Hydrobiologia

, Volume 590, Issue 1, pp 115–121 | Cite as

The genetic variability of the red king crab, Paralithodes camtschatica (Tilesius, 1815) (Anomura, Lithodidae) introduced into the Barents Sea compared with samples from the Bering Sea and Kamchatka region using eleven microsatellite loci

  • Knut E. Jørstad
  • Christian Smith
  • Zac Grauvogel
  • Lisa Seeb
Invasive Crustacea

Abstract

The intentional introduction of red king crab, Paralithodes camtschatica (Tilesius, 1815) in the Barents Sea represent one of a few successful cases and one that now supports a commercial fishery. Introductions of alien species into new environments are often associated with genetic bottlenecks, which cause a reduction in the genetic variation, and this could be important for the spreading potential of the species in the Atlantic Ocean. Red king crab samples collected in the Varangerfjord located on the Barents Sea (northern Norway) were compared with reference crab samples collected from the Bering Sea and Kamchatka regions in the Pacific Ocean. All samples were screened for eleven microsatellite loci, based on the development of species-specific primers. The observed number of alleles per locus was similar, and no reduction in genetic variation, including gene diversity and allelic richness, was detected between the Varangerfjord sample and the reference sample from Okhotsk Sea near Kamchatka, indicating no genetic bottlenecking at least for the microsatellite loci investigated. The same results were found in comparison with the sample from Bering Sea. The level of genetic differentiation among the samples, measured as overall FST across all loci, was relatively low (0.0238) with a range of 0.0035–0.1000 for the various loci investigated. The largest pairwise FST values were found between the Bering Sea and Varangerfjord/Barents Sea samples, with a value of 0.0194 across all loci tested. The lowest value (0.0101) was found between the Varangerfjord and Kamchatka samples. Genetic differentiation based on exact tests on allele frequencies revealed highly significant differences between all pairwise comparisons. The high level of genetic variation found in the Varangerfjord/Barents Sea sample could be of significance with respect to further spreading of the species to other regions in the North Atlantic Ocean.

Keywords

Paralithodes camtschatica Red king crab introduction Barents Sea Bering Sea Kamchatka region Genetic variability Microsatellites 

References

  1. Andrew, J. & R. D. Ward, 1996. Allozyme genetics of the marine fanworm Sabella spallanzanii: Comparison of native European and introduced Australian populations. Marine Ecology Progress Series 152: 131–143.Google Scholar
  2. Carlton, J. T., 2002. Bioinvasion ecology: Assessing invasion impact and scale. In Leppakoski, E., Gollash S. & Olenin S. (eds), Invasive aquatic species of Europe: Distribution,impacts and management. Kluwer Academic Publisher. Dordrecht, Boston, London: 7–9.Google Scholar
  3. Carlton, J. T. & J. B. Geller, 1993. Ecological roulette: The global transport of nonindigenous marine organisms. Science 261: 78–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cohen, A. N., J. T. Carlton & M. C. Fountain, 1995. Introduction, dispersal and potential impacts of the green crab Carcinus maenas in San Francisco Bay, California. Marine Biology 122: 225–237.Google Scholar
  5. Geller, J. B., J. T. Carlton & D. A. Powers, 1994. PCR-based detection of mtDNA haplotypes of native and invading mussels on the northeastern Pacific coast: latitudinal patterns of invasion. Marine Biology 119: 243–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Geller, J. B., E. D. Walton, E. D. Grosholz & G. M. Ruiz, 1997. Cryptic invasions of the crab Carcinus detected by molecular phylogeography. Molecular Ecology 6: 901–906.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Grosholz, E. D. & G. M. Ruiz, 1996. Predicting the impact of introduced marine species: Lessions from the multiple invasions of European green crab, Carcinus maenas. Biology Conservation 78: 59–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Grosholz, E. D., 2002. Ecological and evolutionary consequences of coastal invasions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17(1): 22–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goudet, J., 1995. FSTAT: A computer program to calculate F-statistics. Journal of Heredity 86: 485–486.Google Scholar
  10. Ivanov, B .G. 2001. Decapod crustaceans (Crustacea, Decapoda) of the Northern Pacific as a pool for the introduction into the Atlantic: An introduction is feasible but is it advisable? In Ivanov, B. G. (ed.), Study of biology of commercial crustaceans and algae of Russia seas. Collected papers. Moscow, VNIRO Publishing: 32–74.Google Scholar
  11. Jørstad, K. E., E. Farestveit, H. Rudra, A. -L. Agnalt & S. Olsen, 2002. Studies on red king crab (Paralithodes camtschaticus) introduces to the Barents Sea. In Crab 2001: Crabs in Cold Water Regions: Biology, Management and Economics. University of Alaska Sea Grant Collage Program. AK-SG-02-01: 425–437.Google Scholar
  12. Kuzmin, S. & S. Olsen, 1994. Barents Sea king crab (Paralithodes camtschatica). The transplantation experiments were successful. International Council for Exploration of Sea Council Meeting 1994/ K: 1–12.Google Scholar
  13. Kuzmin, S., S. Olsen, & O. Gerasimova, 1996. Barents Sea king crab (Paralithodes camtschatica) – The transplantation experiments were successful. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Biology, Management and Economics of Crabs from High Latitude Habitats. University of Alaska Sea Grant College Program Report no. 96–02: 649–663.Google Scholar
  14. Luikart, G. & J. M. Cornuet, 1998. Empirical evaluation of a test for identifying recently bottlenecked populations from allele frequency data. Conservation Biology 12: 228–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Orlov, Ju. I. & A. F. Karpevich, 1965. On the introduction of the commercial crab Paralithodes camtschatica (Tilesius) into the Barents Sea. Journal du Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer 156: 59–61.Google Scholar
  16. Orlov, Yu. I. & B. G. Ivanov, 1978. In the introduction of the Kamchatka King Crab Paralithodes camtschatica (Decapod: Anomura: Lithodidae) into the Barents Sea. Marine Biology 48: 373–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Raymond, M. & F. Rousset, 1995. GENEPOP (Version 1.2): Population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity 86: 248–249.Google Scholar
  18. Reilly, A., N. G. Elliott, P. M. Grewe, C. Clabby, P. Powell & R. D. Ward, 1999. Genetic differentiation between Tasmanian cultured Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) and their ancestral Canadian population: comparison of microsatellite DNA and allozyme and mitochondrial DNA variation. Aquaculture 173: 459–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Seeb J. E., G. H., Kruse L. W. Seeb R. G. Weck, 1989. Genetic structure of Red king crab populations in Alaska faciliates enforcement of fishing regulations. Proceedings of the International Symposium on King & Tanner Crabs, Nov. 1989, Anchorage, Alaska: 491–502.Google Scholar
  20. Seeb, L. W., E. J. Kretschmer, J. B. Olsen, W. D. Templin, K. C. Jones & W. S. Grant, 2002. Development of microsatellite loci in red king crab (Paralithodes camtschaticus). Molecular Ecology Notes 2: 137–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Stoner, D. S., R. Ben-Shlomo, B. Rinkevich, & I. L. Weissman, 2002. Genetic variability of Botryllus schlosseri invations to the east and west coast of USA. Marine Ecology Progress Series 243: 93–100.Google Scholar
  22. Tilesius, W. C., 1815. De Cancris Camtschaticis, Oniscis, Entomostracis et Cancellus marinis microscopicis noctilucentibus cum tabulis IV Aenaeis et appendice adnexo de Acaris et Ricinis Camtschaticis. Auctore Tilesio. Conventui exhibuit die 3 Februarii 1813. Mémoires de l’Académie Impériale de Sciences de St Pétersbourg 5: 331–405.Google Scholar
  23. Ward, R. D. & J. Andrew, 1995. Population genetics of northern Pacific seastar Asterias amurensis Lutken (Echinodermata: Asteriidae): allozyme differentiation among Japanese, Russian and recently introduced Tasmanian populations. Marine Biology 124: 99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ward, R. D., K. E. Jørstad & G. Maguire, 2003. Microsatellite diversity in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) introduced to Western Australia. Aquaculture 219: 169–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Knut E. Jørstad
    • 1
  • Christian Smith
    • 2
  • Zac Grauvogel
    • 2
  • Lisa Seeb
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Marine ResearchBergenNorway
  2. 2.Gene Conservation Laboratory, Alaska Department of Fish and GamesAnchorageUSA

Personalised recommendations