Skip to main content
Log in

Natural variation in macroinvertebrate assemblages and the development of a biological banding system for interpreting bioassessment data—a preliminary evaluation using data from upland sites in the south-western Cape, South Africa

  • Primary Research Paper
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The variability of macroinvertebrate assemblages was investigated at 27 upland reference sites in the south-western Cape, South Africa. Multivariate analyses showed that sites did not group on the basis of geomorphological zonation, i.e. mountain stream and foothill-cobble bed. When separate analyses were undertaken for mountain stream (n = 21) and foothill-cobble bed sites (n = 6), assemblages formed three and two groups, respectively. Similarity amongst groups ranged from 47% to 52%, while within-group similarity was between 54% and 67%. Environmental variables shown to contribute to this variability included distance from source, cation ratio ([Na+]+[K+]/([Na+]+[K+]+[Ca2+]+[Mg2+]), pH, longitude and stream width. Whilst overall variability in the metrics of the biotic index, SASS (South African Scoring System), is high at reference sites, the interpretation of monitoring-site data using biological bands derived from a range of reference sites, ensured that variability was taken into account and that detection of disturbance at a monitoring site was not impeded. A biological banding system has been developed for upland sites in the south-western Cape, together with a list of reference or expected SASS-taxa. This list includes details pertaining to seasonality and biotope preferences. The ability to define reference conditions that take intrinsic variability amongst reference sites into account is important for the accurate interpretation of bioassessment data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armitage, P. D., D. Moss, J. F. Wright & M. T. Furse, 1983. The performance of a new biological water quality score system based on macroinvertebrates over a wide range of unpolluted running-water sites. Water Research 17: 333–347.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. A., 1997. Modelling and managing the effects of trout farms on Cape rivers. Unpublished Doctoral thesis, Zoology Department, University of Cape Town, South Africa, 175 pp.

  • Chutter F. M., 1998. Research on the Rapid Biological Assessment of Water Quality Impacts in Streams and Rivers. Water Research Commission Report No 422/1/98. Water Research Commission, Pretoria, South Africa, 230 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, S. D., 1984 The effects of trout on water strider in stream pools. Oecologia 63: 376–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, S. D., L. Barmuta, O. Sarnelle, K. Kratz & S. Diehl, 1997. Quantifying spatial heterogeneity in streams. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 16(1): 174–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowl, T. A., C. R. Townsend, N. Bouwes & H. Thomas, 1997. Scales and causes of patchiness in stream invertebrate assemblages: top-down predator effects. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 16(1): 277–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dallas, H. F., 2002. Spatial and temporal heterogeneity in lotic systems: implications for defining reference conditions for riverine macroinvertebrates. Water Research Commission Report No.KV138/03, Water Research Commission, Pretoria, 218 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dallas, H. F., 2004. Seasonal variability of macroinvertebrate assemblages in two regions of South Africa: implications for aquatic bioassessment. African Journal of Aquatic Science 29(2): 173–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dallas, H. F., In Press. The influence of biotope availability on macroinvertebrate assemblages in South African rivers: implications for aquatic bioassessment. Freshwater Biology.

  • Davies, B. R. & J. A. Day, 1998. Vanishing Waters. University of Cape Town Press, South Africa. .

    Google Scholar 

  • Furse, M. T., 2000. The application of RIVPACS procedures in headwater streams – an extensive and important natural resource. In Wright, J. F., D. W. Sutcliffe & M. T. Furse (eds), Assessing the Biological Quality of Fresh Waters: RIVPACS and Other Techniques Freshwater Biological Association, United Kingdom.

  • Golterman, H. I., Clymo, R. S. & M. A. M Ohnstad, 1978. Methods for Chemical and Physical Analysis of Fresh Waters. IBP Handbook No. 8. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, United Kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, A. D. & J. D. Agnew, 1962. The distribution of invertebrates endemic to acid streams in the Western and Southern Cape Province. Annals of the Cape Provincial Museums II, CSIR Reprint No. RW 121, Pretoria, South Africa.

  • Hawkins, C. P., J. N. Hogue, L. M. Decker & J. W. Feminella, 1997. Channel morphology, water temperature, and assemblage structure of stream insects. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 16(4): 728–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, J. M. & D. M. Schael, 2001. Assessing the Ecological Relevance of a Spatially-nested Geomorphological Hierarchy for River Management. Water Research Commission Report 754/1/01. Pretoria, South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Low, A.B. & A. G. Rebelo A.G., 1996. Vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Department of Environmental Affairs & Tourism, Pretoria, South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, C., A. Palmer, J. O’keeffe & R. Palmer, 1994. Macroinvertebrate community structure and altitudinal changes in the upper reaches of a warm, temperate southern African river. Freshwater Biology 32: 337–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, M. A. & N. L. Poff, 1997. Heterogeneity in streams: the influence of environmental heterogeneity on patterns and processes in streams. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 16(1): 169–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, M. & R. H. Norris, 1996. The effect of habitat-specific sampling on biological assessment of water quality using a predictive model. Freshwater Biology 36: 419–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poff, N. L. & J. V. Ward, 1990. Physical habitat template of lotic systems: recovery in the context of historical pattern of spatiotemporal heterogeneity. Environmental Management 14(5): 629–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Primer, 1999. Version 5. Plymouth Marine Laboratory, United Kingdom.

  • Pringle, C. M., R. J. Naiman, G. Bretchko, J. R. Karr, M. W. Oswood, J. R. Webster, R. L. Welcome & M. J. Winterbourn, 1988. Patch dynamics in lotic systems: the stream as a mosaic. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 7: 503–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowntree, K. M. & R. A. Wadeson, 1999. A Hierarchical Geomorphological Model for the Classification of Selected South African Rivers. Water Research Commission Report No. 497/1/99. Water Research Commission, Pretoria, South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, J. C. & R. H. Norris, 2000. Biological assessment of river quality: developments of AUSRIVAS models and outputs. In Wright J. F., D. W. Sutcliffe & M. T. Furse (eds), Assessing the Biological Quality of Fresh Waters: RIVPACS and Other Techniques Freshwater Biological Association, United Kingdom.

  • Smith, M. J., W. R. Kay, D. H. D. Edward, P. J. Papas, K. J. Richardson,.J. C. Simpson, A. M. Pinder, D. J. Cale, P. H. J. Howitz, J. A. Davis, F. H. Yung, R. H. Norris & S. A. Halse, 1999. AusRiVAS: using macroinvertebrates to assess ecological condition of rivers in Western Australia. Freshwater Biology 41(2): 269–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snaddon, C. D. & B. R. Davies, 1998. A preliminary assessment of the effects of a small inter-basin transfer of water on discharge and invertebrate community structure. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 14: 421–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, D. M. & M. D. Picker, 1999. A revision of Aphanicercella Tillyard (Plecoptera: Notonemouridae) including the A. barnardii (Tillyard) species-complex. African Entomology 7: 197–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, B. A. & C. L. Griffiths, 2001. Amphipods. In Day J. A., B. A. Stewart, I. J. De Moor & A. E. Louw (eds), Guides to the Freshwater Invertebrates of Southern Africa, Vol. 4, Crustaceae III. Water Research Commission, Pretoria, South Africa.

  • Townsend, C. R., S. Doledec & M. R. Scarsbrook, 1997. Species traits in relation to temporal and spatial heterogeneity in streams: a test of habitat templet theory. Freshwater Biology 37: 367–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vegter J. R., 1995. Geology Map of South Africa with Simplified Lithostratigraphy for Geohydrological Use. Water Research Commission TT 74/95, Pretoria, South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wishart, M. J. & J. A. Day, 2002. Endemism in the freshwater fauna of the south-western Cape, South Africa. Verhandlungen der Internationalen Vereinigung fűr Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie 28: 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helen F. Dallas.

Additional information

Handling editor: D. Dudgeon

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dallas, H.F., Day, J.A. Natural variation in macroinvertebrate assemblages and the development of a biological banding system for interpreting bioassessment data—a preliminary evaluation using data from upland sites in the south-western Cape, South Africa. Hydrobiologia 575, 231–244 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-006-0374-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-006-0374-y

Keywords

Navigation