The recent death of Peter McHugh becomes an occasion for the remembrance and recollection of the distinctive form of reflexive or analytic social inquiry, which framed his work and that of his longtime friend and collaborator, Alan Blum. Following dual appointments at York University, Toronto, Canada in 1972, Blum and McHugh’s partnership formed the basis for a community of scholars and students throughout the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s. A brief review of McHugh and Blum’s works shows theoretical roots in social constructivism and a deep appreciation of the linguistic turn, which in turn lead to the development of a form of social analysis that meets the stringent requirements of a reflexive sociology by repudiating any claim to a privileged exemption of theoretical speech (practice) from the hermeneutical circle of speech and language. Blum and McHugh are shown to embrace and not to evade the hermeneutical circle by a form of social inquiry that subverts the inherent possibilities available within speech and social convention to make available an encounter with the (moral) authority or form of life for that self-same speech. With each example of everyday life or conventional usage, McHugh (and Blum) move from theorizing which formulates the complexity of a particular instance of social interaction through its rules, to the question of the form of life that make that particular instance of the rules possible. It is the pursuit of transparency between speech and its roots in language that informed and continues to inform the distinctive style of social theory fostered at York-Toronto under the orchestration of McHugh and Blum.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Or as Cuff et al. (2006: 320–321) state the same point later in a discussion of Bourdieu: “A classic criticism of this view…is that if applied universally, it raises a problem about the status of sociological knowledge and thus about itself as a claim about the world.” Imputing a social constructionist view of knowledge to Bourdieu, Cuff et al. observe that the latter views all knowledge as socially determined and yet given their scientific commitment they are interested in developing a version of Bourdieu’s reflexive sociology along the lines of an objectivist resolution of it.
Blum, A. F., & McHugh, P. (1971). The social ascription of motives. American Sociological Review, 36(1), 98–109.
Blum, A. F., & McHugh, P. (Eds.). (1979). Friends, enemies, and strangers: Theorizing in art, science and everyday life. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex.
Blum, A. F., & McHugh, P. (1984). Self-reflection in the arts and sciences. Atlantic Highlands, New Jersey: Humanities.
Colburn, K. (1975). Hedonism, incest and the problem of difference. Theory and Society, 2(3), 351–374.
Colburn, K. (1986). Critical theory and the hermeneutical circle. Sociological Inquiry, 2(3), 367–380.
Colburn, K. (1987). Desire and discourse in foucault: The sign of the fig leaf in Michelangelo’s David. Human Studies, 10, 61–79.
Colburn, K., & Moore, M. C. (1979). Art, analysis and the problem of virtue. In A. F. Blum & P. McHugh (Eds.), Friends, enemies, and strangers: Theorizing in art, science and everyday life. Norwood (pp. 51–70). New Jersey: Ablex.
Cuff, E. C., Sharrock, W. W., & Francis, D. W. (2006). Perspectives in sociology (5th ed.). New York: Routledge.
Gadamer, H. G. (1975). Truth and method. London: Sheed and Ward.
Jenkins, H. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT.
McHugh, P. (1968). Defining the situation. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.
McHugh, P. (1970a). A common-sense perception of deviance. In H. P. Dreitzel (Ed.), Recent sociology no. 2 (pp. 151–181). New York: Macmillan.
McHugh, P. (1970b). A common-sense conception of deviance. In J. D. Douglas (Ed.), Deviance and respectability (pp. 61–89). New York: Basic Books.
McHugh, P. (1970c). On the failure of positivism. In J. D. Douglas (Ed.), Understanding everyday life (pp. 324–335). Chicago: Aldine.
McHugh, P. (1993). Making, fragmentation, and the end of endurance. Dianoia, 2(1), 41–51.
McHugh, P. (1996). Insomnia and the (t)error of lost foundation in postmodernism. Human Studies, 19(1), 17–42.
McHugh, P. (2005). Shared being, old promises, and the just necessity of affirmative action. Human Studies, 28(2), 129–156.
McHugh, P., Raffel, S., Foss, D. C., & Blum, A. F. (1974). On the beginning of social inquiry. London: Routlege & Kegan Paul.
McLuhan, M., & Fiore, Q. (1967). The medium is the massage. New York: Random House.
Moore, M. C. (1981). The humanization of commitment: The correspondence of Walter Benjamin and Theodore Adorno. Maieutics, 1(1), 94–113.
Sandywell, B. (2008). Sociology, European. International encyclopedia of the social sciences. http://www.encyclopedia.com Accessed 14 January 2010.
About this article
Cite this article
Colburn, K., Moore, M.C. Honoring (Recollecting) Our Memory of Peter McHugh as Social Theorist. Hum Stud 33, 271–279 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-010-9151-z
- Peter McHugh
- Alan Blum
- Reflexive sociology
- Social theory
- Hermeneutical circle
- York University-Toronto