An introduction to the Freshwater Animal Diversity Assessment (FADA) project

Abstract

The Freshwater Animal Diversity Assessment (FADA) project aims at compiling an overview of genus- and species-level diversity of animals in the continental, aquatic ecosystems of the world. It is a collective effort of 163 experts, and presents 59 articles treating the diversity and endemism of different animal taxa, ranging from microscopic worms to mammals, at global and regional scales. Given their structural importance, an article on macrophytes is also added. Here, we give an overview of the project’s history, and outline the common framework of the various articles, as well as the conventions the experts agreed to adhere to in their treatises. Furthermore, we briefly introduce future prospects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1

Notes

  1. 1.

    Micrognathozoa, a monotypic taxon of moss-dwelling microscopic organisms of which only two disjunct records exist (Disco Island, Greenland and the subantarctic Crozet Islands: De Smet, 2002), is not treated in a full article.

References

  1. Balian, E., H. Segers, C. Lévêque & K. Martens, 2007. Freshwater Animal Diversity Assessment. http://www.Fada.Biodiversity.be (20 November 2007).

  2. Cox, C. B., 2001. The biogeographic regions reconsidered. Journal of Biogeography 28(4): 511–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. De Smet, W. H., 2002. A new record of Limnognathia maerski Kristensen & Funch, 2000 (Micrognathozoa) from the subantarctic Crozet Islands, with redescription of the trophi. Journal of Zoology, London 258: 381–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dudgeon, D., A. H. Arthington, M. O. Gessner, Z. Kawabata, D. J. Knowler, C. Lévêque, R. J. Naiman, A. Prieur-Richard, D. Soto, M. L. J. Stiassny & C. A. Sullivan, 2006. Freshwater biodiversity: Importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biological Reviews 81: 163–182.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Groombridge, B. & M. Jenkins, 1998. Freshwater Biodiversity: A Preliminary Global Assessment. World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Groombridge, B. & M. Jenkins, 2000. Global Biodiversity. Earth’s Living Resources in the 21st Century. World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  7. IUCN, 2006. 2006 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. http://www.iucnredlist.org (20 November 2007).

  8. Lévêque, C., E. V. Balian & K. Martens, 2005. An assessment of animal species diversity in continental water systems. Hydrobiologia 542: 39–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Myers, N., R. A. Mittermeier, C. G. Mittermeier, G. A. B. da Fonseca & J. Kent, 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403: 853–858.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Postel, S., & S. Carpenter, 1997. Freshwater ecosystem services. In: Daily, G. C. (ed.), Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Ecosystem Services. Island Press, Washington D.C., U.S.A., 195–214.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Postel, S. & B. Richter, 2003. Rivers for Life: Managing Water for People and Nature. Island Press, Washington D.C., U.S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Revenga, C. & Y. Kura, 2003. Status and Trends of Biodiversity of Inland Water Ecosystems. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, Technical Series 11.

  13. Segers, H., 2007. Annotated checklist of the rotifers (Phylum Rotifera) with notes on nomenclature, taxonomy and distribution. Zootaxa 1564: 1–104.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wallace, A. R. 1876. The Geographical Distribution of Animals, 2 vol. Harper, New York, xxiii + 503, xi + 553 pp. (reprinted 1962, Hafner, New York).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are greatly indebted to all experts involved in the project, who contributed their expertise and passion to the daunting task of producing the present volume, and who always showed patience and enthusiasm despite the delays and difficulties encountered during the publishing process. Also, we gratefully acknowledge the numerous reviewers who offered their time and precious advice to improve the contributions.

The project was supported by the Belgian Science Policy, the Belgian Biodiversity Platform, and the Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. V. Balian.

Additional information

Guest editors: E. V. Balian, C. Lévêque, H. Segers & K. Martens

Freshwater Animal Diversity Assessment

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-008-9303-6.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Balian, E.V., Segers, H., Lévêque, C. et al. An introduction to the Freshwater Animal Diversity Assessment (FADA) project. Hydrobiologia 595, 3–8 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-007-9235-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Global biodiversity
  • Endemism
  • Metazoa
  • Aquatic
  • Non-marine
  • Freshwater
  • Review