Skip to main content
Log in

A Natural Disaster Framed Common Pool Resource Game Yields No Framing Effects Among Mongolian Pastoralists

  • Published:
Human Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study used common pool resource experimental economic games to explore the effects of natural disasters on Mongolian pastoralists' common pool resource management. In this game, two anonymous players have access to a hypothetical envelope of money from which they can withdraw funds. Three versions of the game were used: a version in which the amount of money players can withdraw is constant, one where the amount of money could change by chance, and a version where the amount could change because of a hypothetical natural disaster (dzud in Mongolian). The results indicate that framing the game as a natural disaster had no framing effects on players' behavior in two regions of Mongolia: one that is highly susceptible to winter weather disasters and one that is less susceptible. These results suggest that cultural norms and values regarding common pool resource use might prevent over-extraction in rural Mongolia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

Data Availability

The data sets generated during the current study are available at the following link: [LINK].

References

  • Aktipis, C. A., Cronk, L., & de Aguiar, R. (2011). Risk-pooling and herd survival: An agent-based model of a Maasai gift-giving system. Human Ecology, 39, 131–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartos, V. (2015). Seasonal scarcity and sharing norms. CERGE-EI in Prague, May 2015.

  • Batsaikhan, E. O. (2014). Mongolia: Becoming an Nation State (1911–1952). Bitpress Printing Company.

  • Begzsuren, S., Ellis, J. E., Ojima, D. S., Coughenour, M. B., & Chuluun, T. (2004). Livestock responses to droughts and severe winter weather in the Gobi Three Beauty National Park. Mongolia. Journal of Arid Environments, 59(4), 785–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F. (2006). From Community-Based Resource Management to Complex Systems: The Scale Issue and Marine Commons. Ecology & Society 11(1).

  • Bold, B. (1996). Socio-economic segmentation – Khot-ail in nomadic livestock keeping in Mongolia. Nomadic Peoples, 39, 69–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camerer, C. F., Fehr, E. (2004). Measuring social norms and preferences using experimental games: A guide for social scientists. In Foundations of human sociality: Economic experiments and ethnographic evidence from fifteen small-scale societies: 55–95.

  • Cardenas, J., Mantilla, C., & Sethi, R. (2015). Stable Sampling Equilibrium in Common Pool Resource Games. Games, 6, 299–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conte, T. J., & Tilt, B. (2014). The Effects of China’s Grassland Contract Policy on Pastoralists’ Attitudes towards Cooperation in an Inner Mongolian Banner. Human Ecology, 42, 837–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, L. (1993). Patterns of mutual assistance in the Mongolian pastoral economy. Nomadic Peoples, 33, 153–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronk, L., & Leech, B. (2013). Meeting at Grand Central: Understanding the Social and Evolutionary Roots of Cooperation. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cronk, L. (2007). The influence of cultural framing on play in the trust game: A Maasai example. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28(5), 352–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronk, L., & Wasielewski, H. (2008). An unfamiliar social norm rapidly produces framing effects in an economic game. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 6(4), 283–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreber, A., Ellingsen, T., Johannesson, M., & Rand, D. G. (2013). Do people care about social context? Framing effects in dictator games? Experimental Economics, 16, 349–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eldevochir, E. (2016). Livestock Statistics in Mongolia Asia and Pacific Commission on Agricultural Statistics 26th Session, Thimphu, Bhutan.

  • Ember, C. R., Skoggard, I., Ringen, E. J., & Farrer, M. (2018). Our better nature: Does resource stress predict beyond-household sharing? Evolution and Human Behavior, 39(4), 380–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endicott, E. (2012). A History of Land Use in Mongolia: The Thirteenth Century to the Present. Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Ericksen, A. (2014). Depend on Each Other and Don’t Just Sit: The Socialist Legacy, Responsibility, and Winter Risk among Mongolian Herders. Human Organization, 73(1), 38–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feeny, D., Berkes, F., McCay, B. J., & Acheson, J. M. (1990). The Tragedy of the Commons: Twenty-two years later. Human Ecology, 18(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Gimenez, M. E., Baival, B., Batbuyan, B., & Ulambayar, T. (2015). Lessons from the Dzud: Community-Based Rangeland Management Increases the Adaptive Capacity of Mongolian Herders to Winter Disasters. World Development, 68, 48–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Gimenez, M. E. (2001). The Effects of Livestock Privatisation on Pastoral Land Use and Land Tenure in Post-Socialist Mongolia. Nomadic Peoples, 5(2), 49–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Gimenez, M. E. (1999). Sustaining the Steppes: A Geographical History of Pastoral Land Use in Mongolia. Geographical Review, 89(3), 315–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fratkin, E. A. (1997). Pastoralism: Governance and Development Issues. Annual Review of Anthropology, 26, 235–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fratkin, E. A., & Mearns, R. (2003). Sustainability and Pastoral Livelihoods: Lessons from East African Maasai and Mongolia. Human Organization, 62(2), 112–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, R., Ostrom, E., & Walker, J. M. (1990). The Nature of Common-Pool Resource Problems. Rationality and Society, 2(3), 335–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelcich, S., Guzman, R., Rodriguez-Sickert, C., Castilla, J. C., Cardenas, J. C. (2013). Exploring External Validity of Common Pool Resource Experiments: Insights from Artisanal Benthic Fisheries in Chile. Ecology and Society 18(3).

  • Gerkey, D. (2013). Cooperation in Context: Public Goods Games and Post-Soviet Collectives in Kamchatka, Russia. Current Anthropology 54(2).

  • Gil-White, F. J. (2004). Ultimatum Game with Ethnicity Manipulation: Problems Faced Doing Field Economic Experiments and their Solutions. Field Methods 16(2).

  • Gurven, M. (2004). To give an give not: The behavioral ecology of human food transfers. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 47, 185–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagen, E. H., & Hammerstein, P. (2006). Game Theory and Human Evolution: A critique of some recent interpretations of experimental games. Theoretical Population Biology, 69, 339–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haley, K. J., & Fessler, D. M. T. (2005). Nobody’s watching? Subtle cues affect generosity in an anonymous economic game. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 245–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. (1968). The Tragedy of the Commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilker, T., Natsagdorj, E., Waring, R. H., Apustin, A., & Wang, Y. (2014). Satellite observed widespread decline in Mongolian grasslands largely due to overgrazing. Global Change Biology, 20, 418–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, C., & Sneath, D. (1999). The End of Nomadism? Society, State, and the Environment in Inner Asia. The White Horse Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, C., & Sneath, D. (1996). Culture and Environment in Inner Asia 1: The Pastoral Economy and the Environment. The White Horse Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lattimore, O. (1941). Inner Asian Frontiers of China. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, W., Huntsinger, L. (2011). China's Grassland Contract Policy and its Impacts on Herder Ability to Benefit in Inner Mongolia: Tragic Feedbacks. Ecology & Society 16(2).

  • Liu, Y. Y., Evans, J. P., McCabe, M. E., de Jeu, R. A. M., van Dijk, A. I. J. M., Dolman, A. J., Saizen, I. (2013). Changing Climate and Overgrazing Are Decimating Mongolian Steppes. PLoS One 8(2).

  • McCabe, J. T., Leslie, P. W., & DeLuca, L. (2010). Adopting Cultivation to Remain Pastoralists: The Diversification of Maasai Livelihoods in Northern Tanzania. Human Ecology, 38, 321–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mearns, R. (1996). Community, collective action and common grazing: The case of postsocialist Mongolia. The Journal of Development Studies, 32(3), 297–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mearns, R. (1993). Pastoral institutions, land tenure and land policy reform in post-socialist Mongolia (PALD): A Research and Training Project. Institute of Development Studies at the University of Sussex.

  • Messick, M., Allison, S. T., Samuelson, C. D. (1988). Framing and Communication Effects on Group Members' Responses to Environmental and Social Uncertainty. In Applied Behavioral Economics Vol. II, Edited by Shlomo Maital. New York University Press.

  • Murphy, D. J. (2018). "We're Living from Loan-to-Loan:" Pastoral Vulnerability and the cashmere-debt Cycle in Mongolia. In Donald C. Wood (Ed.) Individual and Social Adaptations to Human Vulnerability (Research in Economic Anthropology, Volume 38). Emerald Publishing Limited.

  • Murphy, D. J. (2014). Ecology of Rule: Territorial Assemblages and Environmental Governance in Rural Mongolia. Anthropological Quarterly, 87(3), 759–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E., Dietz, T., Dolsak, N., Stern, P. C., Stonich, S., & Weber, E. U. (2002). The Drama of the Commons. National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., & Walker, J. (1994). Rules. University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions). Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Purevjaw, G., Balling, R. C., Jr., Cerveny, R. S., Allan, R., Compo, G. P., Jones, P., Peterson, T. C., Brunet, M., Driouech, F., Stella, J. S., Svoma, B. M., & Krahenbuhl, D. (2015). The Tosontsengel Mongolia world record sea-level pressure extreme: Spatial analysis of elevation bias in adjustment-to-sea-level pressures. International Journal of Climatology, 35, 2968–2977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, A., Budescu, D. V., & Suleiman, R. (1993). Sequential Requests from Randomly Distributed Shared Resources. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 37, 241–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruffle, B., Sosis, R. (2007). Does it Pay to Pray? Costly Ritual and Cooperation. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy 7(1).

  • Sneath, D. (2003). Land use, the environment and development in post-socialist Mongolia. Oxford Development Studies, 4, 441–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sneath, D. (2002). Mongolia in the Age of the Market: Pastoral Land-use and the Development Discourse. Markets and moralities: Ethnographies of postsocialism 191.

  • Sneath, D. (1993). Social relations, networks and social organisation in post-socialist rural Mongolia. Nomadic Peoples, 33, 193–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sosis, R., Ruffle, B. (2003). Religious Ritual and Cooperation: Testing for a Relationship on Israeli Religious and Secular Kibbutzim. Current Anthropology 44(5).

  • Swift, J., & Siurua, H. (2002). Drought and Zud but No Famine (Yet) in the Mongolian Herding Economy. IDS Bulletin, 33(4), 88–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swiss Development Cooperation (SDC). (2010). A Livelihood Study of Herders in Mongolia. Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sznycer, D. (2016). Personal communication regarding zero-sum orientation survey variables in August 2016.

  • Tachirii, K., Shinoda, M., Klinenberg, B., & Morinaga, Y. (2008). Assessing Mongolian snow disaster risk using livestock and satellite data. Journal of Arid Environments, 72, 2251–2263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. (2012). Constraints of grassland science, pastoral management, and policy in Northern China: Anthropological perspectives on degradational narratives. Journal of Development Issues 11(3).

  • Taylor, J. (2006). Negotiating the Grassland: The Policy of Pasture Enclosures and Contested Resource Use in Inner Mongolia. Human Organization, 65(4), 374–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Templer, G., Swift, J., & Payne, P. (1993). The changing significance of risk in the Mongolian pastoral economy. Nomadic Peoples, 33, 105–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrift, E. D., Byambabaatar, I. (2015). Management of dzud risk in Mongolia: Mutual aid and institutional interventions. Proceedings of the Trans-disciplinary Research Conference: Building Resilience of Mongolian Rangelands. Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia, June 9–10, 2015.

  • UNDP. (2010). UNDP on Early Recovery: 2009–2010 Monoglian Dzud. Retrieved from http://www.undp.mn/publications/Early_recovery.pdf

  • Upton, C. (2008). Social Capital, Collective Action and Group Formation: Developmental Trajectories in Post-Socialist Mongolia. Human Ecology, 36(2), 175–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vernooy, R. (2011). How Mongolian Herders are Transforming Nomadic Pastoralism. Solutions, 2(5), 82–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J. M., Gardner, R., & Ostrom, E. (1990). Rent Dissipation in a Limited-Access Common-Pool Resource: Experimental Evidence. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 19, 203–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., Wang, J., Li, S., Qin, D. (2014). Vulnerability of the Tibetal Pastoral Systems to Climate and Global Change. Ecology & Society 19(4).

  • Williams, D. M. (2002). Beyond Great Walls: Environment, Identity, and Development on the Chinese Grasslands of Inner Mongolia. Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. M. (1996). The Barded Walls of China: A Contemporary Grassland Drama. The Journal of Asian Studies, 55(3), 665–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zukosky, M. L. (2008). Reconsidering governmental effects of grassland science and policy in China. Journal of Political Ecology 15(1).

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank The Human Generosity Project and Drs. Lee Cronk, Athena Aktipis, and Daniel Sznycer for their advice on methods and data analysis. I would also like to thank Dr. Clifford Montagne, Badamgarav Dovchin, Erdenebadrakh Dovchin, and the BioRegions International 2015 summer field team for their assistance. Finally, I thank the pastoral communities of Tosontsengel and Orkhon, Mongolia, for their hospitality and assistance during data collection.

Funding

This research was supported by funding from the National Science Foundation (Grant Number 1627439), The Fulbright Institute of International Education, and the American Center for Mongolian Studies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Conte.

Ethics declarations

Informed Consent

This project and study procedures were reviewed by the Rutgers University Institutional Review Board for ethical compliance. Participation in this project was voluntary and based on verbal consent from study participants.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Conte, T. A Natural Disaster Framed Common Pool Resource Game Yields No Framing Effects Among Mongolian Pastoralists. Hum Ecol 50, 259–271 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-021-00287-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-021-00287-0

Keywords