Advertisement

Hydrobiologia

, Volume 549, Issue 1, pp 259–266 | Cite as

Direct and Indirect Effects of Solar Ultraviolet Radiation on Attached Bacteria and Algae in Lotic Systems

  • Yoshikuni HodokiEmail author
Primary Research Paper

Abstract

I examined the effects of solar ultraviolet radiation (UVR) on attached bacteria and algal densities in lotic systems in outdoor artificial stream apparatus. Flumes were covered with four types of film for UVR screening treatments, and attached bacterial cell densities and their temporal variations were compared between conditions excluding and including solar UVR. Attached bacterial cell densities were depressed by solar UVR, and both accrual rate and saturated density were significantly lower in the +UVR (full solar radiation) condition than in −UVR and dark conditions. Solar UVR also indirectly affected the rate of algal accrual. Microscopic direct observations of attached bacterial cell density and algae on substrata showed that solar UVR depressed the accrual of attached bacteria and consequently the frequency of sites with high bacterial cell density that can trap suspended algae in the water. The final amount of algal accrual in the +UVR condition was one-fourth of that in the −UVR condition. Therefore, the effects of solar UVR may be more serious in systems where periphyton are frequently removed by floods.

Key words

attached algae attached bacteria periphyton community solar UVR 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ács, É., Kiss, K. T., Szabó, K., Makk, J. 2000Short-term colonization sequence of periphyton on glass slides in a large river (River Danube, near Budapest)Algological Studies100135156Google Scholar
  2. Aizaki, M. 1980Changes in standing crop and photosynthetic rate attendant on the film development of periphyton in a shallow eutrophic riverJapanese Journal of Limnology41225234Google Scholar
  3. Blenkinsopp, S. A., Lock, M. A. 1994The impact of storm-flow on river biofilm architectureJournal of Phycology30807818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bothwell, M. L., Sherbot, D., Roberge, A. C., Daley, R. J. 1993Influence of natural ultraviolet radiation on lotic periphytic diatom community growth, biomass accrual, and species composition: short-term versus long-term effectsJournal of Phycology292435Google Scholar
  5. Bothwell, M. L., Sherbot, D. M. J., Pollock, C. M. 1994Ecosystem response to solar ultraviolet B radiation: influence of trophic level interactionsScience26597100Google Scholar
  6. Cabrera, S., Pizarro, G. 1994Change in chlorophyll a concentration, copepod abundance and UV and PAR penetration in the water column during the ozone depletion in Antarctic Lake Kitiesh, 1992Archiv für Hydrobiologie beiheft Ergebnisse der Limnologie43123134Google Scholar
  7. Claret, C. 1998A method based on artificial substrates to monitor hyporheic biofilm developmentInternational Review of Hydrobiology83135143Google Scholar
  8. Enright, J. T. 1976Climate and population regulation. The biogeographer’s dilemmaOecologia24295310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Findlay, S., Howe, K. 1993Bacterial–algal relationships in streams of the Hubbard Brook experimental forestEcology7423262336Google Scholar
  10. Francoeur, S. N., Lowe, R. L. 1998Effects of ambient ultraviolet radiation on littoral periphyton: biomass accrual and taxon-specific responsesJournal of Freshwater Ecology132937Google Scholar
  11. Haack, T. K., McFeters, G. A. 1982Microbial dynamics of an epilithic mat community in a high alpine streamApplied and Environmental Microbiology43702707Google Scholar
  12. Helbling, E. W., Villafañe, V., Ferrario, M., Holm-Hansen, O. 1992Impact of natural ultraviolet radiation on rates of photosynthesis and on specific marine phytoplankton speciesMarine Ecology Progress Series8089100Google Scholar
  13. Hepinstall, J. A., Fuller, R. L. 1994Periphyton reactions to different light and nutrient levels and the response o bacteria to these manipulationArchive für Hydrobiologie131161173Google Scholar
  14. Herndl, G. J., Brugger, A., Hager, S., Kaiser, E., Obernosterer, B., Reitner, I., Slezak, D. 1997Role of ultraviolet-B radiation on bacterioplankton and the availability of dissolved organic matterPlant Ecology1284251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hill, W. R., Dimick, S. M., McNamara, A. E., Branson, C. A. 1997No effects of ambient UV radiation detected in periphyton and grazersLimnology and Oceanography42769774Google Scholar
  16. Hoagland, K. D., Roemer, S. C., Rosowski, J. R. 1982Colonization and community structure of two periphyton assemblages, with emphasis on the diatoms (Bacillariophyceae)American Journal of Botany69188213Google Scholar
  17. Hodoki, Y. 2005aEffects of solar ultraviolet radiation on the periphyton community in lotic systems: comparison of attached algae and bacteria during their developmentHydrobiologia534193204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hodoki, Y. 2005bBacterial biofilm encourages algal immigration onto substrata in lotic systemsHydrobiologia5392734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Horner, R. R., Welch, E. B., Veenstra, R. B. 1983Development of nuisance periphytic algae in laboratory streams in relation to enrichment and velocityWetzel, R. G. eds. Periphyton of Freshwater EcosystemsDr W. Junk PublishersThe Hague,121134Google Scholar
  20. Hudon, C., Bourget, E. 1981Initial colonization of artificial substrate: community development and structure studied by scanning electron microscopyCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science3813711384Google Scholar
  21. Jeffrey, W. H., Aas, P., Lyons, M. M., Coffin, R. B., Pledger, R. J., Mitchell, D. L. 1996aAmbient solar radiation-induced photodamage in marine bacterioplanktonPhotochemistry and Photobiology64419427Google Scholar
  22. Jeffrey, W. H., Pledger, R. J., Aas, P., Hager, S., Coffin, R. B., Haven, R. Y., Mitchell, D. L. 1996bDiel and depth profiles of DNA photodamage in bacterioplankton exposed to ambient solar ultraviolet radiationMarine Ecology Progress Series137283291Google Scholar
  23. Kiffney, P. M., Clements, W. H., Cady, T. A. 1997Influence of ultraviolet radiation on the colonization dynamics of a Rocky Mountain stream benthic communityJournal of North American Benthological Society16520530Google Scholar
  24. Kim, D. S., Watanabe, Y. 1993The effect of long wave ultraviolet radiation (UV-A) on the photosynthetic activity of natural population of freshwater phytoplanktonEcological Research8225234Google Scholar
  25. Kim, D. S., Watanabe, Y. 1994Inhibition of growth and photosynthesis of freshwater phytoplankton by ultraviolet A (UVA) radiation and subsequent recovery from stressJournal of Plankton Research1616451654Google Scholar
  26. Lesser, M. P., Cullen, J. J., Neale, P. J. 1994Carbon uptake in a marine diatom during acute exposure to ultraviolet B radiation: relative importance of damage and repairJournal of Phycology30183192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lindell, M., Edling, H. 1996Influence of light on bacterioplankton in a tropical lakeHydrobiologia3236773Google Scholar
  28. Liu, D., Lau, L., Chau, Y. K., Pacepavicius, G. J. 1993Characterization of biofilm development on artificial substratum in natural waterWater Research27361367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lock, M. A., Wallace, R. R., Costerton, J. W., Ventullo, R. M., Charlton, S. E. 1984River epilithon: toward a structural-functional modelOikos421022Google Scholar
  30. McNamara, A. E., Hill, W. R. 2000UV-B irradiance gradient affects photosynthesis and pigments but not food quality of periphytonFreshwater Biology43649662Google Scholar
  31. Morikawa, K., Shibuya, T. 2000Spatial distribution of the microbial community to develop on a slide glass submerged in river waterMicrobes and Environments158591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ochs, C. A. 1997Effects of UV radiation on grazing by two marine heterotrophic nanoflagellates on autotrophic picoplanktonJournal of Plankton Research1915171536Google Scholar
  33. Peterson, C. G., Stevenson, R. J. 1992Resistance and resilience of lotic algal communities: importance of disturbance timing and currentEcology7314451461Google Scholar
  34. Romani, A. M., Sabater, S. 1999Effect of primary producers on the heterotrophic metabolism of a stream biofilmFreshwater Biology41729736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sand-Jensen, K. 1983Physical and chemical parameters regulating growth of periphytic communitiesWetzel, R. G. eds. Periphyton of Freshwater EcosystemsDr W. Junk PublishersThe Hague,6371Google Scholar
  36. Sokal, R. R., Rohlf, F. J. 1997Biometry,3W. H. Freeman and CompanyNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Sommaruga, R., Oberleiter, A., Psenner, R. 1996Effect of UV radiation on the bacterivory of a heterotrophic nanoflagellateApplied and Environmental Microbiology6243954400Google Scholar
  38. Sommaruga, R., Obernosterer, I., Herndl, G. J., Psenner, R. 1997Inhibitory effect of solar radiation on thymidine and leucine incorporation by freshwater and marine bacterioplanktonApplied and Environmental Microbiology6341784184Google Scholar
  39. Stevenson, R. J. 1983Effects of current and conditions simulating autogenically changing microhabitats on benthic diatom immigrationEcology6415141524Google Scholar
  40. Vinebrooke, R. D., Leavitt, P. R. 1996Effects of ultraviolet radiation on periphyton in an alpine lakeLimnology and Oceanography4110351040Google Scholar
  41. Zar, J. H. 1996Biostatistical Analysis,3Prentice-HallUpper Saddle River, NJ, USAGoogle Scholar
  42. Zellmer, I. D. 1996The impact of food quantity on UV-B tolerance and recovery from UV-B damage in Daphnia pulexHydrobiologia3198792CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Environmental Earth ScienceHokkaido UniversitySapporo, HokkaidoJapan

Personalised recommendations