, Volume 548, Issue 1, pp 233–249 | Cite as

Influence of Pulsed Inflows and Nutrient Loading on Zooplankton and Phytoplankton Community Structure and Biomass in Microcosm Experiments Using Estuarine Assemblages

  • Yesim Buyukates
  • Daniel RoelkeEmail author
Primary Research Paper


Productivity and community structure of phytoplankton and zooplankton are influenced by hydrologic disturbances in many ways. In a recent modeling study it was suggested that pulsed inflows might enhance zooplankton performance, curb accumulation of phytoplankton accumulated biomass, and promote phytoplankton species diversity. We tested these predictions by performing microcosm experiments on natural plankton assemblages from the Nueces Delta, TX, USA. On three occasions (March, June, and September 2001), experiments of semi-continuous and flow-through design were conducted using natural plankton assemblages. We investigated the effect of two different inflow and nutrient loading regimes on zooplankton biomass, and phytoplankton biomass and diversity, i.e., continuous and pulsed inflows of 3 day frequency. Despite differences in initial community structure on these three occasions, as well as the very different communities that arose between experimental designs, our findings showed that pulsed inflows altered plankton dynamics. In all cases, pulsed inflows resulted in greater zooplankton biomass. In most cases, pulsed inflows resulted in lower phytoplankton biomass and higher diversity. We speculate that greater phytoplankton diversity in the pulsed flow treatments favored selectively feeding zooplankton, whose better performance prevented higher accumulation of phytoplankton biomass.


pulsed inflow zooplankton phytoplankton diversity biomass microcosm estuary wastewater discharge 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alcaraz, M. 1997Copepods under turbulence: grazing, behavior and metabolic ratesScientia Marina61177195Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, H. D., Dunton, K. H. 2002Freshwater inundation effects on emergent vegetation of a hypersaline salt marshEstuaries2514261435Google Scholar
  3. Barbiero, R. P., James, W. F., Barko, J. W. 1999The effects of disturbance events on phytoplankton community structure in a small temperate reservoirFreshwater Biology42503512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bureau of Reclamation, 2000. Concluding report: Rincon Bayou Demonstration Project. Volume II. Findings. U. S Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Oklahoma-TXGoogle Scholar
  5. Buyukates, Y., 2003. Characterization of the Plankton Community in the Lower Rincon Delta: Investigations Regarding New Approaches to Management. Ph. D. Dissertation. Texas A & M University, Department of Wildlife & Fisheries Sciences, College Station, TXGoogle Scholar
  6. Cottingham, K. L., Schindler, D. E. 2000Effects of grazer community structure on phytoplankton response to nutrient pulsesEcology81183200Google Scholar
  7. Ebenhöh, W. 1988Coexistence of an unlimited number of algal species in a model systemTheoretical Population Biology34130144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fejes, E. M., Roelke, D. L., Gable, G., Heilman, J. L., McInnes, K. J., Zuberer, D. A. 2005Microalgal productivity, community composition, and pelagic food web dynamics in a semi-tropical, turbid salt marsh isolated from freshwater inflowEstuaries2894105Google Scholar
  9. Flöder, S., Sommer, U. 1999Diversity in planktonic communities: an experimental test of the intermediate disturbance hypothesisLimnology and Oceanography4411141119Google Scholar
  10. Gaedeke, A., Sommer, U. 1986The influence of the frequency of periodic disturbances on the maintenance of phytoplankton diversityOecologia712528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gismervik, I., Andersen, T. 1997Prey switching by Acartia clausi: experimental evidence and implications of intraguild predation assessed by a modelMarine Ecology Progress Series157247259Google Scholar
  12. Guillard, R. L., Ryther, J. H. 1962Studies of marine planktonic diatoms. I. Cyclotella nana Hustedt and Detonula confervacea CleveCanadian Journal of Microbiology8229239PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hambright, K. D., Zohary, T. 2000Phytoplankton species diversity controlled through competitive exclusion and physical disturbancesLimnology and Oceanography45110122Google Scholar
  14. Hann, B. J., Goldsborough, L. G. 1997Responses of a prairie wetland to press and pulse additions of inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus: invertebrate community structure and interactionsArchiv für Hydrobiologie140169194Google Scholar
  15. Havens, K. E. 1991aThe importance of rotiferan and crustacean zooplankton as grazers of algal productivity in a freshwater estuaryArchiv für Hydrobiologie122122Google Scholar
  16. Havens, K. E. 1991bZooplankton dynamics in a freshwater estuaryArchiv für Hydrobiologie1236997Google Scholar
  17. Heilman, J. L., Cobos, D. R., Heinsch, F. A., Campbell, C. S., McInnes, K. J. 1999Tower-based conditional sampling for measuring ecosystem-scale carbon dioxide exchange in coastal wetlandsEstuaries22584591Google Scholar
  18. Heinsch, F. A., J. L. Heilman, K. J. McInnes, D. R. Cobbs, D. A. Zuberer & D. L. Roelke, 2004. Carbon dioxide exchange in a high marsh on the Texas Gulf Coast: Effects of freshwater availability. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. AcceptedGoogle Scholar
  19. Horne, A. J., Goldman, C. R. 1994LimnologyMcGraw HillNew York576Google Scholar
  20. Huisman, J., A. M. Johansson, E. O. Folmer & F. J. Weissing, 2001. Towards a solution of the plankton paradox: the importance of physiology and life history. Ecology Letters, 2001, 408–411.Google Scholar
  21. Hutchinson, G. E. 1961The paradox of the planktonThe American Naturalist95137147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ingrid, G., Andersen, T., Vadstein, O. 1996Pelagic food webs and eutrophication of coastal waters: Impact of grazers on algal communitiesMarine Pollution Bulletin332235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kagami, M., Yoshida, T., Gurung, T. B., Urabe, J. 2002Direct and indirect effects of zooplankton on algal composition in situ grazing experimentsOecologia133356363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Katechakis, A., Stibor, H., Sommer, U. 2002Changes in the phytoplankton community and microbial food web of Blanes Bay (Catalan Sea, NW Mediterranean) under prolonged grazing pressure by doliolids (Tunicata), cladocerans or copepods (Crustacea)Marine Ecology Progress Series2345569Google Scholar
  25. Kim, H. W., Joo, G. J., Walz, N. 2001Zooplankton dynamics in the hyper-eutrophic Nakdong River system (Korea) regulated by an estuary dam and side channelsInternational Review of Hydrobiology86127143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kirk, J. T. O. 1994Light and Photosynthesis in Aquatic EcosystemsCambridge University PressUK509Google Scholar
  27. Lehman, J. T. 1988Selective herbivory and its role in the evolution of phytoplankton growth strategiesSandgren, C. D. eds. Growth and reproductive strategies of freshwater phytoplanktonCambridge University PressNew York369387Google Scholar
  28. Lund, J. W. G., Kipling, C., LeCren, E. D. 1958The inverted microscope method of estimating algal numbers and the statistical basis of estimations by countingHydrobiologia11143170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. MacKay, N. A., Elser, J. 1998Nutrient recycling by Daphnia reduces N2 fixation by cyanobacteriaLimnology and Oceanography43347354Google Scholar
  30. Montagna, P. A., Kalke, R. D., Ritter, C. 2002Effect of restored freshwater inflow on macrofauna and meiofauna in upper Rincon Bayou, Texas, USAEstuaries2514361447Google Scholar
  31. Padisak, J. 1993The influence of different disturbance frequencies on the species richness, diversity and equitability of phytoplankton in shallow lakesHydrobiologia249135156Google Scholar
  32. Palmer, T. A., Montagna, P. A., Kalke, R. D. 2002Downstream effects of restored freshwater inflow to Rincon Bayou, Nueces Delta, Texas, USAEstuaries2514481456Google Scholar
  33. Petersen, J. E., Sanford, L. P., Kemp, W. M. 1998Coastal plankton responses to turbulent mixing in experimental ecosystemsMarine Ecology Progress Series1712341Google Scholar
  34. Prescott, G. W. 1978How to Know the Freshwater AlgaeW. C. Brown Company PublishersDubuque (I.O.)293Google Scholar
  35. Quintana, X. D., Comin, F. A., Moreno-Amich, R. 1998Nutrient and plankton dynamics in a Mediterranean salt marsh dominated by incidents of flooding. Part 2: Response of the zooplankton community to disturbancesJournal of Plankton Research2021192127Google Scholar
  36. Reynolds, C. S. 1984The Ecology of Freshwater PhytoplanktonCambridge University PressNew York384Google Scholar
  37. Reynolds, C. S. 1989Physical determinants of phytoplankton successionSommer, U. eds. Plankton ecology: succession in plankton communitiesSpringer-VerlagBerlin57107Google Scholar
  38. Roelke, D. L., Cifuentes, L. A., Eldridge, P. M. 1997Nutrient and phytoplankton dynamics in a sewage-impacted Gulf Coast Estuary: a field test of the PEG-model and equilibrium resource competition theoryEstuaries20725742Google Scholar
  39. Roelke, D. L., Eldridge, P. M., Cifuentes, L. A. 1999A model of phytoplankton competition for limiting and non-limiting nutrients: implications for management of dynamic environmentEstuaries2292104Google Scholar
  40. Roelke, D. L. 2000Copepod food-quality threshold as a mechanism influencing phytoplankton succession and accumulation of biomass, and secondary productivity: a modeling study with management implicationsEcological Modelling134245274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Roelke, D. L., Buyukates, Y. 2001The diversity of harmful algal bloom-triggering mechanisms and the complexity of bloom initiationHuman and Ecological Risk Assessment713471362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Roelke, D. L., Buyukates, Y. 2002Dynamics of phytoplankton succession coupled to species diversity as a system-level tool for study of Microcystis population dynamics in eutrophic lakesLimnology and Oceanography4711091118Google Scholar
  43. Roelke, D. L., Augustine, S., Buyukates, Y. 2003Fundamental predictability in multispecies competition: The influence of large disturbanceThe American Naturalist162615623CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Roelke, D. L., Buyukates, Y., Williams, M., Jean, J. 2004Interannual variability in the seasonal plankton succession of a shallow, warm-water lakeHydrobiologia513205218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Saiz, E., Alcaraz, M. 1991Effects of small-scale turbulence on development time and growth of Acartia grani (Copepoda, Calanoida)Journal Plankton Research13873883Google Scholar
  46. Schippers, P., Verschoor, A. M., Vos, M., Mooij, W. M. 2001Does “supersaturated coexistence” resolve the “paradox of the plankton”?Ecology Letters2001404407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shannon, C. E., Weaver, W. 1949The Mathematical Theory of CommunicationUniversity of Illinois PressUrbana125Google Scholar
  48. Sommer, U. 1981The role of r- and K-selection in the succession of phytoplankton in Lake ConstanceActa Oecologia2448464Google Scholar
  49. Sommer, U. 1984The paradox of the plankton: fluctuations of the phosphorus availability maintain diversity of phytoplankton in flow-through culturesLimnology and Oceanography29633636Google Scholar
  50. Sommer, U. 1985Comparison between steady state and nonsteady state competition: Experiments with natural phytoplanktonLimnology and Oceanography30335346Google Scholar
  51. Sommer, U., Gliwicz, Z. M., Lampert, W., Duncan, A. 1986The PEG-model of seasonal succession of plankton events in freshwatersArchiv für Hydrobiologie106436440Google Scholar
  52. Sommer, U., Padisak, J., Reynolds, C. S., Nagy, P. J. 1993Hutchinson’s heritage: the diversity-disturbance relationship in phytoplanktonHydrobiologia24917Google Scholar
  53. Sommer, U., Stibor, H. 2002Copepoda–Cladocera–Tunicata: the role of three major mesozooplankton groups in pelagic food websEcological Research17161174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Saunders, P. A., Shaw, W. H., Bukaveckas, P. A. 2000Differences in nutrient limitation and grazer suppression of phytoplankton in seepage and drainage lakes of the Adirondack region, NY, USAFreshwater Biology43391407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. SPSS Advanced statistics™ 6.1, 1994. SPS Inc. Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  56. Steiner, C. F. 2001The effects of prey heterogeneity and consumer identity on the limitation of trophic-level biomassEcology8224952506Google Scholar
  57. Sterner, R. W. 1989The role of grazers in phytoplankton successionSommer, U. eds. Plankton ecology: succession in plankton communitiesSpringer-VerlagBerlin107170Google Scholar
  58. Utermöhl, H., 1958. Zur Vervollkommnung der quantitativen Phytoplankton-Methodik. Mitteilungen Internationale Vereiningung für Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie 9Google Scholar
  59. Ward, G. H., Irlbeck, M. J., Montagna, P. A. 2002Experimental river diversion for marsh enhancementEstuaries2514161425Google Scholar
  60. Wetzel, R. G., Likens, G. E. 1991Limnological AnalysisSpringer-VerlagNew York391Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Wildlife and Fisheries SciencesTexas A&M UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations