Skip to main content
Log in

System simulation of interaction between hydrotechnical structures and rocks

  • Hydrotechnical Construction
  • Published:
Power Technology and Engineering Aims and scope

Abstract

Geological analysis shows three types of variability of natural processes, i.e., temporal, spatial, and scale ones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. A. Varga and M. B. Remenyak, “Some engineering-geological aspects of analysis of safety of HTS,” in: Safety of Power Structures. Issue 7 [in Russian], AO NIIÉS, Moscow (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. A. Varga, “Probabilistic analysis of safety of hydrotechnical structures interacting with the geological environment,” Geoékologiya, No. 2 (2002).

  3. A. A. Varga, “Simulation of rock slides with allowance for hypocritical creep,” Gidrotekh. Stroit., No. 3 (2003).

  4. É. G. Gaziev, Rock Foundation of Concrete Dams [in Russian], Izd. Stroit. vuzov, Moscow (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. L. Kagan et al., “Toktogul’skaya dam on the Naryn River,” Geol. Plotiny, VIII, (1980).

  6. L. Muller, “Rockslide in the Vajont Valley,” Problems of Engineering Geology [Russian translation], Mir, Moscow (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. V. Rats, Nonuniformity of Rocks and of Their Physical Properties [in Russian], Nauka Moscow (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. B. Remenyak, “Some problems of interpretation of data of field observations of the foundation of the Ingurskaya arch dam,” Gidrotekh. Stroit., No. 12 (1996).

  9. A. I. Savich and É. I. Gaziev, “Effect of reservoirs on the behavior of rock beds of high dams,” Gidrotekh. Stroit., No. 11 (2005).

  10. V. M. Arnao et al., “The Tablachaca slide No. 1, Peru, and its stabilization,” in: Proc. IV Int. Symp. on Landslides. Vol. 1, Toronto (1984).

  11. A. Blank, J.-L. Durville, B. Gandin, and B. Princent, “Methods de surveillance d’un glissement de terrain de tres grande ampleur: le Clapiere, Alpes Maritimes,” Fr. Bull. IAEG, No. 35, 1987 (1978).

  12. D. S. Cavers, “Simple methods to analyze buckling of rock slopes,” RM, 14 (1981).

  13. G. R. Darbre, “Probabilistic safety assessment of dams,” in: Proc. of the XX Congr. ICOLD, R. 13 (2000).

  14. M. H. De Freitas and R. J. Watters, “Some field examples of toppling failure,” Geotechnique, 23(4) (1973).

  15. E. Hoek, “When is a design in rock engineering acceptable?” in: Proc. 7th Int. Congr. on R. M. Balkema. Vol. 3, Rotterdam (1993).

  16. H. Kreuzer, “The use of risk analyses to support dam safety decisions and management,” in: Proc. of the XX Congr. ICOLD, Q76, G.R.

  17. D. P. Moore, V. D. Ripley, and K. L. Groves, “Evaluation of mountain slope movements at Wahleach,” in: Geotechnique and Natural Hazards, BiTech Publishers, Vancouver (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  18. “The hydroelectric project,” Int. Construction, 33(6) (1997).

  19. R. C. Woodward, “The investigation of toppling slope failures in wedded ash flow tuff at Glennies Creek Dam, New South Wales,” Quart. J. Eng. Geol., 21 (1988).

  20. C. W. Yu and J. C. Chern, “Creep modeling of an endangered slope adjacent to Wusheh dam,” in: Proc. of the Taiwan 7 th Int. IAEG Congr., Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 3789–3795, t. 5 (1994).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

__________

Translated from Gidrotekhnicheskoe Stroitel’stvo, No. 3, March 2006, pp. 8–12.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Varga, A.A., Remenyak, M.B. System simulation of interaction between hydrotechnical structures and rocks. Power Technol Eng 40, 137–141 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10749-006-0035-3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10749-006-0035-3

Keywords

Navigation