Honoring (Recollecting) Our Memory of Peter McHugh as Social Theorist

Abstract

The recent death of Peter McHugh becomes an occasion for the remembrance and recollection of the distinctive form of reflexive or analytic social inquiry, which framed his work and that of his longtime friend and collaborator, Alan Blum. Following dual appointments at York University, Toronto, Canada in 1972, Blum and McHugh’s partnership formed the basis for a community of scholars and students throughout the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s. A brief review of McHugh and Blum’s works shows theoretical roots in social constructivism and a deep appreciation of the linguistic turn, which in turn lead to the development of a form of social analysis that meets the stringent requirements of a reflexive sociology by repudiating any claim to a privileged exemption of theoretical speech (practice) from the hermeneutical circle of speech and language. Blum and McHugh are shown to embrace and not to evade the hermeneutical circle by a form of social inquiry that subverts the inherent possibilities available within speech and social convention to make available an encounter with the (moral) authority or form of life for that self-same speech. With each example of everyday life or conventional usage, McHugh (and Blum) move from theorizing which formulates the complexity of a particular instance of social interaction through its rules, to the question of the form of life that make that particular instance of the rules possible. It is the pursuit of transparency between speech and its roots in language that informed and continues to inform the distinctive style of social theory fostered at York-Toronto under the orchestration of McHugh and Blum.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    Or as Cuff et al. (2006: 320–321) state the same point later in a discussion of Bourdieu: “A classic criticism of this view…is that if applied universally, it raises a problem about the status of sociological knowledge and thus about itself as a claim about the world.” Imputing a social constructionist view of knowledge to Bourdieu, Cuff et al. observe that the latter views all knowledge as socially determined and yet given their scientific commitment they are interested in developing a version of Bourdieu’s reflexive sociology along the lines of an objectivist resolution of it.

References

  1. Blum, A. F., & McHugh, P. (1971). The social ascription of motives. American Sociological Review, 36(1), 98–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Blum, A. F., & McHugh, P. (Eds.). (1979). Friends, enemies, and strangers: Theorizing in art, science and everyday life. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blum, A. F., & McHugh, P. (1984). Self-reflection in the arts and sciences. Atlantic Highlands, New Jersey: Humanities.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Colburn, K. (1975). Hedonism, incest and the problem of difference. Theory and Society, 2(3), 351–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Colburn, K. (1986). Critical theory and the hermeneutical circle. Sociological Inquiry, 2(3), 367–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Colburn, K. (1987). Desire and discourse in foucault: The sign of the fig leaf in Michelangelo’s David. Human Studies, 10, 61–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Colburn, K., & Moore, M. C. (1979). Art, analysis and the problem of virtue. In A. F. Blum & P. McHugh (Eds.), Friends, enemies, and strangers: Theorizing in art, science and everyday life. Norwood (pp. 51–70). New Jersey: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cuff, E. C., Sharrock, W. W., & Francis, D. W. (2006). Perspectives in sociology (5th ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gadamer, H. G. (1975). Truth and method. London: Sheed and Ward.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jenkins, H. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  11. McHugh, P. (1968). Defining the situation. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  12. McHugh, P. (1970a). A common-sense perception of deviance. In H. P. Dreitzel (Ed.), Recent sociology no. 2 (pp. 151–181). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  13. McHugh, P. (1970b). A common-sense conception of deviance. In J. D. Douglas (Ed.), Deviance and respectability (pp. 61–89). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  14. McHugh, P. (1970c). On the failure of positivism. In J. D. Douglas (Ed.), Understanding everyday life (pp. 324–335). Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  15. McHugh, P. (1993). Making, fragmentation, and the end of endurance. Dianoia, 2(1), 41–51.

    Google Scholar 

  16. McHugh, P. (1996). Insomnia and the (t)error of lost foundation in postmodernism. Human Studies, 19(1), 17–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. McHugh, P. (2005). Shared being, old promises, and the just necessity of affirmative action. Human Studies, 28(2), 129–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. McHugh, P., Raffel, S., Foss, D. C., & Blum, A. F. (1974). On the beginning of social inquiry. London: Routlege & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  19. McLuhan, M., & Fiore, Q. (1967). The medium is the massage. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Moore, M. C. (1981). The humanization of commitment: The correspondence of Walter Benjamin and Theodore Adorno. Maieutics, 1(1), 94–113.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sandywell, B. (2008). Sociology, European. International encyclopedia of the social sciences. http://www.encyclopedia.com Accessed 14 January 2010.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenneth Colburn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Colburn, K., Moore, M.C. Honoring (Recollecting) Our Memory of Peter McHugh as Social Theorist. Hum Stud 33, 271–279 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-010-9151-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Peter McHugh
  • Alan Blum
  • Reflexive sociology
  • Social theory
  • Hermeneutical circle
  • York University-Toronto