Abstract
This paper argues that the gesture of being silent —or “subjective silence”— can be described as a specific modulation of attention, in which consciousness gains awareness of a specific realm of experience where the body appears as a transcendental dimension of the self. Taking Dauenhauer’s typology as a point of departure, I will describe what I understand with the expressions “subjective silence” –and “the gesture of being silent”– and try to show its specific relation to “attention,” according to Husserl’s description of it. Second, that the noematic field of this “subjective silence” is the realm of the pre-predicative, since it allows consciousness to maintain a certain intentional tension that does not focus on any categorial object. Finally, I will try to show that in this realm of the pre-predicative, the body appears as an immanent dimension of consciousness and, therefore, not as a mere object but as a transcendental instance of the self.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For the empirical and observable considerations of silence as a constitutive element of discourse, see the work of Sacks, Schegloff & Jefferson (1974), as well as the more recent work by Nikolic (2016), by Chowdhury, Stepanov, Daniel & Ricccardi (2017), or the interdisciplinary compendium of Jaworsky (1997). Notably, the results obtained by empirical social research find remarkable coincidences with the phenomenological perspective. Both reveal the profound semantic aspect that silence has, even in brief moments within a conversation. I am grateful to one of the anonymous reviewers for suggesting this line of inquiry.
The consideration of the body as transcendental suggests that silence is not only an attentional phenomenon but also ontological. The ontological relationship between language and silence, that is, the position of language in the general economy of being, as carefully explored by both Martin Heidegger (1996: §35, 165) and Emmanuel Levinas (2009: 77) in a non-transcendental way, is transformed here in the relationship between ontology and body. Being is not only revealed to language and through language but also to the body and through the body.
References
Abram, D. (1996). The spell of the sensuous: Perception and language in a more- than-human world. Pantheon Books.
Acheson, K. (2008). Silence as gesture: Rethinking the nature of communicative silences. Communication Theory, 18, 535–555. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00333.x
Aithamon, M. (2022). Silence: A predicament for feminist anthropology and social innovation. Feminist Anthropology, 3, 373–380. https://doi.org/10.1002/fea2.12096
Brito Vieira, M. (2020). Representing silence in politics. American Political Science Review, 114(4), 976–988. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305542000043X
Brito Vieira, M., Jung, T., Gray, S. W. D., et al. (2019). The nature of silence and its democratic possibilities. Contemporary Political Theory, 18, 424–447. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-019-00330-2
Cage, J. (1961). Silence lectures and writings. Wesleyan University Press.
Chowdhury, S. A., Stepanov, E., Danieli, M., Riccardi, G. (2017) Functions of silences towards information flow in spoken conversation. In Proceedings of the workshop on speech-centric natural language processing, 1–9, https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W17-4601
Dauenhauer, B. (1973). On silence. Research in Phenomenology, 3(1), 9–27. https://doi.org/10.1163/156916473X00026
Dauenhauer, B. (1976). Silence: An intentional analysis. Research in Phenomenology, 6(1), 63–83. https://doi.org/10.1163/156916476X00041
Dauenhauer, B. (1980). Silence: The phenomenon and its ontological significance. Indiana University Press.
de Haro, A. S. (1997). Fundamentos del análisis fenomenológico del cuerpo. In A. Serrano de Haro (Ed.), La posibilidad de la fenomenología (pp. 185–216). Editorial Complutense.
Depraz, N. (2014). Attention et vigilance: À la croisée de la phénoménologie et des sciences cognitives. Presses Universitaires de France.
Depraz, N. (2009). Introduction. In E. Husserl, Phénoménologie de l’attention, trans. N. Depraz. Vrin.
Duhoe, A. A. A., & Giddi, E. (2020). Semantic analysis of silence in conversational discourse. Journal of Linguistics and Foreign Languages, 1(1), 18–32.
Friskics, S. (2001). Dialogical relations with nature. Environmental Ethics, 23, 391–410. https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics20012345
Serrano de Haro, Agustín. (2010). Atención y dolor. Análisis fenomenológico. In J. Ortega y Gasset et al., Cuerpo vivido (pp. 123-161). Ediciones Encuentro.
Heidegger, M. (1996). Being and time. Trans. J. Stambaugh. State University of New York Press.
Henry, M. (1965). Philosophy and phenomenology of the body. Trans. G. Etzkorn. Martinus Nijhoff.
Henry, M. (2000). Incarnation. Une philosophie de la chair. Les Éditions du Seuil.
Husserl, E. (1948). Erfahrung und Urteil. Untersuchungen zur Genealogie der Logik. Ed. L. Landgrebe. Prag: Academia, 1939, rpt. Hamburg: Claassen & Goverts; Experience and judgment: investigations in a genealogy of logic. Trans. J. S. Churchill and K. Ameriks. Northwestern University Press, 1973.
Husserl, E. (1952). Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Zweites Buch: Phänomenologische Untersuchungen zur Konstitution. Ed. M. Biemel. Husserliana 4. Martinus Nijhoff; Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy. Second book: Studies in the phenomenology of constitution. Trans. R. Rojcewicz and A. Schuwer. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989.
Husserl, E. (1954). Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie. Eine Einleitung in die phänomenologische Philosophie. Ed. W. Biemel. Husserliana 6. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff; The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology: An introduction to phenomenological philosophy. Trans. D. Carr. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1970.
Husserl, E. 1973. Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus dem Nachlass. Dritter Teil: 1929–1935. Ed. I. Kern. Husserliana 15. Martinus Nijhoff.
Husserl, E. (2004). Wahrnehmung und Aufmerksamkeit. Texte aus dem Nachlass (1893–1912). In T. Vongehr, R. Giuliani. (Eds.) Husserliana 38. Springer.
Jaworski, A. (Ed.). (1997). Silence. An interdisciplinary perspective. Mouton de Gruyter.
Levinas, E. (2009). Parole et silence. In Œuvres completes 2. Parole et silence. Bernard Grasset/IMEC.
Merlau-Ponty, M. (1964). Le visible et l’invisible. Gallimard.
Merlau-Ponty, M. (1995). La nature. Éditions du Seuil.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard; Phenomenology of Perception. Trans. C. Smith. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1960). Signes. Paris: Gallimard; Signs. Trans. R. C. McCleary. Northwestern University Press, 1964.
Moran, D. (2011). Edmund Husserl’s phenomenology of habituality and habitus. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 42(1), 53–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071773.2011.11006731
Nikolić, M. (2016). The functions of silence in confrontational discourse. Sic, 1(7), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.15291/sic/1.7.lc.6
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. https://doi.org/10.2307/412243
Vogel, S. (2006). The silence of nature. Environmental Values, 15(2), 145–171.
Abbreviations
Hua IV: Husserl, Edmund. 1952. Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Zweites Buch: Phänomenologische Untersuchungen zur Konstitution. Ed. M. Biemel. Husserliana 4. Martinus Nijhoff; Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy. Second book: Studies in the phenomenology of constitution. Trans. R. Rojcewicz and A. Schuwer. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989.
Hua VI: Husserl, Edmund. 1954. Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie. Eine Einleitung in die phänomenologische Philosophie. Ed. W. Biemel. Husserliana 6. Martinus Nijhoff; The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology: An introduction to phenomenological philosophy. Trans. D. Carr. Northwestern University Press, 1970.
Hua XV: Husserl, Edmund. 1973. Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus dem Nachlass. Dritter Teil: 1929–1935. Ed. I. Kern. Husserliana 15. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
Hua XXXVIII: Husserl, Edmund. 2004. Wahrnehmung und Aufmerksamkeit. Texte aus dem Nachlass (1893–1912). Ed. T. Vongehr and R. Giuliani. Husserliana 38. Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
I am grateful to I. Quepons and E. A. Behnke, who read previous versions of this article and gave me important recommendations to achieve its final version
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.