Skip to main content
Log in

Assignment of Design Flow-Rates of Spillways with Consideration of their Service Life and Economic Consequences of Failures

  • Published:
Power Technology and Engineering Aims and scope

A method is proposed for designation of design flow rates of water for a period of temporary service of water-development works, which permits direct consideration of both the service life, and also economic and social consequences of possible failures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Construction Rules and Regulations SNiP 2.06.01–86. Water-Development Works. Basic Design Positions [in Russian], State Construction Committee, Moscow (1987).

  2. Construction Rules and Regulations SNiP 33-01–2003. Water-Development Works. Basic Positions [in Russian], Izd. Gosstroi Rossii, Moscow (2004).

  3. Building Code SP 58.13330.2012. Water-Development Works. Basic Positions (updated edition of Construction Rules and Regulations SNiP 33-01–2003 ) [in Russian], Izd. Minregion Rossii, Moscow (2012).

  4. D. M. Hershfield, “Estimating the probable maximum precipitation,” Proc. of the Am. Soc. of Civil Eng. J. Hydraul. Div., 87, 99 – 106 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. G. Cudworth Jr., Flood Hydrology Manual. A Water-Resources Technical Publication, United States Department of Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Denver (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. E. Swain, J. F. England, K. L. Bullard Jr., and D. A. Raff, USBR Guidelines for Evaluating Hydrologic Hazards (June 2006).

  7. US NRC Design-Basis Flood Estimation of Site Characterization at Nuclear Power Plants in the United States of America (November 2011).

  8. Manual for Estimation of Probable Maximum Precipitation. Operational Hydrology. Report No. 1, World Meteorological Organization No. 332 (1986).

  9. Sixteenth ICOLD Congress. Question 60. Reservoirs and the environment—experience in management and monitoring, San Francisco (1988).

  10. ICOLD Bulletin 82. Selection of Design Flood-Current Methods (1992).

  11. Twentieth ICOLD Congress. Question 76. Use of risk analysis to support dam safety decisions and management. Benefits and concerns about dams, Beijing (2000).

  12. STP VNIIG 210.02.NT-04. Methodical Instructions for Risk Analysis of Failures at Water-Development Works [in Russian], Izd. JSC “VNIIG im. B. E. Vedeneeva” (2005).

  13. USBR. Dam Safety Public Protection Guidelines. A Risk Framework to Support Dam-Safety Decision-Making, Denver, Colorado (August 2011).

  14. FEMA-USBR Design Standard No. 14. Appurtenant Structures for Dams (Spillway and Outlet Works). Design Standards (2010_2012).

  15. Guidelines on Acceptable Flood Capacity for Water Dams, Australia, State of Queensland (January 2013).

  16. I. N. Ivashchenko and K. I. Ivashchenko, “Evaluation and regulation of risk associated with dam failures,” Gidrotekh. Stroit., No. 3, 15 – 20 (2013).

  17. D. J. Clemetson, USACE Methods for Quantifying Extreme Flood Hazards, Omaha, Nebraska (29 January 2013).

  18. A. N. Zhirkevich, “Modern approaches to determination of maximum-flow characteristics (an example of the design the Shonla Hydroproject on the Da River in Vietnam),” in: Jubilee Colletion of Scientific Works of the Gidroproekt (1930 – 2000 ) [in Russian], No. 159 (2000), pp. 435 – 460.

  19. A. E. Asarin and A. N. Zhirkevich, “Problems of the hydrologic safety of existing hydroprojects and those under design,” in: First Sci. Tech. Conf.New Developments and Technologies” [in Russian], St. Petersburg (2005), pp. 20 – 25.

  20. A. N. Zhirkevich and A. E. Asarin, “Probable maximum flood (PMF). Basic information and problems associated with use of the procedure of its calculation in Russia,” Gidrotekh. Stroit., No. 4, 30 – 36 (2010).

  21. A. E. Asarin and A. N. Zhirkevich, “Need for development of a procedure for calculation of probable maximum flood (PM) for engineering hydrologic analyses in Russia,” Vodn. Khoz. Rossii, No. 4, 53 – 65 (2012).

  22. A. A. Sokolov and S. E. Ranttsa (eds.), Flood-Flow Analyses. Computational Methods Based on World Experience [in Russian], Gidrometeoizdat, Moscow – Leningrad (1978).

  23. L. S. Kuchment and I. P. Milyukova, “Calculation of maximum possible flow rates of storm-induced floods,” Vodn. Resursy, No. 2 (1987).

  24. N. A. Kartvelishvili, Stochastic Hydrology [in Russian], Gidrometeoizdat, Leningrad (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yu. B. Vinogradov and T. A. Vinogradova, Modern Problems of Hydrology [in Russian], Izdatel’skii Tsentr “Akademiya,” Moscow (2008).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. N. Zhirkevich.

Additional information

Translated from Gidrotekhnicheskoe Stroitel’stvo, No. 1, January 2015, pp. 37 – 41.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ivashchenko, I.N., Zhirkevich, A.N. & Ivashchenko, K.I. Assignment of Design Flow-Rates of Spillways with Consideration of their Service Life and Economic Consequences of Failures. Power Technol Eng 49, 98–102 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10749-015-0581-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10749-015-0581-7

Keywords

Navigation