High-resolution satellite remote sensing of littoral vegetation of Lake Sevan (Armenia) as a basis for monitoring and assessment
- 439 Downloads
Physics-based remote sensing in littoral environments for ecological monitoring and assessment is a challenging task that depends on adequate atmospheric conditions during data acquisition, sensor capabilities and correction of signal disturbances associated with water surface and water column. Airborne hyper-spectral scanners offer higher potential than satellite sensors for wetland monitoring and assessment. However, application in remote areas is often limited by national restrictions, time and high costs compared to satellite data. In this study, we tested the potential of the commercial, high-resolution multi-spectral satellite QuickBird for monitoring littoral zones of Lake Sevan (Armenia). We present a classification procedure that uses a physics-based image processing system (MIP) and GIS tools for calculating spatial metrics. We focused on classification of littoral sediment coverage over three consecutive years (2006–2008) to document changes in vegetation structure associated with a rise in water levels. We describe a spectral unmixing algorithm for basic classification and a supervised algorithm for mapping vegetation types. Atmospheric aerosol retrieval, lake-specific parameterisation and validation of classifications were supported by underwater spectral measurements in the respective seasons. Results revealed accurate classification of submersed aquatic vegetation and sediment structures in the littoral zone, documenting spatial vegetation dynamics induced by water level fluctuations and inter-annual variations in phytoplankton blooms. The data prove the cost-effective applicability of satellite remote-sensing approaches for high-resolution mapping in space and time of lake littoral zones playing a major role in lake ecosystem functioning. Such approaches could be used for monitoring wetlands anywhere in the world.
KeywordsRemote sensing Littoral vegetation Water level fluctuations Spectral unmixing Inversion QuickBird
We thank the SEMIS team and our other Armenian partners for supporting the project activities. A special thanks goes to the EOMAP company for support in processing and parameterisation tasks. Finally, we gratefully thank the VW Foundation for financial support of this study.
- Agyemang, T. K., J. Heblinski, K. Schmieder, H. Sayadyan & L. Vardanyan, 2010. Accuracy assessment of supervised classification of submersed macrophytes: the case of the Gavaraget region of Lake Sevan, Armenia. Hydrobiologia. doi: 10.1007/s10750-010-0465-7.
- Albert, A. & C. D. Mobley, 2003. An analytical model for subsurface irradiance and remote sensing reflectance in deep and shallow case-2 waters. Optics Express 11: 2873–2890 [available on internet at http://opticsexpress./org/abstract.cfm?URI=OPEX-11-22-2873].Google Scholar
- Babayan, A., S. Hakobyan, K. Jenderedjian, S. Muradyan & M. Voscanov, 2006. Lake Sevan—Experience and Lessons Learned Brief: 347–362 [available on internet at http://www.ilec.or.jp/eg/lbmi/pdf/21_Lake_Sevan_27February2006.pdf].
- Blaschke, T., 2000. Landscape metrics: Konzepte eines jungen Ansatzes der Landschaftsökologie im Naturschutz. Archiv für Naturschutz & Landschaftsforschung 9: 267–299.Google Scholar
- Chilingaryan, A. L., B. P. Mnatsakanyan, K. A. Aghababyan & H. V. Toqmagyan, 2002. Hydrology of Rivers and Lakes of Armenia. Yerevan, Armenia.Google Scholar
- Dekker, A., V. Brando, J. Anstee, N. Pinnel, T. Kutser, H. Hoogenboom, R. Pasterkamp, S. Peters, R. Vos, C. Olbert & T. Malthus, 2001. Applications of imaging spectrometry in inland, estuarine, coastal and ocean waters. In van der Meer, F. D. & S. M. de Jong (eds), Imaging Spectrometry: Basic Principles and Prospective Applications, Volume IV of Remote Sensing and Digital Image Processing. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
- Dienst, M., K. Schmieder & W. Ostendorp, 2004. Effects of water level variations on the dynamics of the reed belts of Lake Constance. Limnologica 34: 29–36.Google Scholar
- Digital Globe, 2009 (1). QuickBird Product Description [available on internet at http://www.digitalglobe.com/index.php/85/QuickBird, accessed 24 February 2009].
- Digital Globe, 2009 (2). QuickBird Imagery Products, Product Guide, Revision 5.0 [available on internet at http://www.digitalglobe.com/index.php/6/DigitalGlobe+Products, accessed 03 March 2009].
- Govender, M., K. Chetty & H. Bulcock, 2007. A review of hyperspectral remote sensing and its application in vegetation and water resources studies. Water SA 33: 145–151.Google Scholar
- Haberäcker, P., 1991. Digitale Bildverarbeitung: Grundlagen und Anwendungen. Carl Hanser Verlag, München, Wien.Google Scholar
- Heege, T., A. Bogner & N. Pinnel, 2003. Mapping of submerged aquatic vegetation with a physically based process chain. Proceedings of Remote Sensing, SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering, Vol. 5233. CD-ROM Proceedings.Google Scholar
- Heege, T., C. Häse, A. Bogner & N. Pinnel, 2004. Physikalisch basierte Prozessierung multispektraler Fernerkundungsdaten von Binnengewässern. Laufener Seminarbeiträge, Bayer. Akad. f. Naturschutz u. Landschaftspflege 03: 67–71.Google Scholar
- Heege, T., P. Hausknecht & H. Kobryn, 2006. Hyperspectral seafloor mapping and direct bathymetry calculation using HyMap data from the Ningaloo reef and Rottnest Island areas in Western Australia, CD-ROM. 13th ARSP Conference, 20–24 November 2006, Canberra, Australia: 1–7.Google Scholar
- Heege, T. & J. Fischer, 2004. Mapping of water constituents in Lake Constance using multispectral airborne scanner data and a physically based processing scheme. Canadian Journal Remote Sensing 30: 77–86.Google Scholar
- Jenderedjian, K., A. Babayan, S. Hakobyan, S. Muradyan & M. Voskanov, 2005. Managing Lakes and their Basins for Sustainable Use: A Report for Lake Basin Managers and Shareholders. ILEC Foundation, Kusatsu, Japan.Google Scholar
- Karibyan, M., 2007. Head of Meteorological Station, Sevan, Hydro-Meteorological Agency, Ministry of Nature Protection, Armenia. Personal Communication 4 August 2007.Google Scholar
- McGarigal, K., S. A. Cushman, M. C. Neel & E. Ene, 2002. FRAGSTATS: Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Categorical Maps [available on internet at http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html, accessed March 2010].
- MES-Armenia (Ministy of Emergency Situations), 2008. Hydro-Meteorological Agency. Communication November 2008.Google Scholar
- Miksa, S., T. Heege, V. Kisselev & P. Gege, 2005. Mapping water constituents in Lake Constance using Chris/Proba. Proceedings of the 3rd ESA Chris/Proba Workshop, Volume ESA SP-593, June 2005, Frascati, Italy. ESRIN.Google Scholar
- Petr, T., 2000. Interactions between fish and aquatic macrophytes in inland waters. A review. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 396. FAO, Rome: 185 pp.Google Scholar
- Pinnel, N., 2007. A Method for Mapping Submerged Macrophytes in Lakes using Hyperspectral Remote Sensing: 164 pp [available on internet at http://mediatum2.ub.tum.de/node?id=604557].
- Schmieder, K., M. Dienst & W. Ostendorp, 2002. Effects of the extreme flood in 1999 on the spatial dynamics and stand structure of the reed belts in Lake Constance. Limnologica 32: 131–146.Google Scholar
- Schmieder, K., A. Woithon, T. Heege & N. Pinnel, 2010. Remote sensing techniques and GIS modeling approaches for monitoring and assessment of littoral vegetation at Lake Constance, Germany. Verhandlungen International Verein Limnologie 30(10): 1–3.Google Scholar
- Schneider, S., 2007. Macrophyte trophic indicator values from a European perspective. Limnologica 37(4): 281–289.Google Scholar
- Strang, I. & M. Dienst, 2004. Effects of water level at Lake Constance on the Deschampsietum rhenanae from 1989 to 2003. Limnologica 34: 22–28.Google Scholar
- Woithon, A. & K. Schmieder, 2004. Bruthabitatmodellierung für den Drosselrohrsänger (Acrocephalus arundinaceus L.) als Bestandteil eines integrativen Managementsystems für Seeufer. Limnologica 34: 132–139.Google Scholar