Advertisement

Variability and Change in Maasai Views of Wildlife and the Implications for Conservation

  • David Western
  • D. L. Manzolillo Nightingale
  • Victor Nyaliki MoseEmail author
  • Johnson Ole Sipitiek
  • Kennedy S. Kimiti
Article
  • 108 Downloads

Abstract

Surveys conducted across sections of the pastoral Maasai of Kenya show a wide variety of values for wildlife, ranging from utility and medicinal uses to environmental indicators, commerce, and tourism. Attitudes toward wildlife are highly variable, depending on perceived threats and uses. Large carnivores and herbivores pose the greatest threats to people, livestock, and crops, but also have many positive values. Attitudes vary with gender, age, education, and land holding, but most of all with the source of livelihood and location, which bears on relative abundance of useful and threatening species. Traditional pastoral practices and cultural views that accommodated coexistence between livestock and wildlife are dwindling and being replaced by new values and sensibilities as pastoral practices give way to new livelihoods, lifestyles, and aspirations. Human-wildlife conflict has grown with the transition from mobile pastoralism to sedentary livelihoods. Unless the new values offset the loss of traditional values, wildlife will continue to decline. New wildlife-based livelihoods show that continued coexistence is possible despite the changes underway.

Keywords

Maasai attitudes Human-wildlife conflict Variability Pastoralism Sedentary livelihoods Economic transition Kenya 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the many Resource Assessors (RAs) for help with data collection and the African Conservation Centre (ACC) for coordinating the survey in different study areas.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

The Scientific and Ethical Review Commission of Research with Human Beings of the National Commission for Science, Technology and Innovation (NACOSTI) NO.28 (Revised 2013) in the Republic of Kenya approved this study. Local Maasai communities granted permission to conduct the surveys during group ranch meetings at the different study sites. The respondents voluntarily agreed to take part in the surveys.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10745_2019_65_MOESM1_ESM.docx (24 kb)
Table S1 (DOCX 23 kb)
10745_2019_65_MOESM2_ESM.docx (65 kb)
Table S2 (DOCX 65 kb)
10745_2019_65_MOESM3_ESM.docx (47 kb)
Table S3 (DOCX 47 kb)
10745_2019_65_MOESM4_ESM.docx (42 kb)
Table S4 (DOCX 42 kb)

References

  1. Akama, J. S., Lant, C. S., and Wesley, G. (1996). A Political-Ecology Approach to Wildlife Conservation in Kenya. Environmental Values 5: 4335–4347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ali, I. M. (2005). An ethnocentric approach to seeing biodiversity: Kenya pupils’ attitudes towards parks and wildlife. Applied Environmental Education and Communication 4: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, D., and Grove, R. (eds.) (1987). Conservation in Africa. People, Policies and Practices, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  4. Barua, M., Bhagwat, S. A., and Jadhav, S. (2013). The hidden dimensions of human-wildlife conflict: Health impacts, opportunity and transaction costs. Biological Conservation 157: 309–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernsten, J. L. (1976). The Maasai and their Neighbours: Variables of Interaction. African Economic History 2: 1–11.Google Scholar
  6. Brosius, J. P., Lowenhaupt Tsing, A., and Zerner, C. (2005). Communities and Conservation: Histories and Politics of Community-Based Natural Resource Management, Alta Mira Press, Walnut Creek.Google Scholar
  7. Browne -Nuñez, C., and Jonker, S. A. (2008). Attitudes Towards Wildlife and Conservation Across Africa: A Review of Survey Research. Human Dimensions of Wildlife: An International Journal 13(1): 47–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Campbell, D. J. (1993). Land as Ours, Land as Mine: Economic, Political and Ecological Marginalization in Kajiado District. In Spear, T., and Waller, R. (eds.), Being Maasai, James Currey, London.Google Scholar
  9. Child, G. (1995). Wildlife and People: The Zimbabwe Success. WIsdom Press. In Harare.Google Scholar
  10. Cronk, L. (1989). From Hunters to Herders: Subsistence change as a Reproductive Strategy among the Mukogodo. Current Anthropology 30: 2224–2234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Draheim, M. M., Patterson, K. W., Rockwood, L. L., Guagnano, G. A., and Parsons, E. C. M. (2013). Attitudes of College Undergraduates towards Coyotes (Canis latrans) in an Urban Landscape: Management and Public Outreach Implications. Animals 3: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Flores, D. (2016). Coyote America: A Natural and Supernatural History, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Fosbrooke, H. A. (1948). An Administrative Survey of the Masai Social System. Tanganyika Notes and Records 26: 1–50.Google Scholar
  14. Frank, B. (2016). Human-Wildlife conflicts, the need to include tolerance and coexistence: An introductory comment. Society and Natural Resources: An International Journal 29(6): 738–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gadd, M. E. (2005). Conservation outside of parks: attitudes of local people in Laikipia, Kenya. Environmental Conservation 32(1): 50–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Galaty, J. G. (1982). Being Maasai; being people-of-cattle: ethnic shifters in East Africa. American Ethnologist 9(1): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Galaty, J. G. (1993). Maasai Expansion and the New East African Pastoralism. In Spear, T., and Waller, R. (eds.), Being Maasai, James Currey, London.Google Scholar
  18. Gardner, T. A., Caro, T., Fitzherbert, E. B., Banda, T., and Lalbhai, P. (2007). Conservation Values of Multiple Use Areas in East Africa. Conservation Biology 21: 61516–61525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Goldman, M. J., Roque de Pinho, J., and Perry, J. (2013). Beyond ritual and economics: Maasai lion hunting and conservation Politics. Oryx 47: 4490–4500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grzimek, B., and Grzimek, M. (1960). Serengeti Shall Not Die, Hamish Hamilton, London.Google Scholar
  21. Hardin, G. (1968). The Tragedy of the Commons. Science 162(3859): 1243–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hazzah, L., Dolrenry, S., Naughton, L., Edwards, C. T. T., Mwebi, O., Kearney, F., and Frank, L. (2014). Efficacy of Two Lion Conservation Programs in Maasailand, Kenya. Conservation Biology 28: 3851–3860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hazzah, L., Bath, A., Dolrenry, S., Dickman, A., and Frank, L. (2017). From Attitudes to Actions:Predictors of Lion Killing by Maasai Warriors. PLoS ONE 12(1): 0170796.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Homewood, K. M., and Rogers, W. A. (1991). Maasailand Ecology: pastoralist development and wildlife conservation in Ngorongoro, Tanzania, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hughes, L. (2006). Moving the Maasai: A Colonial Misadventure, Palgrave Macmillan, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hulme, D., and Murphree, M. (2001). African Wildlife and Livelihoods, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  27. Hurn, S. (2012). Humans and Other Animals: Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Human-Cultural Interactions, Pluto Press, London.Google Scholar
  28. Huxley, J. S. (1961). The Conservation of Wild Life and Natural Habitats in Central and East Africa, UNESCO, Paris.Google Scholar
  29. Jacobs, A. (1965). The Traditional Political Organization of the Pastoral Maasai, Unpublished PhD Thesis, Oxford.Google Scholar
  30. Kaltenborn, B. P., Bjerke, T., Nyahongo, J. W., and Williams, D. R. (2006). Animal Preferences and Acceptability of Wildlife Management Actions around Serengeti National Park, Tanzania. Biodiversity and Conservation 15: 4633.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-6196-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kansky, R., and Knight, A. T. (2014). Key factors driving attitudes towards large mammals in conflict with humans. Biological Conservation 179: 93–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Keane, A., Gurd, H., Kaelo, D., Said, M. Y., de Leeuw, J., Rowcliffe, J. M., and Homewood, K. (2016). Gender Differentiated Preferences for a Community-Based Conservation Initiative. PLoS ONE 11(3): e0152432.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Knight, J. (2000). Natural Enemies: People-Wildlife Conflicts in Anthropological Perspective, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  34. Knight, J. (2006). Waiting for Wolves in Japan: An Anthropological Study of People-Wildlife Relations, University of Hawai’i Press, Honolulu.Google Scholar
  35. Lee, D. E., and Bond, M. L. (2018). Quantifying the ecological success of a community-based wildlife conservation area in Tanzania. Journal of Mammalogy gyy014.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyy014 February 28, 2018.
  36. Lee, P.C. and N.E.C. Priston. (2005). “Human Attitudes to Primates: Perceptions of Pests, Conflict and Consequences for Primate Conservation. In Commensalism and Conflict: The Human- Primate Interface, by J. Patterson and J. Wallace (eds). pp. 1–23. Winnipeg: Hignell Printing.Google Scholar
  37. Lindsey, P. A., du Toit, J. T., and Mills, M. G. L. (2005). Attitudes of ranchers towards African wild dogs Lycaon pictus: Conservation implications on private land. Biological Conservation 125: 113–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lopez, B. (1978). Of Wolves and Men, Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  39. Madden, F. (2004). Can traditions of tolerance help minimize conflict? An exploration of cultural factors supporting human-wildlife coexistence. Policy Matters 13: 234–241.Google Scholar
  40. Manfredo, M. J., and Dayer, A. A. (2004). Concepts for Exploring the Social Aspects of Human-Wildlife Conflict in a Global Context. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 9: 317–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McCormick, J. (1989). The Global Environmental Movement, Belhaven Press, London.Google Scholar
  42. Merker, M. (1910). Die Mäsai, D. Riemer, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Messmer, T. (2000). The emergence of human-wildlife conflict management: turning challenges into opportunities. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation 45: 97–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mol, F. (1978). Maa: A Dictionary of the Maasai Language and Folklore (English/Maasai), Marketing Publishing, Nairobi.Google Scholar
  45. Morris, B. (1995). Woodland and Village Reflections on the Animal Estate in Rural Malawi. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 1(2 (Jun): 301–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mullin, M. H. (1999). Mirrors and Windows: Sociocultural Studies of Human-animal Relationships. Annual Review of Anthropology 28: 201–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nash, R. (1968). Wilderness and the American Mind, Yale University Press, New Haven and London.Google Scholar
  48. Neumann, R. P. (1998). Imposing Wilderness: Struggles over Livelihood and Nature Preservation in Africa, University of California Press, Berkley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  49. Ogutu, J. O., Piepho, H.-P., Said, M. Y., Ojwang, G. O., Njino, L. W., and Kifugo, S. C. (2016). Extreme Wildlife Declines and Concurrent Increase in Livestock Numbers in Kenya: What Are the Causes? PLoS ONE 11(9): e0163249.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Okello, M. M. (2005). Land Use Changes and Human-Wildlife Conflicts in the Amboseli Area, Kenya. Human Dimensions of Wildlife: An International Journal 10(1): 19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pratt, D. J., and Gwynne, M. D. (1977). In Pratt, D. J., and Gwynne, M. D. (eds.), Rangeland Management and Ecology in East Africa, Hodder and Stoughton, London.Google Scholar
  52. Romañach, S. S., Lindsey, P. A. and. R. Woodroffe. 2010. Attitudes Towards Predators and Options for Their Conservatoin in the Ewaso Ecosystem. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology pp. 85–93.Google Scholar
  53. Roque de Pinho, J. (2009). Staying Together: People-Wildlife Relationships in a Pastoral Society in Transition, Amboseli Ecosystem, Southern Kenya. PhD Thesis, Fort Collins, USA: Colorado State Univeristy.Google Scholar
  54. Roque de Pinho, J., Grilo, C., Boone, R. B., Galvin, K. A., and Snodgrass, J. G. (2014). Influence of Aesthetic Appreciation of Wildlife species on Attitudes towards Their Conservation in Kenyan Agropastoralist Communities. PLOS ONE 9(2): 1–10.Google Scholar
  55. Sandford, S. 1983 Management of Pastoral Development in the Third World. Wiley, Chichester and Overseas Developmeent Institute, London.Google Scholar
  56. Shanklin, E. (1985). Sustenance and Symbol: Anthropological Studies of Domesticated Animals. Ann. Rev. Anthropol. 14: 375–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Shetler, J. B. (2007). Imagining Serengeti: A History of Landscape Memory in Tanzania from Earliest Times to the Present, Ohio University Press, Athens.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Shibia, M. G. (2010). Determinants of Attitudes and Perceptions on Resource Use and Management of Marsabit National Reserve, Kenya. Journal of Human Ecology 30(1): 55–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sindiyo, D. M. (1968). Game Department field experience in public education. Agricultural and Forestry Journal 33: 237–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sommer, G., and Vossen, R. (1993). Dialects, Sectiolects or Simply Lects? The Maa Language in Time Perspective. In Spear, T., and Waller, R. (eds.), Being Maasai, James Currey, London.Google Scholar
  61. Southgate, C., and Hulme, D. (2000). Uncommon Property: The Scramble for Wetland in Southern Kenya. In Woodhouse, P., Bernstein, H., and Hulme, D. (eds.), African Enclosures? The Social Dynamics of Wetlands in Drylands, James Currey, Oxford, pp. 75–117.Google Scholar
  62. Sterba, J. (2012). Nature Wars, Crown Publishers, New York.Google Scholar
  63. Thomas, K. (1983). Man and the Natural World. A History of the Modern Sensibility, Pantheon Books, New York.Google Scholar
  64. Tyrell, P., Russel, S., and Western, D. (2017). Seasonal movements of wildlife and livestock in a heterogenous pastoral landscape: implications for coexistence and community-based conservation. Global Ecology and Conservation. 12: 57–73.Google Scholar
  65. Waithaka, J. (2004). The Role of Community Wildlife-Based Enterprises in Reducing Human Vulnerability. In Africa Environment Outlook Case Studies: Human Vulnerability to Environmental Change, United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi.Google Scholar
  66. Western, D. (1982). The environment and ecology of pastoralists in arid savannas. Development and Change 13: 183–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Western, D. (1997). In the Dust of Kilimanjaro, Island Press, Washington, D. C.Google Scholar
  68. Western, D., Wright, R. M., and Strum, S. C. (eds.) (1994). Natural Connections: Perspectives in Community-based Conservation, Island, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  69. Western, D., Russell, S., and Cuthill, I. (2009). The Status of protected areas compared to non-protected areas of Kenya. PLoS One. 4(7): 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Western, D., Waithaka, J., and Kamanga, J. (2015). Finding space for wildlife beyond national parks and reducing conflict through community-based conservation: the Kenya experience. Parks 21(1): 51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wilson, E. O. (ed.) (1988). Biodiversity, National Academic Press, Washington, D. C.Google Scholar
  72. Woodroffe, R., Thirgood, S., and Rabinowitiz, A. (2005). The impact of human-wildlfe conflict on natural systems. In Woodroffe, R., Thirgood, S., and Rabinowitz, A. (eds.), People and Wildlife: Conflict or Coexistence, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Yeager, R., and Miller, N. N. (1986). Wildlife, Wild Death: Land Use and Survival in Eastern Africa, State University of New York Press, Albany.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Western
    • 1
  • D. L. Manzolillo Nightingale
    • 2
  • Victor Nyaliki Mose
    • 1
    Email author
  • Johnson Ole Sipitiek
    • 1
  • Kennedy S. Kimiti
    • 1
  1. 1.African Conservation CentreNairobiKenya
  2. 2.Environmental Management AdvisorsHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations