Skip to main content
Log in

The spatial heterogeneity of diatoms in eight southeastern Ohio streams: how far does a single riffle reach?

  • Primary research paper
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Periphyton is a commonly used biomonitoring tool for streams. Often only one or few riffles are sampled and assumed to be representative of a stream reach. Current literature focuses on periphyton heterogeneity at small scales, on individual rocks within a riffle, and larger scales, within watersheds or ecoregions. The intermediate scales, within single riffles or among riffles, have not been adequately addressed. The purpose of this research was to determine how many riffles must be sampled in order to represent a reach and whether the number of necessary riffles varied with stream health. Since periphyton is sensitive to habitat change, it was hypothesized that heterogeneity would be primarily partitioned among riffles. Eight to ten consecutive riffles were sampled at eight individual stream reaches. Sampled reaches were categorized based on previously collected bioassesment data: three non-attaining, three partially-attaining, and two fully-attaining water quality standards as defined by the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency. Data were analyzed using the Bray-Curtis Similarity Index, Hill’s N2 dominance diversity index, and the Acid Mine Drainage Diatom Index of Biotic Integrity. Diatoms appeared to be patchily distributed within a reach. This patchiness often led to varied relative abundance of common species and the introduction or loss of rare species among riffles. To account for this variation within a reach, at least two riffles should be sampled. However, a multimetric index may correctly classify a stream based on a one-riffle sample. Variation does not appear to correspond directly to stream health, but to species richness and diversity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anonymous, 1997. Data Logging Colorimeter Handbook. Hach Company, Loveland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battarbee, R. W., 1973. A new method for estimating absolute microfossil numbers with special reference to diatoms. Limnology and Oceanography 18: 647–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beisel, J., P. Usseglio-Polatera & J. Moreteau, 2000. The spatial heterogeneity of a river bottom: a key factor determining macroinvertebrate communities. Hydrobiologia 422(423): 163–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besse-Lototskaya, A., P. F. M. Verdonschot & J. A. Sinkeldam, 2006. Uncertainty in diatom assessment: sampling, identification and counting variation. Hydrobiologia 566: 247–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyero, L., 2003. The quantification of local substrate heterogeneity in streams and its significance for macroinvertebrate assemblages. Hydrobiologia 499: 161–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B. L., 2003. Spatial heterogeneity reduces temporal variability in stream insect communities. Ecology Letters 6: 316–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, S. D., S. Diehl, K. Kratz & O. Sarnelle, 1998. Implications of scale for patterns and processes in stream ecology. Australian Journal of Ecology 23: 27–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currie, R. J., 1999. Identification of ecosystem stressors in developing an enhancement plan for the Leading Creek watershed, Meigs County Ohio. Ph.D. Dissertation Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, April 14, 1999, Blacksburg, Virginia.

  • Edgar, L. A. & J. D. Picket-Heaps, 1984. Diatom locomotion. Progress in Phycological Research 3: 47–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebler, J. B., 2004. Mesoscale spatial variability of selected aquatic invertebrate community metrics from a minimally impaired stream segment. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 23: 616–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heino, J. & J. Soininen, 2005. Assembly rules and community models for unicellular organisms: patterns in diatoms of boreal streams. Freshwater Biology 50: 567–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heino, J., L. Pauliina & T. Muotka, 2004. Identifying the scales of variability in stream macroinvertebrate abundance, functional composition and assemblage structure. Freshwater Biology 49: 1230–1239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, B. H., A. T. Herlihy, P. R. Kaufmann, R. J. Stevenson, F. H. McCormick & C. B. Johnson, 2000. Use of periphyton assemblage data as an index of biotic integrity. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 19: 50–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hintze, J., 2004. NCSS and PASS. Number Cruncher Statistical Systems. Kaysville, Utah.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, M. G., 2001. Use of similarity measures for quality control of benthic diatom samples. Water Research 35: 2784–2788.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, M. G., A. Cazaubon, E. Coring, A. Dell’Uomo, L. Ector, B. Goldsmith, H. Guasch, J. Hürlimann, A. Jarlman, B. Kawecka, J. Kwandrans, R. Laugaste, E.-A. Lindstrøm, M. Leitao, P. Marvan, J. Padisác, E. Pipp, J. Prygiel, E. Rott, S. Sabater, H. van Dam & J. Vizinet, 1998. Recommendations for the routine sampling of diatoms for water quality assessments in Europe. Journal of Applied Phycology 10: 215–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korte, V. L. & D. W. Blinn, 1983. Diatom colonization on artificial substrata in pool and riffle zones studied by light and scanning electron microscopy. Journal of Phycology 19: 332–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovach, W. L., 1998. MVSP—A Multivariate Statistical Package for Windows, Ver, 3.0. Kovach Computing Services, Pentreath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krammer, K. & H. Lange-Bertalot, 1986–1991. Bacillariophyceae. Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa, 2. Fischer, Stuttgart: 1–4.

  • KYDOW (Kentucky Division of Water), 1993. Methods for Assessing Biological Integrity of Surface Waters. Kentucky Department of Environmental Protection, Frankfort.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindstrøm, E.-A., S. W. Johansen & T. Saloranta, 2004. Periphyton in running waters—long-term studies of natural variation. Hydrobiologia 521: 63–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, R. L. & Y. Pan, 1996. Benthic algal communities as biological monitors. In Stevenson, R. J., M. L. Bothwell & R. L. Lowe (eds), Algal Ecology. Academic Press, San Diego: 705–739.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Machová-Černá, K. & J. Neustupa, 2009. Spatial distribution of algal assemblages in a temperate lowland peat bog. International Review of Hydrobiology 94: 40–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthaei, C. D., C. Guggelberger & H. Huber, 2003. Local disturbance history affects patchiness of benthic river algae. Freshwater Biology 48: 1514–1526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCune, B. & J. B. Grace, 2002. Analysis of Ecological Communities. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan, Y., R. J. Stevenson, B. H. Hill, A. T. Herlihy & G. B. Collins, 1996. Using diatoms as indicators of ecological conditions in lotic systems: a regional assessment. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 15: 481–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Passy, S. I., 2001. Spatial paradigms of lotic diatom distribution: a landscape ecology perspective. Journal of Phycology 37: 370–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, R. & C. W. Reimer, 1966. The Diatoms Of The United States, Vol. 1. Monographs of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. No. 13.

  • Patrick, R. & C. W. Reimer, 1975. The Diatoms of the United States, Vol. 2, Part 1. Monographs of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. No. 13.

  • Potapova, M. & D. F. Charles, 2004. Potential use of rare diatoms as environmental indicators in U.S.A. rivers. In Poulin, M (ed.), Proceedings of the 17th International Diatom Symposium. Biopress Ltd., Bristol, UK: 281–295.

  • Prygiel, J., P. Carpentier, S. Almeida, M. Coste, J. C. Druart, L. Ector, D. Guillard, I. Mercier, P. Moncaut, M. Nazart, N. Nouchet, F. Peres, V. Peeters, F. Rimet & A. Rumeau, 2002. Determination of the biological diatom index (IBD NF T 90–354): results of an intercomparison exercise. Journal of Applied Phycology 14: 27–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rankin, E. T., 2005. Fish and Macroinvertebrate Study of Leading Creek. MBI Technical Report MB/2005-1. Prepared for Ohio DNR, District by the Midwest Biodiversity Institute, Columbus, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soininen, J., 2003. Heterogeneity of diatom communities in different spatial scales and current velocities in a turbid river. Archiv fuer Hydrobiologie 156: 551–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soininen, J. & M. Kokocinski, 2006. Regional diatom body size distributions in streams: Does size vary along environmental, spatial and diversity gradients? Ecoscience 13: 271–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, J. R., 1997. Scale-dependent determinants and consequences of benthic algal heterogeneity. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 16: 248–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, J. R. & L. L. Bahls, 1999. Periphyton protocols. In Barbour, M. T., J. Gerritsen, B. D. Snyder & J. B. Stibling (eds), Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Wadeable Rivers: Periphyton, Benthic Macroinvertebrates, and Fish, 2nd edn. EPA 841-B-99-002. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency office of water, Washington, DC, USA 6-1-6-23.

  • Wang, Y.-K., R. J. Stevenson & L. Metzmeier, 2005. Development and evaluation of a diatom-based Index of Biotic Integrity for the Interior Plateau Region, USA. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 24: 990–1008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellnitz, T. A., N. L. Poff, G. Cosyleón & B. Steury, 2001. Current velocity and spatial scale as determinants of the distribution and abundance of two rheophilic herbivorous insects. Landscape Ecology 16: 111–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zalack, J. T., N. J. Smucker & M. L. Vis, 2010. Development of a diatom index of biotic integrity for acid mine drainage impacted streams. Ecological Indicators 10: 287–295.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emily K. Hollingsworth.

Additional information

Handling editor: K. Martens

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 486 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hollingsworth, E.K., Vis, M.L. The spatial heterogeneity of diatoms in eight southeastern Ohio streams: how far does a single riffle reach?. Hydrobiologia 651, 173–184 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-010-0294-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-010-0294-8

Keywords

Navigation