Advertisement

Hydrobiologia

, Volume 636, Issue 1, pp 271–284 | Cite as

Significant ecosystem-wide effects of the swiftly spreading invasive freshwater bivalve Limnoperna fortunei

  • Demetrio Boltovskoy
  • Alexander Karatayev
  • Lyubov Burlakova
  • Daniel Cataldo
  • Vadim Karatayev
  • Francisco Sylvester
  • Alejandro Mariñelarena
Primary research paper

Abstract

Since its introduction in South America around 1990, the freshwater Asian mussel Limnoperna fortunei has been shown to strongly interact with several components of the local biota. However, investigation of its ecosystem-wide effects was hindered by (1) difficulties associated with evaluation of its densities over large spatial scales and (2) scarcity of pre-invasion environmental data. The present survey overcomes these shortcomings and addresses the question whether Limnopernas impact on the ecosystem-wide scale is measurable and significant. On the basis of diver-collected bottom samples, we estimated the overall density of this mussel in a reservoir (Embalse de Río Tercero, Argentina), where Limnoperna is present since 1998 and analyzed changes in several water-column properties before and after the invasion. The 47 km2 reservoir hosts around 45 billion mussels; at these densities, a volume equivalent to that of this water body can potentially be filtered by the bivalves every 2–3 days. Data collected regularly since 1996 indicate that after the invasion water transparency increased, and suspended matter, chlorophyll a, and primary production decreased significantly, with strong changes occurring in the area with highest mussel densities. Our results indicate that the ecosystem-wide impacts of Limnoperna are generally comparable to those described in Europe and North America for another invasive mussel—Dreissena polymorpha. However, given Limnopernas wider tolerance limits, its influence on newly invaded water bodies, potentially including Europe and North America, will probably be stronger.

Keywords

Invasive bivalves Population density Ecological impact South America Limnoperna fortunei 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was financed by the following grants to DB: UBA X096, PICT (ANPCyT) 25275, and Fundación Williams. A. Karatayev and L. Burlakova were supported by a Stephen F. Austin State University Faculty Research Grant. The assistance of Miguel Hechem in the field is greatly appreciated.

References

  1. Avelar, W. E., S. L. Martim & M. P. Vianna, 2004. A new occurrence of Limnoperna fortunei (Dunker 1856) (Bivalvia, Mytilidae) in the State of São Paulo, Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Biology 64: 739–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boltovskoy, D. & D. Cataldo, 1999. Population dynamics of Limnoperna fortunei, an invasive fouling mollusc, in the lower Paraná River (Argentina). Biofouling 14: 255–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boltovskoy, D., N. Correa, D. Cataldo & F. Sylvester, 2006. Dispersion and impact of invasive freshwater bivalves: Limnoperna fortunei in the Río de la Plata watershed and beyond. Biological Invasions 8: 947–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boltovskoy D., F. Sylvester, A. Otaegui, V. Leytes & D. Cataldo, 2009. Environmental modulation of the reproductive activity of the invasive mussel Limnoperna fortunei in South America. Austral Ecology. doi:  10.1111/j.1442-9993.2009.01974.x.
  5. Brown, J. H. & D. F. Sax, 2004. An essay on some topics concerning invasive species. Austral Ecology 29: 530–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bruesewitz, D. A., J. L. Tank & M. J. Bernot, 2008. Delineating the effects of Zebra Mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) on N transformation rates using laboratory mesocosms. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 27: 236–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burlakova, L. E., A. Y. Karatayev & D. K. Padilla, 2006. Changes in the distribution and abundance of Dreissena polymorpha within lakes through time. Hydrobiologia 571: 133–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caraco, N. F., J. J. Cole, P. A. Raymond, D. L. Strayer, M. L. Pace, S. E. G. Findlay & D. T. Fischer, 1997. Zebra Mussel invasion in a large, turbid river: phytoplankton response to increased grazing. Ecology 78: 588–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Caraco, N. F., J. J. Cole & D. L. Strayer, 2006. Top-down control from the bottom: REGULATION of eutrophication in a large river by benthic grazing. Limnology and Oceanography 51: 664–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cataldo, D. & D. Boltovskoy, 2000. Yearly reproductive activity of Limnoperna fortunei (Bivalvia) as inferred from the occurrence of its larvae in the plankton of the lower Paraná River and the Río de la Plata estuary (Argentina). Aquatic Ecology 34: 307–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cataldo, D., D. Boltovskoy & M. Pose, 2003. Toxicity of chlorine and three non-oxidizing molluscicides to the invasive pest mussel Limnoperna fortunei. Journal of the American Waterworks Association (AWWA) 95: 66–78.Google Scholar
  12. Cataldo, D., D. Boltovskoy, J. L. Hermosa & C. Canzi, 2005. Temperature-dependent larval development rates of Limnoperna fortunei (Mollusca, Bivalvia). Journal of Molluscan Studies 71: 41–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coakley, J. P., G. R. Brown, S. E. Ioannou & M. N. Charlton, 1997. Colonization patterns and densities of Zebra Mussel Dreissena in muddy offshore sediments of Western Lake Erie, Canada. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 99: 623–632.Google Scholar
  14. Darrigran, G., 2002. Potential impact of filter-feeding invaders on temperate inland freshwater environments. Biological Invasions 4: 145–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Darrigran, G. & C. Damborenea, 2005. A South American bioinvasion case history: Limnoperna fortunei (Dunker, 1857), the Golden Mussel. American Malacological Bulletin 20: 105–112.Google Scholar
  16. Drago, E. C. & P. J. Depetris, 1974. Erosión en la cuenca imbrífera y sedimentación en el embalse de Río Tercero (Córdoba, Argentina). Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina 29: 470–478.Google Scholar
  17. Hecky, R. E., R. E. H. Smith, D. R. Barton, S. J. Guildford, W. D. Taylor, M. N. Charlton & T. Howell, 2004. The nearshore phosphorus shunt: a consequence of ecosystem engineering by dreissenids in the Laurentian Great Lakes. Canadian Journal of Aquatic and Fisheries Science 61: 1285–1293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Karatayev, A. Y., L. E. Burlakova & D. K. Padilla, 1997. The effects of Dreissena polymorpha (Pallas) invasion on áquatic communities in Eastern Europe. Journal of Shellfish Research 16: 187–203.Google Scholar
  19. Karatayev, A. Y., L. E. Burlakova & D. K. Padilla, 2003. Impacts of Zebra Mussels on aquatic communities and their role as ecosystem engineers. In Leppäkoski, E., S. Gollasch & S. Olenin (eds), Invasive Aquatic Species of Europe – Distribution, Impacts and Management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands: 433–446.Google Scholar
  20. Karatayev, A. Y., D. Boltovskoy, D. K. Padilla & L. E. Burlakova, 2007. The invasive bivalves Dreissena polymorpha and Limnoperna fortunei: parallels, contrasts, potential spread and invasion impacts. Journal of Shellfish Research 26: 205–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lewandowski, K., 1982. The role of early developmental stages in the dynamics of Dreissena polymorpha (Pall.) (Bivalvia) populations in lakes. II. Settling of larvae and the dynamics of number of settled individuals. Ekologia Polska 30: 223–286.Google Scholar
  22. Makarewicz, J. C., P. Bertram & T. W. Lewis, 2000. Chemistry of offshore surface waters of Lake Erie: pre- and post-Dreissena introduction (1983–1993). Journal of Great Lakes Research 26: 82–93.Google Scholar
  23. Manly, B. F. J., 1992. The Design and Analysis of Research Studies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 1–353.Google Scholar
  24. Mariazzi, A., J. Donadelii, P. Arenas, M. DiSiervi & C. Bonetto, 1992. Impact of a nuclear power plant on water quality of Embalse del Río Tercero Reservoir (Córdoba, Argentina). Hydrobiologia 246: 129–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mellina, E., J. B. Rasmussen & E. L. Mills, 1995. Impact of Zebra Mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) on phosphorus cycling and chlorophyll in lakes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 52: 2553–2573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Molloy, D. P., A. Y. Karatayev, L. E. Burlakova, D. P. Kurandina & F. Laruelle, 1997. Natural enemies of Zebra Mussels: predators, parasites, and ecological competitors. Reviews in Fisheries Science 5: 27–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Montalto, L., O. B. Oliveros, I. de Ezcurra Drago & L. D. Demonte, 1999. Peces del Río Paraná medio predadores de una especie invasora: Limnoperna fortunei (Bivalvia, Mytilidae). Revista de la Facultad de Bioquímica y Ciencias Biológicas de la Universidad Nacional del Litoral 3: 85–101.Google Scholar
  28. Muskó, I. B. & B. Bakó, 2005. The density and biomass of Dreissena polymorpha living on submerged macrophytes in Lake Balaton (Hungary). Archiv für Hydrobiologie 162: 229–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nalepa, T. F., J. A. Wojcik, D. L. Fanslow & G. A. Lang, 1995. Initial colonization of the Zebra Mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) in Saginaw Bay, Lake Huron: population recruitment, density, and size structure. Journal of Great Lakes Research 21: 417–434.Google Scholar
  30. Paolucci, E. M., D. H. Cataldo, C. M. Fuentes & D. Boltovskoy, 2007. Larvae of the invasive species, Limnoperna fortunei (Bivalvia), in the diet of fish larvae in the Paraná River. Hydrobiologia 589: 219–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pastorino, G., G. Darrigran, S. Martin & L. Lunaschi, 1993. Limnoperna fortunei (Dunker, 1957) (Mytilidae) nuevo bivalvo invasor en aguas del Río de la Plata. Neotropica 39: 101.Google Scholar
  32. Penchaszadeh, P. E., G. Darrigran, C. Angulo, A. Averbuj, M. Brogger, A. Dogliotti & N. Pirez, 2000. Predation of the invasive freshwater mussel Limnoperna fortunei (Dunker, 1857) (Mytilidae) by the fish Leporinus obtusidens Valenciennes, 1846 (Anostomidae) in the Río de la Plata, Argentina. Journal of Shellfish Research 19: 229–231.Google Scholar
  33. Petrie, S. & R. Knapton, 1999. Rapid increase and subsequent decline of zebra and quagga mussels in Long Point Bay, Lake Erie: possible influence of waterfowl predation. Journal of Great Lakes Research 25: 772–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Phelps, H. L., 1994. The Asiatic clam (Corbicula fluminea) invasion and system-level ecological change in the Potomac River estuary near Washington, DC. Estuaries 17: 614–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ricciardi, A., 1998. Global range expansion of the Asian mussel Limnoperna fortunei (Mytilidae): another fouling threat to freshwater systems. Biofouling 13: 97–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sardiña, P., D. Cataldo & D. Boltovskoy, 2008. The effects of the invasive mussel, Limnoperna fortunei, on associated fauna in South American freshwaters: importance of physical structure and food supply. Fundamental and Applied Limnology (Archiv für Hydrobiologie) 173: 135–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stanczykowska, A., 1977. Ecology of Dreissena polymorpha (Pall.) (Bivalvia) in lakes. Polskie Archiwum Hydrobiologii 24: 461–530.Google Scholar
  38. Strayer, D. L. & H. M. Malcom, 2006. Long-term demography of a Zebra Mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) population. Freshwater Biology 51: 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Strayer, D. L., J. Powell, P. Ambrose, L. C. Smith, M. L. Pace & D. T. Fischer, 1996. Arrival, spread, and early dynamics of a Zebra Mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) population in the Hudson River estuary Canadian. Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 53: 1143–1149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Strayer, D. L., N. F. Caraco, J. J. Cole, S. Findlay & M. L. Pace, 1999. Transformation of freshwater ecosystems by bivalves. A case study of Zebra Mussels in the Hudson River. BioScience 2: 19–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sylvester, F., J. Dorado, D. Boltovskoy, A. Juárez & D. Cataldo, 2005. Filtration rates of the invasive pest bivalve Limnoperna fortunei as a function of size and temperature. Hydrobiologia 534: 71–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sylvester, F., D. Boltovskoy & D. Cataldo, 2007a. Fast response of freshwater consumers to a new trophic resource: predation on the recently introduced Asian bivalve Limnoperna fortunei in the lower Paraná River, South America. Austral Ecology 32: 403–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sylvester, F., D. Boltovskoy & D. Cataldo, 2007b. The invasive bivalve Limnoperna fortunei enhances benthic invertebrate densities in South American Floodplain Rivers. Hydrobiologia 589: 15–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vanderploeg, H. A., T. F. Nalepa, D. J. Jude, E. L. Mills, K. T. Holeck, J. R. Liebig, I. A. Grigorovich & H. Ojaveer, 2002. Dispersal and emerging ecological impacts of Ponto-Caspian species in the Laurentian Great Lakes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 57: 1209–1228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Demetrio Boltovskoy
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Alexander Karatayev
    • 4
  • Lyubov Burlakova
    • 4
  • Daniel Cataldo
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Vadim Karatayev
    • 5
  • Francisco Sylvester
    • 6
  • Alejandro Mariñelarena
    • 7
  1. 1.Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y NaturalesUniversidad de Buenos Aires, (C1428EHA)Buenos AiresArgentina
  2. 2.Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y TécnicasBuenos AiresArgentina
  3. 3.Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”Buenos AiresArgentina
  4. 4.Great Lakes CenterBuffalo State CollegeBuffaloUSA
  5. 5.City Honors SchoolBuffaloUSA
  6. 6.Great Lakes Institute for Environmental ResearchUniversity of WindsorWindsorCanada
  7. 7.ILPLA, Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas Bs. As.Florencio VarelaArgentina

Personalised recommendations