This article addresses the conversational process taking place during a TV interview in which the contrast shows up between the canonical procedure overseeing the succession and nature of conversational roles and turn-takings in contemporary media contexts and the preservation of an atavistic attitude tied to a traditional culture, Albanian tradition of oda. The discourse in these chambers is a revered phenomenon in the Albanian culture. The interviewee uses the traditional code of oral communication in the oda as a strategy for saving his honour in public, while the interviewer uses another code, the language of investigative journalism. In this paper, a detailed analysis of this interview shows how the sequences built on a basic adjacency pair operate to allow the interviewee to attempt to save face in a compromising situation. We see how the oda structures override normal turn-taking rules and how the face-work process (Goffman Interaction ritual. Essays on the face-to-face behavior, Doubleday, New York, 1967) is reflected in expanded sequences. We consider this topic as an extension of a potential CA analysis when describing how cultural forms with different procedural rules affect general turn-taking.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
The Kanun of Lekë Dukagjini is a written set of traditional Albanian laws that has been used in northern and central Albania, Kosovo, and surrounding areas with large ethnic Albanian populations (such as Montenegro and Macedonia). It was first codified in the fifteenth century, but was actually in use much earlier. The Kanun is the most famous and comprehensive compilation of Albanian customary laws. It was initially an unwritten code of law that, for centuries, strictly governed social behavior and everyday life in almost all Albanian settlements. The Kanun has had a profound influence on Albanian culture and civil law, and even though the Kanun is not legally binding today, it is widely respected and still practiced in modified form in parts of Albania and Kosovo (Trnavci 2010: 201f.; Elsie 2011: 151).
Atkinson, J. (1998). Conversation analysis and institutional talk: Analyzing distinctive turn-taking systems. In S. Cmejrková, J. Hoffmannová, O. Müllerová & J. Svetlá (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th international congresss of IADA (International association for dialog analysis) (pp. 3–17). Tubingen: Niemeyer.
Baldi, B., & Savoia, L. (2010). Metafora e ideologia nel linguaggio politico, te Lingua e società. In M. Arcangeli (Ed.), Lingua Italiana d’Oggi (pp. 119–165). Roma: Bulzoni.
Beattie, G. W. (1989a). Interruption in political interviews: A replay to Bull and Mayer. Journal of Language of Social Psychology,8, 327–339.
Beattie, G. W. (1989b). Interruption in political interviews: The debate ends? Journal of Language of Social Psychology,8, 345–348.
Bull, P. E., & Mayer, K. (1989). Interruption in political interviews: A reply to Beattie. Journal of Language of Social Psychology,8, 341–344.
Çetta, A. (1981). Kërkime Folklorike. Prishtinë: Recherches folkloriques, Redaksia e botimeve.
De Fornel, M. (1988). Constructions disloquées, mouvement thématique et organisation préférentielle dans la conversation. Langue Française,78, 101.
De Fornel, M. (1989). Une situation interactionnelle négligée: La messagerie télématique. Réseaux,7, 38.
Durham, M. E. (1908). High albania. London: Edward Arnold Publishers to the India Office.
Elsie, R. (2011). Historical dictionary of Kosovo. Historical dictionaries of Europe, No. 79 (2nd ed.). Mitchellville: The Scarecrow Press Inc.
Elsie, R. (2016). Albanian oral history: Its importance and my experience paper given at the Seminar on Oral History, 29 March 2016, at the Faculty of History and Philology of the University of Tirana.
Friedrich, P. (1986). The language parallax: Linguistic relativism and poetic indeterminacy. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Garfinkel, H., & Sacks, H. (1970). On formal structures of practical actions. In J. C. McKinney & E. A. Tiryakian (Eds.), Theoretical sociology (pp. 337–366). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual. Essays on the face-to-face behavior. New York: Doubleday.
Goffman, E. (1976). Replies and responses. Discourse in Society, 5, 257–313. (Reprinted in E. Goffman (1981), 5–77).
Grice, P. H. (1975/1989). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole, & J. Morgan (Eds.), Studies in the way of words (pp. 41–58). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Grice, P. (1991). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Gumperz, J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Harré, R. (1985). Situational rhetoric and self-presentation. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Language and social situations (pp. 175–186). Berlin: Springer.
Heritage, J. (1985). Analyzing news interviews: Aspects of the production of talk for an overhearing audience. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis (Vol. 3, pp. 95–117). London: Academic Press.
Jefferson, G. (1985). An exercise in the transcription and analysis of Laughter. In T. A. Van Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis (Vol. 3, pp. 25–34). London: Academic.
Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003 ). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Lerner, H. G. (2004). On the place of linguistic resources in the organisation of talk-in-interaction: Grammar as action in prompting a speaker to elaborate. Research on Language and Social Interaction,37(2), 151–184.
Levin, S. R. (1982). Are figures of thought figures of speech? In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Contemporary perceptions of language: Interdisciplinary dimensions (pp. 112–123). Washington D. C.: Georgetown University Press.
Liddicoat, A. J. (2007). An introduction to conversation analysis. New York: Continuum.
Nopcsa, F. (1908). Brief über seine Reise in Nordalbanien. Mitteilungen der Kais. Königl. Vienna: Geographischen Gesellschaft in Wien.
Sacks, H. (1987). On the preferences for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In G. Button & J. R. E. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social organisation (pp. 54–69). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation. In G. Jefferson (Ed.), With introductions by EA Schegloff (Vols. I and II). Oxford: Blackwell.
Sacks, H., & Schegloff, E. A. (1979). Two preferences in the organisation of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 15–21). New York: Irvington Publishers.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language,50(4), 696–735.
Sapir, D. (1977). The anatomy of metaphor. In The social use of metaphor: Essays on the anthropology of rhetoric. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Schegloff, E. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction, a primer in conversation analysis I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tannen, D. (1982). Oral and literate strategies in spoken and written narratives, language. Linguistic Society of America, 58(1), 1–21.
Tannen, D. (2007 ) Talking voices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tarifa, F. (2008). Of time, honor, and memory: Oral law in Albania. Oral Tradition. https://doi.org/10.1353/ort.0.0017.
Trnavci, G. (2010). The interaction of customary law with the modern rule of law in Albania and Kosova. In M. Sellers & T. Tomaszewski (Eds.), The rule of law in comparative perspective (pp. 201–215).
Yamamoto, K. (2005). The ethical structure of Kanun and its cultural implications. Melosi Design.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Bregasi, M. Saving Face and Atrocities: Sequence Expansions and Indirectness in Television Interviews. Hum Stud 43, 89–106 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-019-09519-1
- Conversation analysis
- Adjacency pairs
- Television interview
- Sequential organization
- Thick description
- Political discourse
- Albanian language