Human Studies

, Volume 39, Issue 2, pp 231–247 | Cite as

Making Loud Bodies “Feminine”: A Feminist-Phenomenological Analysis of Obstetric Violence

  • Sara Cohen ShabotEmail author
Theoretical / Philosophical Paper


Obstetric violence has been analyzed from various perspectives. Its psychological effects have been evaluated, and there have been several recent sociological and anthropological studies on the subject. But what I offer in this paper is a philosophical analysis of obstetric violence, particularly focused on how this violence is lived and experienced by women and why it is frequently described not only in terms of violence in general but specifically in terms of gender violence: as violence directed at women because they are women. For this purpose, I find feminist phenomenology most useful as a way to explain and account for the feelings that many victims of this violence experience and report, including feelings of embodied oppression, of the diminishment of self, of physical and emotional infantilization. I believe that the insights to be found in feminist phenomenology are crucial for explaining how and why this phenomenon is different in kind from other types of medical violence, objectification, and reification. Iris Marion Young’s description of feminine existence under patriarchy, as conformed by a perpetual oppressive “I cannot,” is at the center of my analysis. I argue that laboring bodies are at least potentially perceived as antithetical to the myth of femininity, undermining the feminine mode of bodily comportment under patriarchy and thereby seriously threatening the hegemonic powers. Violence, then, appears to be necessary in order to domesticate these bodies, to make them “feminine” again.


Childbirth Labor Obstetric violence Rape birth Iris Marion Young Feminist phenomenology Body 



This research was supported by the Israel Science Foundation (Grant No. 162151/).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

I am deeply indebted to the two blind reviewers of this paper, whose constructive advice and comments helped me to transform a narrow reading of Obstetric Violence into a much broader and careful project.

Conflict of interest

The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.


  1. Arp, K. (2001). The bonds of freedom: Simone de Beauvoir’s existentialist ethics. Chicago: Open Court Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, J. (2010). Natural childbirth is for the birds. In Sheila Lintott (Ed.), Motherhood—philosophy for everyone: The birth of wisdom (pp. 154–166). Malden: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beauvoir, S. (1948). The ethics of ambiguity (B. Frechtman, Trans.). New York: Philosophical Library (originally published 1947 as Pour une morale de l’ambiguïté, Paris: Gallimard).Google Scholar
  4. Beauvoir, S. (1989). The second sex (H. M. Parshley, Ed., Trans.). New York: Vintage Books (originally published 1949 as Le deuxième sexe, 2 vols, Paris: Gallimard).Google Scholar
  5. Béhague, D., Victora, C. G., & Barros, F. C. (2002). Consumer demand for caesarean sections in Brazil: Informed decision making, patient choice, or social inequality? A population based birth cohort study linking ethnographic and epidemiological methods. British Medical Journal, 324(20), 942–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Behruzi, R., Hatem, M., Goulet, L., Fraser, W., & Misago, Ch. (2013). Understanding childbirth practices as an organizational cultural phenomenon: A conceptual framework. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 13, 205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bellón Sánchez, S. (2014). Obstetric violence: Medicalization, authority abuse and sexism within Spanish obstetric assistance. A new name for old issues?. Utrecht: Erasmus Mundus Master’s Degree in Women’s and Gender Studies, Utrecht University.Google Scholar
  8. Bergoffen, D. (1997). The philosophy of Simone de Beauvoir: Gendered phenomenologies, erotic generosities. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bodner, K., Wierrani, F., Grünberger, W., & Bodner-Adler, B. (2011). Influence of the mode of delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes: A comparison between elective cesarean section and planned vaginal delivery in a low-risk obstetric population. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 283, 1193–1198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bruekens, P. (2001). Over-medicalisation of maternal care in developing countries. In V. De Brouwere & W. Van Lerberghe (Eds.), Safe motherhood strategies: A review of the evidence (pp. 191–202). Antwerp: ITG Press.Google Scholar
  11. Charles, S. (2013). Disempowered women? The midwifery model and medical intervention. In S. LaChance Adams & C. R. Lundquist (Eds.), Coming to life: Philosophies of pregnancy, childbirth and mothering (pp. 215–240). New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Elmir, R., Schmied, V., Wilkes, L., & Jackson, D. (2010). Women’s perceptions and experiences of a traumatic birth: A meta-ethnography. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 66(10), 2142–2153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fernández, I. O. (2013). PTSD and obstetric violence. Midwifery Today, 105, 49–68.Google Scholar
  14. Fisher, L. (2000). Phenomenology and feminism: Perspectives on their relation. In L. Fisher & L. Embree (Eds.), Feminist phenomenology (pp. 17–38). Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fisher, J., Astbury, J., & Smith, A. (1997). Adverse psychological impact of operative obstetric interventions: A prospective longitudinal study. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 31, 728–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fox, B., & Worts, D. (1999). Revisiting the critique of medicalized childbirth: A contribution to the sociology of birth. Gender and Society, 13(3), 326–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Garel, M., Lelong, N., & Kaminski, M. (1987). Psychological consequences of caesarean childbirth in primiparas. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 6(3), 197–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gaskin, I. M. (2003). Ina May’s guide to childbirth. New York: Bantam Dell.Google Scholar
  19. Gaskin, I. M. (2011). Birth matters: A midwife’s manifesta. New York: Seven Stories Press.Google Scholar
  20. Goodman, P., Mackey, M. C., & Tavakoli, A. S. (2004). Factors related to childbirth satisfaction. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 46(2), 212–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hayes-Klein, H. (2014). Forced episiotomy: Kelly’s story. Human Rights in Childbirth. Accessed 13 Feb 2015.
  22. Johnson, C. (2013). The political “nature” of pregnancy and childbirth. In S. LaChance Adams & C. R. Lundquist (Eds.), Coming to life: Philosophies of pregnancy, childbirth and mothering (pp. 193–214). New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Kitzinger, S. (2006). Birth as rape: There must be an end to “just in case” obstetrics. British Journal of Midwifery, 14(9), 544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Landau, I. (2010). Violence and postmodernism: A conceptual analysis. Reason Papers, 32, 67–73.Google Scholar
  25. Lebowitz, L., & Wigren, J. (2005). Phenomenology of rape. Prepared for the Air Force Sexual Assault Response Coordinator Training Program, 1–27.Google Scholar
  26. Leder, D. (1998). A tale of two bodies: The Cartesian corpse and the lived body. In D. Welton (Ed.), Body and flesh: A philosophical reader (pp. 117–129). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  27. Lobel, M., & DeLuca, R. S. (2007). Psychosocial sequelae of cesarean delivery: Review and analysis of their causes and implications. Social Science and Medicine, 64(11), 2272–2284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lundgren, I. (2011). The meaning of giving birth from a long-term perspective for childbearing women. In G. Thomson, F. Dykes, et al. (Eds.), Qualitative research in midwifery and childbirth: Phenomenological approaches (pp. 122–123). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Martin, E. (1987). The woman in the body: A cultural analysis of reproduction. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  30. Martin, K. A. (2003). Giving birth like a girl. Gender and Society, 17(1), 54–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). The primacy of perception and other essays on phenomenological psychology, the philosophy of art, history and politics. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Pérez D’Gregorio, R. (2010). Obstetric violence: A new term introduced in Venezuela. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 111, 201–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Potter, J. E., Berquó, E., Perpétuo, I., Ondina, L. F., Hopkins, K., Mata, R. S., & Maria, C. (2001). Unwanted caesarean sections among public and private patients in Brazil: Prospective study. British Medical Journal, 323(17), 1155–1158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Powers, J. (Ed.). (2009). Labor pains and birth stories: Essays on pregnancy, childbirth, and becoming a parent. San Bruno: Catalyst Book Press.Google Scholar
  35. Reed, A. (2008). Not a happy birthday. The f word: Contemporary UK Feminism. Accessed 13 Feb 2015.
  36. Rich, A. (1986). Of woman born: Motherhood as experience and institution. New York and London: Norton.Google Scholar
  37. Richland, S. (2008). Birth rape: Another midwife’s story. Midwifery Today, 85, 42–43.Google Scholar
  38. Salgado, H., Niy, D., & Diniz, C. (2013). Groggy and with tied hands: The first contact with the newborn according to women that had an unwanted C-section. Journal of Human Growth and Development, 23(2), 190–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Scarth, F. (2004). The other within: Ethics, politics, and the body in Simone de Beauvoir. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  40. Smeenk, A., & ten Have, H. (2003). Medicalization and obstetric care: An analysis of developments in Dutch midwifery. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 6, 153–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Vieira, T. O., Vieira, G. O., Giugliani, E. R. J., Mendes, C. M. C., Martins, C. C., & Silva, L. R. (2010). Determinants of breastfeeding initiation within the first hour of life in a Brazilian population: Cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 10, 760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wagner, M. (2001). Fish can’t see water: The need to humanize birth. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 75, 25–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wolf, J. (2012). Deliver me from pain. Anesthesia and birth in America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Wolf, A. B. (2013). Metaphysical violence and medicalized childbirth. International Journal of Applied Philosophy, 27(1), 101–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Young, I. M. (1980). Throwing like a girl: A phenomenology of feminine body comportment motility and spatiality. Human Studies, 3, 137–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Women’s and Gender Studies Graduate ProgramUniversity of HaifaHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations