, Volume 552, Issue 1, pp 147–158 | Cite as

Setting Goals and Measuring Success: Linking Patterns and Processes in Stream Restoration


Successful stream restoration requires the setting of appropriate goals and an ability to measure restoration success using quantitative ecological indicators. At present, a dichotomy exists between the setting of restoration goals to enhance ecosystem ‘processes’ or ‘functions’ such as sustainability, and measuring the success of these goals using ‘patterns’ or ‘structural’ ecosystem attributes. The presence of a structural facade may be no indication of a viable ecosystem as this requires evaluation of whether key ecosystem processes have been restored and whether the system is ecologically sustainable. We briefly discuss the benefits and drawbacks associated with setting restoration goals and measuring their success based on ecosystem patterns and processes. Two case studies are provided based on measurements of biofilm chlorophyll a and Dissolved Organic Carbon (DOC) to debunk the myth that these structural variables can be used as surrogates for ecosystem processes of productivity and respiration in rivers. We suggest that the discipline of restoration ecology will benefit and grow from a greater appreciation of the functional role of biological communities within stream ecosystems, and from targeting some restoration towards the re-establishment of structurally significant species and functionally significant processes. This approach to stream restoration with a well-founded conceptual base and defined scientific and management goals should expand our knowledge of stream function and contribute to the effective restoration of stream systems.


restoration ecosystem structure ecosystem function river biofilm DOC 


  1. Bott, T. L., Kaplan, L. A. 1985Bacterial biomass, metabolic state, and activity in stream sediments: relation to environmental variables and multiple assay comparisonsApplied and Environmental Microbiology50508522Google Scholar
  2. Boulton, A. J. 1999An overview of river health assessment: philosophies, practice, problems and prognosisFreshwater Biology41469479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bunn, S. E., Davies, P. M. 2000Biological processes in running waters and their implications for the assessment of ecological integrityHydrobiologia422/4236170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bunn, S. E., Davies, P. M., Mosisch, T. D. 1999Ecosystem measures of river health and their response to riparian and catchment degradationFreshwater Biology41333345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burns, A., Ryder, D. S. 2001aThe emergence of biofilms as a monitoring tool in Australian riverine systemsEcological Restoration and Management25363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burns, A., Ryder, D. S. 2001bResponse of bacterial extracellular enzymes to inundation of floodplain sedimentsFreshwater Biology4612991307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cairns, J.,Jr 2000Setting ecological restoration goals for technical feasibility and scientific validityEcological Engineering15171180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chapman, M. G., Underwood, A. J. 2000The need for practical scientific protocols to measure successful restorationWetlands (Australia)192849Google Scholar
  9. Chròst, R. J. 1991

    Environmental control of the synthesis and activity of aquatic microbial ectoenzymes

    Chròst, R.J. eds. Microbial Enzymes in Aquatic EnvironmentsSpringer-VerlagNew York2529
    Google Scholar
  10. Claret, C., Boulton, A. J., Dole-Olivier, M.-J., Marmonier, P. 2001Functional processes versus state variables: interstitial organic matter pathways in floodplain habitatsCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences5815941602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clarke, K. R., Warwick, R. M. 2001Change in Marine Communities: an Approach to Statistical Analysis and Interpretation2PRIMER-EPlymouthGoogle Scholar
  12. Dahm, C. N., Grimm, N. B., Marmonier, P., Valett, H. M., Vervier,  P. 1998Nutrient dynamics at the interface between surface waters and groundwatersFreshwater Biology40427451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dole-Olivier, M.-J., Marmonier, P., Creuzé des Châtelliers, M., Martin, D. 1994

    Interstitial fauna associated with the alluvial floodplains of the Rhône River (France)

    Gibert, J.Danielopol, D. L.Stanford, J. A. eds. Groundwater EcologyAcademic PressSan Diego313347
    Google Scholar
  14. Duffy, J. E. 2002Biodiversity and ecosystem function: the consumer connectionOikos99201219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dynesius, M., Nilsson, C. 1994Fragmentation and flow regulation of river systems in the northern third of the worldScience266753762Google Scholar
  16. Ehrenfeld, J. G. 2000Defining the limits of restoration: the need for realistic goalsRestoration Ecology829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Findlay, S., Hickey, C. W., Quinn, J. M. 1997Microbial enzymatic response to catchment-scale variations in supply of dissolved organic carbonNew Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research31701706Google Scholar
  18. Findlay, S., Sinsabaugh, R. L. 1999Unravelling the sources and bioavailability of dissolved organic matter in lotic aquatic ecosystemsMarine and Freshwater Research50781790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Findlay, S. E. G., Kiviat, E., Nieder, W. C., Blair, E. A. 2002Functional assessment of a reference wetland set as a tool for science, management and restorationAquatic Sciences64107117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. French-McCay, D. P., Peterson, C. H., DeAlteris, J. T., Catena,  J. 2003Restoration that targets function as opposed to structure: replacing lost bivalve production and filtrationMarine Ecology Progress Series264197212Google Scholar
  21. Gessner, M. O., Chauvet, E. 2002A case for using litter breakdown to assess functional stream integrityEcological Applications12498510Google Scholar
  22. Gessner, M. O., Inchausti, P., Persson, L., Raffaelli, D. G., Giller,  P. S. 2004Biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning: insights from aquatic systemsOikos104419422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Giller, P. S., Hillebrand, H., Berninger, U.-G., Gessner, M. O., Hawkins,  S., Inchausti, P., Inglis, C., Leslie, H., Malmqvist, B., Monaghan, T., Morin, P. J., O’Mullan, G. 2004Biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning: emerging issues and their experimental test in aquatic environmentsOikos104423436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Goldstein, P. Z. 1999Functional ecosystems and biodiversity buzzwordsConservation Biology13247255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grayson, J. E., Chapman, M. G., Underwood, A. J. 1999The assessment of restoration of habitat in urban wetlandsLandscape and Urban Planning43227236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hackney, C. T. 2000Restoration of coastal habitats: expectation and realityEcological Engineering15165170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hobbs, R. J. 2003Ecological management and restoration: Assessment, setting goals and measuring successEcological Management and Restoration (Supplement)4S23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hobbs, R. J., Harris, J. A. 2001Restoration ecology: repairing the Earth’s ecosystems in the new millenniumRestoration Ecology9239246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hobbs, R. J., Norton, D. A. 1996Towards a conceptual framework for restoration ecologyRestoration Ecology493110Google Scholar
  30. Karr, J. R. 1996

    Ecological integrity and ecological health are not the same

    Schulze, P.C. eds. Engineering with Ecological ConstraintsNational Academy PressWashington, DC97109
    Google Scholar
  31. Karr, J. R. 1999Defining and measuring river healthFreshwater Biology41221234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Keddy, P. 1999Wetland restoration: the potential for assembly rules in the service of restorationWetlands19716732Google Scholar
  33. Kentula, M. E. 2000Perspectives on setting success criteria for wetland restorationEcological Engineering15199209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ladson, A., Tilleard, J., Ewing, S., Stewardson, M., Rutherford, I. 1999

    Successful stream rehabilitation: first set the goals

    Rutherfurd, I.Bartley, R. eds. Proceedings of the Second Australian Stream Management ConferenceCRC for Catchment HydrologyMelbourne381387
    Google Scholar
  35. Lake, P. S. 2005Perturbation, restoration and seeking ecological sustainability in Australian flowing watersHydrobiologia552109120Google Scholar
  36. Loreau, M. 2000Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: recent theoretical advancesOikos91317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McArthur, M. D., Richardson, J. S. 2002Microbial utilization of dissolved organic carbon leached from riparian litterfallCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences5916681676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McKee, K. L., Faulkner, P. L. 2000Restoration of biogeochemical function in mangrove forestsRestoration Ecology8247259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Miller, W. M., Boulton, A. J. 2005Managing and rehabilitating ecosystem processes in regional urban streams in AustraliaHydrobiologia552121133Google Scholar
  40. Minshall, G. W. 1988Stream ecosystem theory: a global perspectiveJournal of the North American Benthological Society7263288Google Scholar
  41. Mosisch, T. D., Bunn, S. E. 1997Temporal patterns of rainforest stream epilithic algae in relation to flow-related disturbanceAquatic Botany58181193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Odum, E. P. 1969The strategy of ecosystem developmentScience164262270PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Palmer, M. A., Poff, N. L. 1997The influence of environmental heterogeneity on patterns and processes in streamsJournal of the North American Benthological Society16169173Google Scholar
  44. Paul, M. J., Meyer, J. L. 2001Streams in the urban landscapeAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics32333365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pedroli, B., Blust, G., Looy, K., Rooij, S. 2002Setting targets in strategies for river restorationLandscape Ecology17518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Peterson, C. G. 1996

    Response of benthic algal communities to natural physical disturbance

    Stevenson, R. J.Bothwell, M. L.Lowe, R. L. eds. Algal Ecology: Freshwater Benthic EcosystemsAcademic PressSan Diego375403
    Google Scholar
  47. Poff, N. L., Allan, J. D., Bain, M. B., Karr, J. R., Prestegaard, K. L., Richter, B. D., Sparks, R. E., Stromberg, J. C. 1997The natural flow regime: a paradigm for river conservation and restorationBioScience47769784Google Scholar
  48. Pratt, J. R., Cairns, J.,Jr. 1996

    Ecotoxicology and the redundancy problem: understanding effects of community structure and function

    Newman, M. C.Jagoe, C. H. eds. Ecotoxicology: A Hierarchical TreatmentLewis PublishersNew York187202
    Google Scholar
  49. Ryder, D. S. 2004Response of epixylic biofilm metabolism to water level variability in a regulated floodplain riverJournal of the North American Benthological Society23214223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Simenstad, C. A., Thom, R. M. 1996Functional equivalency trajectories of the restored Gog-Le-Hi-Te estuarine wetlandEcological Applications63956Google Scholar
  51. Society for Ecological Restoration Science and Policy Working Group, 2002. The SER Primer on Ecological Restoration. www.ser.org/.Google Scholar
  52. Sutherland, L., D. S. Ryder & R. J. Watts, 2002. Ecological Assessment of Variable Flow Releases in the Mitta Mitta River, Victoria. Report to the Murray-Darling Basin Commission, Canberra.Google Scholar
  53. Tett, P., Kelly, M. G., Hornberger, G. M. 1975A method for the spectrophotometric measurement of chlorophyll a and pheophytin a in benthic microalgaeLimnology and Oceanography20887896Google Scholar
  54. Tockner, K., Bretschko, G. 1996Spatial distribution of particulate organic matter (POM) and benthic invertebrates in a river-floodplain transect (Danube, Austria): importance of hydrological connectivityArchiv für Hydrobiologie Supplementband111127Google Scholar
  55. Walker, B. 1995Conserving biological diversity through ecosystem resilienceConservation Biology9747752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Walsh, C. J., Breen, P. J. 1999

    Urban stream rehabilitation through a decision-making framework to identify degrading processes and prioritise management actions

    Rutherfurd, I.Bartley, R. eds. Proceedings of the Second Australian Stream Management ConferenceCRC for Catchment HydrologyMelbourne763768
    Google Scholar
  57. Ward, J. V. 1998Riverine landscapes: Biodiversity patterns, disturbance regimes, and aquatic conservationBiological Conservation8326978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ward, J. V., Tockner, K., Uehlinger, U., Malard, F. 2001Understanding natural patterns and processes in river corridors as the basis for effective river restorationRegulated Rivers: Research, Management17311323Google Scholar
  59. Watts, R. J., Ryder, D. S. 2001Developing biological indicators for the assessment of environmental flowsAustralian Journal of Water Resources5119122Google Scholar
  60. Wilkins, S., Keith, D. A., Adam, P. 2003Measuring success: evaluating the restoration of a grassy eucalypt woodland on the Cumberland Plain, Sydney, AustraliaRestoration Ecology11489503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Williams, W. D. 1980An Ecological Basis for Water Resource ManagementANU PressCanberra, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  62. Williams, W. D. 2003Spaceship EarthHardyLewis, AdelaideGoogle Scholar
  63. Williams, W. D., Sládecková, A. 1997Water as a Limiting Resource: Conservation and ManagementInternational Association of Theoretical and Applied LimnologyStuttgartGoogle Scholar
  64. Zedler, J. B. 1996Coastal mitigation in southern California: the need for a regional restoration strategyEcological Applications68493Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ecosystem ManagementUniversity of New EnglandArmidaleAustralia

Personalised recommendations