Barad, K. (1996). Meeting the universe halfway: Realism and social constructivism without contradiction. In L. Nelson & J. Nelson (Eds.), Feminism, science, and the philosophy of science (pp. 161–194). Boston, MA: Kluwer.
Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society,
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Barad, K. (2011). Erasers and erasures: Pinch’s unfortunate ‘uncertainty principle’. Social Studies of Science,
Brandom, R. (1994). Making it explicit: Reasoning, representing, and discursive commitment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Daston, L., & Galison, P. (2007). Objectivity. Cambridge, MA: Zone Books.
Folse, H. J. (1985). The philosophy of Niels Bohr: The framework of complementarity. New York, NY: North Holland Physics.
Hekman, S. (2010). The material of knowledge: Feminist disclosures. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Hird, M. (2009). Feminist engagements with matter. Feminist Studies,
Kierkegaard, S. (1992). Concluding unscientific postscript to Philosophical fragments (Vol. 1) [H. Hong & E. Hong (Eds. & Trans.)]. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Kukla, R. (2008). Naturalizing objectivity. Perspectives on Science,
Latour, B. (2007). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Lewis, C. I. (1946). An analysis of knowledge and valuation. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.
Lloyd, E. (1995). Objectivity and the double standard for feminist epistemologies. Synthese,
Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency, and science. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Pinch, T. (2011). Karen Barad, quantum mechanics, and the paradox of mutual exclusivity. Social Studies of Science,
Putnam, H. (1977). Realism and Reason. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association,
Rouse, J. (1996). Engaging science: How to understand its practices philosophically. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Rouse, J. (2002). Vampires: Social constructivism, realism, and other philosophical undead. History and Theory,
Rouse, J. (2003). How scientific practices matter: Reclaiming philosophical naturalism. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Rouse, J. (2004). Barad’s feminist naturalism. Hypatia,
Schatzki, T. (2002). The site of the social: A philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Schatzki, T., Knorr Cetina, K., & von Savigny, E. (Eds.). (2001). The practice turn in contemporary theory. New York, NY: Routledge.
Tanesini, A. (2010). Naturalism and normativity: Rorty and Barad. In M. Janack (Ed.), Feminist interpretations of Richard Rorty (pp. 199–216). University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Wehling, P. (2006). The situated materiality of scientific practices: Postconstructivism—A new theoretical perspective in science studies? Science, Technology & Innovation Studies,