, Volume 661, Issue 1, pp 163–177 | Cite as

The contribution of man-made ditches to the regional stream biodiversity of the new river watershed in the Florida panhandle

  • Troy N. Simon
  • Joseph Travis
Primary research paper


The role of ditches as reservoirs for or contributors to regional diversity has rarely been assessed. In this study, we aimed (1) to assess the effect of ditches on aquatic faunal assemblages of first order streams and (2) to assess the extent to which the animal communities in altered streams that are crossed by ditches resembled those found in nearby natural streams. We examined the fauna of four different aquatic habitats of the New River watershed in the Florida Panhandle: (1) natural streams, (2) altered streams, (3) ditches that cross the altered streams, and (4) ditches that do not cross the altered streams, sampling these habitats in three geographically distinct sites and visiting each location three times during a summer. Ditches did not have the same environmental features as streams and as a result their faunal community did not completely mimic those of natural streams. Streams contained 50% less aquatic vegetation and more canopy cover, while natural streams were more acidic than any other habitat. The connected altered stream and ditch habitats contained the highest biodiversity, while natural streams contained the lowest. Our ordination of taxonomic composition did not reveal any significant differences between habitats. However, natural streams were more likely to contain Hyalella spp., Oligochaetes, and Palaemonetes spp. than other sites, yet did not contain Baetidae spp., Naucorida spp., Trepobate spp., Dolomedes okefinokensis, Leptolucania ommata, or any Centrarcids. These results indicate the importance of ditches within this system as a reservoir for and contributor to regional stream biodiversity and this finding should be taken into consideration by managers for the conservation of the regional freshwater biodiversity.


Biodiversity Connectivity Ditches Macroinvertebrates Streams Wetlands 



We thank Ace Haddock of Tates Hell State Forest who not only helped with his extensive knowledge of the State Forest hydrology and history, but for allowing the study to be conducted. We thank Travis Mcdevitt Galles and George Waynside for their help in the field sampling. We thank Brian Inouye, Nora Underwood, Felicia Coleman, and the members of their labs for all their help, encouragement, and loaned supplies. Excellent final revisions were provided by two anonymous reviewers and the associate editor of Hydrobiologia. Support for this work was provided through NSF award DEB 0822547 to J. Travis and M. Schrader.


  1. Amarasinghe, U. S. & R. L. Welcomme, 2002. An analysis of fish species richness in natural lakes. Environmental Biology of Fishes 65: 327–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armitage, P. D., K. Szoszkiewicz, J. H. Blackburn & I. Nesbitt, 2003. Ditch communities: a major contributor to floodplain biodiversity. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 13: 165–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benke, A. C., 1978. Interactions among coexisting predators–a field experiment with dragonfly nymphs. Journal of Animal Ecology 47: 335–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blanko, S., S. Romo & M. J. Villena, 2004. Experimental study on the diet of mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki) under different ecological conditions in a shallow lake. International Review of Hydrobiology 89: 250–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chick, J. H., F. Jordan, J. P. Smith & C. C. McIvor, 1992. A comparison of four enclosure traps and methods used to sample fishes in aquatic macrophytes. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 7: 353–361.Google Scholar
  6. Claret, C., P. Marmonier, M. Dole-Olivier & M. J. Castella, 1999. Effects of management works on the interstitial fauna of floodplain aquatic systems (River Rhone, France). Biodiversity and Conservation 8: 1179–1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cowley, D. E., R. C. Wissmar & R. Sallenave, 2007. Fish assemblages and seasonal movements of fish in irrigation canals and river reaches of the middle Rio Grande, New Mexico (USA). Ecology of Freshwater Fish 16: 548–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crowder, L. B. & W. E. Cooper, 1982. Habitat structural complexity and the interaction between bluegills and their prey. Ecology 63: 1802–1813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davies, B., J. Biggs, P. Williams, M. Whitfield, P. Nicolet, D. Sear, S. Bray & S. Maund, 2008. Comparative biodiversity of aquatic habitats in the European agricultural landscape. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 125: 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Bie, T., S. Declerck, K. Martens, L. De Meester, L. Brendonck, 2008. A comparative analysis of cladoceran communities from different water body types: patterns in community composition and diversity. Hydrobiologia 597: 19–27.Google Scholar
  11. Declerck S., J. Vandekerkhove, L. Johansson, K. Muylaert, J. M. Conde-Porcuna, K. Van der Gucht, C. Perez-Martinez, T. Lauridsen, K. Schwenk, G. Zwart, W. Rommens, J. Lopez-Ramos, E. Jeppesen, W. Vyverman, L. Brendonck, L. De Meester, 2005. Multi-group biodiversity in shallow lakes along gradients of phosphorus and water plant cover. Ecology 86: 1905–1915.Google Scholar
  12. Diehl, S., 1992. Fish predation and benthic community structure: the role of omnivory and habitat complexity. Ecology 73: 1646–1661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Diehl, S., 1993. Effects of habitat structure on resource availability, diet and growth of benthivorous perch, Perca fluviatilis. Oikos 67: 403–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Diehl, S., 1995. Direct and indirect effects of omnivory in a littoral lake community. Ecology 76: 1727–1740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dwyer, F. J., S. A. Burch, C. G. Ingersoll & J. B. Hunn, 1992. Toxicity of trace element and salinity mixtures to striped bass (Morone saxatilis) and Daphnia magna. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 11: 513–520.Google Scholar
  16. Eddy, S. & J. C. Underhill, 1978. How to know the Freshwater Fishes, 3rd ed. Wm. C. Brown Company Publishers, Dubuque, IA, USA.Google Scholar
  17. Fisher, S. G. & G. E. Likens, 1973. Energy flow in Bear Brook, New Hampshire: an integrative approach to stream ecosystem metabolism. Ecological Monographs 43: 421–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Flecker, A. S., 1996. Ecosystem engineering by a dominant detritivore in a diverse tropical stream. Ecology 77: 1845–1854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Greathouse, E. A., C. M. Pringle, W. H. McDowell & J. G. Holmquist, 2006. Indirect upstream effects of dams: consequences of migratory consumer extirpation in Puerto Rico. Ecological Applications 16: 339–352.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Gresens, S. E., K. T. Belt, J. A. Tang, D. C. Gwinn & P. A. Banks, 2007. Temporal and spatial responses of Chironomidae (Diptera) and other benthic invertebrates to urban stormwater runoff. Hydrobiologia 575: 173–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gunzburger, M. S. & J. Travis, 2004. Evaluating predation pressure on green treefrog larvae across a habitat gradient. Oecologia 140: 422–429.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hanson, M. A. & M. G. Butler, 1994. Responses to food web manipulation in a shallow waterfowl lake. Hydrobiologia 279(280): 457–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hawkins, C. P., M. L. Murphy & N. H. Anderson, 1982. Effect of canopy, substrate composition, and gradient on the structure of macroinvertebrate communities in cascade range streams of Oregon. Ecology 63: 1840–1856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Heltshe, J. F. & N. E. Forrester, 1983a. Species richness using the jackknife procedure. Biometrics 39: 1–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Heltshe, J. F. & N. E. Forrester, 1983b. Estimating diversity using quadrat sampling. Biometrics 39: 1073–1076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hernandez, O., R. W. Meritt & M. S. Wipfli, 2005. Benthic invertebrate community structure is influenced by forest succession after clearcut logging in southeastern Alaska. Hydrobiologia 533: 45–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Herzon, I. & J. Helenius, 2008. Agricultural drainage ditches, their biological importance and functioning. Biological Conservation 141: 1171–1183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hooper, D. U., F. S. Chapin, J. J. Ewel, A. Hector, P. Inchausti, S. Lavorel, J. H. Lawton, D. M. Lodge, M. Loreau, S. Naeem, B. Schmid, H. Setala, A. J. Symstad, J. Vandermeer & D. A. Wardle, 2005. Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecological Monographs 75: 3–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hrabik, T. R., B. K. Greenfield, D. B. Lewis, A. I. Pollard, K. A. Willson & T. K. Kratz, 2005. Landscape-scale variation in taxonomic diversity in four groups of aquatic organisms: the influence of physical, chemical, and biological properties. Ecosystems 8: 301–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hurlbert, S. H., J. Zedler & D. Fairbanks, 1972. Ecosystem alteration by mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis) predation. Science 175: 639–641.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Johnson, L. E. & J. T. Carlton, 1996. Post-establishment spread in large-scale invations: dispersal mechanisms of the zebra mussel Dreissena polymorpha. Ecology 77: 1686–1690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jordan, F. S., S. Coyne, J. C. Trexler, 1997. Sampling fishes in vegetated habitats: effects of habitat structure on sampling characteristics of the 1-m(2) throw trap. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society. 126(6): 1012–1020.Google Scholar
  33. Kennish, M. J., 2001. Coastal salt marsh systems in the US: a review of anthropogenic impacts. Journal of Coastal Research 17: 731–748.Google Scholar
  34. Lawler, S. P., D. Dritz, T. Strange & M. Holyoak, 1999. Effects of introduced mosquitofish and bullfrogs on the threatened California red-legged frog. Conservation Biology 13: 613–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Legendre, P. & L. Legendre, 1998. Numerical Ecology, 2nd ed. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  36. Leips, J. & J. Travis, 1999. The comparative expression of life-history traits and its relationship to the numerical dynamics of four populations of the Least Killifish. Journal of Animal Ecology 68: 595–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lemly, A. D., S. E. Finger & M. K. Nelson, 1993. Sources and impacts of irrigation drainwater contaminants in arid wetlands. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 12: 2265–2279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lloyd, M., 1967. Mean crowding. Journal of Animal Ecology 36: 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lomolino, M. V. & M. D. Weiser, 2001. Towards a more general species-area relationship: diversity on all islands, great and small. Journal of Biogeography 28: 431–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Marerolle, M. J., 2004. Drainage ditches facilitate frog movements in a hostile landscape. Landscape Ecology 20: 579–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mauritzen, M., P. J. M. Bergers, H. P. Andreassen, H. Bussink & R. Barendse, 1999. Root vole movement patterns: do ditches function as habitat corridors? The Journal of Applied Ecology 36: 409–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Merritt, R. W. & K. W. Cummins (eds.), 1996. An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America, 3rd ed. Kendall/Hunt publishing company, Dubuque, IA, USA.Google Scholar
  43. Nicolet, P., J. Biggs, G. Fox, M. J. Hodson, C. Reynolds, M. Whitfield & P. Williams, 2004. The wetland plant and macroinvertebrate assemblages of temporary ponds in England and Wales. Biological Conservation 120: 261–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Paul, M. J. & J. L. Meyer, 2001. Streams in the urban landscape. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 32: 333–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Poff, L. N., D. J. Allan, M. B. Bain, J. R. Karr, K. L. Prestegaard, B. D. Richter, R. E. Sparks & J. C. Stromberg, 1997. The natural flow regime. Bioscience 47: 769–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pringle, G. M., 2001. Hydrologic connectivity and the management of biological reserves: a global perspective. Ecological Applications 11: 981–998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pyke, G. H., 2008. Plauge minnow or mosquito fish? A review of the biology and impacts of introduced Gambusia species. The Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 39: 171–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Raymond, H. L., 1979. Effects of dams and impoundments on migrations of juvenile chinook salmon and steelhead from the Snake River, 1966 to 1975. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 85: 505–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rehage, J. S. & J. C. Trexler, 2006. Assessing the net effect of anthropogenic disturbance on aquatic communities in wetlands: community structure relative to distance from canals. Hydrobiolobia 569: 359–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Reyjol, Y., M. A. Rodriguez, N. Dubuc, P. Magnan & F. Rejean, 2008. Among- and within-tributary responses of riverine fish assemblages to habitat features. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 65: 1379–1392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Richardson, J. M. L., M. S. Gunzburger & J. Travis, 2006. Variation in predation pressure as a mechanism underlying differences in numerical abundance between populations of the poeciliid fish Heterandria formosa. Oecologia 147: 596–605.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Rozas, L. P. & W. E. Odum, 1988. Occupation of submerged aquatic vegetation by fishes: testing the roles of food and refuge. Oecologia 77: 101–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ruesink, J. L. & D. S. Srivastava, 2001. Numerical and per capita responses to species loss: mechanisms maintaining ecosystem function in a community of stream insect detritivores. OKIOS 93: 221–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schaefer, J. F., S. T. Heulett, T. M. Farrell, 1994. Interaction between two poeciliid fishes (Gambusia holbrooki and Heterandria formosa) and their prey in a Florida marsh. Copeia: 516–520.Google Scholar
  55. Scheffer, M., A. A. Achterberg & B. Beltman, 1984. Distribution of macro-invertebrates in a ditch in relation to the vegetation. Journal of Freshwater Biology 14: 367–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Schueler, T., 1994. The importance of imperviousness. Watershed Protection Techniques 1: 100–111.Google Scholar
  57. Sheer, M. B. & E. A. Steel, 2006. Lost watersheds: barriers, aquatic habitat connectivity, and salmon persistence in the willamette and lower columbia river basins. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 135: 654–1669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Simpson, K. W., R. W. Bode & J. R. Colquhoun, 1985. The macroinvertebrate fauna of an acid-stressed headwater stream in the Adirondack moundains, New-York. The Journal of Freshwater Biology 15: 671–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Smith, E. P. & G. van Belle, 1984. Nonparametric estimation of species richness. Biometrics 40: 119–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Srivastava, D. S., J. B. Cardinale, L. A. Downing, E. J. Duffy, C. Jouseau, M. Sankaran & J. P. Wright, 2009. Diversity has stronger top-down than bottom-up effects on decomposition. Ecology 90: 1073–1083.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Stackelberg, P. E., 1997. Presence and distribution of chlorinated organic compounds in streambed sediments, New Jersey. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 33: 271–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Suren, A. M., L. Paul, K. Image & B. K. Sorrell, 2008. Variation in wetland invertebrate communities in lowland acidic fens and swamps. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 53: 727–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Therriault, T. W. & J. Kolasa, 1999. Physical determinants of richness, diversity, evenness and abundance in natural aquatic microcosms. Hydrolobia 412: 123–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Turner, A. M. & J. C. Trexler, 1997. Sampling aquatic invertebrates from marshes: evaluating the options. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 16: 694–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Valiela, I., 2006. Global Coastal Change. Blackwell, Malden, MA.Google Scholar
  66. Vannote, R. L., G. W. Minshall, K. W. Cummins, J. R. Sedell & C. E. Cushing, 1980. The river continuum concept. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 37: 130–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Welch, P. S., 1948. Limnological Methods. Mc Graw-Hill, New York: 381.Google Scholar
  68. Williams, P., M. Whitfield, J. Biggs, S. Bray, G. Fox, P. Nicolet & D. Sear, 2003. Comparative biodiversity of rivers, streams, ditches and ponds in an agricultural landscape in southern England. Biological Conservation 115: 329–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Woodward, G. & A. G. Hildrew, 2002. The impact of sit-and-wait predator: separating consumption and prey emigration. OKIOS 99: 409–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Troy N. Simon
    • 1
    • 2
  • Joseph Travis
    • 2
  1. 1.Odum School of EcologyUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biological ScienceFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA

Personalised recommendations