Abstract
In order to test the hypothesis that zooplankton biomass distribution (total and taxonomic groups) was influenced by the nutrient concentration and primary productivity distribution in three tropical reservoirs, subsurface samples were taken in the fluvial, transitional and lacustrine regions of three reservoirs (oligotrophic, mesotrophic and eutrophic) in southern Brazil (Paraná State) in March and September 2002. Zooplankton biomass ranged from 0.04 to 264.47 mg DW m−3. Higher biomass values were observed for cladocerans (73.60%; 0.01–259.86 mg DW m−3), followed by copepods (22.05%; 0.01–69.69 mg DW m−3) and rotifers (4.35%; 0.01–11.52 mg DW m−3). In general, the total zooplankton, rotifer, cladoceran and copepod biomass, and chlorophyll-a and total nutrient concentrations showed a similar longitudinal distribution within the reservoirs. Total zooplankton, rotifer and cladoceran biomass were related to the chlorophyll-a concentration, and zooplankton biomass was related to the total phosphorus distribution. This may have been due to the significant multicolinearity between the chlorophyll-a and total phosphorus concentrations. Cyanobacteria influenced the taxonomic group biomass results by interfering with the filter feeding in larger zooplankton species, which favoured the dominance of smaller species. As regards the longitudinal distribution of copepod biomass, cyanobacteria biomass determined the displacement of the microcrustaceans to the fluvial region of Iraí Reservoir. Our results supported the hypothesis formulated and the primary productivity was the major predictor of the zooplankton biomass distribution in the reservoirs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahrens, M. A. & R. H. Peter, 1991. Patterns and limitations in limnoplankton size spectra. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 48: 1967–1978.
Auer, B., U. Elzer & H. Arndt, 2004. Comparison of pelagic food webs in lakes along a trophic gradient and with seasonal aspects: influence of resource and predation. Journal of Plankton Research 26: 697–709.
Baranyi, C., T. Hein, C. Holarek, S. Keckeis & F. Schiemer, 2002. Zooplankton biomass and community structure in a Danube River floodplain system: effects of hydrology. Freshwater Biology 47: 473–482.
Berninger, U. G., B. J. Finlay & P. Kuuppo-Leinikki, 1991. Protozoan control of bacterial abundances in freshwater. Limnology and Oceanography 39: 139–147.
Bottrell, H. H., A. Duncan, Z. M. V Gliwicz, E. Grygierek, A. Herzig, A. Hillbricht-Ilkowska, H. Kurasawa, P. Larsson & T. Weglenska, 1976. A review of some problems in zooplankton production studies. Norwegian Journal of Zoology 24: 419–456.
Christoffersen, K, B. Riemann, A. Klysner & M. Sondergaard, 1993. Potential role of fish predation and natural population of zooplankton in structuring a plankton community in eutrophic lake water. Limnology and Oceanography 38: 561–573.
Golterman, H. L., R. S. Clymo & M. A. M. Ohnstad (eds), 1978. Methods for Physical and Chemical Analysis of Freshwaters. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford and Edinburgh.
Kalff, J., 2002. Limnology: Inland Water Ecosystems. Prentice Hall, New Jersey 592 pp.
Kimmel, B. L., O. T. Lind & L. J. Paulson, 1990. Reservoir primary production. In Thornton, K. W., B. L. Kimmel & F. E. Payne (eds), Reservoir Limnology: Ecological Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 133–194.
Leonard, J. A. & H. W. Paerl, 2005. Zooplankton community structure, micro-zooplankton grazing impact, and seston energy content in the St. Johns river system, Florida as influenced by the toxic caynobacterium Cylindrospermopsi raciborskii. Hydrobiologia 537: 89–97.
Mackereth F. J. H., J. Heron & J. F. Talling, (eds), 1978. Water analysis: some revised methods for limnologists. Freshwater Biological Association, Windermere.
Marzolf, G. R., 1990. Reservoirs as Environments for Zooplankton. In Thornton K. W., B. L. Kimmel & F. E Payne (eds), Reservoir Limnology: Ecological Perspectives. Wiley-InterScience, New York, 195–208.
Matsumura-Tundisi, T., A. C. Rietzler & J. G. Tundisi, 1989. Biomass (dry weight and carbon content) of plankton Crustacea from Broa reservoir (São Carlos, SP, Brazil) and its fluctuation across one year. Hydrobiologia 179: 229–236.
Okano, W. Y., 1994. Análise da estrutura e dinâmica populacional da comunidade de um reservatório artificial (Represa do Monjolinho, São Carlos, SP). Tese de Doutorado, UFSCar, São Carlos, 128 pp.
Pace, M. L. & J. D. Orcutt Jr., 1981. The relative importance of protozoans, rotifers and crustaceans in a freshwater zooplankton community. Limnology and Oceanography 26: 822–830.
Pace, M. L., 1986. An empirical analysis of zooplankton community size structure across lake trophic gradients. Limnology and Oceanography 31: 45–55.
Pagioro, T. A., L. F. M. Velho, F. A. Lansac-Tôha, D. G. Pereira & A. K. S. Nakamura, 2005. Influência do grau de trofia sobre os padrões de abundância de bactérias e protozoários planctônicos em reservatórios do estado do Paraná. In Rodrigues L., S. M. Thomaz, A. A. Agostinho & L. C. Gomes (eds), Biocenoses em reservatórios: padrões espaciais e temporais. Rima, São Carlos, 47–56.
Ruttner-Kolisko, A., 1977. Suggestions for biomass calculation of plankton rotifers. Archiv für Hydrobiologie Beihefte Ergebnisse der Limnologie 8: 71–76.
Sampaio, E. V., O. Rocha, T. Matsumura-Tundisi & J. G. Tundisi, 2002. Composition and abundance of zooplankton in the limnetic of seven reservoirs of the Paranapanema river. Brazilian Journal of Biology 62: 525–545.
Sendacz, S., Caleffi, S., Santos-Soares, J. 2006. Zooplankton biomass of reservoirs in different trophic conditions in the State of São Paulo, Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Biology 66: 337–350.
Sokal R. R. & F. J. Rohlf (eds). 1991. Biometry: The principles and practices of statistics in biological research. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York.
Statistica, 1996. Tulsa: Stat Soft. 3v.
Thornton, K. W., 1990. Perspectives on Reservoir Limnology. In Thornton K. W., B. L. Kimmel & F. E. Payne (eds), Reservoir Limnology: Ecological Perspectives. Wiley-InterScience, New York, 1–14.
Train, S., S. Jati, L. C. Rodrigues & B. M. Pivato, 2005. Distribuição espacial e temporal do fitoplâncton em três reservatórios da bacia do rio Paraná. In Rodrigues L., S. M. Thomaz, A. A. Agostinho & L. C. Gomes (eds), Biocenoses em reservatórios: padrões espaciais e temporais. Rima, São Carlos, 73–85.
Velho, L. F. M., Lansac-Tôha, F. A. & C. C. Bonecker, 2005. Distribuição longitudinal da comunidade zooplanctônica em reservatórios. In Rodrigues L., S. M. Thomaz, A. A. Agostinho & L. C. Gomes (eds), Biocenoses em reservatórios: padrões espaciais e temporais. Rima, São Carlos, 129–136.
Wetzel, G. 1990. In Thornton, K. W., B. L. Kimmel & F. E. Payne (eds), Reservoir Limnology: Ecological Perspectives. Wiley InterScience, New York, 227–238.
Acknowledgements
We thank CNPq (PRONEX), FINEP (CT-Hidro) and Nupelia for financial and logistical support, Dr. Kevin Murphy (Glasgow University) and Dr. Eric Dibble (Mississipi State University) for suggestions and English revision, and CNPq for the scholarships.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Handling editor: S. Dodson
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bonecker, C.C., Nagae, M.Y., Bletller, M.C.M. et al. Zooplankton biomass in tropical reservoirs in southern Brazil. Hydrobiologia 579, 115–123 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-006-0391-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-006-0391-x