Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Macroinvertebrate community response to large-woody debris additions in small warmwater streams

  • Primary research paper
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Half-logs are a common restoration tool used to provide cover for fish in degraded streams. These structures may also provide a stable substrate for biofilm production and aquatic macroinvertebrate colonization. Half-logs (N = 108) were installed into nine streams of the upper Wabash River basin, Indiana, in July 2003 to examine changes in aquatic macroinvertebrate community composition and functional guilds under varying land-use types. Following installation, half-logs were colonized and showed statistically significant increases in both relative abundance and taxa richness of macroinvertebrates over time. The number of Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera (EPT) taxa collected from half-logs, as a percentage of total community composition, was positively related to the percentage of canopy coverage across streams and the relative abundance of shredder taxa utilizing half-logs decreased significantly with increasing canopy coverage. Forest streams exhibited significantly lower relative abundances of individuals colonizing half-logs (mean = 14.9 taxa/0.25 m2) than fallow field and agricultural streams (mean = 29.5 and 33.1, respectively). The percentage of pollution-tolerant taxa using half-logs was highest in fallow field streams (mean = 18.4%), followed by forest and agriculture systems (mean = 15.9% and 13. 9%, respectively). These results indicate that half-logs were colonized by aquatic macroinvertebrates and exhibited changes in community composition and functional feeding guilds over time and across land-use types. The extent of colonization and use of half-logs was largely dependent upon the pre-existing in-stream habitat quality and the predominant land-use type.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Anderson, N. H., 1992. Influence of disturbance on insect communities in Pacific Northwest streams. Hydrobiologia 248: 79–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, N. H., J. R. Sedell, L. M. Roberts & F. J. Triska, 1978. The role of aquatic invertebrates in processing of wood debris in coniferous forest streams. The American Midland Naturalist 100: 64–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Angermeier, P. L. & J. R. Karr, 1984. Relationships between woody debris and fish habitat in a small warmwater stream. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113: 716–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, P. D., K. Lattmann, N. Kneebone & I. Harris, 2001. Bank profile and structure as determinants of macroinvertebrate assemblages – seasonal changes and management. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management 17: 543–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beisel, J. N., P. Usseglio-Polatera & J. C. Moreteau, 2000. The spatial heterogeneity of a river bottom: A key factor determining macroinvertebrate communities. Hydrobiologia 442/423: 163–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benke, A. C. & J. B. Wallace, 2003. Influence of wood on invertebrate communities in streams and rivers. In Gregory, S. V., K. L. Boyer & A. M. Gurnell (eds), The Ecology and Management of Wood in World Rivers. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 37, Bethesda, Maryland, 149–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkman, H. E., C. F. Rabeni & T. P. Boyle, 1986. Biomonitors of stream quality in agricultural areas: Fish versus invertebrates. Environmental Management 10: 413–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilby, R. E. & J. W. Ward, 1989. Changes in characteristics and function of woody debris with increasing size of streams in western Washington. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 118: 368–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braccia, A. & D. P. Batzer, 2001. Invertebrates associated with woody debris in a southeastern US forested floodplain wetland. Wetlands 21: 18–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, S. A., 1980. Effects of stream habitat improvement on invertebrates, trout populations, and mink activity. Journal of Wildlife Management 44: 871–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, J. Y., C. W. Andrus & H. A. Froehlich, 1990. Woody debris, channel features, and macroinvertebrates of streams with logged and undisturbed riparian timber in northeastern Oregon, U.S.A Canadian Journal of Aquatic Sciences 47: 1103–1111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier, K. J. 1995. Environmental factors affecting the taxonomic composition of aquatic macroinvertebrate communities in lowland waterways of Northland, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 29: 453–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delong, M. D. & M. A. Brusven, 1998. Macroinvertebrate community structure along the longitudinal gradient of an agriculturally impacted stream. Environmental Management 22: 445–457.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drury, D. M. & W. E. Kelso, 2000. Invertebrate colonization of woody debris in coastal plain streams. Hydrobiologia 434: 63–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dufour, J. A., 1989. Evaluation of half-logs as habitat improvement structures for smallmouth bass Micropterus dolomieui and rock bass Ambloplites rupestris. M.S. Thesis, Michigan State University, East Lansing.

  • Frimpong, E. A., T. M. Sutton, K. J. Lim, P. J. Hrodey, B. Engel, T. P. Simon, J. G. Lee & D. C. Le Master, 2005. Determination of optimal riparian forest buffer dimensions for stream biota landscape association models using multimetric and multivariate response. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 62: 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genito, D., W. J. Gburek & A. N. Sharpley, 2002. Response of stream macroinvertebrates to agricultural land cover in a small watershed. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 17: 109–119.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haggerty, S. M., D. P. Batzer & C. R. Jackson, 2004. Macroinvertebrate response to logging in coastal headwater streams of Washington, U.S.A. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 61: 529–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hax, C. L. & S. W. Golladay, 1993. Macroinvertebrate colonization and biofilm development on leaves and wood in a boreal river. Freshwater Biology 29: 79–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hax, C. L. & S. W. Golladay, 1998. Flow disturbance of macroinvertebrates inhabiting sediments and woody debris in a prairie stream. American Midland Naturalist 139: 210–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, R. L., 1982. An evaluation of half-logs to improve brown trout habitat in Emmons Creek. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison, Wisconsin. Report Number 116.

  • Johnson, L. B., D. H. Breneman & C. Richards, 2003. Macroinvertebrate community structure and function associated with large wood in low gradient streams. River Research and Applications 19: 199–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Z. B. & J. H. Kennedy, 2003. Macroinvertebrate assemblages of submerged woody debris in the Elm Fork of the Trinity River, Texas. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 18: 187–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenat, D. R. & J. K. Crawford, 1994. Effects of land use on water quality and aquatic biota of three North Carolina streams. Hydrobiologia 294: 185–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathooko, J. M., & C. O. Otieno, 2002. Does surface textural complexity of woody debris in lotic ecosystems influence their colonization by aquatic invertebrates? Hydrobiologia 489: 11–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCafferty, W. P., 1998. Aquatic entomology the fishermen’s and ecologists’ illustrated guide to insects and their relatives. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Sudbury, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKie, B. & P. S. Cranston, 2001, Colonisation of experimentally immersed wood in south eastern Australia: Responses of feeding groups to changes in riparian vegetation. Hydrobiologia 452: 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meador, M. R., C. R. Hupp, T. F. Cuffney & M. E. Gurtz, 1993. Methods for characterizing stream habitat as part of the National Water-Quality Assessment program. U.S. Geological Survey, Raleigh, North Carolonia. Open-File Report 93-408.

  • Merritt, R. W. & K. W. Cummins (eds), 1984. An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America, 2nd edn. Kendall/Hunt Publishers, Dubuque, Iowa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, D. R., J. M. Buffington, R. D. Smith, K. M. Schmidt & G. Pess, 1995. Pool spacing in forest channels. Water Resources Research 31: 1097–1105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plafkin, J. L., M. T. Barbour, K. D. Porter, S. K. Gross & R. M. Hughes, 1989. Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and rivers: Benthic macroinvertebrates and fish. EPA 444/4-89-001. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio.

  • Rinella, D. J. & J. W. Feminella, 2005. Comparison of benthic macroinvertebrates colonizing sand, wood, and artificial substrates in a low-gradient stream. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 20: 209–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, D. W. & G. W. Minshall, 1980. Colonization of an introduced substrate by stream macroinvertebrates. Oikos 34: 259–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shields, F. D., Jr., S. S. Knight & C. M. Cooper, 1995. Use of the index of biotic integrity to assess physical habitat degradation in warmwater streams. Hydrobiologia 312: 191–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talmage, P. J., J. A. Perry & R. M. Goldstein, 2002. Relation of instream habitat and physical conditions to fish communities of agricultural streams in the northern Midwest. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 22: 825–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, J. B. & J. R. Webster, 1996. The role of macroinvertebrates in stream ecosystem function. Annual Review of Entomology 41: 115–139.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wohl, N. E. & R. F. Carline, 1996. Relations among riparian grazing, sediment loads, macroinvertebrates, and fishes in three central Pennsylvania streams. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 53: 260–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank T. Bacula, A. Mooradian, D. Rajchel, S. Reed, and C. White for their laboratory assistance, as well as E. Frimpong for his assistance with spatial data analyses. Constructive comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript by D. Kreutzweiser, G. Parker, T. Simon, and A. Steinman improved this manuscript. Funding for this project was provided for by Purdue University Department of Forestry and Natural Resources. This research was approved for publication as manuscript 18099 by the Purdue University Agricultural Research Programs.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Trent M. Sutton.

Additional information

Handling editor: R. Bailey

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hrodey, P.J., Kalb, B.J. & Sutton, T.M. Macroinvertebrate community response to large-woody debris additions in small warmwater streams. Hydrobiologia 605, 193–207 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-008-9354-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-008-9354-8

Keywords