Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A Global Summary of Local Residents’ Attitudes toward Protected Areas

  • Published:
Human Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One proxy for measuring the prevalence of positive park-people relationships is people’s attitudes toward protected areas. In this paper, I summarize 83 studies that capture local communities’ attitudes toward 132 protected areas resulting in 117 cases that capture people’s attitudes toward protected areas. In 84% of the cases, the majority of respondents had positive attitudes toward the protected area. In 56% of the cases, more than 75% of respondents had positive attitudes toward the protected area. People were most positive toward protected areas in Latin America and Africa, followed by Asia and Europe. Although not significant, people were more positive toward larger, older, less strictly protected, and sub-nationally managed protected areas. The preponderance of positive attitudes suggests that we should not underestimate people’s support for protected areas and their potential willingness to participate in conservation efforts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbot, J. I. O., Thomas, D. H. L., Gardner, A. A., Neba, S. E., and Khen, M. W. (2001). Understanding the links between conservation and development in the Bamenda highlands, Cameroon. World Development 29: 1115–1136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I., and Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allendorf, T. D. (2007). Residents’ attitudes toward three protected areas in southwestern Nepal. Biodiversity and Conservation 16: 2087–2102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allendorf, T. D. (2010). A framework for the park–people relationship: Insights from protected areas in Nepal and Myanmar. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 17: 417–422.

  • Allendorf, T. D., and Allendorf, K. (2013). Gender and attitudes toward protected areas in Myanmar. Society & Natural Resources 26: 962–976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allendorf, T. D., Aung, M., and Songer, M. (2012). Using residents’ perceptions to improve park-people relationships in Chatthin wildlife sanctuary, Myanmar. Journal of Environmental Management 99: 36–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allendorf, T. D., Radeloff, V. C., and Keuler, N. S. (2019). People’s perceptions of protected areas across spatial scales. PARKS 25: 25–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allendorf, T. D., Swe, K. K., Oo, T., Htut, Y., Aung, M., Aung, M., Allendorf, K., Hayek, L. A., Leimgruber, P., and Wemmer, C. (2006). Community attitudes toward three protected areas in upper Myanmar (Burma). Environmental Conservation 33: 344–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allendorf, T. D., and Yang, J. (2013). The role of ecosystem services in park–people relationships: The case of Gaoligongshan nature reserve in Southwest China. Biological Conservation 167: 187–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrade, G. S. M., and Rhodes, J. R. (2012). Protected areas and local communities: An inevitable partnership toward successful conservation strategies? Ecology and Society 17: 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arjunan, M., Holmes, C., Puyravaud, J. P., and Davidar, P. (2006). Do developmental initiatives influence local attitudes toward conservation? A case study from the Kalakad-Mundanthurai Tiger Reserve, India. Journal of Environmental Management 79: 188–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aung, P. S., Adam, Y. O., Pretzsch, J., and Peters, R. (2015). Distribution of forest income among rural households: A case study from Natma Taung national park, Myanmar. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods 24: 190–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bragagnolo, C., Malhado, A., Jepson, P., and Ladle, R. (2016). Modelling local attitudes to protected areas in developing countries. Conservation and Society 14: 163–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockington, D., and Wilkie, D. (2015). Protected areas and poverty. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 370: 20140271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne-Nuñez, C., and Jonker, S. A. (2008). Attitudes toward wildlife and conservation across Africa: A review of survey research. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 13: 47–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cetas, E. R., and Yasué, M. (2016). A systematic review of motivational values and conservation success in and around protected areas. Conservation Biology 31: 203–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewu S. & Røskaft E. (2017) Community attitudes towards protected areas: Insights from Ghana. Oryx: 1–8

  • Dolisca, F., McDaniel, J. M., Shannon, D. A., and Jolly, C. M. (2009). A multilevel analysis of the determinants of forest conservation behavior among farmers in Haiti. Society & Natural Resources 22: 433–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gifford, R., and Nilsson, A. (2014). Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: A review. International Journal of Psychology 49: 141–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartter, J., and Goldman, A. (2010). Local responses to a forest park in western Uganda: Alternate narratives on fortress conservation. Oryx 45: 60–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heberlein, T. A. (2012). Navigating environmental attitudes. Conservation Biology 26: 583–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinen, J. T. (1993). Park people relations in Kosi Tappu wildlife reserve, Nepal - a socioeconomic analysis. Environmental Conservation 20: 25–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinen, J. T., and Shrivastava, R. J. (2009). An analysis of conservation attitudes and awareness around Kaziranga National Park, Assam, India: Implications for conservation and development. Population and Environment 30: 261–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hough, J. L. (1988). Obstacles to effective Management of Conflicts between National-Parks and surrounding human communities in developing-countries. Environmental Conservation 15: 129–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. M., and Naughton-Treves, L. (2012). Eco-bursaries as incentives for conservation around Arabuko-Sokoke Forest, Kenya. Environmental Conservation 39: 347–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, F. G., Wölfing, S., and Fuhrer, U. (1999). Environmental attitude and ecological behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology 19: 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leverington, F., Costa, K. L., Pavese, H., Lisle, A., and Hockings, M. (2010). A global analysis of protected area management effectiveness. Environmental Management 46: 685–698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, C. A. (2012). Accruing benefit or loss from a protected area: Location matters. Ecological Economics 76: 119–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, C. A., Salerno, J., Hartter, J., Chapman, C. A., Reyna, R., Tumusiime, D. M., and Drake, M. (2017). Changing perceptions of protected area benefits and problems around Kibale National Park, Uganda. Journal of Environmental Management 200: 217–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maikhuri, R. K., Nautiyal, S., Rao, K. S., Chandrasekhar, K., Gavali, R., and Saxena, K. G. (2000). Analysis and resolution of protected area - people conflicts in Nanda Devi biosphere reserve, India. Environmental Conservation 27: 43–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meena, V., Macdonald, D. W., and Montgomery, R. A. (2014). Managing success: Asiatic lion conservation, interface problems and peoples’ perceptions in the Gir protected area. Biological Conservation 174: 120–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, T. R., Minteer, B. A., and Malan, L.-C. (2011). The new conservation debate: The view from practical ethics. Biological Conservation 144: 948–957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moorman, R. S. (2006). Benefits of local residents visiting La Selva Biological Station, Costa Rica. Environmental Conservation 33: 89–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagendra, H., Rocchini, D., and Ghate, R. (2010). Beyond parks as monoliths: Spatially differentiating park-people relationships in the Tadoba Andhari Tiger Reserve in India. Biological Conservation 143: 2900–2908.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naidu, S. C. (2013). Legal exclusions, private wealth and livelihoods: An analysis of work time allocation in protected areas. Ecological Economics 89: 82–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negi, C. S., and Nautiyal, S. (2003). Indigenous peoples, biological diversity and protected area management - policy framework towards resolving conflicts. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 10: 169–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nepal, S. K., and Weber, K. E. (1995). Managing resources and resolving conflicts - national-parks and local people. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 2: 11–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, D., Gramotnev, G., Baxter, G., Butler, J. R. A., Wich, S. A., and McAlpine, C. A. (2016). Community motivations to engage in conservation behavior to conserve the Sumatran orangutan. Conservation Biology 30: 816–826.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldekop, J. A., Holmes, G., Harris, W. E., and Evans, K. L. (2016). A global assessment of the social and conservation outcomes of protected areas. Conservation Biology 30: 133–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ormsby, A., and Kaplin, B. A. (2005). A framework for understanding community resident perceptions of Masoala National Park, Madagascar. Environmental Conservation 32: 156–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagdee, A., Kim, Y., and Daugherty, P. J. (2006). What makes community forest management successful: A meta-study from community forests throughout the world. Society & Natural Resources 19: 33–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rico García-Amado, L., Ruiz, P. M., and Barrasa, G. S. (2013). Motivation for conservation: Assessing integrated conservation and development projects and payments for environmental services in La Sepultura biosphere reserve, Chiapas, Mexico. Ecological Economics 89: 92–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, R. (2004). On the colonial margins and in the global hotspot: Park-people conflicts in highland Thailand. Asia Pacific Viewpoint 45: 13–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarker, A. R., and Røskaft, E. (2014). Perceptions of farmers in Bangladesh to Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) as an agricultural Pest in. Environment and Natural Resources Research 4: p23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sodhi, N. S., Lee, T. M., Sekercioglu, C. H., Webb, E. L., Prawiradilaga, D. M., Lohman, D. J., Pierce, N. E., Diesmos, A. C., Rao, M., and Ehrlich, P. R. (2010). Local people value environmental services provided by forested parks. Biodiversity and Conservation 19: 1175–1188.

    Google Scholar 

  • St John, F. A. V., Edwards-Jones, G., and Jones, J. P. G. (2010). Conservation and human behaviour: Lessons from social psychology. Wildlife Research 37: 658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, M. J. (2010). Payoffs versus process: Expanding the paradigm for park/people studies beyond economic rationality. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 29: 174–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P. C. (2000a). New environmental theories: Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues 56: 407–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P. C. (2000b). Psychology and the science of human-environment interactions. American Psychologist 55: 523–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straede, S., and Helles, F. (2000). Park-people conflict resolution in Royal Chitwan National Park, Nepal: Buying time at high cost? Environmental Conservation 27: 368–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Struhsaker, T. T., Struhsaker, P. J., and Siex, K. S. (2005). Conserving Africa’s rain forests: Problems in protected areas and possible solutions. Biological Conservation 123: 45–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thapa Karki, S., and Hubacek, K. (2015). Developing a conceptual framework for the attitude–intention–behaviour links driving illegal resource extraction in Bardia National Park, Nepal. Ecological Economics 117: 129–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thapa, S., and Hubacek, K. (2011). Drivers of illegal resource extraction: An analysis of Bardia National Park, Nepal. Journal of Environmental Management 92: 156–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triguero-Mas, M., Olomi-Sola, M., Jha, N., Zorondo-Rodriguez, F., and Reyes-Garcia, V. (2009). Urban and rural perceptions of protected areas: A case study in Dandeli wildlife sanctuary, Western Ghats, India. Environmental Conservation 36: 208–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP-WCMC (United Nations Environment Programme’s World Conservation Monitoring Centre) (2016). The world database on protected areas, WCMC, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vedeld, P., Jumane, A., Wapalila, G., and Songorwa, A. (2012). Protected areas, poverty and conflicts: A livelihood case study of Mikumi National Park, Tanzania. Forest Policy and Economics 21: 20–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weladji, R. B., Moe, S. R., and Vedeld, P. (2003). Stakeholder attitudes towards wildlife policy and the Benoue wildlife conservation area, North Cameroon. Environmental Conservation 30: 334–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weladji, R. B., and Tchamba, M. N. (2003). Conflict between people and protected areas within the Benoue wildlife conservation area, North Cameroon. Oryx 37: 72–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, P., Igoe, J., and Brockington, D. (2006). Parks and peoples: The social impact of protected areas. Annual Review of Anthropology 35: 251–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaller, J., and Feldman, S. (1992). A simple theory of the survey response: Answering questions versus revealing preferences. American Journal of Political Science 36: 579–616.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Luis Ruedas for planting the seed of this idea in November 2004 while sitting by a creek in Alaungdaw Kathapa National Park in Myanmar and Chris Wemmer for making that trip possible. Thanks to Keera Allendorf for her help with the analysis. I would also like to thank Adena Rissman and her lab for insightful comments as well as two anonymous reviewers whose comments greatly improved the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1630 Linden Drive, Madison, WI, 53706, USA

    Teri D. Allendorf

Authors
  1. Teri D. Allendorf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Teri D. Allendorf.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that they have no financial or non-financial conflicts of interest.

Informed Consent

No informed consent was necessary for this study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 25 kb)

ESM 2

(DOCX 76 kb)

ESM 3

(DOCX 39 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Allendorf, T.D. A Global Summary of Local Residents’ Attitudes toward Protected Areas. Hum Ecol 48, 111–118 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-020-00135-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-020-00135-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation