Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Extending the phytoplankton tool kit for the UK Water Framework Directive: indicators of phytoplankton community structure

  • EUROPEAN SURFACE WATERS
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Water Framework Directive (WFD) demands consideration of normative definitions for assessing ecological state of marine waters. For phytoplankton, ‘deviations from the ideal’ need to be considered for species composition and abundance, average biomass and the occurrence of blooms. A combination of phytoplankton metrics has been developed which, when considered in combination, should provide a confident assessment of the ecological state of each water body under assessment. The aim of this study was to evaluate phytoplankton community structure in different coastal and estuarine water bodies within England and Wales, and to contribute evidence towards the development of a community-based phytoplankton indicator. Influences of seasonality on the species assemblage were tested using a long-term data set available from a long-term monitoring site just offshore of Plymouth, UK. There is a substantive seasonal influence to the data, with a maximum of 10–14 common species (out of a potential 20) reoccurring within the same calendar month over a 10-year time span. Comparisons between reference and test water bodies give a range of common species of between 3 and 11 species within water type and season. A statistical and qualitative approach for comparing the most common species occurring between a reference and test site were tested for development of a WFD phytoplankton assessment tool. Overall, the results indicate that there are distinct phytoplankton assemblages over seasons which could form the basis of a community assessment metric. However, differences in boundary conditions are negligible between the different areas. There is evidence that community populations may be ubiquitous across marine water types in England and Wales, and development of generic seasonal lists across typologies could be appropriate in the further development of this tool.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alheit, J., C. Mollmann, J. Dutz, G. Kornilovs, P. Loewe, V. Mohrholz & N. Wasmund, 2005. Synchronous ecological regime shifts in the central Baltic and the North Sea in the late 1980s. ICES Journal of Marine Science 62: 1205–1215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CIS, 2003. Transitional and coastal waters—typology, reference conditions and classification systems. Common implementation strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC), Guidance document 5, working group 2.4—COAST, European Commission: 119 pp.

  • Cloern, J. E., 2001. Our evolving conceptual model of the coastal eutrophication problem. Marine Ecology Progress Series 210: 223–253.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cloern, J. E. & R. Dufford, 2005. Phytoplankton community ecology: principles applied in San Francisco Bay. Marine Ecology Progress Series 285: 11–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • CSTT, 1994. Comprehensive studies for the purposes of Article 6 of DIR 91/271 EEC, the Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive. Published for the Comprehensive Studies Task Team of Group Coordinating Sea Disposal Monitoring by the Forth River Purification Board, Edinburgh.

  • CSTT, 1997. Comprehensive studies for the purposes of Article 6 & 8.5 of DIR 91/271 EEC, the Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive, second edition. Published for the Comprehensive Studies Task Team of Group Coordinating Sea Disposal Monitoring by the Department of the Environment for Northern Ireland, the Environment Agency, the Scottish Environmental Protection Agency and the Water Services Association.

  • Devlin, M. J., M. Best, D. Coates, E. Bresnan, S. O’Boyle, R. Park, J. Silke, J. Skeats & J. Barry, 2007. Establishing boundary classes for classification of marine waters using phytoplankton communities—the first step in establishing a link between nutrient pressure and the marine plant community. Marine Pollution Bulletin 55: 91–104.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Devlin, M., J. Barry, J. Foden, D. Sivyer, D. Mills, R. Gowen & P. Tett, 2008. Relationships between suspended particulate material, light attenuation and Secchi depth in UK marine waters. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 79: 429–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Directive, 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Communities L 327: 1–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, M., P. C. Reid & B. Planque, 2001. Long term and regional variability of phytoplankton biomass in the north-east Atlantic (1960–1995). ICES Journal Marine Science 58: 39–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M., N. Hastings & B. Peacock, 1993. Statistical Distributions, 2nd ed. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foden, J., D. Sivyer, D. Mills & M. Devlin, 2008. Spatial and temporal distribution of chromophoric dissolved organic matter (CDOM) fluorescence and its contribution to light attenuation in UK waterbodies. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 79: 707–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallegos, C. L., T. E. Jordan & D. L. Correll, 1992. Event-scale response of phytoplankton to watershed inputs in a subestuary: timing, magnitude and location of blooms. Limnology and Oceangraphy 37: 813–828.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gallegos, C. L. & T. E. Jordan, 1997. Seasonal progression of factors limiting phytoplankton pigment biomass in the Rhode River estuary, Maryland (USA). I. Controls on phytoplankton growth. Marine Ecology Progress Series 161: 185–198.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, L., 1994. Long term trends in the distribution of phytoplankton in Chesapeake Bay: roles of light, nutrients and streamflow. Marine Ecology Progress Series 104: 267–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiblinger, C., O. Anneville, R. Tadonleke, F. Rimet, J. C. Druart, J. Guillard & M. T. Dokulil, this issue. Central-European Water Quality indices applied to long-term data from peri-alpine lakes: test and possible improvements. Hydrobiologia. doi:10.1007/s10750-009-9877-7.

  • Kruk, C., N. Mazzeo, G. Lacerot & C. S. Reynolds, 2002. Classification schemes of phytoplankton: selecting an ecological approach for the analysis of species temporal replacement. Journal of Plankton Research 24: 901–912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malcolm, S., D. Nedwell, M. J. Devlin, A. Hanlon, S. Dare, R. Parker & D. Mills, 2002. First Application of the OSPAR Comprehensive Procedure to Waters Around England and Wales. Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Report to DEFRA, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, H. G. & R. W. Alden, 1990. A comparison of phytoplankton assemblages and environmental relationships in three estuarine rivers of the lower Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries 13: 287–300.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • OSPAR Commission, 2003. The OSPAR Integrated Report 2003 on the Eutrophication Status of the OSPAR Maritime Area based upon the first application of the Comprehensive Procedure. Includes “baseline”/assessment levels used by Contracting Parties and monitoring data (MMC 2003/2/4; OSPAR Publication 2003: ISBN: 1-904426-25-5).

  • OSPAR Commission, 2005. Common Procedure for the Identification of the Eutrophication Status of the OSPAR Maritime Area. (Reference number: 2005–3). EUC 05/13/1, Annex 5 as amended and endorsed by OSPAR 2005 Summary Record – OSPAR 05/21/1, §§ 6.2–6.5 and Annex 6: 36 pp.

  • Ptacnik, R., A. G. Solimini & P. Brettum, this issue. Performance of a new phytoplankton composition metric along a eutrophication gradient in Nordic lakes. Hydrobiologia. doi:10.1007/s10750-009-9870-1.

  • Reid, P. C. & H. G. Hunt, 1998. Are observed changes in the plankton on the North Atlantic and North Sea linked to climate change? Workshop report, Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission. Amsterdam: 310–315.

  • Reynolds, C. S., 2000. Phytoplankton designer—or how to predict compositional responses to trophic state change. Hydrobiologia 424: 67–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, S., J. Allen, P. Balson, R. Boyle, D. Burden, D. Connor, M. Elliott, M. Webster, J. Reker, C. Mills, B. O’Connor & S. Pearson, 2003. Typology for the Transitional and Coastal Waters for UK and Ireland. (Contractors: Aqua-fact International Services Ltd, BGS, CEFAS, IECS, JNCC). Funded by Scotland and Northern Ireland Forum for Environmental Research, Edinburgh and Environment Agency of England and Wales. SNIFFER Contract ref: WFD07 (230/8030)): 94 pp.

  • Sommer, U., 1989. Nutrient status and nutrient competition of phytoplankton in a shallow, hypertrophic lake. Limnology and Oceanography 34: 1162–1173.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tett, P., C. Carreira, D. K. Mills, S. van Leeuwen, J. Foden, E. Bresnan & R. J. Gowen, 2008. Use of a phytoplankton community index to assess the health of coastal waters. ICES Journal of Marine Science 65: 1475–1482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsirtsis, G. & M. Karydid, 1998. Evaluation of phytoplankton community indices for detecting eutrophication trends in the marine environment. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 50: 255–269.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • UKTAG, 2005a. Classification schemes in river basin planning: an overview. WP11a(I) [available from http://www.wfduk.org/tag_guidance?Article%20_11/POMEnvStds?WP11a-1910-05/view].

  • UKTAG, 2005b. Environmental standards for use in classification and program of measures for the Water Framework Directive. WP14e [available from http://www.wfduk.org/tag_guidance?Article%20_11/POMEnvStds?WP11a-1910-05/view].

  • Wasmund, N. & S. Uhlig, 2003. Phytoplankton trends in the Baltic Sea. ICES Journal of Marine Science 60: 177–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiltshire, K. H. & B. F. Manly, 2004. The warming trend at Helgoland Roads, North Sea: phytoplankton response. Helgoland Marine Research 58: 269–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Catchment to Reef Research Group, ACTFR, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, 4811, Australia

    Michelle Devlin

  2. Center for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Pakefield Rd., Lowestoft, Norfolk, NR33 0HT, UK

    Jon Barry & Suzanne Painting

  3. Environment Agency, Kingfisher House, Goldhay Way, Orton Goldhay, Peterborough, Cambridgeshire, PE2 5ZR, UK

    Mike Best

Authors
  1. Michelle Devlin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jon Barry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Suzanne Painting
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mike Best
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michelle Devlin.

Additional information

Guest editors: P. Nõges, W. van de Bund, A. C. Cardoso, A. Solimini & A.-S. Heiskanen

Assessment of the Ecological Status of European Surface Waters

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Devlin, M., Barry, J., Painting, S. et al. Extending the phytoplankton tool kit for the UK Water Framework Directive: indicators of phytoplankton community structure. Hydrobiologia 633, 151–168 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-009-9879-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-009-9879-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation