Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Verification of Dynamic Stability Calculations of Energy Districts with Distributed Generating Facilities

  • Published:
Power Technology and Engineering Aims and scope

One of the global energy trends is the introduction of distributed generating facilities (distributed generation, DG). Therefore, the ongoing transformation of electric power systems (EPS) significantly changes the properties of power systems. Problems arise with ensuring sustainability, which is generally the main condition for validity and survivability of energy districts with DG facilities and EPS. Moreover, ensuring sustainability under remarkable perturbation remains one of the main tasks. This problem is mainly solved via mathematical modeling. However, the necessary EPS mathematical model of real dimension contains a rigid nonlinear system of differential equations of an extremely high order. Simplifications and restrictions, which reduce the completeness and significance of the obtained simulation results, are inevitably applied to improve the conditionality of the EPS mathematical model in numerical integration. Such an application requires verification. This article proposes a direction of verification alternative to the existing ones based on the use of a model standard instead of full-scale data. Such verification reveals the influence of the applied simplifications and limitations in numerical modeling on the quality of solving the sustainability estimation problems of an EPS with a DG under remarkable perturbation. The studies presented in this article are conducted using the example of an energy district with DG facilities included in EPS with real dimensions. The findings of these studies demonstrate the resulting errors of stability calculations under remarkable perturbation, the nature of their change and the causes of occurrence, as well as the influencing factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. N. Gaeini, Amani, A. Moradi, M. Jalili, and X. Yu, “Cooperative secondary frequency control of distributed generation: The role of data communication network topology,” Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Sys., 92, 221 – 229 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. P. V. Ilyushin and A. L. Kulikov, Automatic Control of Normal and Emergency Modes of Power Districts with Distributed Generation: Monograph [in Russian], NRU RANEPA, Nizhny Novgorod (2019).

  3. E. Nasr-Azadani, C. A. Cadzares, D. E. Olivares, and K. Bhattacharya, “Stability analysis of unbalanced distribution systems with synchronous machine and DFIG based distributed generators,” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, 5(5), 2326 – 2338 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. E. P. Madruga, D. P. Bernardon, R. P. Vieira, and L. L. Pfitscher, “Analysis of transient stability in distribution systems with distributed generation,” Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Sys., 99, 555 – 565 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. G. Hall, J. M. Watt, Modern Numerical Methods for Ordinary Differential Equations, Clarendon, Oxford, UK (1976).

  6. S. Chakraborty, R. Ramanujam, “New numerical integration methods for simulations of electromagnetic transients,” Int. J. Emerg. Electr. Power Sys., 19(4) (2018).

  7. N. Watson, J. Arrillaga, Power Systems Electromagnetic Transients Simulation, The Institution of Engineering and Technology (2007).

  8. H. Guo, C. Zheng, H. H.-C. Iu, and T. Fernando, “A critical review of cascading failure analysis and modeling of power system,” Renew. Syst. Energ. Rev., 80, 9 – 22 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. J. Bialek, E. Ciapessoni, D. Cirio, Cotilla-Sanchez, C. Dent, I. Dobson, P. Henneaux, P. Hines, J. Jardim, S. Miller, M. Panteli, M. Papic, A. Pitto, J. Quiros-Tortos, and D. Wu, “Benchmarking and validation of cascading failure analysis tools,” IEEE Trans. Power Sys., 31(6), 4887 – 4900 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. R. Villena-Ruiz, A. Honrubia-Escribano, J. Fortmann, and E. Gómez-Lázaro, “Field validation of a standard type 3 wind turbine model implemented in DIgSILENT-PowerFactory following IEC 61400-27-1 guidelines,” Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Sys., 116 (2020).

  11. Pan European Grid Advanced Simulation and State Estimation. https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/21140 (accessed Jan. 13, 2021)þ

  12. P. Overholt, D. Kosterev, J. Eto, S. Yang, and B. Lesieutre, “Improving reliability through better models: using synchrophasor data to validate power plant models,” IEEE Power Energy Mag., 12(3), 44 – 51 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Z. Huang, T. B. Nguyen, D. Kosterev, and R. Guttromson, “Model validation of power system components using hybrid dynamic simulation,” in: Proc. IEEE/PES Trans. Distr. Conf. Exhib., Dallas, TX, USA, pp. 153 – 160 (2006).

  14. A. Suvorov, A. Gusev,M. Andreev, and A. Askarov, “The novel approach for electric power system simulation tools validation,” Electr. Eng., 101(2), 457 – 466 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. A. Suvorov, A. Gusev, M. Andreev, and A. Askarov, “A validation approach for short-circuit currents calculation in largescale power systems,” Int. Trans. Electr. Energy Sys., 30(4), 1 – 20 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Power System Dynamic Performance Committee, Power System Stability Subcommittee. Dynamic Models for Turbine-Governors in Power System Studies, IEEE PES Resource Center (2013).

  17. R. Majumder, “Some aspects of stability in microgrids,” IEEE Trans. Power Sys., 28(3), 3243 – 3252 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. M. Farrokhabadi, C. A. Cadzares, J. W. Simpson-Porco, E. Nasr, L. Fan, Patricio A. Mendoza-Araya, R. Tonkoski, U. Tamrakar, N. Hatziargyriou, D. Lagos, R.W.Wies, M. Paolone, M. Liserre, L. Meegahapola, M. Kabalan, A. H. Hajimiragha, D. Peralta, M. A. Elizondo, K. P. Schneider, F. K. Tuffner, and J. Reilly, “Microgrid stability definitions, analysis, and examples,” IEEE Trans. Power Sys., 35(1), 13 – 29 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. A. Ishchenko, Dynamics and Stability of Distribution Networks with Dispersed Generation, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, Eindhoven (2008).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University, Tomsk, Russia

    A. A. Suvorov, A. B. Askarov, M. V. Andreev & V. E. Rudnik

Authors
  1. A. A. Suvorov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. B. Askarov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. V. Andreev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. V. E. Rudnik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. A. Suvorov.

Additional information

Translated from Élektricheskie stantsii, No. 10, October 2021, pp. 12 – 25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34831_EP.2021.1083.10.003

A matter for discussion (Ed.).

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Suvorov, A.A., Askarov, A.B., Andreev, M.V. et al. Verification of Dynamic Stability Calculations of Energy Districts with Distributed Generating Facilities. Power Technol Eng 55, 967–978 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10749-022-01459-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10749-022-01459-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation