, Volume 585, Issue 1, pp 249–253 | Cite as

Early release of eggs and embryos in a brooding ancient asexual ostracod: brood selection or a gambling strategy to increase fecundity?

  • Ricardo L. Pinto
  • Carlos E. F. Rocha
  • Koen Martens
Ostracoda (ISO15)


Asexual lineages lack the means to purge their genomes of (deleterious) mutations through recombination. Evolutionary theory thus predicts that such lineages will be prone to early extinction. In brooding animals, brood selection might provide a mechanism to counter the accumulation of mutations. Of the three putative ancient asexual animal groups, only the darwinulid ostracods are brooders. Here, we test the incidence of egg and juvenile abortion in a darwinulid species, Penthesilenula brasiliensis, under two temperature treatments. Part of the offspring is released without brooding (close to 30% in one treatment). The majority of these aborted eggs hatches and develops. As it is unlikely that females are such bad judges of offspring quality, either the surviving animals will present deficiencies later on in development (brood selection) or early egg release can be a (bet-hedging) strategy to increase fecundity in favourable conditions.


Brooding Ancient asexual Ostracoda Darwinulidae Reproduction Evolution Bet-hedging 



Fábio Lang da Silveira (São Paulo, Brazil) is acknowledged for allowing the use of equipment in his laboratory. Roberto Munehiza Shimizu (São Paulo, Brazil) provided advice with statistics. FAPESP allocated a Ph.D. grant (Processo: 03/13510-5) to RLP and provided financial assistance to KM (Processo: 98/05073-4). The study was also supported with a scholarship from ‘Pós-Graduação, Área Zoologia, IB-USP’ and ‘CAPES/PROAP/IBUSP-2003’. Robin Smith (Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan), Isa Schön (Brussels, Belgium) and several anonymous referees read the manuscript and suggested improvements.


  1. Horne, D. J., K. Martens & F. Mösslacher, 1998. A short note: is there brood selection in Darwinula stevensoni? In Crasquin-Soleau, S., E. Braccini & F. Lethiers (eds), What about Ostracoda! Actes du 3e Congrès Européen des Ostracodologistes, Paris-Bierville, France 8–12 juillet 1996. Bulletin des Centres de Recherches Exploration-Production Elf-Aquitaine 20: 33–35.Google Scholar
  2. Lively, C. M. & S. G. Johnson, 1994. Brooding and the evolution of parthenogenesis: strategy models and evidence from aquatic invertebrates. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 256: 89–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Martens, K., G. Rossetti & D. J. Horne, 2003. How ancient are ancient asexuals? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 270: 723–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Maynard-Smith, J., 1990. Evolution of Sex. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  5. McGregor, D. L., 1969. The reproduction potential, life history and parasitism of the freshwater ostracod Darwinula stevensoni (Brady and Robertson). In Neale, J. W. (ed.), The taxonomy, morphology and ecology of recent Ostracoda. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh, 194–221.Google Scholar
  6. Pinto, R. L., C. E. F. Rocha & K. Martens, 2004. On the genus Penthesilenula Rossetti & Martens, 1998 (Crustacea, Ostracoda, Darwinulidae) from (semi-) terrestrial habitats in Sao Paulo State (Brazil), with the description of a new species. Journal of Natural History 38: 2567–2589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ranta, E., 1979. Population biology of Darwinula stevensoni (Crustacea, Ostracoda) in an oligotrophic lake. Annales Zoologici Fennici 16: 28–35.Google Scholar
  8. Rossetti, G. & K. Martens, 1996. Redescription and morphological variability of Darwinula stevensoni (BRADY & ROBERTSON, 1870) (Crustacea, Ostracoda). Bulletin de l’Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, Biologie 66: 73–92.Google Scholar
  9. Rossetti, G. & K. Martens, 1998. Taxonomic Revision of the Recent and Holocene representatives of the Family Darwinulidae (Crustacea, Ostracoda), with a description of three new genera. Bulletin de l’Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, Biologie 68: 55–110.Google Scholar
  10. Schön, I. & K. Martens, 2003. No slave to sex. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 270: 827–833.Google Scholar
  11. Van Doninck, K., I. Schön, L. De Bruyn & K. Martens, 2002. A general purpose genotype in an ancient asexual. Oecologia 132: 205–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Van Doninck, K., I. Schön, K. Martens & B. Goddeeris, 2003a. The life-cycle of the ancient asexual ostracod Darwinula stevensoni (Brady & Robertson, 1870) (Crustacea, Ostracoda) in a temporate pond. Hydrobiologia 500: 331–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Van Doninck, K., I. Schön, F. Maes, L. De Bruyn & K. Martens, 2003b. Ecological strategies in an ancient asexual animal group. Freshwater Biology 48: 1285–1294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ricardo L. Pinto
    • 1
  • Carlos E. F. Rocha
    • 1
  • Koen Martens
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de BiociênciasUniversidade de São PauloSão PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Freshwater BiologyRoyal Belgian Institute of Natural SciencesBrusselsBelgium
  3. 3.Deparment of BiologyUniversity of GhentGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations