Skip to main content
Log in

Accountably Other: Trust, Reciprocity and Exclusion in a Context of Situated Practice

  • Published:
Human Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The first part of this paper makes five points: First, the problem of Otherness is different and differently constructed in modern differentiated societies. Therefore, approaches to Otherness based on traditional notions of difference and boundary between societies and systems of shared belief will not suffice; Second, because solidarity can no longer be maintained through boundaries between ingroup and outgroup, social cohesion has to take a different form; Third, to the extent that Otherness is not a condition of demographic, or belief based, exclusion in modern societies, but rather something that happens to people otherwise available to one another in interaction, othering is a processthat occurs over the course of interaction, turn by turn, not a set of beliefs or a state of mind; Fourth, othering may be supported by accounts and narratives, and these may exist before the fact – or be articulated after the fact. But, over the course of an ongoing interaction, beliefs and narratives do not explain what goes wrong with practices; Fifth, practices require reciprocity and trust. Therefore, practices require a morestringent form of morality – not a less stringent form – and moresocial cohesion – not less – than traditional society.

The second part of the paper illustrates these five points with an extended analysis of a cross-race interaction in which accounts are invoked, reciprocity breaks down, and participants are rendered as Accountable Others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Coates, D. and Rawls, A. (2005). Trust, Trouble, and Lies: Language Games of Blindness. Unpublished Manuscript.

  • David, G. (2005). ‘Making Change’ in an Arab-owned Convenience Store. Unpublished Manuscript.

  • Du Bois, W.E.B. (1903/2004). The Souls of Black Folk. Boulder: Paradigm Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1893/1933). The Division of Labor in Society. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. (1948/2006). Seeing Sociologically. Boulder: Paradigm Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. (1963). A Conception of and Experiments with ‘Trust’ as a Condition of Stable Concerted Actions. In Motivation and Social Interaction. O.J. Harvey. (Ed.) New York: The Ronald Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood-Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. (2002). Ethnomethodology's Program: Working Out Durkheim's Aphorism. Ed. and with an introducton by A. W. Rawls. Boulder: Rowman and Lifflefield.

  • Goffman, E (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City: Doubleday Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi-Strauss, C. (1962) Totemism. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine D. (1988). Flight from Ambiguity: Essays in Social and Cultural Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, P.K. (1976). The Decline of Civility: A Comment on Erving Goffman's Sociology. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology 13: 13–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G.H. (1934). Mind, Self and Society. Chicago: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, O. (1985). Slavery and Social Death. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, A.W. (2005a). Introduction. In H. Garfinkel. A. Rawls (Ed.) Seeing Sociologically: The Routine Grounds of Social Action. Boulder: Paradigm Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, A.W. (2005b). Epistemology and Practice: Durkheim's The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, A.W. (2004). Epistemology and Practice: Durkheim's The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, A.W. (2002). Editor's Introduction. In Garfinkel (2002).

  • Rawls, A.W. (2000). Race as an Interaction Order Phenomena: W.E.B. DuBois's ‘Double Consciousness’ Thesis Revisited. Sociological Theory 18, 2: 239–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, A.W. (1990). Emergent Sociality: A Dialectic of Commitment and Order. Symbolic Interaction 13: 63–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, A.W. (1987). The Interaction Order Sui Generis: Goffman's Contribution to Social Theory. Sociological Theory. (5)2: 136–149.

  • Reisman, D. (1950). The Lonely Crowd. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H. (1992/1995). Lectures on Conversation, Vols. 1 & 2. Ed. G. Jefferson and with an Introduction by E.A. Schegloff. Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A. and Jefferson, G. (1974). The Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turntaking in Conversation. Language 50: 696–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E.A., Jefferson, G. and Sacks, H. (1977). The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation. Language 53, 2: 361–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G. (1950). The Stranger. In The Sociology of Georg Simmel. Trans. K. Wolff. New York: Free Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne Warfield Rawls.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rawls, A.W., David, G. Accountably Other: Trust, Reciprocity and Exclusion in a Context of Situated Practice. Hum Stud 28, 469–497 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-005-9005-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-005-9005-2

Keywords

Navigation