, Volume 537, Issue 1–3, pp 239–248 | Cite as

Effects of waterfowl, large fish and periphyton on the spring growth of Potamogeton pectinatus L. in Lake Mogan, Turkey

  • Håkan SandstenEmail author
  • Meryem Beklioglu
  • Özlem Ince


It has been argued that waterfowl and fish may threaten growth of submerged macrophytes, especially in spring during the early growth phase when plant biomass is low. A small reduction of biomass at that time might delay growth or decrease subsequent productivity. We investigated the impact of waterfowl and large fish on the spring growth of fennel pondweed (Potamogeton pectinatusL.) by employing an exclosure experiment in the macrophyte-dominated clear-water Lake Mogan, Turkey. Birds and large fish were excluded from eight plots and both in situvegetation and macrophytes kept in pots were compared to eight open plots. Also, to investigate the effect of periphyton on plant growth it was removed from half of the pot plants. Exclusion of waterfowl and fish may decrease predation on macroinvertebrates, which in turn may affect periphyton, and macrophyte growth, why macroinvertebrates also were sampled. Waterfowl density was high (15–70 ind. of coot, Fulica atraL. ha−1), abundance of submerged plants was also high with a surface coverage of 70–80%, and benthivorous fish were present, mainly tench, (Tinca tincaL.) and carp, (Cyprinus carpioL.). Exclusion of waterfowl and large fish did not significantly affect the spring growth of pondweed; neither plants growing in situnor kept in pots. Removal of periphyton from the plants in the pots did not favour growth. The density of macroinvertebrates was not affected by the exclusion of waterfowl and large fish, but it was positively related to aboveground biomass of fennel pondweed. We suggest that even if waterfowl and large fish are in high densities, their effect on fennel pondweed spring growth in lakes with abundant submerged vegetation, such as Lake Mogan, is low.


coot herbivory submerged plants alternative stable states 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson, M.G., Low, J.B. 1976Use of sago pondweed by waterfowl on the Delta March, ManitobaJournal of Wildlife Management40233242Google Scholar
  2. Beekman, J. H., M. R. van Eerden, S. Dirksen, 1991. Bewick’s swan Cygnus columbianus bewickii utilising the changing resource of Potamogeton pectinatus during autumn in the Netherlands. In Sears, J., Bacon P.J. (eds), Wildfowl, Supplement No. 1, Third IWRB International Swan Symposium: 238–248.Google Scholar
  3. Beklioglu, M. 2002Does biomanipulation work for warm-temperate lakes? Lake Eymir first case Study in TurkeyNATO Science Series, IV. Earth and Environmental Sciences13207215Google Scholar
  4. Beklioglu, M., Ýnce, Ö., Tüzün, Ý. 2003Restoration of the eutrophic Lake Eymir, Turkey, by biomanipulation after a major external nutrient control IHydrobiologia48993105Google Scholar
  5. Burnak, S.L., Beklioglu, M. 2000Macrophyte-dominated clear-water state of Lake MoganTurkish Journal of Zoology24305313Google Scholar
  6. Diehl, S. 1992Fish predation and benthic community structure: the role of omnivory and habitat complexityEcology7316461661Google Scholar
  7. Diehl, S., Kornijóv, R. 1998Influence of submerged macrophytes on trophic intersactions among fish and macroinvertebratesJeppesen, E.Søndergaard, Ma.Søndergaard, Mo.Christoffersen, K. eds. The Structuring Role of Submerged Macrophytes in LakesSpringer-VerlagNewYorkGoogle Scholar
  8. DSI (Devlet Su Isleri, Energy Bakanligi) 1993. Mogan gölü limnolojik etüd raporu. TC Bayindirlik ve Iskan Bakanligi DSI Genel Müdürlü_ü I_letme ve Bakim Dairesi Baskanligi (in Turkish).Google Scholar
  9. Fernández, O.A., Murphy, K.J., López Cazorla, A., Sabbatini, M.R., Lazzari, M.A., Domaniewski, C.J.J., Irigoyen, J.H. 1998Interrelationships of fish and channel environmental conditions with aquatic macrophytes in Argentine irrigation systemHydrobiologia3801525Google Scholar
  10. Garcia, L.M., Adelman, I.R. 1985An in situ estimate of daily food consumption and alimentary canal evacuation rates in common carp, Cyprinus carpio LJournal of Fish Biology27487494Google Scholar
  11. Hargeby, A., Andersson, G., Blindow, I., Johansson, S. 1994Trophic web structure in a shallow eutrophic lake during a dominance shift from phytoplankton to submerged macrophytesHydrobiologia2798390Google Scholar
  12. Hurter, H. 1979Nahrungsökologie des Blässhuhn (Fulica atra) an den Überwinterungsgewässern im nördlichen AlpenvorlandDer Ornitologische Beobachter76257288Google Scholar
  13. Jeppesen, E., Jensen, J.P., Kristensen, P., Søndergaard, M., Mortensen, E., Sortkjær, O., Olrik, K. 1990Fish manipulation as a lake restoration tool in shallow, eutrophic, temperate lakes. 2: threshold levels, long-term stability and conclusionHydrobiologia200/201219227Google Scholar
  14. Kiørboe, T. 1980Distribution and production of submerged macrophytes in Tipper grund (Ringkøbing fjord, Denmark) and the impact of waterfowl grazingJournal of Applied Ecology17675687Google Scholar
  15. Kiraç C.O., Karauz S., Aykurt A., Gürsan M., O. Arihan, in prep. Comprehensive monitoring of birds of Lake Mogan during the period of 1993–1994.Google Scholar
  16. Lauridsen, T.L., Sandsten, H., Hald Møller, P. 2003The restoration of a shallow lake by introducing Potamogetonspp.: the impact of waterfowl grazingLakes and Reservoirs: Research and Management8177187Google Scholar
  17. Lehmann, A., Castella, E., Lachavanne, J.-B. 1997Morphological traits and spatial heterogeneity of aquatic plants along sediment and depth gradients, Lake Geneva, SwitzerlandAquatic Botany55281299Google Scholar
  18. Lodge D.M., Cronin G., van Donk E., Froelich A.J. (1998). Impact of herbivory on plant standing crop: comparisons among biomes, between vascular and nonvascular plants, and among freshwaterherbivore taxa. In : Jeppesen E., Søndergaard Ma., Søndergaard Mo., Christoffersen K.(eds). The Structuring Role of Submerged Macrophytes in Lakes. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Maitland, P.S., Campbell, R.N. 1992Freshwater FishesHarper Collins PublishersLondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Marklund, O., Sandsten, H. 2002Reduction of benthic macroinvertebrates due to waterfowl foraging on submerged vegetation during autumn migrationAquatic Ecology36541547Google Scholar
  21. Mitchell S.F., Perrow M.R.(1998). Interactions between grazing birds and macrophytes. In : Jeppesen, E., Ma. Søndergaard, Mo. Søndergaard, K. Christoffersen (eds). The Structuring Role of Submerged Macrophytes in Lakes. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Morin, P.J. 1998Realism, precision and generality in experimental ecologyResetarits, W.J.,Jr.Bernardo, J. eds. Experimental Ecology Issues and Perspectives.Oxford University PressNew York5070Google Scholar
  23. Özesmi U. (1999). Ecology and politics of rehabilitation: Mogan Lake wetland ecosystem, Ankara, Turkey. In : Streever W.(eds). An International Perspective on Wetland Rehabilitation: 181–187.Google Scholar
  24. Perrow, M.R., Schutten, J., Howes, J.R., Holzer, T., Madgwick, F.G., Jowitt, A.J.D. 1997Interactions between coot (Fulica atra) and submerged macrophytes: the role of birds in the restoration processHydrobiologia342/343241255Google Scholar
  25. Pilon, J., Santamaría, L., Hootsmans, M., Vierssen, W. 2003Latitudinal variation in Potamogeton pectinatus L.: vegetative growth and asexual reproductionPlant Ecology165247262Google Scholar
  26. Scheffer, M., Hosper, S.H., Meijer, M.-L., Moss, B., Jeppesen, E. 1993Alternative Equilibria in Shallow LakesTrends in Ecology and Evolution8275279Google Scholar
  27. Sidorkewicj, N.S., Lopez, A., Cazorla, C., Fernandez, O.A., Mockel, G.C., Burgos, M.A. 1999Effects of Cyprinus carpio on Potamogeton pectinatus in experimental culture: The incidence of the periphytonHydrobiologia4151319Google Scholar
  28. Søndergaard, M., Bruun, L., Lauridsen, T., Jeppesen, E., Vindbæk Madsen, T. 1996The impact of grazing waterfowl on submerged macrophytes in a shallow eutrophic lakeAquatic Botany537384Google Scholar
  29. Spencer, D.F. 1994Estimating the impact of grass carp on sago pondweed in the Byrnes Canal: implications for biological control in northern California irrigation systemsEcological Modelling72187204Google Scholar
  30. Snow D.W., Perrins C.M. (eds), R. Gillmor, B. Hillcoat, Roselaar C.S., D. Vincent, D. I. M. Wallace, Wilson M.G., 1998. Handbook of the Birds of the Western Palearctic. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  31. Strand, J.A., Weisner, S.E.B. 2001Morphological plastic responses to water depth and wave exposure in an aquatic plant (Myriophyllum spicatum)Journal of Ecology89166175Google Scholar
  32. Van Donk, E., Otte, A. 1996Effects of grazing by fish and waterfowl on the biomass and species compostion of submerged macrophytesHydrobiologia340285290Google Scholar
  33. Van Donk, E., Deckere, E., Klein Breteteler, J.G.P., Meueleman, J.T. 1994Herbivory by fish and waterfowl on macrophytes in a biomanipulated lake: effects on long-term recoveryInternationale Vereinigung für Limnologie2521392143Google Scholar
  34. Van Dijk, G.M. 1993Dynamics and attenuation characteristics of periphyton upon artificial substratum under various light conditions and some additional observations on periphyton upon Potamogeton pectinatus LHydrobiologia252143161Google Scholar
  35. Van Wijk, R.J. 1988Ecological studies on Potamogeton pectinatus L.I. General charachteristics, biomass production and life cycles under field conditionsAquatic Botany31211258Google Scholar
  36. Weisner, S.E.B., Strand, J.A., Sandsten, H. 1997Mechanisms regulating abundance of submerged vegetation in shallow eutrophic lakesOecologia109592599Google Scholar
  37. Wiegleb, G., Kaplan, Z. 1998An account of the species of Potamogeton L. (Potamogetonaceae)Folia Geobotanica33241316Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Håkan Sandsten
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Meryem Beklioglu
    • 3
  • Özlem Ince
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Limnology, Department of EcologyLund UniversitySweden
  2. 2.HS Kalmar-KronobergVäxjöSweden
  3. 3.Department of BiologyMiddle East Technical UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  4. 4.Department of BiologyKirikkale UniversityKirikkaleTurkey

Personalised recommendations