Hydrobiologia

, Volume 572, Issue 1, pp 59–70 | Cite as

Local stream habitat variables predicted from catchment scale characteristics are useful for predicting fish distribution

  • James Mugodo
  • Mark Kennard
  • Peter Liston
  • Sue Nichols
  • Simon Linke
  • Richard H. Norris
  • Mark Lintermans
Article

Abstract

South-east Queensland (Australia) streams were described by 21 local habitat variables that were chosen because of their potential association with fish distribution. An Assessment by a Nearest Neighbour Analysis (ANNA) model used large-scale variables that are robust to human influence to predict what the values of each of the 21 local habitat variables at each site would be without modification from human activity. The ANNA model used elevation, stream order, distance from source and longitude to predict the local habitat variables; other candidate predictor variables (mean rainfall, latitude and catchment area) were not found to be useful. The ANNA model was able to predict five of the 21 local habitat variables (average width, sand (%), cobble (%), rocks (%) and large woody debris) with an R2 of at least 0.2. The observed values of these five local habitat variables were used to model the distributions of individual fish species. The species distribution models were developed using logistic regression based on a subset of the data (some of the data were withheld for model validation) and a forward stepwise model selection procedure. There was no difference in predictive performance of fish distribution models for model predictions based on observed values and model predictions based on ANNA predicted values of local habitat variables in the withheld data (p-value = 0.85). Therefore, it is possible to predict the suitability of sites as habitat for given fish species using estimated (estimates based on large-scale variables) natural values of local habitat variables.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Armitage P. D., Gunn R. J. M., F. M. T., Wright J. F. and Moss D. (1987). The use of prediction to assess macroinvertebrate response to river regulation. Hydrobiologia 144: 25–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkinson, B. & D. Mahoney, 2001. S-Plus ROC functions. In Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and ResearchGoogle Scholar
  3. Belliard J., Boet P. and Tales E. (1997). Regional and longitudinal patterns of fish community structure in the Seine River basin, France. Environmental Biology of Fishes 50: 133–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bond N. R. and Lake P. S. (2003). Characterizing fish-habitat associations in streams as the first step in ecological restoration. Austral Ecology 28: 611–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Centor R. M. and Schartz J. S. (1985). An evaluation of methods for estimating the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. Medical Decision Making 5: 149–156PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Davies N. M., Norris R. H. and Thoms M. C. (2000). Prediction and assessment of local stream habitat features using large-scale catchment characteristics. Freshwater Biology 45: 343–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. (1992). Hierarchies and spatial scale in process geomorphology: A review. Geomorphology 4: 303–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. DeLong E. R., DeLong D. M. and Clarke-Pearson D. L. (1988). Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: A nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44: 837–845PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Draper N. R. and Smith H. (1966). Applied Regression Analysis. John Wiley and Sons, Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Efron B. and Tibshirani R. J. (1993). An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman and Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Fielding A. H. and Bell J. F. (1997). A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environmental Conservation 24: 38–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Franklin J. (1998). Predicting the distribution of shrub in southern California from climate and terrain-derived variables. Journal of Vegetation Science 9: 733–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Frissell C. A., Liss W. J., Warren C. E. and Hurley M. D. (1986). A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification: Viewing streams in a watershed context. Environmental Manangement 10(2): 199–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gafny S., Goren M. and Gasith A. (2000). Habitat condition and fish assemblage structure in a coastal mediterranean stream (Yarqon, Israel) receiving domestic effluent. Hydrobiologia 422: 319–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gorman O. T. and Karr J. R. (1978). Habitat structure and stream fish communities. Ecology 59: 507–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Green D. and Swets J. A. (1966). Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. John Wiley and Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Hall L. W., Morgan R. P., Perry E. S. and Waltz A. (2002). Development of a provisional physical habitat index for Maryland freshwater streams. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 77: 265–291PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hanley J. A. and McNeil B. J. (1982). The meaning and use of the area under receiver operating characteristic curve. Radiology 143: 29–36PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hanley J. A. and McNeil B. J. (1983). A method for comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 148: 839–843PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Harper D. and Everard M. (1998). Why should the habitat-level approach underpin holistic river survey and management?. Aquatic Conservation-Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 8: 395–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hosmer D. W. and Lemeshow S. (1989). Applied Logistic Regression. John Wiley & Sons, BrisbaneGoogle Scholar
  22. Imhof J. G., Fitzgibbon J. and Annable W. K. (1996). A hierarchical evaluation system for characterizing watershed ecosystems for fish habitat. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 53: 312–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. James F. C. and McCulloch C. E. (1990). Multivariate analysis in ecology and systematics: Panaceae or pandora’s box. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 21: 129–166Google Scholar
  24. Jeffers J. N. R. (1998). Characterization of river habitats and prediction of habitat features using ordination techniques. Aquatic Conservation-Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 8: 529–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Joy M. K. and Death R. G. (2002). Predictive modelling of freshwater fish as a biomonitoring tool in New Zealand. Freshwater Biology 47: 2261–2275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kauffman J. B., Beschta R. L., Otting N. and Lytjen D. (1997). An ecological perspective of riparian and stream restoration in the western United States. Fisheries 22: 12–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kennard, M. J., B. J. Pusey, A. H. Arthington & S. J. Mackay, 2006. Development and application of a predictive model of freshwater fish assemblage composition to evaluate river health in eastern Australia. Hydrobiologia. This VolumeGoogle Scholar
  28. Knighton D. (1984). Fluvial Forms and Processes. Edward Arnold, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  29. Linke S., Norris R., Faith D. P. and Stockwell D. (2005). ANNA: A new prediction method for bioassessment programs. Freshwater Biology 50: 147–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Maddock I. (1999). The importance of physical habitat assessment for evaluating river health. Freshwater Biology 41: 373–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McCullagh P. and Nelder J. A. (1989). Generalized Linear Models. Chapman and Hall, London, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Merrick J. R. and Schmida G. E. (1984). Australian Freshwater Fishes: Biology and Management. Griffin Press Ltd, Netley, South AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  33. Olden J. D. and Jackson D. A. (2002). A comparison of statistical approaches for modelling fish species distributions. Freshwater Biology 47: 1976–1995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pearce J. and Ferrier S. (2000). An evaluation of alternative algorithms for fitting species distribution models using logistic regression models. Ecological Modelling 128: 127–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Poff N. L. (1997). Landscape filters and species traits: Towards mechanistic understanding and prediction in stream ecology. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 16: 391–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Poff N. L. and Allan J. D. (1995). Functional-Organization of Stream Fish Assemblages in Relation to Hydrological Variability. Ecology 76: 606–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Poff N. L. and Ward J. V. (1990). The physical habitat template of lotic systems: Recovery in the context of historical pattern of spatio-temporal heterogeneity. Environmental Management 14: 629–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pusey B. J. and Kennard M. J. (1996). Species richness and geographical variation in assemblage structure of the freshwater fish fauna of the Wet Tropics region of northern Queensland. Marine and Freshwater Research 47: 563–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pusey B. J., Kennard M. J. and Arthington A. H. (2004). Freshwater Fishes of North-eastern Australia. CSIRO Publishing, CollingwoodGoogle Scholar
  40. Pusey B. J., Kennard M. J., Arthur J. M. and Arthington A. H. (1998). Quantitative sampling of stream fish assemblages: Single- versus multiple pass electrofishing. Australian Journal of Ecology 23: 365–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Richards C., Haro R. J., Johnson B. L. and Host G. E. (1997). Catchment and reach-scale properties as indicators of macroinvertebrate species traits. Freshwater Biology 37: 219–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Richards C., Johnson L. B. and Host G. E. (1996). Landscape-scale influences on stream habitats and biota. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 53(Suppl. 1): 295–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schlosser I. J. (1995). Critical landscape attributes that influence fish population dynamics in headwater streams. Hydrobiologia 303: 71–81Google Scholar
  44. Schlosser I. J. and Angermeier P. L. (1995). Spatial variation in demographic processes of lotic fishes: Conceptual models, empirical evidence and implications for conservation. American Fisheries Society Symposium 17: 392–401Google Scholar
  45. Schumm S. A. and Lichty R. W. (1965). Time, space and causality in geomorphology. American Journal of Science 263: 110–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Swets J. A. and Pickett R. M. (1982). Evaluation of Diagnostic Systems. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • James Mugodo
    • 1
  • Mark Kennard
    • 2
  • Peter Liston
    • 1
  • Sue Nichols
    • 1
  • Simon Linke
    • 1
  • Richard H. Norris
    • 1
  • Mark Lintermans
    • 3
  1. 1.Cooperative Research Centre for Freshwater EcologyUniversity of CanberraCanberraAustralia
  2. 2.Cooperative Research Centre for Freshwater Ecology, Centre for Riverine Landscapes, Faculty of Environmental SciencesGriffith UniversityNathanAustralia
  3. 3.Wildlife Research & MonitoringEnvironment ACTCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations