Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Meaning and Method in the Social Sciences1

  • Published:
Human Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Academia’s mathematical metaphysics are briefly explored en route to an elaboration of the qualitatively rigorous requirements underpinning the calibration and unambiguous interpretation of quantitative instrumentation in any science. Of particular interest are Gadamer’s emphases on number as the paradigm of the noetic, on the role of play in interpretation, and on Hegel’s sense of method as the activity of the thing itself that thought experiences. These point toward and overlap with (1) Latour’s study of the metrological social networks through which technological phenomena are brought into language as modes of being that can be understood, and (2) the way that Rasch’s models for measurement comprise a potential beginning for metaphysically astute, qualitatively and quantitatively integrated, mathematical methods in the social sciences. The paper closes with observations on the general problem that is philosophy, the need to remain open to multiplicities of meaning even as clear understandings are sought and obtained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen, E.B. (1977). Sufficient Statistics and Latent Trait Models. Psychometrika 42: 69–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrich, D.A. (1988). Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. Vol. series no. 07-068: Rasch Models for Measurement. Beverly Hills CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrich, D.A. (2002). Understanding Resistance to the Data-Model Relationship in Rasch’s Paradigm: A Reflection for the Next Generation. Journal of Applied Measurement 3: 325–359.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Andrich, D.A., Lyne, A., Sheridan, B. and Luo, G. (2003). RUMM: Rasch Unidimensional Models for Measurement. Perth, Australia: RUMM Laboratory Pty Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballard, E.G. (1978). Man and Technology: Toward the Measurement of a Culture. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernet, R. (1989). On Derrida’s ‘Introduction’ to Husserl’s Origin of Geometry. In H.J. Silverman (Ed.), Derrida and Deconstruction. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, R.J. (1983). Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science, Hermeneutics, and Praxis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, T. and Fox, C. (2001). Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences. Mahwah NJ: LEA, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burtt, E.A. (1932/1954). The Metaphysical Foundations of Modern Physical Science, rev. ed. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caputo, J.D. (1997). A Commentary. In J.D. Caputo (Ed.), Deconstruction in a Nutshell: A Conversation with Jacques Derrida. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, S.E. (1997). Rasch Invents “Ounces”. Rasch Measurement Transactions 11: 557 [http://www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt112.htm{#}Ounces].

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1978). Structure, Sign and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences. In Writing and Difference. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1982). Margins of Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1989). Edmund Husserl’s Origin of Geometry: An Introduction. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (2003). Interview on Writing. In G.A. Olson and L. Worsham (Eds.), Critical Intellectuals on Writing. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Embretson, S.E. (1996, September). Item Response Theory Models and Spurious Interaction Effects in Factorial ANOVA Designs. Applied Psychological Measurement 20: 201–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelhard, G., Jr. (1994). Resolving the Attenuation Paradox. Rasch Measurement Transactions 8: 379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G.H. (1995). Derivations of the Rasch model. In G. Fischer and I. Molenaar (Eds.), Rasch Models: Foundations, Recent Developments, and Applications. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W.P., Jr. (1988). Truth, Method, and Measurement: The Hermeneutic of Instrumentation and the Rasch model [diss]. Dissertation Abstracts International, 49, 0778A, Department of Education, Division of the Social Sciences: University of Chicago (376 pages, 23 figures, 31 tables).Fisher, W. P., Jr. (1988). Truth, Method, and Measurement: The Hermeneutic of Instrumentation and the Rasch model [diss]. Dissertation Abstracts International, 49, 0778A, Department of Education, Division of the Social Sciences: University of Chicago (376 pages, 23 figures, 31 tables).

  • Fisher, W.P., Jr. (1994). The Rasch Debate: Validity and Revolution in Educational Measurement. In M. Wilson (Ed.), Objective Measurement: Theory into Practice, Vol. II. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W.P., Jr. (1997a). Physical Disability Construct Convergence Across Instruments: Towards a Universal Metric. Journal of Outcome Measurement 1: 87–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W.P., Jr. (1997b, June). What Scale-Free Measurement Means to Health Outcomes Research. Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation State of the Art Review 11: 357–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W.P., Jr. (1999). Foundations for Health Status Metrology: The Stability of MOS SF-36 PF-10 Calibrations Across Samples. Journal of the Louisiana State Medical Society 151: 566–578.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W.P., Jr. (2000). Objectivity in psychosocial measurement: What, Why, How. Journal of Outcome Measurement 4: 527–563.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W.P., Jr. (2003a). The Mathematical Metaphysics of Measurement and Metrology: Toward Meaningful Quantification in the Human Sciences. In A. Morales (Ed.), Renascent Pragmatism: Studies in Law and Social Science. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W.P., Jr. (2003b, December). Mathematics, Measurement, Metaphor, Metaphysics: Part I. Implications for Method in Postmodern Science. Theory & Psychology 13: 753–790.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W.P., Jr., Eubanks, R.L. and Marier, R.L. (1997). Equating the MOS SF36 and the LSU HSI Physical Functioning Scales. Journal of Outcome Measurement 1: 329-362.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W.P., Jr., Harvey, R.F., Taylor, P., Kilgore, K.M. and Kelly, C.K. (1995, February). Rehabits: A common Language of Functional Assessment. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 76: 113–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W.P., Jr. and Wright, B.D. (1994). Introduction to Probabilistic Conjoint Measurement theory and Applications. International Journal of Educational Research 21: 559–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H.-G. (1980). Dialogue and Dialectic: Eight Hermeneutical Studies on Plato. Trans. P.C. Smith. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Gadamer, H.-G. (1980). Dialogue and Dialectic: Eight Hermeneutical Studies on Plato. Trans. P. C. Smith. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

  • Gadamer, H.-G. (1981). Reason in the Age of Science. Trans. F.G. Lawrence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Gadamer, H.-G. (1981). Reason in the Age of Science. Trans. F. G. Lawrence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Gadamer, H.-G. (1986). The Idea of the Good in Platonic–Aristotelian Philosophy. Trans. P.C. Smith. New Haven: CT: Yale University Press.Gadamer, H.-G. (1986). The Idea of the Good in Platonic--Aristotelian Philosophy. Trans. P. C. Smith. New Haven: CT: Yale University Press.

  • Gadamer, H.-G. (1989). Truth and Method (rev. ed.). Trans. J. Weinsheimer and D.G. Marshall. New York: Crossroad.Gadamer, H.-G. (1989). Truth and Method (rev. ed.). Trans. J. Weinsheimer and D. G. Marshall. New York: Crossroad.

  • Gadamer, H.-G. (1991). Plato’s Dialectical Ethics: Phenomenological Interpretations Relating to the Philebus. Trans. R.M. Wallace. New Haven: CT: Yale University Press.Gadamer, H.-G. (1991). Plato’s Dialectical Ethics: Phenomenological Interpretations Relating to the Philebus. Trans. R. M. Wallace. New Haven: CT: Yale University Press.

  • Gerhart, M. and Russell, A. (1984). Metaphoric Process: The Creation of Scientific and Religious Understanding, Foreword by Paul Ricoeur. Fort Worth: Texas Christian University Press.Gerhart, M. and Russell, A. (1984). Metaphoric Process: The Creation of Scientific and Religious Understanding, Foreword by Paul Ricoeur. Fort Worth: Texas Christian University Press.

  • Hallyn, F. (Ed.). (2000). Metaphor and Analogy in the Sciences. Hingham, MA: Kluwer.Hallyn, F. (Ed.). (2000). Metaphor and Analogy in the Sciences. Hingham, MA: Kluwer.

  • Hambleton, R.K. and Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item Response Theory: Principles and Applications. Hingham MA: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heelan, P. (1983, June). Natural Science as a Hermeneutic of Instrumentation. Philosophy of Science 50: 181–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1966). Discourse on Thinking: A Translation of Gelassenheit. Trans. J.M. Anderson and E.H. Freund. New York: Harper & Row.Heidegger, M. (1966). Discourse on Thinking: A Translation of Gelassenheit. Trans. J. M. Anderson and E. H. Freund. New York: Harper & Row.

  • Heidegger, M. (1967). What is a Thing? Trans. W.B. Barton, Jr. and V. Deutsch. South Bend, IN: Regnery/Gateway.Heidegger, M. (1967). What is a Thing? Trans. W. B. Barton, Jr. and V. Deutsch. South Bend, IN: Regnery/Gateway.

  • Heidegger, M. (1971). On the Way to Language. Trans. P.D. Hertz. New York: Harper & Row.Heidegger, M. (1971). On the Way to Language. Trans. P. D. Hertz. New York: Harper & Row.

  • Heidegger, M. (1982). The Basic Problems of Phenomenology. Ed. J.M. Edie, Trans. A. Hofstadter. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Heidegger, M. (1982). The Basic Problems of Phenomenology. Ed. J. M. Edie, Trans. A. Hofstadter. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

  • Heilbron, J.L. (1993). Weighing Imponderables and Other Quantitative Science Around 1800. Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences (Vol. 24 (Supplement), Part I, pp. 1–337). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holm, K. and Kavanagh, J. (1985). An Approach to Modifying Self-Report Instruments. Research in Nursing and Health 8: 13–18.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holton, G. (1988). Thematic Origins of Scientific Thought, rev. ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (1970). The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihde, D. (1991). Instrumental Realism: The Interface Between Philosophy of Science and Philosophy of Technology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihde, D. (1998). Expanding Hermeneutics: Visualism in Science. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearney, R. (1984). Dialogues with Contemporary Continental thinkers: The Phenomenological Heritage. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, P.R. and Schumacher, C.F. (1984, December). The Rasch Model: Its Use by the National Board of Medical Examiners. In Evaluation and the Health Professions.Kelley, P. R. and Schumacher, C. F. (1984, December). The Rasch Model: Its Use by the National Board of Medical Examiners. In Evaluation and the Health Professions.

  • Kuhn, T.S. (1961). The Function of Measurement in Modern Physical Science. Isis 52(168): 161–193. (Rpt. in The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T.S. (1977). The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T.S. (1979). Metaphor in Science. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linacre, J.M. (1999). Understanding Rasch measurement: Estimation methods for Rasch measures. Journal of Outcome Measurement 3: 382–405.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Linacre, J.M. (2003). A User’s Guide to WINSTEPS Rasch-Model Computer Program, v. 3.38. Chicago: Winsteps.com.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandel, J. (1978, December). Interlaboratory testing. ASTM Standardization News 6: 11-12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. and Sugarman, J. (2001, April). Interpreting human kinds: Beginnings of a hermeneutic psychology. Theory & Psychology 11: 193–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michell, J. (1990). An Introduction to the Logic of Psychological Measurement. Mahwah, NJ: LEA, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michell, J. (2000, October). Normal Science, Pathological Science and Psychometrics. Theory & Psychology 10: 639–667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulton, M. (1993). Probabilistic mapping. Rasch Measurement Transactions 7(1): 268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundy, B. (1986). On the General Theory of Meaningful Representation. Synthese 67: 391–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narens, L. (2002). Theories of Meaningfulness. Mahwah, NJ: LEA, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, F. (1967). The Will to Power. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell, J. (1993). Metrology: The Creation of Universality by the Circulation of Particulars. Social Studies of Science 23: 129–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, C. (1987, March). Axiomatics, hermeneutics, and practical rationality. International Philosophical Quarterly XXVII(1): 81–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pledge, H.T. (1939). Science Since 1500: A Short History of Mathematics, Physics, Chemistry, Biology. London: His Majesty’s Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests (reprint, with Foreword and Afterword by B.D. Wright, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980). Copenhagen: Danmarks Paedogogiske Institut.Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests (reprint, with Foreword and Afterword by B. D. Wright, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980). Copenhagen: Danmarks Paedogogiske Institut.

  • Rasch, G. (1961). On General Laws and the Meaning of Measurement in Psychology. In Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasch, G. (1977). On Specific Objectivity: An Attempt at Formalizing the Request for Generality and Validity of Scientific Statements. Danish Yearbook of Philosophy 14: 58-94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. (1974). Violence and Language. In D. Stewart and J. Bien (Eds.), Political and Social Essays by Paul Ricoeur. Athens: Ohio University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. (1977). The Rule of Metaphor: Multi-Disciplinary Studies of the Creation of Meaning in Language. Trans. Robert Czerny. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Ricoeur, P. (1977). The Rule of Metaphor: Multi-Disciplinary Studies of the Creation of Meaning in Language. Trans. Robert Czerny. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

  • Ricoeur, P. (1981). Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences: Essays on Language, Action and Interpretation. Trans. J.B. Thompson. New York: Cambridge University Press.Ricoeur, P. (1981). Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences: Essays on Language, Action and Interpretation. Trans. J. B. Thompson. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Risser, J. (1989). The Two Faces of Socrates: Gadamer/Derrida. In D.P. Michelfelder and R.E. Palmer (Eds.), Dialogue & Deconstruction: The Gadamer–Derrida Encounter. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roche, J. (1998). The Mathematics of Measurement: A Critical History. London: Athlone Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J.F. (1960). A History of Mathematics. London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E.V., Jr. (2002). Detecting and Evaluating the Impact of Multidimensionality Using Item Fit Statistics and Principal Component Analysis of Residuals. Journal of Applied Measurement 3: 205–231.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M.W. (1990). Understanding of Irony in Poetry. Rasch Measurement Transactions 4: 89–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R.M. (2000). Fit Analysis in Latent Trait Measurement Models. Journal of Applied Measurement 1: 199–218.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stengers, I. (2000). Theory Out of Bounds. Vol. 19: The Invention of Modern Science. Trans. D.W. Smith. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Stengers, I. (2000). Theory Out of Bounds. Vol. 19: The Invention of Modern Science. Trans. D. W. Smith. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

  • Stucki, G., Daltroy, L., Katz, N., Johannesson, M. and Liang, M.H. (1996). Interpretation of Change Scores in Ordinal Clinical Scales and Health Status Measures: The Whole May Not Equal the Sum of the Parts. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 49: 711–717.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Suppes, P., Krantz, D.H., Luce, R.D. and Tversky, A. (1989). Foundations of Measurement, Volume II: Geometric and Probabilistic Representations. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, L.L. (1959). The Measurement of Values. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Linden, W.J. and Hambleton, R.K. (1997). Item Response Theory: A Brief History. In W.J. van der Linden and R.K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory (IRT). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waugh, R.F. (2003). Measuring Attitudes and Behaviors to Studying and Learning for University Students: A Rasch Measurement Model Analysis. Journal of Applied Measurement 4: 164–180.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wernimont, G. (1978, December). Careful Intralaboratory Study Must Come First. ASTM Standardization News 6: 11–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilshire, B. (1982). Role Playing and Identity: The Limits of Theatre as Metaphor. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise, M.N. (Ed.). (1995). The Values of Precision. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Wise, M. N. (Ed.). (1995). The Values of Precision. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1980). Culture and Value. Ed. G.H. von Wright, in collaboration with H. Nyman, Trans. B. Winch. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Wittgenstein, L. (1980). Culture and Value. Ed. G. H. von Wright, in collaboration with H. Nyman, Trans. B. Winch. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Wolfe, E.W. (2000). Equating and Item Banking With the Rasch Model. Journal of Applied Measurement 1: 409–434.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. and Bernasconi, R. (1988). Derrida and Différance. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, B.D. (1984). Despair and Hope for Educational Measurement. Contemporary Education Review 3: 281–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, B.D. (1997, Winter). A History of Social Science Measurement. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 16: 33–45, 52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, B.D. and Mok, M. (2000). Understanding Rasch Measurement: Rasch Models Overview. Journal of Applied Measurement 1: 83–106.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, B.D. and Stone, M.H. (1979). Best Test Design: Rasch Measurement. Chicago: MESA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, M.L., Adams, R.J. and Wilson, M.R. (1998). ConQuest: Generalized Item Response Modelling Software. Camberwell, Victoria, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. MetaMetrics, Inc., 1000 Park 40 Plaza, Suite 120, Durham, NC 27713, U.S.A.

    WILLIAM P. FISHER Jr.

Authors
  1. WILLIAM P. FISHER Jr.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to WILLIAM P. FISHER Jr..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

FISHER, W.P. Meaning and Method in the Social Sciences1 . Hum Stud 27, 429–454 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-004-3339-z

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-004-3339-z

Search

Navigation