Abstract
We tested the hypothesis that small prey can coexist with large predators. For this we confronted two predators (smaller Asplanchna brightwellii: 900 μm and larger A. sieboldi: 1400 μm) with three prey rotifers (smaller: Anuraeopsis fissa (70 μm); larger: Brachionus calyciflorus (200 μm) and intermediate: B. patulus (120 μm)) using functional response, prey preference, population growth and life table demography. Regardless of prey type, A. sieboldi was able to consume more prey than A. brightwellii and it consumed higher number of B. patulus than of B. calyciflorus or A. fissa. Prey preference experiments showed that A. brightwellii had no preference for B. calyciflorus regardless of prey density, while A. sieboldi preferred B. calyciflorus and avoided A. fissa. Data on population growth showed that A. brightwellii was always numerically more abundant than A. sieboldi. Prey type had a significant effect on peak abundances of A. sieboldi but not of A. brightwellii. Life table demography data revealed a significantly lower lifespan in A. brightwellii fed B. calyciflorus, compared to B. patulus, but not when compared to A. fissa. A. sieboldi lifespan was not affected by prey type. Depending on prey type and predator species, generation time varied from 2 to 3 days. Both lowest (0.38 d−1) and highest (0.98 d−1) population growth rates were observed in A. sieboldi. We suggest that reduced reproductive output in Asplanchna was caused by either large (B. calyciflorus) or small (A. fissa) prey. At natural densities of Anuraeopsis, it is unlikely that Asplanchna reaches abundances high enough to exterminate this prey. By its extremely small size (combining low energetic profitability with low encounter rates with predators) A. fissa may coexist with Asplanchna in nature.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrams, P. A. & C. J. Walters, 1996. Invulnerable prey and the paradox of enrichment. Ecology 77: 1125–1133.
Ali, A. J., S. S. S. Sarma, G. Murugan & H. J. Dumont, 1996. Effect of zooplankton type and abundance on prey consumption by the fairy shrimp, Streptocephalus proboscideus (Anostraca: Crustacea). Hydrobiologia 319: 191–202.
Borowitzka, M. A. & L. J. Borowitzka, 1988. Micro-algal Biotechnology. Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom.
Conde-Porcuna, J. M. & S. S. S. Sarma, 1995. Prey selection by Asplanchna girodi (Rotifera): The importance of prey defence mechanisms. Freshwater Biology 33: 341–348.
Dumont, H. J., S. S. S. Sarma & A. J. Ali, 1995. Laboratory studies on the population dynamics of Anuraeopsis fissa (Rotifera) in relation to food density. Freshwater Biology 33: 39–46.
Felix, A., M. E. Stevens & R. L. Wallace, 1995. Unpalatability of a colonial rotifer, Sinantherina socialis, to small zooplanktivorous fishes. Invertebrate Biology 114: 139–144.
Garza-Mouriño, G., M. Silva-Briano, S. Nandini, S. S. S. Sarma & M. E. Castellanos-Páez, 2005. Morphological and morphometrical variations of selected rotifer species in response to predation: a seasonal study of selected brachionid species from Lake Xochimilco (Mexico). Hydrobiologia 546: 169–179.
Gilbert, J. J., 1985. Escape response of the rotifer Polyarthra: a high-speed cinematographic analysis. Oecologia 66: 322–331.
Gilbert, J. J., 1998. Kairomone-induced morphological defenses in roifers In Tollrian, R. & C. D. Harvell, (eds), The Ecology and Evolution of Inducible Defenses. Princeton University Press, Princeton: 127–141.
Iyer, N. & T. R. Rao, 1995. The epizoic mode of life in Brachionus rubens Ehrenberg as a deterrent against predation by Asplanchna intermedia Hudson. Hydrobiologia 313/314: 377–380.
Iyer, N. & T. R. Rao, 1996. Responses of the predatory rotifer Asplanchna intermedia to prey species differing in vulnerability: Laboratory and field studies. Freshwater Biology 36: 521–533.
King, C. & T. W. Snell, 1980. Density-dependent sexual reproduction in natural populations of the rotifer Asplanchna girodi Hydrobiologia, 73: 149–152.
Krebs, C. J., 1985. Ecology; the Experimental Analysis of Distribution and Abundance, 3rd edn. Harper & Row, New York.
Krebs J. R., 1993. Ecological Methodology. Harper Collins Publ., New York.
Nandini, S. & S. S. S. Sarma, 1999. Effect of starvation time on the prey capture behaviour, functional response and population growth of Asplanchna sieboldi (Rotifera). Freshwater Biology 42: 121–130.
Nandini, S., R. Pérez-Chávez & S. S. S. Sarma, 2003. The effect of prey morphology on the feeding behaviour and population growth of the predatory rotifer Asplanchna sieboldi: A case study using five species of Brachionus (Rotifera). Freshwater Biology 48: 2131–2140.
Nandini, S., P. Ramírez-García & S. S. S. Sarma, 2005. Seasonal variations in the species diversity of planktonic rotifers in Lake Xochimilco, Mexico. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 20: 287–294.
Nandini, S. & S. S. S. Sarma, Rómulo Javier Amador-López & Sandra Bolaños-Muñoz, 2007. Population growth and body size in five rotifer species in response to variable food concentration. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 22: 1–10.
Ooms-Wilms, A. L., 1998. On the Food Uptake and Population Dynamics of Rotifers in a Shallow Eutrophic Lake. Thesis, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Pourriot, R. & T. W. Snell, 1983. Resting eggs in rotifers. Hydrobiologia 104: 213–224.
Rothhaupt, K. O., 1990. Changes of the functional responses of the rotifers Brachionus rubens and Brachionus calyciflorus with particle sizes. Limnology and Oceanography 35: 24–32.
Sagrario, M. H. 2003. Efecto de la densidad de la presa Brachionus calyciflorus Pallas sobre el crecimiento poblacional del depredador Asplanchna brightwelli (Gosse). Thesis, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico.
Sarma, S. S. S., 1993. Feeding responses of Asplanchna brightwelli (Rotifera): laboratory and field studies. Hydrobiologia 255/256: 275–282.
Sarma, S. S. S., N. Iyer & H. J. Dumont, 1996. Competitive interactions between herbivorous rotifers: importance of food concentration and initial population density. Hydrobiologia 331: 1–7.
Sarma, S. S. S., P. S. Larios-Jurado & S. Nandini, 2001. Effect of three food types on the population growth of Brachionus calyciflorus and Brachionus patulus (Rotifera: Brachionidae). Revista de Biología Tropical 49: 75–82.
Sarma, S. S. S., E. L. Pavón-Meza & S. Nandini, 2003. Comparative population growth and life table demography of the rotifer Asplanchna girodi at different prey (Brachionus calyciflorus and Brachionus havanaensis) (Rotifera) densities. Hydrobiologia 491: 309–320.
Wallace, R. L., T. W. Snell, C. Ricci & T. Nogrady, 2006. Rotifera Part 1: Biology, Ecology and Systematics. Guides to the Identification of the Microinvertebrates of the Continental Waters of the World. Kenobi Productions, Ghent/Backhuys Publishers, The Netherlands.
Weber, C. I., 1993. Methods for Measuring the Acute Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater and Marine Organisms, 4th edn. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio, EPA/600/4–90/027F.
Acknowledgements
Two anonymous reviewers have improved our presentation. We thank PAPIME PE201406 (UNAM, Mexico) for a project. Additional financial support was received from CONACyT-Mexico ( SNI - 18723 and 20520).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Dedicated to H. J. Dumont for his 65th year.
Guest editors: S. S. S. Sarma, R. D. Gulati, R. L. Wallace, S. Nandini, H. J. Dumont and R. Rico-Martínez
Advances in Rotifer Research
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sarma, S.S.S., Nandini, S. Small prey size offers immunity to predation: a case study on two species of Asplanchna and three brachionid prey (Rotifera). Hydrobiologia 593, 67–76 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-007-9069-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-007-9069-2