Abstract
The diurnal movements and spatial distribution of adult pikeperch, Sander lucioperca, in the Elbe River, Czech Republic was observed using radio telemetry. The hypothesis that light intensity, within four different intervals (dawn, day, dusk, night), would determine the spatial distribution of pikeperch in a riverine environment were tested across a time span of 12 months. During the day, fish were located in deep water of the main channel, moving towards shallower waters during twilight and residing in the littoral zone, closest to the riverbanks, at night. Movement activity followed the behavioural pattern in a drainage canal with maximum at twilight and minimum at night. This suggests that nocturnal positions of adult pikeperch in the shallows were not associated with hunting but more likely with resting.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ali, M. A., R. A. Ryder & M. Antcil, 1977. Photoreceptors and visual pigments as related to behavioural responses and preferred habitats of perches (Perca spp.) and pikeperches (Stizostedion spp.). Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 34: 1475–1480.
Anderson, O., 1984. Optimal foraging by largemouth bass in structured environments. Ecology 65: 851–861.
Anett, C. A., 1998. Hunting behavior of Florida largemouth bass, Micropterus salmoides floridanus, in a channelized river. Environmental Biology of Fishes 53: 75–87.
Cerri, D. R., 1983. The effect of light intensity on predator and prey behaviour in cyprinid fish: factors that influence prey risk. Animal Behaviour 31: 736–742.
Christensen, B. & L. Persson, 1993. Species-specific anti-predator behaviours: effects on prey choice in different habitats. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 32: 1–9.
Copp, G. H. & P. Jurajda, 1993. Do small riverine fish move inshore at night? Journal of Fish Biology 43: 229–241.
Copp, G. H. & P. Jurajda, 1999. Size-structured diel use of river banks by fish. Aquatic Sciences 61: 75–91.
Craig, J. F., 1987. The Biology of Perch and Related Fish. Croom Helm, London.
Fedorova, G. V. & K. S. Drozzhina, 1982. Daily feeding rhytm of pikeperch Stizostedion lucioperca and perch Perca fluviatilis from Lake Ladoga. Journal of Ichthyology 22: 52–60.
Hall, D. J., E. E. Werner, J. F. Gilliam, G. G. Mittelbach, D. Howard & C. G. Doner, 1979. Diel foraging behaviour and prey selection in the golden shiner (Notemigonus chrysoleucas). Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 36: 1029–1039.
Helfman, G. S., 1993. Fish behaviour by day, night and twilight. In Pitcher, T. J. (ed.), Behaviour of Teleost Fishes, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall, London: 479–512.
Hemmings, C. C., 1966. Olfaction and vision in fish schooling. Journal of Experimental Biology 45: 449.
Howick, G. L. & W. J. O’Brien, 1983. Piscivorous feeding-behavior of largamouth bass—an experimental analysis. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 112: 508–516.
Jepsen, N., A. Koed & F. Okland, 1999. The movements of pikeperch in a shallow reservoir. Journal of Fish Biology 54: 1083–1093.
Leopold, L. B., 1994. A view of the river. Harvard University Press, Cambridge: 298 pp.
McFarland, W. N. & C. M. Wahl, 1996. Visual constraints on migration behaviour of juvenile French grunts. Environmental Biology of Fishes 46: 109–122.
Metcalfe, N. B., N. H. C. Fraser & M. D. Burns, 1999. Food availiblity and the nocturnal vs. diurnal foraging trade-off in juvenile salmon. Journal of Animal Ecology 68: 371–381.
Olesen, K. W., 1987. Bed topography in shallow river bends. Facuty of Civil Eng., Delft Univ. Tech., Report 87-1.
Pitcher, T. J., 1986. Function of shoaling in teleosts. In Pitcher, T. J. (ed.), The Behaviour of Teleost Fishes. Croom Helm, London: 294–337.
Poulet, N., C. Arzel, S. Messad, S. Lek & Ch. Argillier, 2005. Diel activity of adult pikeperch Sander lucioperca (L.) in a drainage canal in the Mediterranean basin during spring. Hydrobiologia 543: 79–90.
Power, M. E., 1984. Depth distributions of armoured catfish: predator-induced resource avoidance? Ecology 65: 523–528.
Power, M. E., 1987. Predator avoidance by grazing fishes in temperate and tropical streams: importance of stream depth and prey size. In Kerfoot, W. C. & A. Sih (eds), Predation: direct and indirect impacts in aquatic communities. University Press of New England, Dartmouth, New Hampshire.
Sanders, R. E., 1992. Day versus night electrofishing catches from near-shore waters of the Ohio and Muskingum Rivers. Ohio Journal of Science 92: 51–59.
SAS Institute, 2004. SAS/STAT® 9.1 User’s Guide. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
Schlosser, I. J., 1987. The role of predation in age- and size-related habitat use by stream fishes. Ecology 68: 651–659.
Talmon, A. M., 1992. Bed topography of river bends with suspended sediment transport. Facuty of Civil Eng., Delft Univ. Tech., Report 92-5.
Turesson, H. & C. Brönmark, 2004. Foraging behaviour and capture success in perch, pikeperch and pike and the effects of prey density. Journal of Fish Biology 65: 363–373.
White, G. C. & R. A. Garrott, 1990. Analysis of wildlife radio-tracking data. Academic Press, New York: 383 pp.
Winter, J. D., 1983. Advances in underwater biotelemetry. In Nielsen, L. A. & D. Johnsen (eds), Fisheries Techniques. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD: 371–395.
Winter, J. D., V. B. Kuechle, D. B. Sinff & J. R. Tester, 1978. Equipment and methods for radio tracking freshwater fish. Univ. Minessota: Agricultural Experiment Station, Miscellaneous Reports 152.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank an anonymous referee and A. Slavíková for valuable comments on earlier versions of the manuscript, AJE (American Journal Experts) for the language assistance and technical staff at the Water Research Institute in Prague for assistance with the fieldwork. The study was financially supported by grant from the Ministry of Environment of the Czech Republic (SP/2e7/229/07).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Handling editor: J. Cambray
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Horký, P., Slavík, O. & Bartoš, L. A telemetry study on the diurnal distribution and activity of adult pikeperch, Sander lucioperca (L.), in a riverine environment. Hydrobiologia 614, 151–157 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-008-9503-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-008-9503-0