Advertisement

Human Ecology

, Volume 47, Issue 4, pp 515–526 | Cite as

Different but Similar? Exploring Vulnerability to Climate Change in Brazilian and South African Small-Scale Fishing Communities

  • Ivan Machado MartinsEmail author
  • Louise Carin Gammage
  • Astrid Jarre
  • Maria A. Gasalla
Article

Abstract

Small-scale fisheries face similar challenges and constraints, including marginalization, spatial competition, unequal power relations, limited participation in decision-making processes, and climate stressors. We compare the vulnerability of small-scale fishing communities under pressure from climate change in the southern Cape in South Africa and the South Brazil Bight in Brazil using a standardized vulnerability framework to identify the differences and/or similarities between the fishing communities in both countries. In Brazil, high dependence on fishing and attachment to place increased the vulnerability of the fishers; in contrast, in South Africa strong dependence on markets to buy food threatened food security of the fishers. These findings provide noteworthy insights into the regional vulnerability of fishing communities in both countries; additionally, the results support the development of local climate change mitigation plans and provide examples for similar communities that are likely to experience climate stressors in other regional locations.

Keywords

Small-scale Fisheries Climate change Vulnerability Management Southern cape, South Africa, South Brazil bight, Brazil 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico) for the scholarship for the first author (IMM) and FAPESP (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo) for the research grant to MAG and IMM. The support of the South African Research Chair in Marine Ecology and Fisheries, funded by the South African Department of Science and Technology and administered by the South African National Research Foundation, to LCG and AJ is gratefully acknowledged. All authors thank the GULLS project (Belmont Forum research initiative) for the opportunity to interact, and for collating part of the data underlying this study. We express our sincere gratitude to all fishers who kindly collaborated with the study.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10745_2019_98_MOESM1_ESM.docx (26 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 25 kb)

References

  1. Adams, C. (2000). Caiçaras na Mata Atlantica: Pesquisa cientifica versus planejamento e gestão ambiental, FAPESP, São Paulo.Google Scholar
  2. Allison, E. H., and Ellis, F. (2001). The Livelihoods Approach and Management of Small-Scale Fisheries. Marine Policy 25: 377–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnal, E., and Forster, M. (2010). Growth, employment and inequality in Brazil, China, India and South Africa: An overview. In OECD. Tackling Inequalities in Brazil, China, India and South Africa, OECD Publishing, Paris, pp. 13–55.Google Scholar
  4. Aswani, S., Howard, J., Gasalla, M. A., Jennings, S., Malherbe, W., Martins, I. M., Narayanakumar, R., van Putten, I. E., Salim, S. S., Swathilekshmi, P. S., and Watmough, G. R. (2018). An Integrated Framework for Assessing Coastal Community Vulnerability Across Cultures, Oceans and Scales. Climate and Development.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2018.1442795.
  5. Bauer, D. F. (1972). Constructing Confidence Sets using Rank Statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association 67: 687–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Begossi, A., Salivonchyk, S. V., Hanazaki, N., Martins, I. M., and Bueloni, F. (2012). Fishers (Paraty, RJ) and Fish Manipulation Time: A Variable Associated to the Choice for Consumption and Sale. Brazilian Journal of Biology 72(4): 973–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Béné, C. R., Arthur, H., Norbury, E. H., Allison, M. C. M., Beveridge, S., Bush, L., Campling, W., Leschen, D., Little, D., Squires, S., Thilsted, S. H., Troell, M., and Williams, M. (2016). Contribution of Fisheries and Aquaculture to Food Security and Poverty Reduction: Assessing the Current Evidence. World Development 79: 177–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berkes, F., Mahon, R., McConney, P., Pollnac, R., and Pomeroy, R. (2001). Managing Small-Scale Fisheries: Alternative Directions and Methods, International Development Research Centre, Ottawa.Google Scholar
  9. Brugere, C., Holvoet, K., and Allison, E. (2008). Livelihood Diversification in Coastal and Inland Fishing Communities: Misconceptions, Evidence and Implications for Fisheries Management. Working Paper, Sustainable Fisheries Livelihoods Programme (SFLP), FAO/DFID, Rome.Google Scholar
  10. Castro, B. M., and Miranda, L. B. (1998). Physical oceanography of the Western Atlantic continental shelf located between 4N and 34S coastal segment 4W. In Robinson, A. R., and Brink, K. H. (eds.), The Sea 11, Wiley, New York, pp. 209–251.Google Scholar
  11. Castro, M. S., Martins, I. M., and Hanazaki, N. (2016). Trophic Relationships Between People and Resources: Fish Consumption in an Artisanal Fishers Neighborhood in Southern Brazil. Ethnobiology and Conservation 5: 4.  https://doi.org/10.15451/ec2016-7-5.4-1-16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Diegues, A. C. (2006) Artisanal fisheries in Brazil. Chennai, India, International Collective in Support of Fishworkers,(SAMUDRA Monograph). http://aquaticcommons.org/252/.
  13. Duggan, G. (2018) Return to the Realm of the Kob Kings: Social Capital, Learning, Resilience and Action Resarch in a Changing Fishery. Dissertation, University of Cape Town.Google Scholar
  14. FAO (2015). Voluntary Guidelines for Securing Sustainable Small-Scale Fisheries in the Context of Food Security and Poverty Eradication, FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
  15. FAO (2016). The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2016. Contributing to Food Security and Nutrition for All, FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
  16. Freire, K. M. F., Aragão, J. A. N., Araújo, A. R. R., Ávila-da-Silva, A. O., Bispo, M. C. S., Velasco, G., Carneiro, M. H., Gonçalves, F. D. S., Keunecke, K. A., Mendonça, J. T., Moro, P. S., Motta, F. S., Olavo, G., Pezzuto, P. R., Santana, R. F., Santos, R. A., Trindade-Santos, I., Vasconcelos, J. A., Vianna, M., and Divovich, E. (2015). Reconstruction of catch statistics for Brazilian marine waters (1950-2010). In Freire, K. M. F., and Pauly, D. (eds.), Fisheries Catch Reconstructions for Brazil’s Mainland and Oceanic Islands, University of British Columbia, Fisheries Centre Research Reports, pp. 3–30.Google Scholar
  17. Gammage, L. C. (2015) Considering One’s Options when the Fish Leave. A Case Study of the Traditional Commercial Hand Line Fishery of the Southern Cape. Dissertation, University of Cape Town.Google Scholar
  18. Gammage, L. C., Jarre, A., and Mather, C. (2017). A Case Study from the Southern Cape Linefishery 1: The Difficulty of Fishing in a Changing World. South African Journal of Science 113(5/6): 8.  https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2017/ 20160252.
  19. Gammage, L. C., Jarre, A., and Mather, C. (2019). A Changing Fishery System: Perspectives from Crew in the Southern Cape’s Handline Fishery. South African Geographical Journal 101(2): 210–252.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03736245.2019.1581656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Garcia, S. M., Zerbi, A., Aliaume, C., Do Chi, T., and Lasserre, G. (2003). The ecosystem approach to fisheries. Issues, terminology, principles, institutional foundations, implementation and outlook, FAO Fisheries Technical Paper.No.443. Fao, Rome.Google Scholar
  21. Gasalla, M. A., and Rossi-Wongtschowski, C. L. D. B. (2004). Contribution of Ecosystem Analysis to Investigating the Effects of Changes in Fishing Strategies in the South Brazil Bight Coastal Ecosystem. Ecological Modelling 172: 283–306.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2003.09.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Giraldi, M., and Hanazaki, N. (2014). Use of Cultivated and Harvested Edible Plants by Caicaras-what can Ethnobotany Add to Food Security Discussions? Human Ecology Review 20(2): 51–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Glavovic, B. C., and Boonzaier, S. (2007). Confronting Coastal Poverty: Building Sustainable Coastal Livelihoods in South Africa. Ocean & Coastal Management 50: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Griffiths, M. H. (2000). Long-Term Trends in Catch and Effort of Commercial Linefish Off South Africa’s Cape Province: Snapshots of the 20th Century. South African Journal of Marine Science 22(1): 81–110.  https://doi.org/10.2989/025776100784125663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hanazaki, N., Berkes, F., Seixas, C. S., and Peroni, N. (2013). Livelihood Diversity, Food Security and Resilience among the Caiçara of Coastal Brazil. Human Ecology 41(1): 153–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hobday, A. J., and Pecl, G. T. (2014). Identification of Global Marine Hotspots: Sentinels for Change and Vanguards for Adaptation Action. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 24(2): 415–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hobday, A. J., Cochrane, K., Downey-Breedt, N., Howard, J., Aswani, S., Byfield, V., Duggan, G., Duna, E., Dutra, L. X. C., Frusher, S. D., Fulton, E. A., Gammage, L., Gasalla, M. A., Griffiths, C., Guissamulo, A., Haward, M., Jarre, A., Jennins, S. M., Jordan, T., Joyner, J., Ramani, N. K., Shanmugasundaram, S. L. P., Malherbe, W., Cisneros, K. O., Paytan, A., Pecl, G. T., Plaganyi, E. E., Razafindrainibe, H., Roberts, M., Rohit, P., Sainulabdeen, S. S., Sauer, W., Valappil, S. T., Zacharia, P. U., and van Putten, E. I. (2016). Planning Adaptation to Climate Change in Fast-Warming Marine Regions with Seafood-Dependent Coastal Communities. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries: 1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-016-9419-0.
  28. Isaacs, M. (2011). Individual Transferable Quotas, Poverty Alleviation and Challenges for Small-Country Fisheries Policy in South Africa. MAST 10(2): 63–84.Google Scholar
  29. Jarre, A., Hutchings, L., Kirkman, S., Kreiner, A., Tchipalanga, P., Kainge, P., Uanivi, U., van der Plas, A. K., Blamey, L. K., Coetzee, J. C., Lamont, T., Samaai, T., Verheye, H. M., Yemane, D. G., Axelsen, B. E., Ostrowski, M., Stenevik, E. K., and Loeng, H. (2015). Synthesis: Climate Effects on Biodiversity, Abundance and Distribution of Marine Organisms in the Benguela. Fisheries Oceanography 24: 122149.  https://doi.org/10.1111/fog.12086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kawarazuka, N., and Bene, C. (2010). Linking Small-Scale Fisheries and Aquaculture to Household Nutritional Security: An Overview. Food Security 2: 343–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kent, G. (1997). Fisheries, Food Security, and the Poor. Food Policy 22(5): 393–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kleinschmidt, H., Sauer, W. H. H., and Britz, P. (2003). Commercial Fishing Rights Allocation in Post-Apartheid South Africa: Reconciling Equity and Stability. African Journal of Marine Science 25(1): 25–35.  https://doi.org/10.2989/18142320309503998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lopes, P. M., Silvano, R. A. M., and Begossi, A. (2011). Extractive and Sustainable Development Reserves in Brazil: Resilient Alternatives to Fisheries? Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 54(4): 421–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Marschke, M., and Berkes, F. (2007). Exploring Strategies that Build Livelihood Resilience: A Case from Cambodia. Ecology and Society 11(42) www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol1/iss1/art42. Accessed Feb 2018.
  35. Martins, I. M. (2018) Vulnerability to and Perception of Climate Change among Small-Scale Fishing Communities from the South Brazil Bight. Doctoral Dissertation, University of São Paulo.Google Scholar
  36. Martins, I. M., Medeiros, R. P., and Hanazaki, N. (2014). From Fish to Ecosystems: The Perceptions of Fishermen Neighboring a Southern Brazilian Marine Protected Area. Ocean and Coastal Management 91: 50–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Martins, I. M., Medeiros, R. P., Di Domenico, M., and Hanazaki, N. (2018). What Fishers’ Local Ecological Knowledge can Reveal about the Changes in Exploited Fish Catches. Fisheries Research 198: 109–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Maru, Y. T., Smith, M. S., Sparrow, A., Pinho, P. F., and Dube, O. P. (2014). A Linked Vulnerability and Resilience Framework for Adaptation Pathways in Remote Disadvantaged Communities. Global Environmental Change 28: 337–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McDonald, J. H. (2008). Handbook of Biological Statistics, Sparky House Publishing, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  40. Moura, R. L., Minte-Vera, C. V., Curado, I. B., Francini-Filho, R. B., Rodrigues, H. D. C. L., Dutra, G. F., Alves, C. D., and Souto, F. J. B. (2009). Challenges and Prospects of Fisheries Co-Management under a Marine Extractive Reserve Framework in Northeastern Brazil. Coastal Management 37: 617–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. MPA (Ministério da Pesca e Aquicultura) 2011. Boletim estatístico da pesca e aquicultura, 60p.Google Scholar
  42. Nayak, P. K., Oliveira, L. E., and Berkes, F. (2014). Resource Degradation, Marginalization, and Poverty in Small-Scale Fisheries: Threats to Social-Ecological Resilience in India and Brazil. Ecology and Society 19(2): 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Norton, M. (2014) At the Interface: Marine Compliance Inspectors at work in the Western Cape. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Cape Town.Google Scholar
  44. OECD (2009). Economic Outlook, OECD Publishing, Paris.Google Scholar
  45. OECD (2019). Economic Outlook, OECD Publishing, Paris.Google Scholar
  46. Pauly, D. (2006). Major Trends in Small-Scale Marine Fisheries, Woth Emphasis on Developing Countries, and Some Implications for the Social Science. MAST 4(2): 7–22.Google Scholar
  47. Pauly, D., and Zeller, D. (2016). Catch Reconstructions Reveal that Global Marine Fisheries Catches are Higher than Reported and Declining. Nature Communications 7: 10244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Popova, E. E., Yool, A., Byfield, V., Cochrane, K., Coward, A., Salim, S. S., Gasalla, M. A., and Henson, S. A. (2016). From global to regional and back again: unifying mechanisms of climate change relevant for adaptation across five ocean warming hotspots. Global Change Biology 22: 2038–2053.Google Scholar
  49. Royston, P. (1982). An Extension of Shapiro and Wilk's W test for Normality to Large Samples. Applied Statistics 31: 115–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Seixas, C. S., Kalikoski, D. C., Almudi, T., Batista, V. S., Costa, A. L., Diogo, H. L., Ferreira, B. P., Futemma, C. R. T., Moura, R. L., Ruffino, M. L., Salles, R., and Thé, A. P. G. (2011). Gestão compartilhada do uso de recursos pesqueiros no Brasil: elementos para um programa nacional. Ambiente & Sociedade 14: 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Silva, T. A., Borba, P., Duarte, M., Dutra, C., Fajardo, M., Borges, F. S. (2015). Effectiveness of the Participation Principle in the Implementation of Marine Protected Areas: Brazilian Case Study. Law for Sustainability, IUCN, Brasilia: Brazil. https://www.iucn.org/sites/dev/files/participation_principle_in_mpas_in_brazil.pdf.
  52. Silveira, I. C. A., Schmidt, A. C. K., Campos, E. J. D., Godoi, S. S., and Ikeda, Y. (2000). A corrente do Brasil ao largo da costa leste brasileira. Brazilian Journal of Oceanography 48: 171–183.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-87592000000200008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sowman, M., Scott, D., Green, L. J. F., Hara, M. M., Hauck, M., Kirsten, K., Paterson, B., Raemaekers, S., Jones, K., Sunde, J., and Turpie, J. K. (2013). Shallow Waters: Social Science Research in South Africa's Marine Environment. African Journal of Marine Science 35(3): 385–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sowman, M., Sunde, J., Raemaekers, S., and Schultz, O. (2014). Fishing for Equality: Policy for Poverty Alleviation for South Africa’s Small-Scale Fisheries. MAST 46: 31–42.Google Scholar
  55. Trimble, M., and Johnson, D. (2013). Artisanal Fishing as an Undesirable Way of Life? The Implications for Governance of Fishers’ Wellbeing Aspirations in Coastal Uruguay and Southern Brazil. Marine Policy 37: 37–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Trimble, M., Araujo, L. G., and Seixas, C. S. (2014). One Party does not Tango! Fishers’ Non-Participation as a Barrier to Co-Management in Paraty, Brazil. Ocean and Coastal Management 92: 9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. van Sittert, L. (2002). Those who Cannot Remember the Past are Condemned to Repeat it: Comparing Fisheries Reforms in South Africa. Marine Policy 26: 295–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Visser, N. (2015). The Origins of the Present: Economic Conflicts in the Fisheries of the South African South Coast, Circa 1910 to 1950. MAST 14: 9.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40152-015-0029-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wickham, H., Chang, W. (2016). Devtools: Tools to Make Developing R Packages Easier. R Package Version 1 12.0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=devtools. Accessed Feb 2018.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ivan Machado Martins
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Louise Carin Gammage
    • 3
  • Astrid Jarre
    • 3
  • Maria A. Gasalla
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Fisheries Ecosystems Laboratory (LabPesq), Oceanographic InstituteUniversity of São PauloSão PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Faculdade São LucasCaçapavaBrazil
  3. 3.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of Cape Town Cape TownCape TownSouth Africa
  4. 4.Institute of Advanced Studies (IEA)University of São PauloSão PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations