Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Importance of Hydrodynamics for Protected and Endangered Biodiversity of Lowland Rivers

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the relationship between protected and endangered riverine species (target species) and hydrodynamics in river-floodplain ecosystems, combining ecological and policy-legal aspects of biodiversity conservation in river management. The importance of different hydrodynamic conditions along a lateral gradient was quantified for various taxonomic groups. Our results show that (i) target species require ecotopes along the entire hydrodynamic gradient; (ii) different parts of the hydrodynamic gradient are important to different species, belonging to different taxonomic groups; (iii) in particular low-dynamic parts are important for many species and (iv) species differ in their specificity for hydrodynamic conditions. Many species of higher plants, fish and butterflies have a narrow range for hydrodynamics and many species of birds and mammals use ecotopes along the entire gradient. Even when focussing only on target species, the entire natural hydrodynamic gradient is important. This means that the riverine species assemblage as a whole can benefit from measures focussing on target species only. River reconstruction and management should aim at re-establishing the entire hydrodynamic gradient, increasing the spatial heterogeneity of hydrodynamic conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • B. G. W. Aarts F. W. B. Brink Particlevan den P. H. Nienhuis (2004) ArticleTitleHabitat loss as the main cause of the slow recovery of fish faunas of regulated large rivers in Europe: the transversal floodplain gradient River Research and Applications 20 3–23 Occurrence Handle10.1002/rra.720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. B. Bayley (1995) ArticleTitleUnderstanding large river-floodplain ecosystems BioScience 145 153–158 Occurrence Handle10.2307/1312554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Chovanec J. Waringer M. Straif W. Graf W. Reckendorfer A. Waringer-Löschenkohl H. Waidbacher H. Schultz (2005) ArticleTitleThe Floodplain Index – a new approach for assessing the ecological status of river/floodplainsystems according to the EU Water Framework Directive Archiv für Hydrobiologie Supplement 155, Large Rivers 15 169–185

    Google Scholar 

  • De Nooij, R. J. W., D. Alard, G. de Blust, N. Geilen, B. Goldschmidt, V. Huesing, H. J. R. Lenders, R. S. E. W. Leuven, K. M. Lotterman, S. Muller, P. H. Nienhuis & I. Poudevigne, 2001. Development and application of BIO-SAFE, a policy and legislation based model for assessment of impacts of flood prevention measures on biodiversity in river basins. Final report IRMA-SPONGE project 11. NCR publication 11-2001. Netherlands Centre for River Studies, Delft (http://www.ncr-web.org/downloads/pub11.pdf)

  • R. J. W. Nooij ParticleDe R. S. E. W. Leuven H. J. R. Lenders G. Blust Particlede N. Geilen B. Goldschmidt S. Muller P. H. Nienhuis I. Poudevigne (2004) ArticleTitleBIO-SAFE: assessing the impact of physical reconstruction on protected and endangered species River Research and Applications 20 299–313 Occurrence Handle10.1002/rra.779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. J. W. Nooij ParticleDe H. W. H. Hendriks R. S. E. W. Leuven H. J. R. Lenders P. H. Nienhuis (2005) ArticleTitleEvaluation of floodplain rehabilitation: a comparison of ecological and policy based biodiversity assessment Archiv für Hydrobiologie Supplement 155, Large Rivers 15 413–424

    Google Scholar 

  • W. J. Junk P. B. Bayley R. E. Sparks (1989) ArticleTitleThe flood-pulse concept in river-floodplain systems Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 106 110–127

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Klijn H. A. Udo Haes Particlede (1994) ArticleTitleA hierarchical approach to ecosystems and its implications for ecological land classification Landscape Ecology 9 89–104

    Google Scholar 

  • H. J. R. Lenders R. S. E. W. Leuven P. H. Nienhuis K. D. Oostinga P. J. M. Heuvel Particlevan den (1998) Ecological rehabilitation of floodplains along the middle reach of the river Waal: a prosperous future for fauna target species? P. H. Nienhuis R. S. E. W. Leuven A. M. J. Ragas (Eds) New Concepts for Sustainable Management of River Basins Backhuys Publishers Leiden 35–52

    Google Scholar 

  • H. J. R. Lenders R. S. E. W. Leuven P. H. Nienhuis R. J. W. Nooij Particlede S. A. M. Rooij Particlevan (2001) ArticleTitleBIO-SAFE: A method for evaluation of biodiversity values on the basis of political and legal criteria Landscape and Urban Planning 55 119–135 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00149-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. S. E. W. Leuven S. Wijnhoven L. Kooistra R. J. W. Nooij Particlede M. A. J. Huijbregts (2005) ArticleTitleToxicological constraints for rehabilitation of riverine habitats: a case study for metal contamination of floodplain soils along the Rhine Archiv für Hydrobiologie Supplement 155, Large Rivers 15 657–676

    Google Scholar 

  • P. H. Nienhuis R. S. E. W. Leuven A. M. J. Ragas (1998) New concepts for sustainable management of river basins Backhuys publishers Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • P. H. Nienhuis R. S. E. W. Leuven (1998) Ecological concepts for the sustainable management of lowland river basins: a review. P. H. Nienhuis R. S. E. W. Leuven A. M. J. Ragas (Eds) New Concepts for Sustainable Management of River Basins Backhuys Publishers Leiden 7–33

    Google Scholar 

  • P. H. Nienhuis R. S. E. W. Leuven (2001) ArticleTitleRiver restoration and flood protection: controversy or synergism? Hydrobiologia 444 85–99 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1017509410951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. H. Nienhuis A. D. Buijse R. S. E. W. Leuven A. J. M. Smits R. J. W. Nooij Particlede E. M. Samborska (2002) ArticleTitleEcological rehabilitation of the lowland basin of the river Rhine (NW Europe) Hydrobiologia 478 53–72 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1021070428566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rademakers, J. G. M. & H. P. Wolfert, 1994. Het Rivier-Ecotopen-Stelsel; een indeling van ecologisch relevante ruimtelijke eenheden ten behoeve van ontwerp- en beleidsstudies in het buitendijkse rivierengebied. Publicaties en rapporten van het project ‘Ecologisch Herstel Rijn en Maas’. RIZA, Lelystad (in Dutch, with English summary)

  • Van den Brink, F. W. B., 1994. Impact of hydrology on floodplain lake ecosystems along the lower Rhine and Meuse. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen

  • F. W. B. Brink ParticleVan den G. Velde Particlevan der A. D. Buijse A. G. Klink (1996) ArticleTitleBiodiversity in the lower Rhine and Meuse river-floodplains: its significance for ecological river management Netherlands Journal of Aquatic Ecology 30 129–149 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02272234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Molen, D. T., N. Geilen, J. J. G. M. Backx, B. J. M. Jansen & H. P. Wolfert, 2003. Water Ecotope Classification for integrated water management in the Netherlands. European Water Management Online ( http://www.ewaonline.de/journal/2003_03.pdf)

  • H. T. C. Stokkom ParticleVan A. J. M. Smits R. S. E. W. Leuven (2005) ArticleTitleFlood defense in the Netherlands: a new era, a new approach Water International 30 76–87 Occurrence Handle10.1080/02508060508691839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W. C. E. P. Verberk H. Esselink (2003) ArticleTitleRestoring fauna diversity requires an integration of animal ecology and landscape ecology Landschap 20 3–7

    Google Scholar 

  • J.V. Ward K. Tockner F. Schiemer (1999) ArticleTitleBiodiversity of floodplain river ecosystems: ecotones and connectivity Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 15 125–139 Occurrence Handle10.1002/(SICI)1099-1646(199901/06)15:1/3<125::AID-RRR523>3.0.CO;2-E

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. V. Ward K. Tockner (2001) ArticleTitleBiodiversity: towards a unifying theme for river ecology Freshwater Biology 46 807–819 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2427.2001.00713.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. V. Ward K. Tockner D. B. Arscott C. Claret (2002) ArticleTitleRiverine landscape diversity Freshwater Biology 47 517–539 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00893.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. A. Wiens (2002) ArticleTitleRiverine landscapes: taking landscape ecology into the water Freshwater Biology 47 501–515 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00887.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. J. W. de Nooij.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Nooij, R.J.W., Verberk, W.C.E.P., Lenders, H.J.R. et al. The Importance of Hydrodynamics for Protected and Endangered Biodiversity of Lowland Rivers. Hydrobiologia 565, 153–162 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-005-1911-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-005-1911-9

Keywords

Navigation