Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Influence of fish-farming management on duck breeding in French fish pond systems

Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Cite this article

Abstract

Fish ponds host a relatively important share of the breeding population of waterfowl in Europe. The objective of this study was to investigate the influence of fish-farming management on the distribution of dabbling and diving duck breeding, in 103 fishponds from four regions important for duck breeding in France. Duck breeding in fish ponds was apparently influenced by food resource and nesting site availability. Dabbling duck pair density was generally higher when invertebrates were abundant in macrophytes beds and when competition for food with carps Cyprinus carpio was potentially decreased by lower fish stock biomass. Diving duck pair abundance seemed to be negatively influenced by low invertebrates biomasses in pond sediment and by the absence of large reed beds at the edge of waterbodies. The difference between dabbling and diving ducks was also confirmed by a study of the variation in brood numbers standardized by pair numbers. This brood:pair ratio corresponded to a measure of nesting success and the possible attraction of fish ponds for some broods hatched in neighbouring waterbodies. Dabbling duck brood:pair ratio was lower in one of the study regions where most of meadow areas surrounding fish ponds have been transformed into cereal crops in the past few decades. Diving duck brood:pair ratio was positively linked to pond fertilization due to fish farming. Fish farming, therefore, influenced duck breeding by an interaction between carp density and fertilization. We hypothesize that fertilization increases zooplankton density, thereby decreasing the competition between carps and waterfowl for benthic prey.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  • Albrecht, T., P. Musil & J. Cepak, 2000. Habitat selection of waterfowl broods on intensively managed fishponds in Czech Republic. Sylvia 36(suppl.): 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albrecht, T., D. Horak, J. Kreisinger, K. Weidinger, P. Klvana & T. C. Michot, 2006. Factors determining pochard nest predation along a wetland gradient. Journal of Wildlife Management 70: 784–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, G., 1981. Influence of fish on waterfowl in lakes. Anser 20: 21–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, D., K. Burnham, W. Gould & S. Cherry, 2001. Concerns about find effects that are actually spurious. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29: 311–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbe, J., O. Schlumberger & N. Bouretz, 2000. Evaluation de la production piscicole potentielle des étangs. Ingenierie – EAT 11: 49–62 (in French).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartonek, J. C. & J. J. Hickey, 1969. Selective feeding by juvenile diving ducks in summer. The Auk 86: 443–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouffard, S. H. & M. A. Hanson, 1997. Fish in waterfowl marshes: waterfowls manager’s perspective. Wildlife Society Bulletin 25: 146–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broyer, J., 2000. La Dombes, espace d’équilibre ou simple substrat pour la culture céréalière. Courrier de l’Environnement de l’INRA 40: 63–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broyer, J., 2002. Résultats comparés de la reproduction des anatidés dans trois principales régions de nidification de France: la Dombes, la Brenne, le Forez (in French with English summary: Comparative breeding success of Anatidae in three important breeding areas: the Dombes, the Brenne and the Forez). Alauda 70: 377–386.

  • Bukacinska, N., D. Bukacinski, J. P. Cygan, K. A. Dobrowolski & W. Kaczmarek, 1996. The importance of fishponds to waterfowl in Poland. Acta Hydrobiologica 37: 57–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, K. P. & D. R. Anderson, 1998. Model selection and inference. Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherry, S., 1998. Statistical tests in publications of the wildlife society. Wildlife Society Bulletin 26: 947–953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., 1994. The earth is round (p < .05). American Psychologist 49: 997–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conover, W. & R. Iman, 1981. Rank transformations as a bridge between parametric and nonparametric statistics. The American Statistician 35: 124–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, R. M., M. A. Hanson, C. Roy, N. H. Euliss, D. H. Johnson & M. G. Butler, 1998. Mallard duckling growth and survival in relation to aquatic invertebrates. Journal of Wildlife Management 62: 124–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cramp, S. & K. E. L. Simmons, 1977. Handbook of the Birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa. Volume I, Ostrich to Ducks. Oxford University Press, Oxford: 722 pp.

  • Crivelli, A. J., 1983. The destruction of aquatic vegetation by carps. Hydrobiologia 106: 37–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danell, K. & K. Sjőberg, 1982. Successional patterns of plant invertebrates and ducks in a man-made lake. Journal of Applied Ecology 9: 345–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desgranges, J. L. & C. Gagnon, 1994. Duckling response to changes in the trophic web of acidified lakes. Hydrobiologia 280: 207–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desgranges, J. L. & J. Rodrigue, 1986. Influence of acidity and competition with fish on the development of ducklings in Quebec. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 30: 743–750.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dirschl, H. J., 1969. Foods of lesser scarp and blue-winged teal in the Saskatchewan River Delta. Journal of Wildlife Management 33: 77–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, M. O. G., 1979. Competition between freshwater fish and goldeneyes for common prey. Oecologia 41: 99–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fanget, R., 1976. Contribution à l’écologie des étangs piscicoles de la Dombes: sur le régime alimentaire de la Carpe à miroirs Cyprinus carpio. Thèse, Université Lyon I (in French).

  • Giles, N., 1994. Tufted duck (Aythya fuligula) habitat use and brood survival increases after fish removal from gravel pit lakes. Hydrobiologia 279/280: 587–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giles, N., M. Street & R. M. Wright, 1990. Diet composition and prey preference of tench, Tinca tinca, common bream, Abramis brama, perch, Perca fluviatilis and roach, Rutilus rutilus, in two contrasting gravel pit lakes: potential trophic overlap with waterfowl. Journal of Fish Biology 37: 545–957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gőransson, G., J. Karlsson, S. G. Nilsson & S. Ulfstrand, 1975. Predation on bird nests in relation to antipredator aggression and nest density: an experimental study. Oïkos 26: 117–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, R. J., A. B. Sargeant, D. H. Johnson, L. M. Cowardin & T. L. Schaffer, 1995. Factors associated with duck nest success in the Prairie Pothole Region of Canada. Wildlife Monograph 128: 1–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grygiereck, E., 1979. Plankton as an ecological indication of the influence of the farming measures on ponds biocenosis. Polish Ecological Studies 5: 77–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guisan, A. & N. E. Zimmermann, 2000. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological Modeling 135: 147–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, M. A. & M. G. Butler, 1994. Response of plankton, turbidity and macrophytes to biomanipulation in a shallow prairie lake. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 51: 1180–1188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, D., R. Wright & M. Street, 1987. Survival of mallard ducklings and competition with fish for invertebrates on a flooded gravel quarry in England. Ibis 129: 159–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyer, V. M. & D. E. Canfield, 1994. Bird abundance and species richness on Florida lakes: influence of trophic status, lake morphology, and aquatic macrophytes. Hydrobiologia 297/280: 107–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen, O. W., 1991. Feeding behaviour of breeding Wigeon Anas penelope in relation to seasonal emergence and swarming behaviour of chironomids. Ardea 79: 409–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D., 1999. The insignificance of statistical significance testing. Journal of Wildlife Management 63: 763–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joyner, D. E., 1980. Influence of invertebrates on pond selection by ducks in Ontario. Journal of Wildlife Management 44: 700–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozulin, A., O. Ostrovski, F. Tanneberger, O. Pareiko & V. Yurko, 2002. Waterbirds of large fishponds of Belarus. OMPO Special Publication, Vilnius.

  • Krapu, G. L., 1974. Foods of breeding pintails in North Dakota. Journal of Wildlife Management 38: 408–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krasowski, T. P. & T. D. Nudds, 1986. Microhabitat structure of nest sites and nesting success of diving ducks. Journal of Wildlife Management 50: 203–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krull, J. N., 1970. Aquatic plant-macroinvertebrate associations and waterfowl. Journal of Wildlife Management 34: 707–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lafont, M., 1989. Contribution à la gestion des eaux continentales: utilisation des oligochètes comme descripteurs de l’état biologique et du degré de pollution des eaux et des sédiments. Thèse, Université Lyon I (in French).

  • Le Louarn, H. & M. Birkan, 2000. The impact of physico-chemical and biological characteristics of ponds on the nesting of the common pochard in Mayenne. Game and Wildlife Science 17: 129–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewkowicz, M. & S. Lewkowicz, 1976. Organic and inorganic nutrient enrichment and the living conditions of carp fry in first rearing ponds. Physico-chemical factors and zooplankton. Acta Hydrobiologica 18: 235–257.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lilie, R. A. & J. O. Evrard, 1994. Influence of macroinvertebrates and macrophytes on waterfowl utilization of wetlands in the Prairies Pothole Region of north-western Wisconsin. Hydrobiologia 279/280: 235–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, M., 2001. Les étangs de pisciculture en Europe est-centrale. Typologie des systèmes d’exploitation et impacts des modalités de gestion sur l’avifaune (in French with English summary: Fishponds in Eastern Europe. Typology of fish-farming systems and effects of pond management on aquatic vegetation and nesting birds). Thèse, Université Strasbourg I.

  • Mallory, M. L., D. K. Mc Nichol & P. J. Weatherhead, 1994. Habitat quality and reproductive effort of common goldeneyes nesting near Sudbury, Canada. Journal of Wildlife Management 58: 552–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mc Eadie, J. A. & A. Keast, 1982. Do goldeneye and perch compete for food? Oecologia 55: 225–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meijer, M.-L., E. H. R. R. Lammens, A. J. P. Raat, M. P. Grimm & H. Hosper, 1990. Impact of cyprinids on zooplankton and algae in ten drainable ponds. Hydrobiologia 191: 275–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morin, A., J. Stephenson, J. Skrike & A. G. Solimini, 2004. Sieve retention probabilities of stream benthic invertebrates. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 23: 383–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musil, P., 1999. Monitoring of water bird breeding populations in the Czech Republic (1988–1997). Vogelwelt 119: 253–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musil, P., J. Cepak, K. Hudec & J. Zarybnicky, 2001. The long-term trends in the breeding waterfowl populations in the Czech Republic. OMPO/Institute of Applied Ecology, Kostelec nad Cernymi lesy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nester, M., 1996. An applied statistician’s creed. Applied Statistics 45: 401–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noyes, J. H. & R. L. Jarvis, 1985. Diet and nutrition of breeding female redhead and canvasback ducks in Nevada. Journal of Wildlife Management 49: 203–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, M. & J. M. Black, 1990. Waterfowl Ecology. Chapman & Hall, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, G. R., 1991. Survival of juvenile American black ducks on a managed wetland in New Brunswick. Journal of Wildlife Management 55: 466–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pehrsson, O., 1979. Feeding behaviour, feeding of diving ducks breeding at lake Myvatn, Iceland. Ornis Fennica 48: 77–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petr, T., 2000. Interactions between fish and aquatic macrophytes in inland waters. A review. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No 396, Rome.

  • Pokorny, J. & L. Pechar, 2000. Development of fishpond ecosystems in the Czech Republic: role of management and nutrient input (Limnological review). Sylvia 36: 8–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pykal, J. & J. Janda, 1994. Pocetnost vodnich ptaku na rybnicich ve vztahu k rybnicnimu hospodareni. Sylvia 30: 3–11 (in Czech).

    Google Scholar 

  • Robin, J., 1999. Dynamique saisonnière du phytoplancton en étang de pisciculture de la plaine du Forez (Loire). Essai de contrôle des cyanobactéries. Thèse, Université Lyon I (in French).

  • Rutschke, E. & H. Liebherr, 1995. Bestand und Bestandentwicklung einiger Wildentenarten in Ostdeutschland. Beiträge zur Jagd und Wildforschung 20: 261–273 (in German).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffer, M., 1990. Multiplicity of stable states in freshwater systems. Hydrobiologia 200/201: 475–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheffer, M., S. H. Hosper, M.-I. Meijer, B. Moss & E. Jeppesen, 1993. Alternative equilibria in shallow lakes. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8: 275–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlumberger, O., 2002. Mémento de pisciculture d’étangs. Cemagref, Paris, France (in French).

    Google Scholar 

  • Serie, J. R. & G. A. Swanson, 1976. Feeding ecology of breeding gadwalls on saline wetlands. Journal of Wildlife Management 40: 69–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, C. & D. King, 1984. Role of fish in regulation of plant and animal communities in eutrophic ponds. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 41: 1851–1855.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugden, L. G., 1973. Feeding ecology of pintail, gadwall, American widgeon, and lesser scaup duckling in southern Alberta. Canadian Wildlife Service Report Series 24: 45 pp.

  • Sukhanova, O. V., 1996. Nesting ecology of the tufted duck and the pochard in Central Russia. Game and Wildlife 13: 709–722.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, G. A., 1984. Invertebrates consumed by dabbling ducks (Anatinae) on the breeding grounds. Journal of the Minnesota Academy of Science 50: 3–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, G. A. & J. R. Serie, 1974. Feeding ecology of breeding blue-winged teals. Journal of Wildlife Management 38: 396–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, G. A., G. L. Krapu & J. R. Serie, 1979. Foods of laying female dabbling ducks on the breeding grounds. In Bookhout, T. A. (ed.), Proceedings of the 1977 Symposium, The Wildlife Society, Madison, WI.

  • Vallod, D., 1984. Suivis physico-chimiques et biologiques d’étangs de la Dombes. Application à la gestion piscicole. Thèse, Université Lyon I (in French).

  • Winfield, D. K. & I. J. Winfield, 1994. Possible competitive interactions between overwintering tufted duck Aythya fuligula and fish populations of lough Neagh, Northern Ireland: evidence from diet studies. Hydrobiologia 279/280: 377–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, R. M. & V. E. Phillips, 1992. Changes in the aquatic vegetation of two gravel pit lakes after reducing the fish population density. Aquatic Botany 43: 43–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wunder, W., 1938. La nourriture naturelle de la Carpe dans les étangs et les moyens d’en développer la production. Bulletin Français de Pisciculture 112: 121–129 (in French).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank colleagues/fieldworkers who contributed to the data collection: F. Bourguemestre, L. Hérault, L. Huguet (Brenne), M. Benmergui, J. Y. Fournier, L. Curtet, C. Chimenton (Dombes), J. B. Mouronval, A. Canny (Champagne), G. Chavas, D. Delayre, G. Pluvier, R. Delaroque (Forez) and V. Pereira (Institut Supérieur d’Agriculture Rhône-Alpes) for invertebrate collection and analysis, C. Bernard for fish farmer questioning in Champagne. This study was funded by the following institutes: ONCFS, Conseil Général de la Loire, Fédération des chasseurs de l’Indre. We also warmly thank Catherine Carter (ONCFS) for the improvement of the English writing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage, Direction des Études et de la Recherche, Station de la Dombes, Montfort, 01330, Birieux, France

    Joël Broyer & Clément Calenge

Authors
  1. Joël Broyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Clément Calenge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joël Broyer.

Additional information

Handling editor: Steven Declerck

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Broyer, J., Calenge, C. Influence of fish-farming management on duck breeding in French fish pond systems. Hydrobiologia 637, 173–185 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-009-9994-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-009-9994-3

Keywords

search

Navigation