, Volume 660, Issue 1, pp 117–124 | Cite as

Sedimentation of photosynthetic pigments during the bloom of the green sulfur bacterium Chlorobium phaeobacteroides in Lake Kinneret: spatial patterns



Sediment fluxes were studied in the subtropical Lake Kinneret (Israel) in 2006, 2007, and 2008 from mid-June to October, when lake was chemically stratified and the green sulfur bacterium Chlorobium phaeobacteroides formed a dense population in the anoxic metalimnion. The rate of seston accumulation in traps was measured with sedimentation traps positioned along an offshore transect connecting the littoral zone and lake center. The sediment fluxes increased from the lake center towards the littoral, while the percentage of organic material (OM) decreased correspondingly. High fluxes of bacteriochlorophyll e (BChl e—a signature pigment of Chl. phaeobacteroides) and chlorophyll a (Chl a—a marker for eukaryotic algae and cyanobacteria) were detected in all locations. The relative contributions of Chl a and BChl e to the bulk of the accumulated OM were higher in traps positioned below the thermocline in the pelagic zone than in traps located near the shore line. The presence of BChl e in traps exposed to oxic conditions in the littoral, where Chl. phaeobacteroides does not develop, implies horizontal translocation of cells from the lake center towards its periphery. We assume that seiche-mediated movement of particles embedded in the metalimnetic waters is the most probable explanation for the existence of Chl. phaeobacteroides tracer in an oxic environment, but do not exclude the possibility of resuspension of settled particles as source for BChl e in littoral traps. The green sulfur bacteria are potentially important component of the sediment flux of photosynthesizing organisms in a thermally stratified lake and should be taken into account when carbon budget are constructed.


Chlorophyll a Bacteriochlorophyll e Green sulfur bacteria Sedimentation 


  1. Antenucci, J. P., J. Imberger & A. Saggio, 2000. Seasonal evolution of the basin-scale internal wave field in a large stratified lake. Limnology and Oceanography 45: 1621–1638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bergstein, T., Y. Henis & B. Z. Cavari, 1979. Investigations on the photosynthetic sulfur bacterium Chlorobium phaeobacteroides causing seasonal blooms in Lake Kinneret. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 25: 999–1007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bloesch, J., 2004. Sedimentation and lake sediment formation. In O’Sullivan, P. E. & C. S. Reynolds (eds), The Lakes Handbook, vol. 2: Lake Restoration and Rehabilitation. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA: 197–229.Google Scholar
  4. Eckert, W. & A. Parparov, 2006. Feasibility study for monitoring dissolved and particulate carbon in Lake Kinneret, IOLR Report T15/06. Israel Oceanographic and Limnological Research, Tabgha.Google Scholar
  5. Eckert, W., J. Imberger & A. Saggio, 2002. Biogeochemical response to physical forcing in the water column of a warm monomictic lake. Biogeochemistry 61: 291–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Koren, N. & M. Klein, 2000. Rate of sedimentation in Lake Kinneret, Israel: spatial and temporal variations. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 25: 895–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Koren, N. & I. Ostrovsky, 2002. Sedimentation in a stratified subtropical lake. Verhandlungen der internationale Vereinigung für Limnologie 27: 2636–2639.Google Scholar
  8. Leavitt, P. R. & D. A. Hodgson, 2001. Sedimentary pigments. In Smol, J. P., H. J. B. Birks & W. M. Last (eds), Tracking Environmental Changes Using Lake Sediments, Vol. 3. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: 295–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lemckert, C. J., J. P. Antenucci, A. Saggio & J. Imberger, 2004. Physical properties of turbulent benthic boundary layers generated by internal waves. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 130: 58–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lewis, J., A. S. D. Harris, K. J. Jones & R. L. Edmonds, 1999. Long term survival of marine planktonic diatoms and dinoflagellates in stored sediment samples. Journal of Plankton Research 21: 343–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lorke, A., 2007. Boundary mixing in the thermocline of a large lake. Journal of Geophysical Research C09019. doi: 10.1029/2006C004008.
  12. MacIntyre, S. & R. Jellison, 2001. Nutrient fluxes from upwelling and enhanced turbulence at the top of the pycnocline in Mono Lake, California. Hydrobiologia 466: 13–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Meyers, P. A. & R. Ishiwatari, 1993. Lacustrine organic geochemistry. An overview of indicators of organic matter sources and diagenesis in lake sediments. Organic Geochemistry 20: 867–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ostrovsky, I. & A. Sukenik, 2008. Spatial heterogeneity of biogeochemical parameters in a subtropical lake. In Mohanty, P. K. (ed.), Monitoring and Modeling Lakes and Coastal Environments. Springer, NewYork: 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ostrovsky, I. & Y. Yacobi, 1999. Organic matter and pigments in surface sediments: possible mechanisms of their horizontal distributions in a stratified lake. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 56: 1001–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ostrovsky, I. & Y. Z. Yacobi, 2009. Temporal evolution and spatial heterogeneity of ecosystem parameters in a subtropical lake. In Ciraolo, G., G. B. Ferreri & E. Napoli (eds), Proceedings 13th Workshop on Physical Processes in Natural Waters: 1–15. ISBN 978-88-903895-0-4.Google Scholar
  17. Pandolfini, E., I. Thys, B. Leporcq & J.-P. Descy, 2000. Grazing experiments with two freshwater zooplankters: fate of chlorophyll and carotenoid pigments. Journal of Plankton Research 22: 305–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Reynolds, C. S., 2006. Ecology of Phytoplankton. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rimmer, A., I. Ostrovsky & Y. Z. Yacobi, 2008. Light availability for Chlorobium phaeobacteroides development in Lake Kinneret. Journal of Plankton Research 30: 765–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Serruya, S., 1975. Wind, water temperature and motion in Lake Kinneret: general pattern. Verhandlungen Internationale Vereinigung für theoretische und angewandte Limnologie 19: 73–87.Google Scholar
  21. Sobek, S., E. Durisch-Kaiser, R. Zurbrügg, N. Wongfun, M. Wessels, N. Pasche & B. Wehrli, 2009. Organic carbon burial efficiency in lake sediments controlled by oxygen exposure time and sediment source. Limnology and Oceanography 54: 2243–2254.Google Scholar
  22. Yacobi, Y. Z. & I. Ostrovsky, 2008. Downward flux of organic matter and pigments in Lake Kinneret (Israel): relationships between phytoplankton and the material collected in sediment traps. Journal of Plankton Research 30: 1189–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Yacobi, Y. Z. & M. Schlichter, 2004. GIS application for mapping of phytoplankton using a multi-channel fluorescence probe derived information. In Chen, Y., K. Takara, I. D. Cluckie & F. H. De Smedt (eds), GIS and Remote Sensing in Hydrology, Water Resources and Environment. IHAS Publication 289. International Association of Hydrological Sciences Press, Wallinford, UK: 301–307.Google Scholar
  24. Yacobi, Y. Z. & T. Zohary, 2010. Carbon:chlorophyll a ratio, assimilation numbers and turnover times in Lake Kinneret phytoplankton. Hydrobiologia 639: 185–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Yacobi, Y. Z., W. Eckert, H. G. Trueper & T. Berman, 1990. High performance liquid chromatography detection of phototrophic bacterial pigments in aquatic environments. Microbial Ecology 19: 127–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Israel Oceanographic and Limnological ResearchYigal Allon Kinneret Limnological LaboratoryMigdalIsrael
  2. 2.Department of Marine Geosciences, Charney School of Marine SciencesUniversity of HaifaHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations