Human Studies

, Volume 39, Issue 1, pp 51–69 | Cite as

The Common Denominator: The Reception and Impact of Berger and Luckmann’s The Social Construction of Reality

Theoretical/Philosophical Paper

Abstract

This paper discusses the reception and impact of Berger and Luckmann’s The Social Construction of Reality (SCR). The article will, first, address Berger and Luckmann themselves and their approach to the book (see section 1). In the next part, we will sketch the diffusion of the basic concept of the book (see section 2a). Then we want to show that the reception exhibits a particular open form, which allowed it to disperse into extremely different disciplines not only of the social sciences and the humanities (see section 2b). It is the disciplinary distance in particular that detaches the diffusion of the concept from reference to the book (see section 3). In the next part, we can see that this detachment leads to the variation of approaches to social construction (see section 4). Particularly, it is the misidentification with constructivism (see section 5) that leads to misunderstandings, which will then be clarified in contrast to our reconsideration of the basic thesis of SCR (see section 6). The conclusion (section 7) will state that Berger and Luckmann’s concept therefore constitutes the common denominator of social constructivist approaches.

Keywords

Social construction Constructivism Constructionism Social theory Sociological theory 

References

  1. Abbot, A. (2001). The chaos of discipline. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Abels, H. (1998). Einführung in die Soziologie. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  3. Berger, P. L. (1967). The sacred canopy. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  4. Berger, P. L. (1974). Some second thoughts on substantive versus functional definitions of religion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 13, 125–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berger, P. L. (2011). Adventures of an accidental sociologist. How to explain the world without becoming a bore. New York: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  6. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1963). Sociology of religion and sociology of knowledge. Sociology and Social Research, 47, 61–73.Google Scholar
  7. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1995). Modernity, pluralism and the crisis of man. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Foundation Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. Berger, P. L. & Luckmann, T. [1966] (1967). The social construction of reality. A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Doubleday [Paperback: New York: Anchor Books].Google Scholar
  9. Bergmann, J., & Luckmann, T. (Eds.). (1999). Kommunikative Konstruktion von Moral. Bd. 1: Struktur und Dynamik der Formen moralischer Kommunikation. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  10. Best, J. (2008). Historical development and defining issues of constructionist inquiry. In J. A. Holstein & J. F. Gubrium (Eds.), Handbook of constructionist research (pp. 41–64). New York, London: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bijker, W. T., Hughes, P., & Pinch, T. (Eds.). (1987). The social construction of technological systems. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  12. Bourdieu, P. (1980). Le sens pratique. Paris: Editions Minuit.Google Scholar
  13. Bruner, J. S., & Haste, H. (1987). Making sense. The child’s construction of the world. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Burr, V. (1995). An introduction to social constructionism. London, New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble. Feminism and the subversion of identity. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Cobern, W. W. (1993). Contextual constructivism: The impact of culture on the learning and teaching of science. In K. G. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 51–69). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  17. Eberle, T. S. (1992). A new paradigm for the sociology of knowledge: “The social construction of reality” after 25 years. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 18(2), 493–502.Google Scholar
  18. Elliott, A. (2009). Contemporary social theory. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Endress, M. (2002). Formation und Transformation sozialer Wirklichkeit. Tübingen: Eine Untersuchung zur phänomenologisch begründeten Soziologie und Sozialtheorie. Habilitationsschrift.Google Scholar
  20. Esser, H. (1993). The rationality of everyday behavior: A rational choice reconstruction of the theory of action by Alfred Schütz. Rationality and Society, 5(1), 7–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fletcher, D. (2006). Entrepreneurial processes and the social construction of opportunity. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 18(5), 421–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Geelan, D. R. (1997). Epistemological anarchy and the many forms of constructivism. Science & Education, 6(1), 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gergen, K. J. (1985). The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist, 40(3), 266–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gergen, K. J., & Gergen, M. M. (2008). Social construction and psychological inquiry. In J. A. Holstein & J. F. Gubrium (Eds.), Handbook of constructionist research (pp. 171–188). New York, London: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  25. Gerhards, J. (2014). Top Ten Soziologie. Welche soziologischen Texte sollten Studierende der Soziologie gelesen haben? Soziologie, 43(3), 313–321.Google Scholar
  26. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of a theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  27. Hacking, I. (1999). The social construction of what?. Cambridge: Hardvard University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Harré, R. (1986). An outline of a social constructionist viewpoint. In R. Harré (Ed.), The social construction of emotions (pp. 2–15). London: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  29. Hjelm, T. (2014). Social constructionisms. Approaches to the study of the human worlds. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  30. Holstein, J. A. & Gubrium, J. F. (Eds.). (2008). The constructionist mosaic. In Handbook of constructionist research (pp. 3–10). New York, London: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  31. Kamlah, W., & Lorenzen, P. (1967). Logische Propädeutik. Vorschule des vernünftigen Redens. Mannheim: B.I. Wissenschaftsverlag.Google Scholar
  32. Keller, R. (2012). Doing discourse analysis. New York: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. Keller, R., Knoblauch, H., & Reichertz, J. (Eds.). (2012). Kommunikativer Konstruktivismus. Theoretische und empirische Arbeiten zu einem neuen wissenssoziologischen Ansatz. Wiesbaden: VS.Google Scholar
  34. Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  35. Knoblauch, H. (1995). Kommunikationskultur. Die kommunikative Konstruktion kultureller Kontexte. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  36. Knoblauch, H. (2001). Communication, contexts and culture. A communicative constructivist approach to intercultural communication. In A. di Luzio, S. Günthner, & F. Orletti (Eds.), Culture in communication. Analyses of intercultural situations (pp. 3–33). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Knoblauch, H. (2013). Qualitative methods at the crossroads: Recent developments in interpretive social research. Forum Qualitative Social Research, 14(3). http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/2063. Accessed February 13, 2016.
  38. Knoblauch, H. (2013b). Communicative constructivism and mediatization. Communication Theory, 23(3), 297–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Knoblauch, H., Tuma, R., & Schnettler, B. (2014). Videography. Introduction to interpretive video analysis of social situations. Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1989). Spielarten des Konstruktivismus. Soziale Welt, 40(1/2), 86–95.Google Scholar
  41. Kuhn, T. S. (1969). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Latour, B. (2010). On the cult of the factish gods. In B. Latour (Ed.), On the modern cult of the factish gods (pp. 1–67). Durham, London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  44. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Light, D. (1967). Review “The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge” by Peter Berger and Thomas Luckmann. Sociological Analysis, 28(1), 55–56f.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Luckmann, T. (1970). On the boundaries of the social world. In M. Natanson (Ed.), Phenomenology and social reality. Essays in memory of Alfred Schutz (pp. 73–100). The Hague: Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Luckmann, T. (1975). The sociology of language. Indianapolis: Bobbs Merrill.Google Scholar
  48. Luckmann, T. (1985). The analysis of communicative genres. In B. F. Nell, R. Singh, & W. M. Venter (Eds.), Focus on quality. Selected proceedings of a conference on qualitative research methodology in the social sciences (pp. 48–61). Durban: Institute for Social and Economic Research.Google Scholar
  49. Luckmann, T. (1990). Towards a science of the subjective paradigm: Protosociology. Critique and Humanism. Special issue, 9–15.Google Scholar
  50. Luckmann, T. (1999). Wirklichkeiten: Individuelle Konstitution und gesellschaftliche Konstruktion. In R. Hitzler, J. Reichertz, & N. Schröer (Eds.), Hermeneutische Wissenssoziologie (pp. 17–28). Konstanz: UVK.Google Scholar
  51. Luckmann, T. (2013). The communicative construction of reality and sequential analysis. Qualitative Sociology Review, 9(2), 40–46.Google Scholar
  52. Luhmann, N. (1997). Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  53. Lynch, M. (1998). Towards a constructivist genealogy of social constructivism. In I. Velody & R. Williams (Eds.), The politics of constructionism (pp. 13–32). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  54. Lynch, M. (2001). The contingencies of social constructionism. Economy and Society, 30(2), 240–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Maquet, J. (1968). Review “The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge” by Peter Berger and Thomas Luckmann. American Anthropologist, 70(4), 836–837f.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Maturana, H. R. (1970). Biology of cognition. Biological computer laboratory research report. BCL 9.0. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois.Google Scholar
  57. Panasuk, R., & Lewis, S. (2012). Constructivism: Constructing meaning or making sense. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(20). http://www.ijhssnet.com/journals/Vol_2_No_20_Special_Issue_October_2012/1.pdf. Accessed February 13, 2016.
  58. Parker, L. (1998). Social construction, discourse and realism. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  59. Perspectives. (1992). The theory section newsletter. The American Sociological Association. Chair G. Calhoun. Reflections on the 25th anniversary of the “Social Construction of Reality social construction of reality”. Perspectives 15(2).Google Scholar
  60. Pfadenhauer, M., & Berger, P. L. (2013). The new sociology of knowledge. New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar
  61. Piaget, J. (1950). La construction du réel chez l’enfant. Neuchâtel, Paris: Delachaux et Niestlé.Google Scholar
  62. Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (Eds.). (1991). The new institutionalism in organisational analysis. Chicago: CUP.Google Scholar
  63. Raskin, J. D. (2002). Constructivism in psychology: Personal construct psychology, radical constructivism, and social constructionism. American Communication Journal, 5(3), 1–24.Google Scholar
  64. Reich, K. (2001). Konstruktivistische Ansätze in den Sozial- und Kulturwissenschaften. In T. Hug (Ed.), Wie kommt die Wissenschaft zu ihrem Wissen? (Vol. 4, pp. 356–376). Baltmanssweiler: Schneider.Google Scholar
  65. Restivo, S., & Croissant, J. (2008). Social constructionism in science and technology studies. In J. A. Holstein & J. F. Gubrium (Eds.), Handbook of constructionist research (pp. 213–229). New York, London: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  66. Samra-Fredericks, D. (2008). Social constructionism in management and organization Studies. In J. A. Holstein & J. F. Gubrium (Eds.), Handbook of constructionist research (pp. 129–151). New York, London: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  67. Schnettler, B. (2006). Thomas Luckmann. Konstanz: UVK.Google Scholar
  68. Schütz, A. & Luckmann, T. [1973] (1975). Strukturen der Lebenswelt (Vol. 1). Neuwied: Luchterhand [The structures of the lifeworld structures of the lifeworld (Vol. 1). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press].Google Scholar
  69. Schütz, A. & Luckmann, T. [1989] (1984). Strukturen der Lebenswelt (Vol. 2). Frankfurt, Main: Suhrkamp [The structures of the lifeworld structures of the lifeworld (Vol. 2). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press].Google Scholar
  70. Searle, J. R. (1995). The construction of social reality. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  71. Seidman, S. (2004). Contested knowledge. Social theory today. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  72. Shotter, J. (1989). Conversational reality. Constructing life through language reality. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  73. Simpson, G. (1967). Review “The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge” by Peter Berger and Thomas Luckmann. American Sociological Review, 32(1), 137f.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Soeffner, H.-G. (1997). The order of rituals. The interpretation of everyday life order of rituals. New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar
  75. Spector, M., & Kitsutse, J. J. (1977). Constructing social problems. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
  76. Stam, H. J. (2001). Introduction: Social constructionism and its critics. Theory and Psychology, 11(3), 291–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Velody, I., & Williams, R. (Eds.). (1998). The politics of constructionism. London, New York, New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  78. von Glasersfeld, E. (1974). Piaget and the radical constructivist epistemology. In C. D. Smock & E. von Glasersfeld (Eds.), Epistemology and education. Follow through publications (pp. 1–24). Athens, GA: University of Georgia.Google Scholar
  79. Ward, L. F. (1905). Evolution of social structures. American Journal of Sociology, 10(5), 589–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Watzlawick, P. (Ed.). (1984). The invented reality: How do we know what we believe we know? (Contributions to constructivism). New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  81. Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics. International Organization, 46(1), 391–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wilson, T. P. (1970). Conceptions of interaction and forms of sociological explanation. American Sociological Review, 35(4), 697–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.TU BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations