Abstract
This article analyzes the moral relevance of technological artifacts and its possible role in ethical theory, by taking the postphenomenological approach that has developed around the work of Don Ihde into the domain of ethics. By elaborating a postphenomenological analysis of the mediating role of ultrasound in moral decisions about abortion, the article argues that technologies embody morality and help to constitute moral subjectivity. This technological mediation of the moral subject is subsequently addressed in terms of Michel Foucault’s ethical position, in which ethics is about actively co-shaping one’s moral subjectivity. Integrating Foucauldian ethics and postphenomenology, the article argues that the technological mediation of moral subjectivity should be at the heart of an ethical approach that takes the moral dimensions of technology seriously.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.
Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.
References
Boucher, J. (2004). Ultrasound: A window to the womb? Obstetric ultrasound and the abortion rights debate. Journal of Medical Humanities, 25, 7–19.
De Vries, G. (1993). Gerede twijfel: over de rol van de medische ethiek in Nederland. Amsterdam: De Balie.
Dorrestijn, S. (2004). Bestaanskunst in de technologische cultuur: over de ethiek van door techniek beïnvloed gedrag. Master’s thesis. University of Twente, The Netherlands.
Foucault, M. (1984a). L’usage des plaisirs. Paris: Gallimard.
Foucault, M. (1984b). Le souci de soi. Paris: Gallimard.
Foucault, M. (1997). Ethics: Subjectivity and truth In P. Rabinow (Ed.), New York: New Press.
Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action. Boston: Beacon Press.
Heidegger, M. (1969). Discourse on thinking (trans: Anderson, J.M. & Freund, E.H.). New York: Harper & Row.
Hottois, G. (1996). Symbool en techniek. Kampen/Kapellen: Kok Agora/Pelckmans.
Ihde, D. (1990). Technology and the lifeworld. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Ihde, D. (1998). Expanding hermeneutics. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Landsman, G. H. (1998). Reconstructing motherhood in the age of “perfect” babies: Mothers of infants and toddlers with disabilities. Signs, 24, 69–99.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception (trans: Smith, C.). London: Routledge.
Mitchell, L. (2001). Baby’s first picture: Ultrasound and the politics of fetal subjects. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
O’Leary, T. (2002). Foucault. The art of ethics. London/New York: Continuum.
Oaks, L. (2000). Smoke-filled wombs and fragile fetuses: The social politics of fetal representation. Signs, 26, 63–108.
Petchesky, R. P. (1987). Fetal images: The power of visual culture in the politics of reproduction. Feminist Studies, 13, 263–292.
Rapp, R. (1998). Refusing prenatal diagnosis: The meanings of bioscience in a multicultural world. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 23, 45–70.
Sandelowski, M. (1994). Separate, but less unequal: Fetal ultrasonography and the transformation of expectant mother/fatherhood. Gender and Society, 8, 230–245.
Smith, A. (2003). Do you believe in ethics? Latour and Ihde in the trenches of the Science Wars (Or: Watch out, Latour, Ihde’s got a gun). In D. Ihde & E. Selinger (Eds.), Chasing technoscience: Matrix for materiality. (pp. 182–194). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Stormer, N. (2000). Prenatal space. Signs, 26, 109–144.
Trouw (2006, 11 December). Abortus om hazenlip komt voor-onderzoeken of echo’s leiden tot meer zwangerschapsafbrekingen. (newspaper article).
Verbeek, P. P. (2005). What things do: Philosophical reflections on technology, agency, and design. University Park: Penn State University Press.
Verbeek, P. P. (2006a). The morality of things—A postphenomenological inquiry. In E. Selinger (Ed.), Postphenomenology: A critical companion to Ihde. (pp. 117–130). New Albany: SUNY Press.
Verbeek, P. P. (2006b). Ethiek en technologie: moreel actorschap en subjectiviteit in een technologische cultuur. Ethische Perspectieven, 16, 267–289.
Zechmeister, I. (2001). Foetal images: The power of visual technology in antenatal care and the implications for women’s reproductive freedom. Health Care Analysis, 9, 387–400.
Acknowledgements
This article was written with financial support of NWO, the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (personal grant for innovational research, “veni” track).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Verbeek, PP. Obstetric Ultrasound and the Technological Mediation of Morality: A Postphenomenological Analysis. Hum Stud 31, 11–26 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-007-9079-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-007-9079-0