Ecology 75(6): 1714–1726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hokanen, H. M. T. & D. Pimentel, 1989. New associations in biological control—theory and practice. Canadian Entomologist 121: 829–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Johnson, K. H. & C. R. Mann, 1986. The importance of plant defence abilities to the structure of subtidal seaweed communities: the kelp Laminaria longicruris de la Pylaie survives grazing by the snail Lacuna vincta (Montagu) at high population densities. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology & Ecology 97: 231–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Keane, R. M. & M. J. Crawley, 2002. Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17(4): 164–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kraan, S., 2008. Sargassum muticum (Yendo) Fensholt in Ireland: an invasive species on the move. Journal of Applied Phycology 20: 825–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Levine, J. M. & C. M. D’Antonio, 1999. Elton revisited: a review of evidence linking diversity and invisibility. Oikos 87: 15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Levine, J. M., P. B. Adler & S. G. Yelenik, 2004. A meta-analysis of biotic resistance to exotic plant invasions. Ecology Letters 7: 975–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jensen, G. C., P. S. McDonald & D. A. Armstrong, 2007. Biotic resistance to European green crab, Carcinus maenas, in California bays. Marine Biology 151: 2231–2243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lyons, D. A. & R. E. Scheibling, 2008. Context-dependent survival of the invasive seaweed Codium fragile ssp. tomentosoides in kelp bed and urchin barren habitats off Nova Scotia. Aquatic Biology 2: 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Monteiro, C. A., A. H. Engelen & R. O. P. Santos, 2009. Macro- and mesoherbivores prefer native seaweeds over the invasive brown seaweed Sargassum muticum: a potential regulating role on invasions. Marine Biology 156: 2505–2515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nearshore Habitat Program, 2001. The Washington State ShoreZone Inventory. Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, WA.Google Scholar
  30. Norton, S. F., 1988. Role of the gastropod shell and operculum in inhibiting predation by fishes. Science 241: 92–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Norton, T. A. & M. R. Benson, 1983. Ecological interactions between the brown seaweed Sargassum muticum and its associated fauna. Marine Biology 75: 169–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Parker, J. D. & M. E. Hay, 2005. Biotic resistance to plant invasions? Native herbivores prefer non-native plants. Ecology Letters 8(9): 959–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Reusch, T. B. H., 1998. Native predators contribute to invasion resistance to the non-indigenous bivalve Musculista senhousia in southern California, USA. Marine Ecology Progress Series 170: 159–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Scagel, R. F., 1956. Introduction of a Japanese alga, Sargassum muticum, into the Northeast Pacific. Washington Department of Fisheries. Fisheries Research Papers 1: 1–10.Google Scholar
  35. Setzer, B. & C. Link, 1971. The wanderings of Sargassum muticum and other relations. Stomatopod 2: 5–6.Google Scholar
  36. Sjotun, K., S. F. Eggereide & T. Hoisaeter, 2007. Grazer-controlled recruitment of the introduced Sargassum muticum (Phaeophyceae, Fucales) in northern Europe. Marine Ecology Progress Series 342: 127–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Strong, J. A., C. A. Maggs & M. P. Johnson, 2009. The extent of grazing release from epiphytism for Sargassum muticum (Phaeophyceae) within the invaded range. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the UK 89(2): 303–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Targett, N. M. & T. M. Arnold, 1998. Predicting the effects of brown algal phlorotannins on marine herbivores in tropical and temperate oceans. Journal of Phycology 34(2): 195–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Toth, G. B. & H. Pavia, 2002. Lack of phlorotannin induction in the kelp Laminaria hyperborea in response to grazing by two gastropod herbivores. Marine Biology 140(2): 403–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Trowbridge, C. D., 1995. Establishment of the green alga Codium fragile ssp. tomentosoides on New Zealand rocky shores: current distribution and invertebrate grazers. Journal of Ecology 83: 949–965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Trowbridge, C. D., 2002. Local elimination of Codium fragile ssp. Tomentosoides: indirect evidence of sacoglossan herbivory? Journal of the Marine Biological Association UK 82: 1029–1030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vadas, R. L., 1977. Preferential feeding: an optimization strategy in sea urchins. Ecological Monographs 47: 337–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Viejo, R. M., 1999. Mobile epifauna inhabiting the invasive Sargassum muticum and two local seaweeds in northern Spain. Aquatic Botany 64: 131–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Williamson, M. H., 1996. Biological Invasions. Chapman and Hall, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kevin H. Britton-Simmons
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  • Benjamin Pister
    • 1
    • 4
  • Iñigo Sánchez
    • 2
  • Daniel Okamoto
    • 3
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Ecology and EvolutionThe University of ChicagoChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biología de Organismos y SistemasThe University of OviedoOviedoSpain
  3. 3.Friday Harbor LaboratoriesUniversity of WashingtonFriday HarborUSA
  4. 4.National Park ServiceCabrillo National MonumentSan DiegoUSA
  5. 5.Department of Ecology, Evolution and Marine BiologyUniversity of California, Santa BarbaraSanta BarbaraUSA

Personalised recommendations