Skip to main content

Blurry Humanism: A Reply to Michael Lynch

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Barnes, B. (1992). Realism, relativism and finitism. In D. Raven, L. van Vucht Tijssen, & J. de Wolf (Eds.), Cognitive relativism and social science (pp. 131–147). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, B., Bloor, D., & Henry, J. (1996). Scientific knowledge: A sociological analysis. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloor, D. (1991). Knowledge and social imagery (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloor, D. (1996). Idealism and the sociology of knowledge. Social Studies of Science, 26(4), 839–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloor, D. (1999). Anti-Latour. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 30A(1), 81–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvert-Minor, C. (2008). The ‘Strong Programme,’ normativity, and social causes. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38(1), 1–22.

  • Calvert-Minor, C. (2014). Epistemological misgivings of Karen Barad’s ‘Posthumanism’. Human Studies. doi:10.1007/s10746-013-9285-x.

  • Collins, H. (1992). Changing order: Replication and production in scientific practice. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flew, A. (1982). A strong programme for the sociology of belief. Inquiry, 25, 365–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, S. (2005). Saving the strong programme? A critique of David Bloor’s recent work. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 36, 706–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1999). For David Bloor and beyond…A reply to David Bloor’s ‘Anti-Latour’. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 30A(1), 113–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M. (2014). Matters of fact, and the fact of matter. Human Studies. doi:10.1007/s10746-013-9297-6.

  • Rouse, J. (1996). Engaging science: How to understand its practices philosophically. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, T. (1996). Social practices: A Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, T., Knorr Cetina, K., & von Savigny, E. (Eds.). (2001). The practice turn in contemporary theory. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolgar, S. (1981). Critique and criticism: Two readings of ethnomethodology. Social Studies of Science, 11(4), 504–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chris Calvert-Minor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Calvert-Minor, C. Blurry Humanism: A Reply to Michael Lynch. Hum Stud 37, 147–152 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-013-9296-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-013-9296-7