Skip to main content

Smallholders’ Perceptions of Fire in the Brazilian Amazon: Exploring Implications for Governance Arrangements

Abstract

Fires have been on the rise in the Brazilian Amazon for a decade, causing biodiversity loss, carbon emission, and damage to local people’s assets and health. Often blamed as being responsible for starting most of the fires, local farmers are also the main actors involved in fire prevention and firefighting. We explore small-scale farmers’ perceptions of fire and governance arrangements through Q methodology and semi-structured interviews. We find that fire prevention and firefighting are both perceived as collective issues. Lack of engagement in these activities is largely related to fire risk perceptions and its controllability, which depends on local collective action, landscape flammability, and the size of the area of fire contagion. To counter large fires, government action is essential. Policies that are supportive of fire control norms and enabling of firefighting seem more likely to achieve positive results than fire bans.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Notes

  1. 1.

    34 sorts (individuals) loaded significantly on four factors, accounting for 55% of total variance.

  2. 2.

    The names of interviewees have been changed to respect their anonymity.

  3. 3.

    Table 1 indicates for factor A, sentence 4 a score of −0.47*, which means that the farmers moderately disagree, with a slight significant difference compared to other factors (p > 0.1). For sentence 5, the score is 1.60***, which means that the farmers strongly agree, with a strong significant difference (p > 0.01).

References

  1. Alencar, A. A., Brando, P. M., Asner, G. P., and Putz, F. E. (2015). Landscape fragmentation, severe drought, and the new Amazon forest fire regime. Ecological Applications 25: 1493–1505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson, L. O., Aragão, L. E., Gloor, M., Arai, E., Adami, M., Saatchi, S. S., Malhi, Y., Shimabukuro, Y. E., Barlow, J., and Berenguer, E. (2015). Disentangling the contribution of multiple land covers to fire-mediated carbon emissions in Amazonia during the 2010 drought. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 29: 1739–1753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aragao, L. E., and Shimabukuro, Y. E. (2010). The incidence of fire in Amazonian forests with implications for REDD. Science 328: 1275–1278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Baccini, A., Walker, W., Carvalho, L., Farina, M., Sulla-Menashe, D., and Houghton, R. (2017). Tropical forests are a net carbon source based on aboveground measurements of gain and loss. Science 358: 230–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Barlow, J., Lennox, G. D., Ferreira, J., Berenguer, E., Lees, A. C., Nally, R. M., Thomson, J. R., Ferraz, S. F.d. B., Louzada, J., Oliveira, V. H. F., Parry, L., Ribeiro de Castro Solar, R., Vieira, I. C. G., Aragão, L. E. O. C., Begotti, R. A., Braga, R. F., Cardoso, T. M. Jr., R.C.D.O., S., C. M. Jr., Moura, N. G., Nunes, S. S., Siqueira, J. V., Pardini, R., Silveira, J. M., Vaz-de-Mello, F. Z., Veiga, R. C. S., Venturieri, A., and Gardner, T. A. (2016). Anthropogenic disturbance in tropical forests can double biodiversity loss from deforestation. Nature 535(7610): 144.

  6. Bowman, M. S., Amacher, G. S., and Merry, F. D. (2008). Fire use and prevention by traditional households in the Brazilian Amazon. Ecological Economics 67: 117–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brondizio, E. S., and Moran, E. F. (2008). Human dimensions of climate change: The vulnerability of small farmers in the Amazon. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 363: 1803–1809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brown, S. R. (1980). Political subjectivity: Applications of Q methodology in political science, Yale University Press New Haven, CT.

  9. Cammelli, F., Angelsen, A. (forthcoming) Amazonian farmers’ response to fire policies and climate change. Ecological Economics

  10. Cano-Crespo, A., Oliveira, P. J., Boit, A., Cardoso, M., and Thonicke, K. (2015). Forest edge burning in the Brazilian Amazon promoted by escaping fires from managed pastures. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences 120: 2095–2107.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Carmenta, R., Parry, L., Blackburn, A., Vermeylen, S., and Barlow, J. (2011). Understanding human-fire interactions in tropical forest regions: A case for interdisciplinary research across the natural and social sciences. Ecology and Society 16(1): 53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Carmenta, R., Vermeylen, S., Parry, L., and Barlow, J. (2013). Shifting cultivation and fire policy: Insights from the Brazilian Amazon. Human Ecology 41: 603–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Carmenta, R., Coudel, E., and Steward, A. M. (2018). Forbidden fire: Does criminalising fire hinder conservation efforts in swidden landscapes of the Brazilian Amazon? The Geographical Journal 185(1): 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Costa (2006). Comunicação & Meio ambiente: A análise das campanhas de prevenção a incendios florestais na Amazonia. . Serie Teses do Núcleo de Altos Estudos Amazonicos. In Belem, Editora da Universidade Federal do Pará, Brazil.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Diaz, M.d.C.V., Nepstad, D., Mendonça, M.J.C., da Motta, R.S., Alencar, A., Gomes, J.C., Ortiz, R.A. (2002) O preço oculto do fogo na Amazônia: Os custos econômicos associados as queimadas e incêndios florestais. Relatório Instituto de Pesquisa Ambiental da Amazônia (IPAM)/Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA)/Centro de Pesquisa Woods Hole.

  16. Ferreira, J. N., Guariguata, M., Koh, L. P., Mansourian, S., Parrotta, J., Sasaki, N., and Schmitt, C. B. (2012). Impacts of forest and land management on biodiversity and carbon, in Parrotta, Wildburger, Mansourian. (org.).Understanding Relationships between Biodiversity, Carbon, Forests and People: The Key to Achieving REDD+Objectives. Vienna: IUFRO World Series 31: 53–80.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fischbacher, U., Gächter, S., and Fehr, E. (2001). Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a public goods experiment. Economics Letters 71: 397–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Godar, J., Gardner, T. A., Tizado, E. J., and Pacheco, P. (2014). Actor-specific contributions to the deforestation slowdown in the Brazilian Amazon. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111: 15591–15596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gruev-Vintila, A., and Rouquette, M. (2007). Social thinking about Collective Risk: How Do Risk-related Practice and Personal Involvement Impact Its Social Representations? Journal of Risk Research 10(4): 555–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Guimarães, J., Veríssimo, A., Amaral, P., and Demachki, A. (2011). Municípios Verdes: caminhos para a sustentabilidade, Imazon, Belem, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hoch, L., Pokorny, B., and De Jong, W. (2009). How successful is tree growing for smallholders in the Amazon? International Forestry Review 11: 299–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. IBGE, (2010) IBGE – INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE GEOGRAFIA E ESTATÍSTICA. Censo Demográfico 2010. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE, 2010. https://ww2.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/populacao/censo2010/default.shtm.

  23. INPE (2018). PRODES (Projeto de Estimativa de Desflorestamento da Amazônia), INPE (Instituto Nacional de Pesquisa Espacial), São José dos Campos-SP, p. 2018 http://www.dpi.inpe.br/prodesdigital/prodes.php.

  24. Morello, T., Ramos, R., Steil, L., Parry, L., Barlow, J., Markusson, N., and Ferreira, A. (2017). Fires in Brazilian Amazon: Why does policy have a limited impact? Ambiente & Sociedade 20: 19–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Morello, T. F., Piketty, M.-G., Gardner, T., Parry, L., Barlow, J., Ferreira, J., and Tancredi, N. S. (2018). Fertilizer Adoption by Smallholders in the Brazilian Amazon: Farm-level Evidence. Ecological Economics 144: 278–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Nepstad, D.C., Moreira, A.G., Alencar, A.A. (1999) A floresta em chamas: origens, impactos e prevenção de fogo na Amazônia. Programa Piloto para a Proteção das Florestas Tropicais do Brasil, Brasília, Banco Mundial.

  27. Nepstad, D., Carvalho, G., Cristina Barros, A., Alencar, A., Paulo Capobianco, J., Bishop, J., Moutinho, P., Lefebvre, P., Lopes Silva, U., and Prins, E. (2001). Road paving, fire regime feedbacks, and the future of Amazon forests. Forest Ecology and Management 154: 395–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pégard, B. (2010). Fire risk and fire management in the context of global climate change: An anlysis of the Provence region or the South-East France and the blue mountains region of Australia. In Institute of environmental studies, faculty of art and social sciences, University of New South Wales, p. 444.

  29. Piketty, M.-G., Poccard-Chapuis, R., Drigo, I., Coudel, E., Plassin, S., Laurent, F., and Thâles, M. (2015). Multi-level governance of land use changes in the Brazilian Amazon: Lessons from Paragominas, State of Pará. Forests 6: 1516–1536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ramos, R. M., Fonseca, R. L., and Morello, T. F. (2016). Unidades de conservação e proteção contra incêndios florestais: relação entre focos de calor e ações articuladas pelas brigadas contratadas. Biodiversidade Brasileira 6: 135–148.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Schwartz, N. B., Uriarte, M., Gutiérrez-Vélez, V. H., Baethgen, W., DeFries, R., Fernandes, K., and Pinedo-Vasquez, M. A. (2015). Climate, landowner residency, and land cover predict local scale fire activity in the Western Amazon. Global Environmental Change 31: 144–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sorrensen, C. (2004). Contributions of fire use study to land use/cover change frameworks: Understanding landscape change in agricultural frontiers. Human Ecology 32: 395–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sorrensen, C. (2009). Potential hazards of land policy: Conservation, rural development and fire use in the Brazilian Amazon. Land Use Policy 26: 782–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Viana, C., Coudel, E., Barlow, J., Ferreira, J., Gardner, T., and Parry, L. (2016). How does hybrid governance emerge? Role of the elite in building a Green Municipality in the Eastern Brazilian Amazon. Environmental Policy and Governance 26: 337–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Winter, G., and Fried, J. (2000). Homeowner Perspectives on Fire Hazard, Responsibility, and Management Strategies at the Wildland-Urban Interface. Society & Natural Resources 13: 33–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Joice Ferreira for her constructive comments that helped us improve this manuscript. We thank Embrapa Amazônia Oriental for hosting us and giving us logistical support. This research was carried out as part of the CGIAR Research Program on Forests, Trees and Agroforestry. Support was also provided by the Erasmus program and by Agropolis Foundation through the Stradiv project (System approach for the TRAnsition to bio-DIVersified agroecosystems).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Federico Cammelli.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 992 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cammelli, F., Coudel, E. & de Freitas Navegantes Alves, L. Smallholders’ Perceptions of Fire in the Brazilian Amazon: Exploring Implications for Governance Arrangements. Hum Ecol 47, 601–612 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-019-00096-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Brazilian Amazon
  • Fires
  • Smallholder farmers
  • Fire policies
  • Q methodology