Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of the Permissibility of Load Shedding Modes of Power Unit No. 9 of the Mosénergo CHPP-22

  • Published:
Power Technology and Engineering Aims and scope

Following the creation of power systems that combined a large quantity of generating equipment, the requirements for maneuverability of steam-powered power units in many respects became less “rigid,” since discharges and load surges are received not by a single unit, but by all power plants operating in the power system, as well as due to the fact that the main tasks of frequency and power regulation were assigned to highly maneuverable hydro generators. Nevertheless, incidents related to the termination of power supply to both individual districts and entire power systems continue to occur. In order to prevent them, frequency and power control systems are being created in the power system, as well as system automation complexes, including frequency load shedding (FLS) units, which carry out auxiliary selection automation (ASA) for power plants or for a balanced area. The allocation of blocks to power own needs is carried out by resetting the load to 10 MW by covering the regulatory channel (RC) of the steam turbine at the command of the electronic turbine control system (ETCS) and acting on the disconnector on the outside of the main electrical circuit of the power unit in combination with the corresponding switching of the steam turbine generator to the transformer of their own needs. According to the technical conditions for delivery [2], the T-295/330-240 turbine provides stable operation at its own needs, amounting to 10% of the nominal. The one-time duration of the turbine operation when the load is discharged to its own needs is no more than 40 min, the total is no more than 200 h per year. The main quantitative limitations of such modes are obtained based on the calculated analysis of the cyclic strength of critical parts of a steam turbine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. E. Valamin, A. Yu. Kultyshev, T. L. Shibaev, A. A. Gol’dberg, Yu. A. Sakhnin, M. Yu. Stepanov, V. N. Bilan, and I. V. Kadkina, “Reasoning for choosing the profile of the heat recovery steam turbine plant for reconstruction of power units with T-250/300-23.5 turbines,” Teploénergetika, No. 11, 14 – 20 (2016).

  2. TU 3111-58097-15052907–2014. Steam Heating Turbine T-295/335-23, 5 [in Russian], UTZ, Yekaterinburg (2014).

  3. RD 34.25.104–93. Technical Requirements to Maneuverability of Power Half-Peak Units of Thermal Power Plants with Condensing Turbines. Approved by RAO “EÉS Rossii,”Énergiya, Moscow (1993).

  4. E. R. Plotkin and A. Sh. Leizerovich, Starting Modes of Steam Turbines of Power Units [in Russian], Énergiya, Moscow (1980).

  5. Yu. G. Dragunov and A. S. Zubchenko (eds.), Steel and Alloys. Handbook [in Russian], Moscow (2014).

  6. L. Ya. Liberman and M. I. Peisikhis, Handbook on Properties of Steels Used in Boiler-Building [in Russian], Mashgiz, Moscow – Leningrad (1967).

  7. B. E. Neimark, Physical Properties of Steels and Alloys Used in Power Engineering [in Russian], Énergiya, Moscow (1967).

  8. E. R. Plotkin, “Calculation of temperature stresses in the thermal groove system on the surface of steam turbine rotors,” Teploénergetika, No. 6 (1983).

  9. RTM 108.020.16–83. Calculation of Temperature Fields of Rotors and Steam Turbine Casings [in Russian], NPO TsKTI, Leningrad (1985).

  10. RD 10-249–98. Norms of Strength Calculation of Stationary Boilers and Steam and Hot Water Pipelines [in Russian], Gosgortechnadzor Rossii – NTTs Promyshlennaya bezopasnost’, Moscow (2004).

  11. EN 10216-2:2013+A1:2019. Seamless Steel Tubes for Pressure Purposes. Technical Delivery Conditions. Part 2. Non-Alloy and Alloy Steel Tubes With Specified Elevated Temperature Properties (English version), CEN, Brussels (2019).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu. A. Radin.

Additional information

Translated from Élektricheskie Stantsii, No. 9, September 2022, pp. 22 – 40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34831/EP.2022.1094.9.005

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lenev, S.N., Radin, Y.A., Gritsenko, A.D. et al. Analysis of the Permissibility of Load Shedding Modes of Power Unit No. 9 of the Mosénergo CHPP-22. Power Technol Eng 56, 889–895 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10749-023-01606-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10749-023-01606-9

Keywords

Navigation