Abstract
Estuarine intertidal soft-bottom macrobenthic infauna of the Tagus estuary was characterised using different mesh size sieves and sediment sampling depth. The study sampled 105 sites using a hand held 0.01 m2 corer. The top layer (0–5 cm) was sieved through nested 1.0 and 0.5 mm meshes whereas the bottom layer (5–20 cm) was through a 1 mm mesh. The total survey took 26 taxa of more than 5800 individuals and a total wet weight biomass of over 650 g. The top layer, using both sieves, gathered 23 taxa (92% of the total), more than 5600 specimens (96%) but less than 8 g of biomass (1%) whereas the 1.0 mm sieve retained 21 taxa (91%), more than 1700 specimens (31%) and almost 7 g of biomass (1%). Abundance was dominated by small annelids, of which Streblospio shrubsolii was 68%, whereas biomass was dominated by molluscs, with the bivalve Scrobicularia plana representing 98%. Multivariate analyses showed an abundance pattern where the top layer data was very similar to that obtained with both layers. The bottom layer data were needed to accurately represent the total biomass pattern. The macrofaunal spatial pattern identified with the 0.5 mm sieve data differed from that identified by the 1.0 mm and was essential to discriminate a faunal assemblage located along the upper part of the shore. It was concluded that in order to characterize the macrofauna community structure, based on the presence/absence of taxa, the top layer and a 1.0 mm sieve would be sufficient. An abundance-based characterization requires the top layer and a 0.5 mm sieve whereas a biomass-based characterization requires data for both layers but it is sufficient to use the 1.0 mm sieve.





Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.References
Bachelet , G., 1990. The choice of a sieving mesh size in the quantitative assessment of marine macrobenthos: a necessary compromise between aims and constraints. Marine Environmental Research 30: 21–35.
Beukema, J. J., 1976. Biomass and species richness of the macrobenthic animals living on the tidal flats of the Dutch Wadden Sea. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 10: 236–361.
Bishop, J. D. D. & J. P. Hartley, 1986. A comparison of the fauna retained on 0.5 mm and 1.0 mm meshes from benthic samples taken in the Beatrice Oilfield, Moray Firth, Scotland. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 91B: 247–262.
Bordovskiy, O. K., 1965. Accumulation and transformation of organic substances in marine sediments. 3. Accumulation of organic matter in bottom sediments. Marine Geology 3: 33-82.
Calvário, J., 1984. Etude préliminaire des peuplements bentiques intertidaux (substrats meubles) de l’estuaire du Tage (Portugal) et sa cartographie. Arquivos do Museu Bocage, Série A 2: 187–206.
Christie, N. D., 1975. Relationship between sediment texture, species richness and volume of sediment sampled by a grab. Marine Biology 30: 89–96.
Clarke, K. R. & R. N. Gorley, 2001. Primer v5: user manual/tutorial. PRIMER-E, Plymouth.
Clarke, K. R. & R. M. Warwick, 2001. Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation. 2nd edn. PRIMER-E, Plymouth.
Crewe, T. L., D. J. Hamilton & A. W. Diamond, 2001. Effects of mesh size on sieved samples of Corophium volutator. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 53: 151–154.
Desgarrado Pereira, C., M. J. Gaudêncio M. T. Guerra & M. T. Lopes, 1997. Intertidal macrozoobenthos of the Tagus estuary (Portugal): The Expo’98 area. Publicaciones Especiales Instituto Español de Oceanografia 23: 107–120.
Dittmann, S., 1995. Benthos structure on tropical tidal flats of Australia. Helgoländer Meeresunters 49: 539–551.
Dittmann, S., 2000. Zonation of benthic communities in a tropical tidal flat of North-East Australia. Journal of Sea Research 43: 33–51.
Eleftheriou, A. & N. A. Holme, 1984. Macrofauna techniques. In Holme, N. A. & A. D. McIntyre (eds), Methods for the study of marine benthos. 2nd edn. Blackwell, Oxford, 140–216.
Gage, J. D., D. J. Hughes & J. L. G. Vecino, 2002. Sieve size influence in estimating biomass, abundance and diversity in samples of deep-sea macrobenthos. Marine Ecology Progress Series 225: 97–107.
James, R. J., M. P. Lincoln Smith & P. G. Fairweather, 1995. Sieve mesh-size and taxonomic resolution needed to describe natural spatial variation of marine macrofauna. Marine Ecology Progress Series 118: 187–198.
Kay, D. G. & R. D. Knights, 1975. The macro-invertebrate fauna of the intertidal soft sediments of South East England. Journal Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 55: 811–832.
Kingston, P. F. & M. J. Riddle, 1989. Cost effectiveness of benthic faunal monitoring. Marine Pollution Bulletin 20: 490–496.
Kristensen, E. & F. Ø. Anderson, 1987. Determination of organic carbon in marine sediments: a comparison of two CHN-analyser methods. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 109: 15–23.
Legendre, P. & L. Legendre, 1998. Numerical ecology. 2nd edn. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.
Lie, U., 1968. A quantitative study of benthic infauna in Pudget Sound, Washington, USA in 1963–1964. Fiskeridirektoratets Skrifter: Serie Havundersokelser 14: 237–556.
Marques, J. C., L. B. Rodrigues & A. J. A. Nogueira, 1993. Intertidal macrobenthic communities structure in the Mondego estuary (Western Portugal): reference situation. Vie et Milieu 43: 177–187.
Mayer, L. M., P. T. Rahaim, W. Guerin, S. A. Macko, L. Watling & F. E. Anderson, 1985. Biological and granulometric controls on sedimentary organic matter of an intertidal mudflat. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 20: 491–503.
McLusky, D. S., 1987. Intertidal habitats and benthic macrofauna of the Forth estuary, Scotland. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 93: 389–399.
Moreira, F., 1993. Macrohabitat selection by waders in the Tagus estuary (Portugal). Portugaliae Zoologica 2: 1–15.
Moreira, F., 1999. On the use by birds on intertidal areas of the Tagus estuary: implications for management. Aquatic Ecology 33: 301–309.
Moreira, M. H., 1988. Estudo da comunidade bêntica num banco de lodo intertidal da Ria de Aveiro, com especial incidência no crescimento, biomassa e produção do berbigão, Cardium edule (L.). Ciência Biológica - Ecology and Systematics, Portugal 8: 47–75.
Ohwada, T., 1988. Mesh size for settlement and recruitment studies of polychaetes with reference to the effect of fixation on washing bottom samples. Asian Marine Biology 5: 35–40.
Quintino, V., A. M. Rodrigues & F. Gentil, 1989. Assessment of macrozoobenthic communities in the lagoon of Óbidos, Western coast of Portugal. Scientia Marina 53: 645–654.
Rees, H. L., 1984. A note on mesh selection and sampling efficiency in benthic studies. Marine Pollution Bulletin 15: 225–229.
Rees, H. L., D. C. Moore, T. H. Pearson, M. Elliott, M. Servile, M. Pomfret & D. Johnson, 1990. Procedures for the monitoring of marine benthic communities at UK sewage sludge disposal sites. Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland. Fisheries Information Pamphlet 18.
Reise, K., 1991. Macrofauna in mud and sand of tropical and temperate tidal flats. In Elliott, M. & J.-P. Ducrotoy (eds), Estuaries and coasts: spatial and temporal intercomparisons. Olsen & Olsen, Fredenborg, 211–216.
Rodrigues, A. M., S. Meireles, T. Pereira, A. Gama & V. Quintino, 2006. Spatial patterns of benthic macroinvertebrates in intertidal areas of a Southern European estuary: the Tagus, Portugal. Hydrobiologia 555: 99–113.
Rodrigues, A. M. & V. Quintino, 1993. Horizontal biosedimentary gradients across the Sado estuary, W Portugal. Netherlands Journal of Aquatic Ecology 27: 465-482.
Rodrigues, A. M. & V. Quintino, 1994. Diagnóstico do estado de qualidade da região subtidal do Barreiro-Seixal, estuário do rio Tejo, através da análise do ambiente biossedimentar. In Rosa Pires, A., C. Pio, C. Bóia & T. Nogueira (eds), Proceedings of 3a Conferência Nacional sobre a Qualidade do Ambiente. Universidade de Aveiro, Aveiro, 967–999.
Schlacher, T. A. & T. H. Wooldridge, 1996. How sieve mesh size affects sample estimates of estuarine benthic macrofauna. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 201: 159–171.
Silva, G., J. L. Costa, P. R. Almeida & M. J. Costa, 2006. Structure and dynamics of a benthic invertebrate community in an intertidal area of the Tagus estuary, Western Portugal: a six year data series. Hydrobiologia 555: 115–128.
Silva, J. A. G., 1991. Ecologia, dinâmica e produção de Scrobicularia plana (da Costa, 1778) (Mollusca, Bivalvia) nos estuários dos rios Mira e Tejo (Portugal). [PhD Thesis]. Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon.
Tanaka, M. O. & F. P. P. Leite, 1998. The effect of sieve mesh size on the abundance and composition of macrophyte-associated macrofaunal assemblages. Hydrobiologia 389: 21–28.
Warwick, R. M., C. L. George & J. R. Davies, 1978. Annual macrofauna production in a Venus community. Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science 7: 215–241.
Ysebaert, T. & P. M. J. Herman, 2002. Spatial and temporal variation in benthic macrofauna and relationships with environmental variables in an estuarine, intertidal soft-sediment environment. Marine Ecology Progress Series 244: 105–124.
Acknowledgements
This study was included in the project SAT-TAGIS – Modelling the habitats, invertebrates and birds in intertidal flats of the Tagus estuary using satellite images and GIS (PDCTM/P/MAR/15256/1999), financed by the Portuguese FCT (Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia). Sónia Meireles and Teresa Pereira benefited from the project research initiation grants. Rui Marques assisted in sediment sampling. The authors acknowledge the comments and suggestions from two anonymous reviewers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below are the electronic supplementary materials.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rodrigues, A.M., Meireles, S., Pereira, T. et al. Spatial heterogeneity recognition in estuarine intertidal benthic macrofaunal communities: influence of sieve mesh-size and sampling depth. Hydrobiologia 587, 37–50 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-007-0684-8
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-007-0684-8


