Skip to main content
Log in

On the Scope of Computational-and-Experimental Evaluation of the Seismic Adequacy of NPP Equipment

  • Published:
Power Technology and Engineering Aims and scope

Relevant regulations require computational-and-experimental evaluation of the seismic adequacy of systems and equipment of each NPP unit, including the experimental study of the dynamic behavior of several thousand items of equipment in actual condition. Possible options for reducing the scope of equipment subject to visual checks, dynamic testing, and computational seismic adequacy analysis are examined. Procedures for optimizing the scope of the computational-and-experimental analysis of seismic adequacy are proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. PNAÉ G-7-002–86. Regulations for Strength Analysis of Equipment and Pipings of Nuclear Power Plants [in Russian], Énergoatomizdat, Moscow (1989).

  2. A. N. Anan’ev, P. S. Kaznovsky, S. P. Kaznovsky, V. I. Lebedev, and Kh. D. Chechenov, Seismic Safety of Nuclear Power Plants [in Russian], Izd. MGTU im N. E. Baumana, Moscow (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  3. RF Patent No. 2284553, S. P. Kaznovsky, P. S. Kaznovsky, V. F. Mishchenkov, and V. V. Piskarev, “A method for verification of the seismic adequacy of a multicomponent system,” Byull. Izobret., No. 27 (2006).

  4. A. P. Kaznovsky, P. S. Kaznovsky, S. I. Ryasnyj, and E. S. Saakov, “Confirmation of the seismic resistance of nuclear power plant equipment after assembly,” Power Tech. Eng., 47(1), 42 – 46 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. A. P. Kaznovsky, P. S. Kaznovsky, K. G. Kas’yanov, and S. I. Ryasnyi, “Verification of the seismic adequacy of the process equipment of Kalininskaya NPPs Unit 4 by dynamic testing,” in: Abstrs. of 2nd Int. Sci.-Tech. Conf. on NPP Commissioning [in Russian], Izd. Atomtehenergo, Moscow (2012).

  6. “NP-064–05. Allowing for natural and man-made impacts on nuclear facilities,” Yadern. Radiats. Bezopasn., No. 3(40), 47 – 87 (2006).

  7. MT 1.2.2.04.0069–2012. A Method for Verification of the Dynamic Response Characteristics of Systems and Components of Safety-Significant NPP Units [in Russian], Izd. Rosenergoatom, Moscow (2012).

  8. A. P. Kaznovsky, P. S. Kaznovsky, S. I. Ryasnyi, and E. S. Saakov, “Seismic regulations for safety-significant systems and components of NPP units,” Élektr. Stantsii, No. 9 (2012).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Translated from Élektricheskie Stantsii, No. 1, January 2014, pp. 21 – 26.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Emel’yanova, A.D., Kaznovsky, A.P., Kaznovsky, P.S. et al. On the Scope of Computational-and-Experimental Evaluation of the Seismic Adequacy of NPP Equipment. Power Technol Eng 48, 135–139 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10749-014-0497-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10749-014-0497-7

Keywords

Navigation